DailyBriefs.info PODCAST 2nd PODCAST MP3of Brief PDF 2ndMP3 2ndPDF 1PgPDF
Review of Article: Vaccines Promote Lifelong Autoimmune Disease by Jeremy James
http://zephaniah.eu/index_htm_files/Vaccines%20Promote%20Lifelong%20Autoimmune%20Disease.pdf
•
The author has long argued that vaccines are of dubious value and potentially harmful1 .
•
In a 2019 publication, the author questioned whether the vaccine industry might be used to inject debilitating or sterilizing drugs into the population2 .
•
The author questions the motivations of government and the pharmaceutical industry in pushing mandatory vaccinations, citing other actions they deem harmful to children3 .
•
The author believes that vaccines are the "perfect vector for mass infection"4 .
•
The "Covid hoax" and subsequent events are seen as evidence that a "Cabal" intends to inflict serious harm through vaccine-delivered toxins4 .
•
The author recommends their earlier papers (#175 and #205) for verifiable information about the dangers of vaccines5 .
•
The public is heavily conditioned by advertising from the vaccine industry, which has reinvested profits to promote vaccine safety and efficacy6 .
•
The author suggests that any poisoning effects of vaccines would be slow and gradual, making the connection to adverse effects difficult to see6 .
•
Drawing on biblical references, the author posits that evil is prevalent in the world and that the actions of sovereign states and corporations should be viewed with this in mind7 ....
•
The author believes there is an "Illuminati Plan" predicated on genocide, with a commencement date for its final phase allegedly set for 2025 according to Alice Bailey's writings9 ....
•
The goal of this plan is the installation of the Antichrist, driven by Satan and his earthly servants12 .
•
A Nobel Prize-winning discovery by Dr. Charles Richet in 1902 demonstrated "anaphylaxis," where an initial low dose of a substance could cause a severe reaction to a subsequent dose13 .
•
Anaphylaxis means the organism is rendered hypersensitive rather than protected by a prior exposure14 .
•
Richet showed that parenteral injection (like vaccine inoculation) of protein substance profoundly and permanently modifies the body's chemical constitution15 .
•
Further research showed that virtually any protein, not just toxins, could cause anaphylaxis16 ....
•
Once a subject is anaphylactized, they may never return to their former state, with sensitivity potentially lasting for years18 .
•
In addition to specific anaphylaxis (to the same substance), there is also "general anaphylaxis," where sensitization to one injected substance increases susceptibility to others19 .
•
Common vaccine ingredients include various potentially harmful substances such as preservatives (like thimerosal), adjuvants, and stabilizers19 ....
•
Richet warned that the body is designed to receive proteins only after modification by digestive juices, and injecting alien proteins can lead to harmful immune responses, including increased sensitivity21 ....
•
The author concludes that it has been well known since 1913 that injecting substances into the blood is potentially harmful and can lead to permanent changes and a range of unpredictable immune reactions, possibly causing autoimmune diseases which have allegedly increased since the introduction of childhood vaccine programs23 ....
Main Themes and Important Ideas:
Vaccines as Harmful and Ineffective:
The author reiterates his long-held belief that vaccines are not beneficial and pose significant risks.
He references his previous publications (#205: "Vaccines are the Perfect Vector for Mass Infection") to support this claim.
He questions the motivation behind mandatory vaccinations, suggesting it's not for public health but part of a malevolent agenda.
Quote: "We have long argued in these paper that vaccines are of dubious value and potentially harmful."
Quote: "As we state in the title to this paper, vaccines are the perfect vector for mass infection."
Conspiracy of a Malevolent "Cabal":
The author posits the existence of a powerful, hidden group ("the Cabal," "persons unknown") that intends to harm humanity using vaccines as a delivery mechanism for toxins.
He connects the "Covid hoax" and subsequent global health initiatives (WHO pandemic treaty, monkeypox, bird flu) to this plan.
