DailyBriefs.info      PODCAST    mp3 of article
Review of Article China's "Characteristics": A Western Perspective
https://www.unz.com/article/the-everything-with-chinese-characteristics-memo-from-unpaid-volunteer-western-sektor-director-of-public-relations-nobody/ 

1 source

Richard Solomon's memo from The Unz Review presents a critical perspective on globalization and suggests how China can redefine it with its own "characteristics." The author, identifying as an unpaid Western public relations volunteer, argues that Western-driven globalization has negatively impacted Western nations, benefiting primarily financial elites. He believes China, unlike the "ZioCorp" he resides in, has leaders who prioritize their citizens and nation. Solomon proposes that China should promote a "merchant" model of mutually beneficial trade and incorporate elements of its own philosophy, like Taoism, into its global outreach and domestic policies, particularly in areas like healthcare and family structure. The memo also critiques the negative consequences of hyper-consumerism and Western ideologies, advocating for a "Middle Kingdom of Truth" approach in China's international relations.

keepSave to note

copy_all

docsAdd note

audio_magic_eraserAudio Overview

mapMind Map

list 20The most important  key Take away point from each source  in order FROM the most important  key Take away point to the least important  key Take away point

Here are 20 key takeaways from the provided source, ordered from what appears to be the most important to the least important based on the author's emphasis:

1.

China has the potential to become the "Middle Kingdom of Truth" by being a credible and transparent source of data, acknowledging mistakes, and correcting them1 . This is presented as a direct contrast to the perceived "Empire of Lies" of the US.

2.

China should develop "public relations with Chinese characteristics" that incorporate truth, even in propaganda, unlike the lying propaganda of ZioCorp2 . The author believes this is crucial for effective global messaging.

3.

China's political class is perceived to serve the interests of its citizens, nation-state, and culture to a greater extent than their American counterparts in ZioCorp3 . This underpins the author's belief in China's potential.

4.

"Globalization" as implemented by the West has led to a massive wealth transfer to the oligarchy and negative consequences for Western nations4 .... The author views this as a parasitic form of globalization.

5.

China benefited from globalization by outsourcing manufacturing, but this benefit may have future "hangover symptoms" like conflict with the US and overreliance on global supply chains6 .... The author highlights the potential downsides for China.

6.

China needs to be aware of the negative connotations associated with "globalization" due to its Western implementation and should reframe it with "Chinese characteristics"9 .... The analogy to Marxism is used to emphasize the need for a new approach.

7.

The "merchant with Chinese characteristics" archetype involves mutually beneficial transactionalism, exchanging goods and technologies that are not locally abundant10 .... This is presented as a better model for international relations.

8.

China should balance its economic needs with the support of pan-Africanism and African ecology, being wary of AFRICOM's potential exploitation7 .... This illustrates a specific challenge in China's global interactions.

9.

Hyper-consumerism, a side effect of globalization, may be negatively impacting China's collective psyche, as evidenced by rising antidepressant use12 .... The author raises concerns about the social costs of rapid development.

10.

China needs to develop "healthcare with Chinese characteristics" by integrating proper diet, exercise, Traditional Chinese Medicine, and advanced technology, while carefully vetting Western medicines14 . The author advocates for a holistic approach to health.

11.

"Zio-feminism" is presented as a Western public relations campaign that undermined the traditional family unit and lowered wages for short-term oligarch profits15 .... This is a critical perspective on social changes in the West.

12.

China's Women's Day public relations should consider including the archetype of the mother to better reflect the natural order and address potential gender imbalances17 .... The author offers a specific suggestion for China's messaging.

13.

Technological materialism divorced from the natural order, as pushed by WEF "philosophers," can lead to negative social distortions and potentially species extinction19 .... The author warns against uncritical adoption of certain Western ideologies.

14.

The Confucius-Tao yin-yang balance is presented as a 100% "Made-In-China" philosophy that can counterbalance technocratic excess, with Tao providing life-force (chi)20 .... This is suggested as a superior alternative to alien ideologies.

15.

Tao, unlike Confucianism, is better suited for foreign export and public relations due to its universal applicability and resonance with various cultures22 . Bruce Lee and the "Kung Fu" TV series are cited as examples22 ....

16.

Current Chinese global messaging, described as "SinoCorp," focuses on win-win futuristic consumerism but lacks the "chi" to build deep trust and loyalty1 .... The author suggests a need for a more profound message.

17.

The author identifies as a "Jewish Hebrew Israelite who follows the Tao," serving "Yahweh in Heaven and Huawei on Earth," and claims a history of prescient analysis regarding China24 . This establishes the author's self-proclaimed expertise and unique perspective.

18.

The outsourcing of manufacturing to low-wage China was a key component of the international bankers' globalization plan, intended to increase corporate earnings and consolidate Wall Street's power6 . The author outlines a specific motive behind globalization.

19.

The bankers' plan for China contained errors, including misjudging the speed of America's decline and the patriotism of China's leaders9 .... This highlights the author's analysis of why the intended outcome did not fully materialize.

20.

