9-6-25 DailyBriefs.info archive  GoogleExplainer.com 

Briefing Document: Global Issues and Domestic Concerns

Date: September 6, 2025

Sources:

• Excerpts from "A Shocking New Weapon Emerges In The Ukraine War & Europe's Addiction To Russian Oil" (PDB)

• Excerpts from "Heart inflammation caused by covid “vaccines” is a potential time bomb - The Expose" (The Expose - Myocarditis)

• Excerpts from "Large Italian study finds mRNA injections have significantly increased the number of cancer cases - The Expose" (The Expose - Cancer)

• Excerpts from "Only When We Know What Propaganda Is, And How It Works, Will We Be Free to Live Our Lives and Rule Ourselves - LewRockwell" (LewRockwell - Propaganda)

• Excerpts from "RFK Will Kill You, Say Losers - LewRockwell" (LewRockwell - RFK)

• Excerpts from "The Zionist Experiment Is Over - LewRockwell" (LewRockwell - Zionist Experiment)

• Excerpts from "Top Secret SEAL Team 6 Mission in North Korea Ends in Chaos & Israel Thwarts An Assassination" (PDB - SEAL Team 6)

• Excerpts from "Trump Rages At Putin, Xi, And Kim & Free Speech Fight In The UK" (PDB - Trump Rages)

• Excerpts from "Trump’s Drug-War Murders in the Caribbean - LewRockwell" (LewRockwell - Drug War Murders)

• Excerpts from "We Are Living Through "the Jeffrey Epstein Genocide", by Kevin Barrett - The Unz Review" (Unz Review - Epstein Genocide)

• Excerpts from "Why Do Vaccines Cause the Illnesses They Prevent - LewRockwell" (LewRockwell - Vaccine Illnesses)

• Excerpts from "I Support India Now. I’m All-In. I’ve Started Shitting in the Street to Show Solidarity., by Andrew Anglin - The Unz Review" (Unz Review - India)

I. Global Geopolitical Shifts and US Foreign Policy

A. Emerging Authoritarian Alliance and US Response:

• Key Fact: China, Russia, and North Korea are demonstrating increasing unity and a clear challenge to the US and Western allies. This was prominently displayed at China's Victory Day parade.

• Quote: President Trump sarcastically commented, "May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un as you conspire against the United States of America." (PDB - Trump Rages)

• China's Assertiveness: China is showcasing advanced weaponry, including "hypersonic anti-ship missiles capable of sinking US aircraft carriers in the Pacific." (PDB - Trump Rages)

• Trump's Diplomatic Stance: Despite his strong rhetoric, Trump has maintained "continued appeals for diplomacy alongside some vague threats" regarding China (due to trade negotiations) and North Korea (desire to meet Kim Jong-un). (PDB - Trump Rages)

• US "Bulwark" Strategy in Asia: The US historically relied on India as a "bulwark against China" through decades of cooperation. (Unz Review - India)

• Shift in US-India Relations: Trump's recent imposition of a "50% tariff" on India for purchasing Russian oil has significantly strained this relationship. India views this as an attack on its sovereignty and is moving closer to China and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

• Quote: "Even if the tariffs are lifted tomorrow, the damage done to the US-India relationship will be permanent." (Unz Review - India)

• Quote: "Based on 100% of the news I’ve seen, India is now completely united against America. Severely. These people are really, really mad." (Unz Review - India)

B. Europe's Dependence on Russian Energy:

• Ongoing Issue: Europe's "continued addiction to Russian energy is undermining Ukraine's efforts to fend off Moscow's aggression." (PDB)

• Financial Discrepancy: A Helsinki-based think tank reported that the "EU is actually spending more money annually on purchasing Russian fossil fuels than on financial aid to Ukraine," specifically 21.9 billion euros on Russian energy versus 18.7 billion euros for Ukraine in 2024. (PDB)

• Sanctions Loophole: Despite efforts to reduce reliance, a "gaping loophole in the sanctions still allows countries to legally buy Moscow's crude provided that it's first refined into fuels elsewhere." (PDB)

C. Israel and Regional Instability:

• Hamas Assassination Plot: Israeli intelligence (Shin Bet) thwarted a Hamas plot to assassinate National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir using explosive drones. The plot was reportedly funded by Hamas officials in Turkey. (PDB - SEAL Team 6)

• Turkish Support for Hamas: Turkey grants "safe haven" and "citizenship" to senior Hamas operatives and maintains "open diplomatic ties" with the group. (PDB - SEAL Team 6)

• Yemen's Houthi Strikes: Yemen's Houthis launched a "devastating missile attack" against Tel Aviv, demonstrating "reach, precision and the growing boldness of non-state actors in the modern battlefield." (LewRockwell - Zionist Experiment)

• "Zionist Experiment Is Over": The source argues that Israel's "collapse is certain—and probably imminent" due to its actions in Gaza and growing international condemnation.