Quote: "The Covid hoax and subsequent developments (WHO pandemic treaty, monkeypox, bird flu, etc) have shown that this is exactly where the Cabal are going. What appeared to be a strategic option in 2019 should now be seen as a major element in their plan. In short, they intend to inflict serious harm on humanity using vaccine-delivered toxins."
Religious Interpretation and the "End Times":
The author frames his arguments within a Christian eschatological perspective, viewing the actions of governments and corporations through the lens of biblical prophecy and the "Children of Wickedness" serving Satan.
He cites biblical verses (Ecclesiastes 8:11, 1 John 5:19, Matthew 24:22) to support his belief in a widespread evil and a plan for global destruction.
He suggests that the world is governed by Satan's plan, executed by his "earthly servants."
Quote: "If the whole world lies is wickedness and 'the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil', then we ought to examine the actions of sovereign states and major corporations with this vital Biblical principle clearly in mind."
Quote: "Satan has a plan – which the Word of God has revealed – and his earthly servants, the Children of Wickedness, are putting it into effect."
The "Illuminati Plan" and 2025:
The document references the "Illuminati Plan," based on the writings of Alice Bailey, as a blueprint for Satan's "End Time revolution."
It highlights passages from Bailey's "The Externalisation of the Hierarchy" that mention the year 2025 as significant for the "externalisation of the Hierarchy" and a period of great change.
The author interprets this as the commencement of the final phase of the Enemy's plan.
Quote: "The following passages from The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, which was first published in 1957, show that the year envisaged for this commencement (at the time the messages were channeled by Ms Bailey) was the one we are now in, namely 2025."
Dr. Charles Richet's Discovery of Anaphylaxis:
A significant portion of the document focuses on the work of Dr. Charles Richet, who won the Nobel Prize in 1913 for his discovery of anaphylaxis.
The author emphasizes Richet's findings that a second injection of a substance can cause a severe, even fatal, hypersensitive reaction, even if the initial dose was small.
He highlights Richet's conclusion that parenteral injection (like vaccination) "modifies profoundly and permanently the chemical constitution of the body fluids" and that the body develops an "increased sensitivity" to subsequent injections.
Quote: "Anaphylaxis... means that state of an organism in which it is rendered hypersensitive, instead of being protected." (quoting Richet)
Quote: "He showed that in fact parenteral injection [such as vaccine inoculation] of protein substance modifies profoundly and permanently the chemical constitution of the body fluids." (commentary on Richet's work)
Anaphylaxis and Autoimmune Diseases:
The author argues that Richet's discovery demonstrates the inherent danger of injecting foreign proteins into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system.
He contends that repeated exposure to foreign proteins via vaccination leads to a state of "heightened sensitivity" and can trigger autoimmune diseases.
He provides a list of common autoimmune diseases (multiple sclerosis, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.) that he believes have increased due to childhood vaccination programs.
Quote: "Every time alien protein penetrates by effraction [i.e. injection], the organism suffers and becomes resistant. This resistance lies in increased sensitivity, a sort of revolt against the second parenteral injection which would be fatal." (quoting Richet's warning)
Quote: "Lesser immune reactions will produce an inflammatory response in one or more organs of the body, causing what we call today an autoimmune disease."
Suppression of Information and the Medical Establishment:
The author claims that the medical profession and pharmaceutical industry have deliberately suppressed information about Richet's findings because it exposes the dangers of vaccination.
He suggests that this suppression is part of the larger "New World Order" agenda.
He praises independent researchers who are exposing the "disturbing truth behind many aspects of modern medicine."
Quote: "We would also encourage our readers to ask themselves why, despite all the evidence, both the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry continue to suppress information about the groundbreaking discovery made by Charles Rickert in 1902."
Vaccines as Stealth Bioweapons:
The author proposes that vaccines could be used as "stealth bioweapons" by introducing harmless substances that later trigger severe reactions upon subsequent exposure.
He describes a "binary or two-phase weapon" scenario where initial vaccines sensitize individuals, and later vaccines containing the same substance could cause anaphylactic shock.