China left Marxism behind for "socialism with Chinese characteristics" because Marxism "never works," according to the author, who cites Antony Sutton's work on the connection between Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution9 .... This provides historical context for China's ideological choices.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down


Briefing Document: "The 'Everything with Chinese Characteristics' Memo" by Richard Solomon

Source: "The 'Everything with Chinese Characteristics' Memo From Unpaid Volunteer Western Sektor Director of Public Relations Nobody," by Richard Solomon, The Unz Review (March 24th, 2025)

Author's Background & Perspective: Richard Solomon identifies himself as an "unpaid volunteer Western Sektor Director of Public Relations Nobody," living in a place he terms "ZioCorp" (a metaphor for a failed, hyper-privatized Western society under "Rothschild Zionist control"). He is a "Jewish Hebrew Israelite who follows the Tao" and claims a history of "prescient analysis" regarding China. His writing style is informal, often sarcastic, and incorporates philosophical and conspiratorial undertones. He presents himself as an outsider offering unsolicited advice to China.

Main Themes and Important Ideas:

Solomon's memo argues that China, having benefited from globalization while the West has declined under a "parasite globalization" orchestrated by international bankers ("ZioCorp"), needs to develop its own version of "everything with Chinese characteristics," particularly in public relations. He believes China has the potential to be a force for good, unlike the "win-lose" approach of the West, but needs to be mindful of the negative aspects of globalization and leverage its own cultural and philosophical strengths.

1. Critique of Western Globalization:

2. China's Opportunity and Challenges:

3. "Everything with Chinese Characteristics": A New Paradigm

4. Public Relations and Global Messaging:

5. The Role of Taoism:

Key Quotes:

Conclusion:

Solomon's memo is a highly subjective and unconventional analysis of globalization and China's role in the world. He presents a critical view of the West, particularly its financial and cultural systems, and offers China advice rooted in his interpretation of Chinese history and philosophy, especially Taoism. While his conspiratorial framing and informal style may be off-putting to some, his memo raises interesting questions about the long-term consequences of globalization, the importance of cultural values in national development, and the need for authentic and credible public relations. His central argument is that China should embrace its own unique characteristics and offer a "truthful" alternative to the perceived failures of the Western model.

convert_to_textConvert to source


Glossary of Key Terms:

convert_to_textConvert to source


Discuss Chinese characteristics.

The concept of "Chinese characteristics" is a recurring theme in the provided source, where the author, Richard Solomon, discusses how China might approach various global issues and its own development in a way that aligns with its unique history, culture, and philosophy1 ....

Here's a breakdown of how "Chinese characteristics" are presented in the memo:

•

Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: The author explicitly mentions that China left Marxism behind and moved to "socialism with Chinese characteristics" because Marxism "never works"3 .... This implies that China has adapted and modified foreign ideologies to suit its own context and needs4 .

•

Globalization with Chinese Characteristics: Solomon proposes that China should give "globalization" "Chinese characteristics" in both practice and public relations5 . He contrasts "Western parasite globalization," which he sees as exploitative, with a model based on the "merchant" archetype in Chinese culture5 .... This archetype involves delivering goods from afar that are not locally produced, engaging in mutually beneficial transactions like exchanging railway technology for African minerals5 .... This suggests that "globalization with Chinese characteristics" would prioritize non-violent transactionalism and win-win programs8 .

•

Ecology with Chinese Characteristics: The author envisions a future where China achieves an "ecological-technological yin-yang balance" or "ecology with Chinese characteristics" by using robots to mine minerals from asteroids, thus balancing technological advancement with environmental considerations7 . This implies a holistic approach to development that considers both technology and nature.

•

Feminism with Chinese Characteristics: Observing the lack of emphasis on motherhood in China's Woman's Day celebrations, Solomon suggests "feminism with Chinese characteristics"9 . He proposes aligning with the "natural order" by creating propaganda and financial incentives to promote younger motherhood, while also offering opportunities for women's education and careers later in life9 . This suggests an approach to gender roles that considers both societal needs and biological realities.

•

Healthcare with Chinese Characteristics: The author advocates for developing "healthcare with Chinese characteristics" by integrating proper diet and exercise, Traditional Chinese Medicine, and advanced medical technology10 . This signifies a blend of traditional wisdom and modern science, rejecting both blind adherence to Western medicine and Luddite rejection of technology10 ....

•

Public Relations/Global Messaging with Chinese Characteristics: Solomon critiques China's current global messaging as "win-win sparkly futuristic consumerism" (SinoCorp) which, while an improvement over "ZioCorp" (his term for a privatized America), lacks "chi" to build trust12 .... He suggests that China should become the "Middle Kingdom of Truth," emphasizing transparency and accountability13 . He also recommends incorporating Taoism and Chinese-perfected Buddhism into its public relations, as Taoism has universal appeal and aligns with various cultural symbols14 .... He even suggests bringing back the spirit of shows like "Kung Fu," which dynamically portrayed Chinese spiritual philosophy, and featuring "real men" in global media outreach12 ....

In essence, the author posits that "Chinese characteristics" involve a blend of pragmatism, a long-term perspective informed by its 5000-year history8 , a focus on win-win scenarios8 , a recognition of the importance of balance (yin-yang)7 ..., and the integration of traditional wisdom with modern advancements10 .... He believes China should leverage its unique cultural and philosophical heritage, particularly Confucianism and Taoism16 ..., to navigate global challenges and present a compelling alternative to Western models13 .

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Western perspective.