Important Facts (as presented by the author):
Dr. Charles Richet won the Nobel Prize in 1913 for discovering anaphylaxis, the phenomenon of heightened sensitivity after an initial injection.
Richet found that even minute amounts of non-toxic proteins could cause anaphylaxis.
Richet believed that once the body is anaphylactized, it can never return to its former state.
Common vaccine ingredients include antigens, preservatives, adjuvants, additives, stabilizers, antibiotics, and inactivating chemicals (a list is provided).
The author claims that the "Illuminati Plan," based on Alice Bailey's writings, indicates 2025 as a significant year for their agenda.
The CDC in 2019 estimated that about one in six children aged 3 through 17 years have one or more developmental disabilities.
Quotes to Note:
"whether the vaccine industry will be used at some stage in the future by persons unknown to inject debilitating or sterilizing drugs into an entire population?" (Author's question from a 2019 paper)
"Anaphylaxis... means that state of an organism in which it is rendered hypersensitive, instead of being protected." (Charles Richet)
"once a subject has been anaphylactized and consequently modified in his chemical constitution, then the subject can never go back to his former state. Return to normal is not possible." (Charles Richet)
"We are so constituted that we can never receive other proteins into the blood than those that have been modified by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates by effraction [i.e. injection], the organism suffers and becomes resistant." (Charles Richet)
"the whole world lieth in wickedness" (1 John 5:19, quoted multiple times)
•The warning at the close of paper #205 advised readers to consider if the vaccine industry might be used in the future to inject debilitating or sterilizing drugs into the entire population.
The author presents this list of negative societal trends to suggest that if the government and pharmaceutical industry are involved in these harmful activities, then their determination to mandate vaccines should also be viewed with suspicion regarding the well-being of children.
Richet demonstrated that after an initial low dose of a substance, a subsequent dose weeks later could produce a severe, heightened reaction, the opposite of immunity. He called this phenomenon anaphylaxis.
Richet concluded that once a subject has been anaphylactized and their chemical constitution modified, they can never fully return to their former state, and the heightened sensitivity can persist for years.
The text states that the digestive system modifies proteins, making their introduction safe, while injected proteins bypass this process, causing the organism to suffer and potentially become hypersensitive.
Common categories of vaccine ingredients mentioned include antigens, preservatives, and adjuvants.
General anaphylaxis, according to Richet, is when an animal that has been made anaphylactically sensitive to one substance becomes significantly more susceptible to other injected substances compared to an animal that had no initial sensitizing injection.
The author applies Ecclesiastes 8:11, which notes that evil deeds are emboldened by the lack of swift punishment, to suggest that the delayed adverse effects of vaccines might obscure their connection to health problems, blinding people to potential harm.
The author interprets the passages from Alice Bailey's work as evidence of a long-term "Illuminati Plan" for global control, with 2025 being a significant target year for the commencement of a final phase, and vaccines potentially playing a role in this plan.
A binary or two-phase bioweapon, in this context, involves an initial "harmless" substance in vaccine #1 that sets up an anaphylactic trigger. This trigger can then be activated years later by a second vaccine (#2) containing the same substance, potentially leading to a severe reaction.
Summary
This document, written by Jeremy James, titled "Vaccines Promote Lifelong Autoimmune Disease," argues that vaccines are not only of dubious value but are potentially harmful, acting as a "perfect vector for mass infection" and possibly a tool for injecting debilitating substances. The author contends that mandatory vaccination efforts, despite alleged dangers, suggest a malevolent intent by governments and the pharmaceutical industry. The paper further explores the Nobel Prize-winning discovery of anaphylaxis by Dr. Charles Richet, highlighting how injected proteins can cause the body to become hypersensitized and permanently alter its biochemical status, potentially leading to autoimmune diseases. Ultimately, the document aims to warn readers about the alleged dangers of vaccines, suggesting a hidden agenda to inflict harm and promoting skepticism towards mainstream medical narratives.