The provided source offers a critical perspective on the West, particularly in comparison to China and in the context of globalization1 . The author, Richard Solomon, positions himself as a Westerner living in a place he calls "ZioCorp," where he believes the "American Dream" has failed for those outside a certain "dome"2 . From this vantage point, he offers several insights into what he perceives as the Western perspective or the state of Western societies:

•

Disillusionment with the current state: Many Western citizens, if they compare their nations in the 80s/early 90s to today, would likely see a "greatest wealth transfer from the middle class to the oligarchy in history, permanent war, a ramped-up police state, weaponized immigration overload, wild inflation, and Rothschild Zionist control of every facet of society"3 .... The author characterizes this as a "ravaged Global South" situation even for the West4 .

•

Critique of "Western parasite globalization": The author describes a form of globalization driven by Western interests that harms local economies and creates unnecessary waste and debt. He uses the example of carrots being transported globally only to be sold back to their origin or forcing local producers to compete with inferior and more expensive imports4 .... He also criticizes digital platform globalization for extracting wealth and controlling intellectual property5 ....

•

Perception of American leadership: The author believes that unlike a "decent percentage" of China's political class, the ruling powers in "ZioCorp" operate on a "win-lose" basis1 .... He suggests that entities like ZioCorp cannot be truthful about their intentions, implying a manipulative approach to governance7 ....

•

Consequences of American policies: The author points to the overprescription of antidepressants in the US, leading to "Prozac Nation USA," as a result of decades of such policies9 . He argues that this harms the nation's "vital force" (chi)10 .

•

Critique of "zio-feminism": The author presents a critical view of certain feminist movements in the West, arguing that they were part of public relations campaigns by corporations and academics to break up the traditional family unit and lower wages11 .... He contrasts this with the imagery he sees during China's Woman's Day celebrations, which he finds lacking in the portrayal of mothers13 .

•

Technological materialism: The author notes a Western tendency towards "technological materialism divorced from the natural order," potentially leading to "species extinction"14 .... He contrasts this with the potential for a Chinese balance through Confucian and Taoist philosophies15 .

•

Loss of trust: The author suggests that while the world does business with a metaphorical "SinoCorp," it doesn't trust it, drawing a parallel to America being perceived as the "Empire of Lies"16 . He implies a lack of credibility in Western messaging, contrasted with a potential "Middle Kingdom of Truth" for China16 .

Overall, the author presents a rather bleak picture of the West from his self-described Western perspective, highlighting issues of economic inequality, political manipulation, social decay, and a flawed approach to globalization and technology. He contrasts this with a more optimistic view of China's potential, albeit with some concerns about adopting negative aspects of Western influence1 ....

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Globalization critique.

The author, Richard Solomon, offers a strong critique of what he terms "Western parasite globalization"1 . He contrasts this with a potential "globalization with Chinese characteristics"2 . Here's a breakdown of his criticisms:

•

Wealth Transfer and Inequality: Solomon argues that since the 1980s and early 1990s, when globalization went into "overdrive," the West has experienced the "greatest wealth transfer from the middle class to the oligarchy in history"3 .

•

Negative Societal Impacts in the West: He lists a series of negative consequences for Western nations, including "permanent war, a ramped-up police state, weaponized immigration overload, wild inflation, and Rothschild Zionist control of every facet of society"1 .... He also notes the ravaged state of the neocon/neoliberal Global South, suggesting globalization has had widespread negative effects1 .

•

Inefficient and Polluting Practices: Solomon criticizes the logistical aspects of "Western parasite globalization," using the example of locally grown carrots being transported around the world only to be sold back or forcing local producers to participate in inefficient global trade, leading to wasted energy and unnecessary pollution1 . This also creates "superfluous middlemen, toll collectors, and debt"4 .

•

Exploitation through Digital Platforms: He argues that "digital platform globalization" further exacerbates wealth inequality by extracting wealth from creators and transferring it to the oligarchy through companies like Amazon and Apple Music4 . Furthermore, he contends that Big Tech finance controls and effectively owns all intellectual property by moving humanity's data to digital platforms5 .

•

Outsourcing and Economic Dependence: A primary goal of globalization, according to the author, was to outsource manufacturing to low-wage China, benefiting corporate earnings and Wall Street's power6 . This led to the US buying Chinese debt, creating an unsustainable financial situation where bankers initially hoped to gain control over China's economy after an eventual US crash6 ....

•

Miscalculations of Western Bankers: Solomon believes Western bankers made critical errors in their globalization plan. They "miscalculated the speed of America’s decline in relation to China’s assent" and "misjudged the patriotism of China’s leaders," who prioritized their people and nation over selling out to international financial interests7 ....

•

Negative Connotations of "Globalization": The author suggests that China should be aware of the "negative connotations attached to ‘globalization’" due to its association with the exploitative "Western" model8 . He draws a parallel to China moving away from Marxism to "socialism with Chinese characteristics" because Marxism "never works," implying that the current form of globalization is similarly flawed8 ....

In contrast to this "Western parasite globalization," Solomon proposes a "globalization with Chinese characteristics" rooted in the "merchant" archetype2 . This model emphasizes mutually beneficial transactions where nations exchange goods and technologies they don't locally produce, such as China providing railway technology to Africa in exchange for minerals2 .... This approach is presented as non-violent transactionalism and focused on win-win programs, contrasting sharply with the perceived win-lose nature of "ZioCorp's" (America's) globalization11 .

Furthermore, Solomon highlights potential "hangover symptoms" of globalization for China itself, despite its initial benefits:

•

Conflict with the US: The bankers may seek to reclaim their "100 pounds of flesh" after the transfer of manufacturing to China, potentially leading to cold war, sanctions, terrorism, proxy wars, or even direct hot war12 ....

•

Overreliance on Global Supply Networks: Global supply chains, whether for imported oil or exported goods, are vulnerable targets13 . He advocates for a balance between the "merchant" (global trade) and the "farmer" (self-reliance) for greater resilience13 .

•

Impact on China's Collective Psyche: While globalization lifted millions out of poverty, it has also led to "shockwave hyper-consumerism" with negative effects on the family unit and society, evidenced by China's skyrocketing use of antidepressants (SSRIs)14 . He links hyper-consumerism to depression and anxiety and warns against the harmful side effects of SSRIs on "vital force" (chi) and the nation's health14 ....

In summary, Solomon presents a scathing critique of the current dominant model of globalization, viewing it as exploitative, harmful to Western societies, and ultimately unsustainable. He suggests that China should forge a different path for globalization based on its own cultural values and a focus on mutual benefit and long-term well-being.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss China's development.

Based on the provided source, China's development is portrayed as a unique trajectory, distinct from Western models and marked by adaptation, pragmatism, and a focus on national interests1 .... Here's a discussion of China's development as presented in the text:

•

Moving Beyond Marxism: The author notes that China "left Marxism behind and moved to ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’ because Marxism never works"2 .... This suggests a pragmatic approach where China adopted an ideology but then adapted it to its specific needs and historical context3 . This signifies a key aspect of China's development: the willingness to modify and innovate rather than rigidly adhere to imported systems3 .

•

Benefiting from Globalization (Initially): China, as a "national collective," benefited from globalization by attracting outsourced manufacturing, leading to increased corporate earnings for Western companies and the purchase of American debt by China4 .... This period lifted millions out of poverty in China7 . However, the author also points out the potential "hangover symptoms" of this model, including conflict with the US, overreliance on global supply chains, and the impact of hyper-consumerism on China's society6 ....

•

Investment in National Development: Unlike the scenario the author paints of Western ruling classes prioritizing their own interests, he believes that a "decent percentage of China’s political class serves the interests of the citizens, nation-state, and culture"1 . He highlights that instead of becoming a mere "coolie industrial park" and money laundering hub for Wall Street, the Communist Party of China (CPC) "invested in its people and nation"2 . This signifies a developmental strategy centered on strengthening the country and its population.

•

Addressing Corruption: The author contrasts China's approach to corruption with that of the US, stating that "unlike the US, China prosecutes top bankers and other high-level officials"2 . This suggests a commitment to maintaining the integrity of its development process by holding powerful individuals accountable.

•

Envisioning "Chinese Characteristics" Across Sectors: The author outlines how China might develop various sectors with its own unique characteristics, building on our previous discussion:

◦

Globalization with Chinese Characteristics: This model emphasizes "non-violent transactionalism" and "win-win programs," drawing on the archetype of the merchant who provides what is locally unavailable9 .... Examples include exchanging railway technology for resources11 .

◦

Ecology with Chinese Characteristics: This involves balancing technological advancement with environmental considerations, aiming for an "ecological-technological yin-yang balance"11 .

◦

Healthcare with Chinese Characteristics: This approach integrates traditional Chinese medicine, proper diet and exercise, and advanced medical technology12 .

◦

Feminism with Chinese Characteristics: This proposed model suggests promoting younger motherhood while also supporting women's education and careers later in life, aligning with a perceived "natural order"13 .

•

Balancing Tradition and Modernity: The author emphasizes the importance of China's philosophical heritage, particularly the "Confucius-Tao yin-yang balance," as a counterbalance to "technological materialism"14 . He argues that while Confucianism promotes social order, Taoism provides vital "chi" and is better suited for engaging with the world outside China15 ....

•

Aiming for Global Trust: Recognizing a potential lack of global trust ("The world does business with SinoCorp. The world respects SinoCorp. But the world doesn’t trust SinoCorp"17 ), the author suggests that China should strive to become the "Middle Kingdom of Truth" by being a credible source of data, acknowledging mistakes, and acting with transparency17 . This is presented as a crucial aspect of China's future development in its global interactions.

In summary, the source portrays China's development as a dynamic process of learning, adapting, and innovating, drawing on its own cultural and philosophical traditions while engaging with the global landscape. It highlights a focus on national interest, a commitment to addressing internal challenges like corruption, and an evolving vision for how China can contribute to and navigate global issues with "Chinese characteristics"1 .... However, the author also points out potential challenges and the need for China to build trust and navigate the complexities of globalization effectively6 ....

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Taoist philosophy.

Based on the source, Taoist philosophy, or the Tao, is presented as a significant element of Chinese thought that offers a unique perspective on various aspects of life and society1 . Here's a discussion of Taoist philosophy as it appears in the provided text:

•

The Way/Tao: The author mentions "The Way/Tao" in the context of humanity potentially reaching a Kardashev Type II Civilization, suggesting it represents a fundamental principle or path for advancement2 .