Discuss Vaccine harm potential.
Based on the provided source, Jeremy James argues strongly that vaccines have significant harm potential1 .... He contends that vaccines are of dubious value and potentially harmful, even suggesting they are a "perfect vector for mass infection"1 ....
The author raises concerns about the determination of governments and the pharmaceutical industry to mandate vaccinations, questioning their motives and suggesting a potential agenda to inflict serious harm on humanity using "vaccine-delivered toxins"2 .... He advises readers to consider whether the vaccine industry could be used to inject debilitating or sterilizing drugs into the entire population2 ....
The source highlights the 1902 discovery of anaphylaxis by Dr. Charles Richet, who received the Nobel Prize in 1913 for this work6 . Anaphylaxis is described as a state where an organism becomes hypersensitive rather than protected after an initial low dose of a substance7 . Richet demonstrated that a subsequent dose could produce a severe reaction8 . The Nobel Prize website notes that parenteral injection (like vaccine inoculation) of protein substance profoundly and permanently modifies the chemical constitution of the body fluids9 ....
According to the text, Richet found that:
A subject with a previous injection is far more sensitive than a new subject11 .
The symptoms of the second injection are different from the first, involving a swift and total depression of the nervous system11 .
A three to four week incubation period is needed for the anaphylactic state to develop11 .
Virtually any protein, not just toxins, can cause anaphylaxis12 .... This includes even minute amounts of organic liquids like milk, serum, egg, and muscle extract14 .
Once a subject is anaphylactized, they can never return to their former state, with sensitivity potentially lasting for years10 ....
The author emphasizes Richet's warning that humans are constituted such that they should only receive proteins into the blood that have been modified by digestive juices16 . He argues that every time alien protein penetrates by injection, the organism suffers and becomes resistant through increased sensitivity, leading to anaphylactic shock upon a second injection16 .... This is presented as a universal defense mechanism against the penetration of heterogenous substances into the blood17 .
Based on Richet's findings, the source concludes that it has been well known since 1913 that:
•
Injecting any substance into the blood is potentially harmful18 .
•
There is a powerful biochemical connection between intravenous introduction of foreign proteins and the immune response18 .
The biochemical status of the body is permanently and irreversibly changed after contamination with foreign protein via injection19 . This is argued to permanently weaken the body unless it confers immunity, which is debated19 .
The more a person is contaminated intravenously, the more sensitized they become19 .
The range of pathological symptoms from this immune response is broad, of indeterminate duration and intensity, often unpredictable and specific to the individual20 . This reaction is caused by the immune system itself, not the triggering protein20 .
Foreign protein can only be safely introduced via the digestive system20 .
The injected foreign protein does not need to be toxic to trigger a severe immune reaction21 .
Lesser immune reactions will produce an inflammatory response, leading to what is called autoimmune disease, which cannot be cured, only alleviated21 . The author believes that the frequency and intensity of common autoimmune diseases have increased since the introduction of childhood vaccine programs22 . He lists examples such as multiple sclerosis, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, irritable bowel syndrome, asthma, lupus, thyroiditis, psoriasis, myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré, and vasculitis22 .
The source also suggests that vaccines could be used as stealth bioweapons, where a harmless substance in one vaccine sets up an anaphylactic trigger that can be activated years later by a second vaccine containing the same substance23 ....
Finally, the author claims that despite all this evidence, the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry continue to suppress information about Richet's discovery25 . He urges readers to consider this information and draw their own conclusions24 .
Discuss Anaphylaxis discovery 1902.
Based on the provided source, the discovery of anaphylaxis in 1902 by Dr. Charles Richet is presented as a pivotal and concerning finding with significant implications for understanding the effects of injecting substances into the body, particularly in the context of vaccination1 .
Dr. Charles Richet's Discovery: In 1902, Dr. Charles Richet demonstrated a phenomenon in dogs that was the opposite of immunization1 .... Instead of becoming protected after an initial low dose of a substance, the dogs exhibited a severe reaction upon receiving a new dose some weeks later2 . Richet named this phenomenon anaphylaxis, which he defined as a state where an organism is rendered hypersensitive instead of being protected3 . This groundbreaking work earned him the Nobel Prize for Medicine/Physiology in 19131 .
Richet's Experiments and Findings: Richet described three possible responses to a second injection of a toxin given after a 3-4 week interval:
No change in effect.
Reduced effect (similar to drug tolerance or what medical science calls immunization)3 ....
Greatly increased effect, which was Richet's discovery of anaphylaxis4 . He noted that in this case, the first injection, instead of protecting the organism, made it more fragile and more susceptible4 .
The Nobel Prize website highlighted that Richet's work showed that parenteral injection (such as vaccine inoculation) of protein substances profoundly and permanently modifies the chemical constitution of the body fluids5 .
Key findings from Richet's further research, as described in the source, include:
A subject that has had a previous injection is far more sensitive than a new subject6 .
The symptoms of the second injection in an anaphylactic reaction (swift and total depression of the nervous system) are different from the symptoms of the first injection6 .
A three to four week period of incubation must elapse before the anaphylactic state results6 .
Initially, Richet thought the injected substance had to be a toxin, but further research revealed that virtually any (seemingly harmless) protein could cause anaphylaxis7 .... This was further supported by the work of Rosenau and Anderson, who demonstrated anaphylaxis after every injection of serum, even in minute amounts, and cited examples from various organic liquids like milk, serum, egg, and muscle extract8 ....
The Permanent Nature of Anaphylactic Sensitization: Richet's research led him to the conclusion that once a subject has been anaphylactized and their chemical constitution modified, they can never return to their former state. Sensitivity to the triggering reaction could persist for years10 ....
Richet's Warning about Injected Proteins: In his Nobel Prize speech, Richet issued a significant warning, stating that the human body is constituted to only safely receive proteins into the blood that have been modified by digestive juices12 . He argued that every time alien protein enters the blood via injection, the organism suffers and develops resistance in the form of increased sensitivity, potentially leading to a fatal anaphylactic shock upon a second injection12 .... He viewed anaphylaxis as a universal defense mechanism against the penetration of foreign substances into the blood13 .
Implications and Suppression: The source emphasizes that Richet's discovery, made in 1902 and recognized with a Nobel Prize in 1913, established that injecting substances into the blood is potentially harmful and permanently alters the body's biochemistry14 .... The author of the source further contends that this crucial information about anaphylaxis and the dangers of injecting foreign proteins has been suppressed by the medical establishment and pharmaceutical industry despite its profound implications16 ....
Discuss Foreign protein injection.
Based on the provided source and our previous discussion, the injection of foreign proteins into the body is presented as a potentially harmful process with significant implications for the immune system1 . The source heavily emphasizes the 1902 discovery of anaphylaxis by Dr. Charles Richet, which earned him the Nobel Prize in 19132 . Anaphylaxis demonstrates that after an initial injection of even a low dose of a substance (a foreign protein), a subsequent dose weeks later can produce a severe, even fatal reaction, characterized by hypersensitivity rather than protection3 ....
According to the source, Richet's research showed that the parenteral injection (such as vaccine inoculation) of protein substances profoundly and permanently modifies the chemical constitution of the body fluids8 .... He found that:
A subject that has received a previous injection becomes far more sensitive to subsequent injections than a subject receiving the substance for the first time7 .
The symptoms resulting from the second injection are distinctly different from those of the first injection, often involving a swift and total depression of the nervous system7 .
This heightened sensitivity, or anaphylaxis, can be triggered by virtually any protein, not just substances that are inherently toxic10 .... Richet's work demonstrated this with various organic liquids like milk, serum, egg, and muscle extract12 .
Once an individual is anaphylactically sensitized, this condition appears to be permanent, with sensitivity potentially lasting for years9 . Return to a former state is not possible9 .