•

Intuition and Natural Order: In the source, the term "stupid" is redefined in a Taoist sense. It refers to a state of being less reliant on official or "smart" media and academic sources and more dependent on instinct, intuition, and observation of the natural order3 .... This highlights a core aspect of Taoism: trusting one's inner wisdom and aligning with the natural world.

•

Yin-Yang Balance: Taoism is consistently presented in conjunction with Confucianism as a yin-yang balance5 .... This fundamental concept emphasizes the interconnectedness and interdependence of seemingly opposing forces.

◦

Tao provides life-force or "chi," which is considered an essential element, particularly in a technological society6 . The author also warns that SSRIs can destroy this "vital force," negatively impacting the nation's health7 .

◦

While Confucianism promotes social stability and an educated society, Taoism offers a necessary balance to prevent Confucianism from becoming rigid and susceptible to corruption6 .

◦

Conversely, Confucianism balances potential excesses in Taoism, noting that while Taoism values conflict avoidance, some followers can become erratic when mistreated6 .

•

Action Through Inaction (Wu Wei): The source explicitly mentions "action through inaction" as a Tao tenet8 . This concept, known as Wu Wei, doesn't necessarily mean doing nothing but rather acting in a way that is natural, effortless, and in accordance with the flow of things. The author even suggests that studying Tao can be a "full-time job," implying a deep engagement with its principles8 .

•

Universal Application: Taoism is described as having a universal application, working with all symbols, archetypes, and myths, from ancient Celtic runes to Native American totems9 . This suggests a fundamental understanding of universal principles that transcend specific cultures.

•

Relevance in the Modern World: The author believes his book on Tao covers 21st-century technocracy and simulation, indicating his view that Taoist principles remain relevant in the face of modern challenges10 . He even suggests that followers of Tao would be well-suited to advise on a post-scarcity society with advanced technology, given their understanding of leisure and non-forced action8 .

•

Counterbalance to Technocracy: Taoist philosophy is presented as a crucial counterbalance to "technological materialism" and "transhumanist technocracy," which the author views as potentially harmful deviations from the natural order5 .... By emphasizing the "Confucius-Tao yin-yang balance," the source suggests that China's spiritual philosophy can provide a necessary ethical and holistic framework for technological advancement.

•

Connection to Traditional Practices: The author implies a link between Taoism and traditional Chinese practices by mentioning Traditional Chinese Medicine as part of "healthcare with Chinese characteristics"12 .

In our conversation history, we also noted the concept of "ecology with Chinese characteristics" aiming for an "ecological-technological yin-yang balance," further illustrating the application of Taoist principles of balance to environmental concerns [previous turn].

Overall, the source portrays Taoist philosophy as a deep well of wisdom emphasizing balance, harmony with nature, intuitive understanding, and a way of acting that aligns with the natural flow of life. It is presented not as an outdated relic but as a vital framework for navigating the complexities of the modern world, offering a counterbalance to potentially harmful excesses of materialism and technology, and holding universal relevance1 ....

China's "Characteristics": A Western Perspective

1 source

Richard Solomon's memo from The Unz Review presents a critical perspective on globalization and suggests how China can redefine it with its own "characteristics." The author, identifying as an unpaid Western public relations volunteer, argues that Western-driven globalization has negatively impacted Western nations, benefiting primarily financial elites. He believes China, unlike the "ZioCorp" he resides in, has leaders who prioritize their citizens and nation. Solomon proposes that China should promote a "merchant" model of mutually beneficial trade and incorporate elements of its own philosophy, like Taoism, into its global outreach and domestic policies, particularly in areas like healthcare and family structure. The memo also critiques the negative consequences of hyper-consumerism and Western ideologies, advocating for a "Middle Kingdom of Truth" approach in China's international relations.

PODCAST TRANSCRIPT

Welcome to the daily briefs.info Lenny and Maria deep dive podcast show review of the article the everything with Chinese characteristics memo from unpaid volunteer western sector director of public relations nobody by Richard Solomon the uns review.

Okay so diving right in.

Yeah let's get into it.

Richard Solomon. Huh?

He's got a um an interesting way of presenting himself that's for sure.

You think unpaid volunteer western sector director of public public relations nobody. That's quite the title, right?

And it definitely makes you wonder what he's all about.

It does make you wonder.

But you know what? Putting the unusual title aside for a second, the memo itself, um, it's actually pretty thoughtprovoking.

Yeah, you're right. It's a dense read, but there's a lot to unpack there.

Definitely a lot to unpack and it's a pretty critical analysis, too, of how China approaches public relations and how it engages with the rest of the world.

I think that's what caught your eye, right?

Absolutely.

I mean, you're always looking for these alternative perspectives on global dynics. dynamics and this memo. Well, it definitely delivers that.

It really does.

One of the first things that jumped out at me,

yeah,

was this whole idea that even propaganda, you know, even propaganda is more effective when it's grounded in some element of truth.

It's like he's saying there needs to be some basis in reality for these narratives to really land.

That's interesting. You know, it makes you think about how different approaches to communication play out on a global scale.

For sure. It challenges you to consider like what's more impactful in the long run, just making stuff up,

right?

Or weaving in some actual facts into the story.

Exactly.

Like which one ultimately has more staying power.

Right. Right.

And then, you know, he goes on to contrast this with what he calls Zioor.

Oh yeah. Zioor,

which is like his metaphor for, I don't know, a failed state or a system that's just totally self- serving.

Yeah. Like a win-lose kind of mentality where it's all about them and nobody else benefits.

Right. Exactly. And he contrasts that with well the potential he sees in China's approach,

right? This whole idea of win-win programs, programs that are actually designed to benefit both sides.

And he roots this in China's history, right?

This 5,000year history of, as he puts it, nonviolent transactionalism.

Wow. 5,000 years. That's a long time.

It's like a deeply ingrained cultural thing.

Yeah. Like a long tradition of exchange and mutual benefit.

Yeah. And it's this idea, this history that he builds his argument on

for why China might take a different approach on the world stage.

Mhm.

He's basically saying that this is in their DNA in a way.

It's fascinating, isn't it? It is

because it makes you question what really drives these international interactions.

For sure. Are they based on pure self-interest or is there something else at play?

He even goes so far as to say that um a significant portion of China's political class

Yeah.

is genuinely focused on serving their people, their nation, their culture,

which is a pretty bold claim considering is right.

Especially when you compare it to his view of Western counterparts.

Exactly. And that's where we really start to dig deep into the meat of this memo. Right. This is where the deep dive truly begins.

Yeah. Because Solomon, he doesn't hold back on his critique of globalization.

Not at all.

Especially how it played out in the 80s and 90s from a Western perspective.

He really doesn't pull any punches.

No, he doesn't.

I mean, he talks about wealth transfer. He talks about all these ongoing conflicts. He talks about a rise in state control. He even uses some pretty strong language, right?

Oh, yeah. Very specific, very loaded terms.

And you know, for someone like you who's trying to understand all these global shifts,

yeah,

his perspective, it's a pretty critical lens.

It is

on something that a lot of people in the West might see as a period of progress.

That's a key point because he's challenging that narrative.

He is headon.

He's saying, "Hold on, let's look at what was really going on beneath the surface."

And what's at the heart of his critique?

Well, he sees globalization at least in its western form as a kind of parasite globalization.

Parasite globalization. That's a powerful image.

It is. It really drives home his point.

So what does he mean by that?

Well, he's essentially saying that this form of globalization is all about moving goods around the world unnecessarily

like just for the sake of moving them.

Basically, it's like there's no real value being created at the source. It's just enriching the middlemen,

the intermediaries, right? And who's losing out in this scenario? Well, he argues that it's led to a lot of negative consequences like

especially for the middle class in the West and for many parts of the global south.

So, not exactly a win-win situation.

Not at all. More like a win-lose

where a select few benefit at the expense of many.

And he doesn't stop there, right?

Nope. He extends this whole parasite analogy to the digital world,

which is I mean it's so relevant to how we live our lives today.

Absolutely. It's like we can't escape it.

So, how does this digital parasite work? He sees these major digital platforms, the ones we all use every day,

like the big tech giants.

Exactly. He sees them as digital toll collectors.

Huh. Digital toll collect.

It's a really striking image, isn't it? Because it captures this idea that they're extracting wealth from creators.

The people who are actually making the content, the products, the services.

Yeah. And then they're consolidated all this power in the hands of a few.

So we're essentially paying a toll just to exist in this digital space.

That's his argument. Yeah.

And one of his points that really got me thinking

was this idea that by moving all of our data online

Yeah.

we're essentially giving these platforms ownership of our intellectual property.

That's a huge one. Especially for you, right?

Yeah. Absolutely.

And when you think about how much of our lives, how much of our work

is now online, it's kind of mind-blowing.

It is.

It really makes you question who's really in control.

So, what's the alternative? I mean, are we supposed to just disconnect?

Well, I don't think that's what Solomon's advocating for.

Okay.

I think he's more about making us aware of the tradeoff,

the trade-offs of this hyperconnected world.

Exactly. He's not saying that the convenience and the benefits aren't real.

But he is saying that they come with a cost.

A cost in terms of

Yeah. extraction, centralized control.

And when he uses the term stupid

Oh, yeah. That's an interesting one.

I mean, it seems harsh, right?

It does, but he's using it in a very specific tauist sense.

It's not stupid. in the traditional sense?

No, not at all.

What does he mean then?

He's talking about a kind of wisdom.

A wisdom that's rooted in

direct experience, intuition,

like a gut feeling.

Yeah. Exactly.

Yeah.

And a skepticism towards the official narratives that are being pushed

by these powerful platforms.

Exactly.

So he's essentially saying, don't just blindly accept what you're being told.

Think for yourself. Question things. Trust your own instincts.

So against this backdrop of western dominated globalization,

which she sees as deeply flawed.

He then shifts his focus to China.

Mhm.

And he acknowledges that China as a whole did benefit economically,

especially through outsourced manufacturing.

Right. But he frames this within a larger narrative

of international bankers making some pretty big strategic errors,

particularly in

underestimating China's potential

and underestimating the dedication of its leadership.

Right. He paints a picture of a very different set of motivations and goals.

It's a really interesting way to look at the global economic shifts we've seen. Isn't it?

It is. It really challenges the conventional wisdom.

And what's fascinating is how he interprets why Western powers engaged in outsourcing in the first place.

Right? He doesn't just buy the whole cost efficiency argument.

No, he sees something else at play.