The author of the source highlights Richet's conclusion that the human body is designed to receive proteins only after they have been modified by digestive juices14 . He argues that when alien proteins are introduced directly into the bloodstream via injection, the organism suffers and develops resistance in the form of increased sensitivity, leading to the risk of anaphylactic shock upon subsequent exposure14 .... This is described as a universal defense mechanism against the entry of foreign substances into the blood15 .
Furthermore, the source suggests that even less severe immune reactions to injected foreign proteins can lead to an inflammatory response in various organs, which is equated with autoimmune disease13 . These diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and others listed, are stated to be incurable by medical treatment, only alleviated, and their frequency and intensity are believed by the author to have increased since the introduction of childhood vaccine programs16 .
The source also raises the alarming possibility that vaccines could be used as stealth bioweapons by employing a two-phase mechanism where an initial harmless protein injection creates an anaphylactic trigger that can be activated years later by a second injection of the same protein17 ....
In conclusion, the injection of foreign proteins, as discussed in this source, is portrayed as a fundamentally risky practice due to the body's potential for developing anaphylaxis and other adverse immune responses, including what are classified as autoimmune diseases. The author emphasizes the lasting and potentially sensitizing effects of such injections, drawing heavily on the early 20th-century findings of Dr. Charles Richet1 .... The source also claims that the significance of these findings has been deliberately suppressed by the medical and pharmaceutical industries21 ....
Discuss Autoimmune disease link.
Based on the provided source and our conversation history, Jeremy James strongly argues for a link between vaccines and autoimmune diseases1 ....
The source posits that since Dr. Charles Richet's discovery of anaphylaxis in 1902, it has been known that injecting foreign proteins can profoundly and permanently modify the body's biochemistry3 .... Richet's work demonstrated that the body can become hypersensitive to subsequent injections, with the second reaction often being more severe and different in nature than the first6 ....
According to the source, lesser immune reactions resulting from the intravenous introduction of foreign proteins (as occurs with vaccines) will produce an inflammatory response in one or more organs of the body, leading to what is called today an autoimmune disease2 . The author claims that these autoimmune diseases cannot be cured by medical treatment, only alleviated2 .
The source provides a list of common autoimmune diseases that the author believes have increased in frequency and intensity since the introduction of the childhood vaccine program10 . This list includes:
Multiple sclerosis
Diabetes
Rheumatoid arthritis
Irritable bowel syndrome
Asthma
Lupus
Thyroiditis
Psoriasis
Myasthenia gravis
Guillain-Barré
Vasculitis
Furthermore, the source mentions that there are known to be more than 100 different autoimmune diseases, and the 'official list' may not include down-stream pathologies10 . The author also notes the increasing rates of developmental disorders and suggests that few doctors are prepared to admit that vaccines are a plausible cause of autism spectrum disorders11 .
The central argument is that the injection of foreign proteins in vaccines bypasses the digestive system, which is the body's natural mechanism for neutralizing potential immune responses12 .... This, according to the source, leads to a state of heightened sensitivity and can trigger the body's immune system to attack its own tissues, resulting in autoimmune conditions2 ....
In conclusion, the source asserts that the understanding of anaphylaxis since 1902, particularly the permanent alteration of body chemistry and the potential for any foreign protein to trigger severe immune reactions, provides a scientific basis for the claim that vaccines can promote lifelong autoimmune diseases1 .... The author believes this crucial information has been suppressed by the medical and pharmaceutical industries15 .
Discuss Illuminati plan 2025.
Based on the provided source, there is a significant discussion about an "Illuminati Plan" with a specific focus on the year 20251 .... This plan is portrayed as a nefarious scheme orchestrated by Satan and carried out by his "earthly servants," referred to as the "Children of Wickedness"1 .... The ultimate goal of this plan is the installation of the Antichrist5 .