He suggests that it was actually a calculated move by Western financial interests.

And what was their goal?

Well, he argues that they were trying to maintain control.

Control of what?

Of the global economy.

But they miscalculated.

They did. judged China's trajectory

and the commitment of its government to national advancement.

Which brings us to this central question. How can China shape globalization with Chinese characteristics?

That's the million-dollar question.

And this is where Solomon introduces this archetype of the merchant in Chinese culture,

the merchant.

But this isn't just any merchant, right?

No, he's very specific about what this role represents.

So, how does he define it?

He defines it as someone who brings goods from afar. are,

but only goods that are

genuinely needed locally.

And this is crucial, right?

Absolutely. It's all about a mutually beneficial exchange.

A stark contrast to that extractive model he associates with western globalization.

Right. This is a very different approach to international trade and engagement.

So, it's not about exploiting other countries for their resources.

No, it's about finding ways to benefit both sides

to create a true win-win scenario.

Exactly.

And he uses some real world examples to illustrate this point. Right?

He does. He points to China's infrastructure projects in Africa,

right?

Like railway construction in exchange for resources.

So, China gets the resources it needs.

Africa gets much needed infrastructure development.

It's a concrete example of this mutually beneficial transactionalism in action.

It is. It's a tangible way to see how this approach can actually work.

But Solomon isn't naive.

No, he's not.

He also warns China about some potential hangover effects from globaliz hangover effects. That's an interesting way to put it.

Like the downsides, the unintended consequences,

right? He's saying, look, even if you do things differently, there are still risks involved.

And one of his primary concerns is

the potential for conflict with the US,

which is a huge one, obviously.

Absolutely. It's like the elephant in the room.

So why does he see this as a risk?

Well, he argues that there are people in the West who feel like they've lost out.

Lost out because of

the shift in global manufacturing power,

right? Because China has become such a dominant force.

Exactly. And he's saying that this resentment, this sense of loss,

it could lead to conflict.

It could.

It's a real possibility that we need to be aware of

and it's a crucial point for you to consider. Right.

Absolutely. Especially when you're analyzing the current geopolitical landscape

because those tensions are real.

They are

and they're not going away anytime soon.

I think Solomon's point is that globalization, even with the best of intentions,

it can create vulnerabilities

and it can lead to conflict

which is It's kind of ironic, right?

It is in a way

because it's supposed to be about bringing people together, about creating interconnectedness,

right? But that interconnectedness also creates dependencies

and when those dependencies are disrupted

or when one side feels like they're losing out,

conflict can arise

and it can escalate quickly.

Another hangover effect he identifies is China's potential over reliance on global supply chains.

Supply chains. Yeah, that's another big one.

And this is where he introduces the counter archetype to the merchant,

which is

the farmer.

The farmer. Okay.

And what does the farmer represent?

Self-reliance.

The ability to provide for yourself, to be independent.

Exactly. It's like don't put all your eggs in one basket.

So, he's not saying that China shouldn't engage in global trade.

No, not at all.

But he is saying that they need to maintain a healthy balance,

a balance between the merchant and the farmer,

between global engagement and domestic self-sufficiency.

Right? And this is especially important given how fragile global supply networks can be.

As we've seen in recent years, right?

Absolutely. I mean, all it takes is one disruption,

one pandemic, one war, one natural disaster,

and a whole system can grind to a halt.

So, this balance is crucial.

It's essential for any nation's long-term security.

And it's not just a practical consideration, right?

It's also deeply philosophical.

This interplay between the merchant and the farmer,

it's like the yin and yang of global trade and domestic self-reliance.

It's about finding that harmony, that equilibrium.

And I think Solomon's point is that China with its long history and its rich philosophical traditions,

it's uniquely positioned to strike that balance.

He's saying that they have the wisdom and the experience to navigate this complex landscape.

And he uses a very specific example to illustrate the dangers of over reliance on external sources.

The Nordstream 2 pipeline.

Oh yeah, that was a huge wakeup call for a lot of people.

It was it showed just how quickly things can change

and how vulnerable you can be if you're not prepared,

especially when it comes to essential resources. ources.

And this brings us to one of the most surprising aspects of Solomon's analysis.

Yeah. What's that?

His concern about the impact of globalization on China's collective psyche.

Really, he goes there.

He does. He acknowledges the immense success that China's had in lifting millions out of poverty,

which is undeniable.

Absolutely. But he also points to some troubling trends

like

the increasing use of anti-depressants in China.

Oh, that's interesting.

And he sees this as a potential indicator of negative social and psychological effects

thinning from

hyperconsumerism. Okay.

And its impact on traditional family structures.

So he's essentially saying that this rapid economic growth

it's come at a cost.

A cost in terms of

social well-being, mental health, a sense of community.

That's a really thoughtprovoking point.

It is it makes you question what we truly value

and whether material wealth is enough.

He even talks about the erosion of vital force orqi.

Chi that's like your life energy, right?

Exact. Exactly. And he's concerned about the over reliance on pharmaceuticals

as a way to cope with these societal pressures

which leads him to propose healthcare with Chinese characteristics.

Okay. What does that look like?

He envisions a system that blends traditional Chinese medicine

with its emphasis on diet and exercise and balance,

right? With advanced medical technology.

So it's not about rejecting modern medicine.