Here are the key aspects of the "Illuminati Plan 2025" as described in the source:
•
Blueprint: The books of Alice Bailey are presented as a "blueprint" of this Illuminati Plan. Bailey is described as a "mouthpiece that Satan selected" to coordinate the work of his followers leading up to his "great End Time revolution"1 . Her book, "The Externalisation of the Hierarchy," published in 1957, is specifically referenced2 .
•
Timeline to 2025: The source provides quotations from the 1976 paperback edition of "The Externalisation of the Hierarchy," which contain messages channeled by Bailey. These passages indicate that 2025 A.D. was the year envisaged for the commencement of the final phase of this plan at the time the messages were received2 ....
•
"The Stage of the Forerunner": The period leading up to 2025 is technically called "The Stage of the Forerunner"7 . This is described as a preparatory period characterized by testing and intended to be revelatory in its techniques and results. During this time, various individuals associated with the "Hierarchy" (Chohans, Masters, initiates, world disciples, disciples, and aspirants) are undergoing a cycle of great activity7 .
•
Great General Assembly in 2025: The source mentions that the "great General Assembly of the Hierarchy" is held every century, and in 2025, the date will "in all probability be set for the first stage of the externalisation of the Hierarchy"3 .
•
Strategic Objectives: The author of the source compares the Illuminati Plan to a standard business plan with "strategic objectives, the allocation of resources, performance measures, and target dates for delivery"8 . The involvement of numerous players working with the "Hierarchy" during the Stage of the Forerunner necessitates a way to coordinate their activities while remaining undetected5 .
•
Genocidal Intent: The Illuminati Plan is predicated on genocide9 . The author suggests that the "Enemy" is obliged to make his intentions explicit to his disciples, and the fact that a date (2025) was given for the commencement of the final phase should be taken seriously, especially given the perceived advancement of worldwide preparations2 . The author also connects this plan to the biblical idea that God limited the days of the "Children of Wickedness" to prevent the destruction of all life, implying a genocidal campaign is underway4 ....
•
Coordination and Concealment: The "Hierarchy" needed a way to coordinate their activities while remaining undetected by the world at large5 . The author suggests that the plan's disclosure in books was safe because most of mankind is too lazy or indifferent to take the clues seriously9 .
•
Goal: Installation of the Antichrist: The overall goal of the "Enemy" through this plan is the installation of the Antichrist, driven by the vision of the entire earth being subject to the visible will of Satan5 .
The author urges readers to review their earlier paper #39 for a more comprehensive understanding of what the "Enemy" is doing, how he operates, and his ultimate aims5 . The 2025 timeline is presented as a critical point for the advancement of this long-term plan.
Glossary of Key Terms
Anaphylaxis: A severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that can occur rapidly after exposure to an allergen. In the context of Richet's work, it refers to a heightened sensitivity and adverse reaction to a second injection of a substance after an initial sensitizing dose.
Autoimmune Disease: A condition in which the body's immune system mistakenly attacks its own tissues and organs, leading to inflammation and damage. The text suggests vaccines as a potential trigger for these diseases.
Cabal: A small group of secret plotters, often with malicious intent. The author uses this term to refer to a hidden group they believe is orchestrating global events, including the promotion of vaccines for harmful purposes.
Illuminati Plan: According to the author, a long-term strategy attributed to Satan and his earthly servants (the "Illuminati") aimed at establishing the Antichrist's rule. The text interprets writings by Alice Bailey as a blueprint for this plan.
Vector (for Mass Infection): In this context, the author argues that vaccines are a perfect vehicle or means by which harmful substances, such as debilitating or sterilizing drugs, could be introduced to a large population.
Parenteral Injection: The administration of a substance into the body by a route other than through the digestive tract, typically by injection. Richet's research focused on the effects of such injections.
Antigen: A substance that elicits an immune response in the body. Vaccines typically contain weakened or inactivated forms of pathogens (like viruses or bacteria) to act as antigens.
Adjuvant: A substance added to a vaccine to enhance the body's immune response to the antigen. Aluminum salts are a common example mentioned in the text.
Toxin: A poisonous substance produced by a living organism. Richet's initial experiments involved toxins, but he later discovered anaphylaxis could be triggered by non-toxic proteins as well.
Heterogenous Substances: Substances that are foreign or different from the body's own constituents. In the context of injection, the author emphasizes the body's reaction to the introduction of such substances into the bloodstream.
Vaccines: Products injected into individuals, which the author argues are of dubious value and potentially harmful1 . They are described as a "perfect vector for mass infection"2 ....
•
Autoimmune Disease: Diseases resulting from the body's immune response, which the author believes have increased in frequency and intensity since the introduction of the childhood vaccine program4 .... Examples listed include multiple sclerosis, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis5 .
•
Vector (for Mass Infection): In this context, vaccines are referred to as a "perfect vector for mass infection," implying they are a means by which harmful substances, potentially including debilitating or sterilizing drugs, could be introduced to a large population2 ....
•
Mandatory Vaccinations: The author notes a determination by government and the pharmaceutical industry to make vaccinations compulsory, citing examples like "No vaccine, no school" policies6 .
•
Pharmaceutical Industry: The industry involved in producing vaccines, which the author views with suspicion, suggesting they prioritize profits over well-being and actively suppress information about vaccine dangers6 ....
•
GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms): Listed alongside pesticides as a means by which the author believes children's food is being poisoned6 .
•
Cabal: A term used to describe a group, possibly involved in a "Covid hoax" and subsequent events, that intends to inflict serious harm on humanity using vaccine-delivered toxins3 .
•
Toxins: Harmful substances that the author suggests are being, or could be, delivered through vaccines to inflict serious harm3 .
•
Social Conditioning: The intense process by which the public is convinced that vaccines are safe and effective, despite alleged rumors to the contrary9 . Advertising, especially fear-based advertising, is presented as a tool for this conditioning7 .
•
Anaphylaxis: A phenomenon discovered by Dr. Charles Richet in 1902, where an organism becomes hypersensitive instead of protected after an initial low dose of a substance, leading to a severe reaction upon a second dose10 .... It is described as a universal defense mechanism against the penetration of heterogenous substances into the blood12 .
•
Hypersensitive: The state of an organism rendered excessively sensitive to a substance after an initial exposure, as seen in anaphylaxis11 .
•
Parenteral Injection: Injection that bypasses the digestive system, such as vaccine inoculation, which Dr. Richet showed profoundly and permanently modifies the chemical constitution of body fluids13 .
•
Protein Substance: The type of substance that Dr. Richet found could cause anaphylaxis when introduced via parenteral injection, even seemingly harmless proteins13 ....
•
Immune Response: The body's defense reaction, which in the context of injected foreign proteins (like those in vaccines), can lead to a "heightened sensitivity" or anaphylaxis upon subsequent exposure10 .... The author suggests lesser immune reactions can cause autoimmune diseases4 .
•
Autoimmune: Relating to a condition where the body's immune system attacks its own tissues, which the author links to the intravenous introduction of foreign proteins through vaccines4 .
•
Developmental Disabilities: A group of conditions involving impairment in physical, learning, language, or behavior areas, which the CDC noted affects about one in six children in the US19 .... The author suggests vaccines are a plausible cause for their increasing incidence19 .
•
Stealth Bioweapon: A potential use of vaccines where untraceable diseases are produced by testing and varying the trigger protein over time21 .
•
Binary Weapon: A two-phase weapon, which the author suggests vaccines could be, where an initial harmless substance sets up an anaphylactic trigger that can be activated later by a second dose of the same substance21 .
•
Adjuvants: Vaccine ingredients, such as aluminum salts, listed as common components22 .... The author does not explicitly define their role but includes them in the list of substances being injected.
•
Illuminati Plan: A plan attributed to Satan and his earthly servants (the Children of Wickedness) for the installation of the Antichrist, with details allegedly found in the books of Alice Bailey24 .... The author believes the vaccine program is part of this plan3 .