No, it's about integrating the best of both worlds

and finding a more holistic approach to health. that takes into account the whole person,

their physical well-being, their mental well-being, their spiritual well-being.

And he also advocates for a more cautious approach to western pharmaceuticals,

which is interesting considering

the influence of big pharma.

Exactly. It's like he's challenging their dominance.

And he's raising some ethical considerations

about the drivers within the global healthcare industry,

like who's really benefiting from the current system

and what are the long-term consequences of our reliance on these drugs?

It's a lot to think about. It is it's a complex issue with no easy answers.

And then he delves into a pretty specific critique of zoo feminism.

Zofism, okay.

Which he characterizes as a western construct

that's led to the disruption of the traditional family unit.

And he sees this as having been driven by

short-term economic gains.

So he's basically saying that it's benefited certain groups

at the expense of the family structure.

And he contrasts this with his proposal for a feminism with Chinese characteristics. which would focus on

encouraging younger motherhood,

okay,

through various means,

right?

Financial incentives, social support,

and what about women who choose to work.

He also talks about providing educational opportunities for mothers who stay at home.

So, it's not about forcing women into a specific role.

No, it's about providing support for different choices,

but it's definitely a very different model

than what we see in many Western societies.

It is, and it's likely to be controversial.

Absolutely. But it's important to understand his perspective

within the context of his broader argument

about cultural preservation and societal well-being.

Right? He's essentially saying that the family unit is the foundation of a healthy society

and that we need to find ways to strengthen it

rather than undermine it.

And finally, he addresses globalization technocracy

globalization technocracy

which is this idea that technology is the solution to all our problems

and that we should just embrace it wholeheartedly

without questioning its impact on society, on the environment, on our values,

right? It's like a blind face in progress.

And Solomon is deeply concerned about this.

He sees it as a dangerous path

that could lead to all sorts of unintended consequences.

And he proposes a uniquely Chinese way to temper these potential excesses,

which is

the balance of Confucianism and Taoism.

Ah, the ancient wisdom traditions.

He sees them as a source of guidance

for navigating the complexities of technological advancement.

And he even suggests that Taloism with its universal appeal.

It could be a valuable tool for China's global public relations efforts.

Interesting.

He even cites Bruce Lee,

Bruce Lee, the martial arts legend

and the kung fu TV series.

Okay, I see where he's going with this.

As examples of Toism's soft power potential,

right? It's about showcasing these philosophical ideas

in a way that resonates with a global audience

and using them to promote a more balanced and harmonious approach to the world.

It's a fascinating idea, isn't it?

It is. It makes you think about the role of philosophy and culture

in shaping our understanding of technology

and in shaping our future.

So to bring it all together,

okay,

Solomon ultimately argues for China to strive to become the middle kingdom of truth.

The middle kingdom of truth.

That's a powerful phrase, isn't it?

It is.

And how does he see China achieving this?

By being transparent about its actions.

By acknowledging its mistakes.

By building trust.

And by moving beyond a purely consumerdriven image on the global stage.

So it's not just about economic power.

No, it's about moral authority.

It's about leading by example.

And he believes that incorporating the wisdom of Taoism

can help China navigate the complexities of our current era.

It's a bold vision, isn't it?

It is.

And it's a challenge to the rest of the world. So, we've journeyed through Richard Solomon's memo.

A wild ride for sure.

We've explored his contrasting views on Western and Chinese governance.

We've looked at his critique of globalization's impact on the West.

And we've delved into his analysis of Globalization's potential hangover for China,

including the risks of conflict with the US,

the challenges of over reliance on global supply chains,

the potential psychological impacts of hyperconsumerism,

and his very specific takes on zofeminism and technocracy.

It's been a lot to take in.

It has, but I think it's been a worthwhile deep dive.

I agree. It's given us a lot to think about.

So, to sum up Solomon's key arguments,

he advocates for China to learn from its move away from Marxism towards socialism with Chinese characteristics

and to adapt globalization accordingly.

He emphasizes the importance of the merchant archetype,

focusing on mutually beneficial exchanges of locally unavailable goods and technologies,

as seen in China's railway projects in Africa.

He also highlights the importance of internal balance,

drawing on the yin-yang of merchant and farmer

or self-reliance.

And he warns about the potential negative impacts of hyperconsumerism

as evidenced by the rising use of anti-depressants in China.

He proposes health care with Chinese characteristics

that integrates traditional Chinese medicine with advanced technology.

He critiques western xy feminism for disrupting the traditional family

and suggests a feminism with Chinese characteristics that supports younger motherhood.

He also warns against a purely materialistic technocracy,

advocating for the balance of confucutionism and talism,

highlighting tauism's universal appeal for global public relations

in using Bruce Lee and the kung fu TV series as examples.

Ultimately, he argues for China to become the middle kingdom of truth

by acknowledging mistakes and building trust

and by moving beyond a purely consumeristic global image.

It's a lot to process.

It is, but it's a powerful vision

and it raises some important questions for all of us

as global interactions intensify.

How might different cultural and philosophical frameworks

shape the future of international relations

and public perception?

Food for thought,

definitely.

Thank you for listening to another session of the and Maria deep dive podcast show.

See you next time.


3-22-25 MIND MAP Global Issues: Finance, Foreign Policy, and Geopolitics