• Quote: "In truth, from its very inception in 1948, the State of Israel has proven itself to be a devilish, murderous, barbaric people—a plague of racism, hatred, ethnic cleansing, war and genocide upon the world." (LewRockwell - Zionist Experiment)

• US Support for Israel: The United States is the "only major government in the world that remains unconditionally supportive of Israel," despite growing domestic opposition. (LewRockwell - Zionist Experiment)

D. North Korean Cyber Threats:

• Cryptocurrency Theft: North Korean hackers are intensifying campaigns to "steal billions in cryptocurrency to fund their sanctioned weapons programs" using "fake job offers." (PDB)

• "Contagious Interview" Scam: This tactic involves recruiters on platforms like LinkedIn or Telegram directing applicants to download malware for "skills tests" or "video interviews," leading to drained digital wallets and exposed corporate systems. (PDB)

• Scale of Theft: Blockchain intelligence firm Chain Analysis estimates North Korea stole at least "$1.3 billion in cryptocurrency last year alone," with a single heist of "$1.5 billion dollars from the buy bit exchange." (PDB)

• Funding Weapons Programs: Stolen digital assets are laundered and converted into "hard currency providing Pyongyang with one of the most reliable lifelines for hard cash money that's then funneled into Kim's sanctioned nuclear weapons programs." (PDB)

II. Domestic US Issues and Controversies

A. Federal Intervention in Crime:

• Trump's Crackdown Strategy: President Trump is "pumping the brakes on his plans to deploy federal troops to Chicago" and instead considering "New Orleans as the potential next target of his crackdown on crime." (PDB)

• DC as a "Template": Trump boasts that a federal takeover in Washington D.C. resulted in "crime is down 11% across the board with nearly 1,700 arrests and more than 160 illegal guns taken off the streets." (PDB)

• Political Divide: Republican governors, like Louisiana's Jeff Landry, welcome federal assistance, while Democratic governors, like Illinois's JB Pritzker, reject it, viewing it as a political challenge to Trump. (PDB)

B. Jeffrey Epstein Scandal and Allegations of Blackmail:

• Trump's Involvement: President Trump's name is reportedly "in the Epstein files," and his administration is accused of trying to redact his name and exonerate Ghislaine Maxwell. (Unz Review - Epstein Genocide)

• "Jeffrey Epstein Genocide": The source alleges that the US executive branch's refusal to stop the "genocide of Gaza" is due to Trump being blackmailed over "viciously raped teenage virgins in front of Israeli spy cameras." (Unz Review - Epstein Genocide)

• Israel's Role: The scandal is presented as evidence that "Israel controls American leaders through blackmail and other unsavory methods." (Unz Review - Epstein Genocide)

• "Drug-War Murders in the Caribbean": Trump is accused of ordering the "intentional military killings of eleven people in international waters near Venezuela" under the guise of drug enforcement, potentially as a "diversion from his own guilt in the Epstein saga." (LewRockwell - Drug War Murders, Unz Review - Epstein Genocide)

C. COVID-19 Vaccine Concerns:

• Heart Inflammation (Myocarditis/Pericarditis): The FDA has "ordered Pfizer and Moderna to expand the warning labels on their covid-19 vaccines to include a heightened risk of heart inflammation, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis, in males aged 16 to 25." (The Expose - Myocarditis)

• "Ticking Time Bomb": Myocarditis is described as a "potential 'ticking time bomb' because of its often-symptomless nature." (The Expose - Myocarditis)

• Delayed Warnings: Critics allege that the "deadly risk was known to the FDA and the CDC from the very outset," citing a confidential Pfizer study from late 2020/early 2021 that reported numerous adverse events and deaths. (The Expose - Myocarditis)

• Increased Cancer Incidence: A large Italian cohort study found a "36% increased incidence of hospitalisation for all cancers among those who received at least one covid vaccination compared to the unvaccinated." (The Expose - Cancer)

• Specific Increases: Statistically significant increases were found for "bowel cancer (54% higher), breast cancer (54% higher) and bladder cancer (105% higher)." (The Expose - Cancer)

• Vaccine-Induced Immune Suppression: Some sources suggest that vaccines, including COVID-19, may cause "vaccine-induced immune suppression," potentially through mechanisms like "Original Antigenic Sin (OAS)." (LewRockwell - Vaccine Illnesses)

• Quote: "If someone is vaccinated for a different strain than what is currently circulating... they tend to have a worse immune response than those who were never vaccinated." (LewRockwell - Vaccine Illnesses)

D. Propaganda and Free Speech Concerns:

• Global Propaganda: Propaganda is described as a "global" and "mind-numbing strategy of serial bombardment — one cataclysmic fuss after another." (LewRockwell - Propaganda)

• "Bio-fascist Fear Machine": The media, both corporate and "alternative," is alleged to have become a "bio-fascist fear machine" driven by corporate cartels, intelligence agencies, and funding from entities like the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation. (LewRockwell - Propaganda)

• Censorship of Dissent: Individuals who contradict official narratives, particularly on COVID-19 and the Ukraine war, face "blacked out on 'social media,' kept off the air by 'our free press,' and/or variously cancelled." (LewRockwell - Propaganda)

• UK Free Speech Fight: Comedian Graham Linehan was "arrested under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting violence" for social media posts criticizing trans activists, sparking outrage and questions about free speech in the UK. (PDB - Trump Rages)

• Quote: Nigel Farage asked rhetorically, "At what point did we become North Korea?" (PDB - Trump Rages)

• Critique of CDC and Public Health: Former CDC directors are criticized for their "Chernobyl-level catastrophe" performance during the pandemic and for being "tone-deaf oafs" who point fingers at critics like RFK Jr. (LewRockwell - RFK)

III. Other Notable Information

• Ukraine War Weaponization of Children: Both sides in the Ukraine war are reportedly "recruiting, manipulating, and using [children] as tools of sabotage" through online platforms, with some facing severe penalties including prison or psychiatric facilities. (PDB)

• Quote: "Kids as young as 12 years older suddenly carrying out sabotage missions in a war that they barely understand." (PDB)

• Putin and Xi Discuss Immortality: A hot mic captured a "bizarre and rather disturbing exchange" between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin discussing "anti-aging technology and the possibility of achieving immortality," with predictions of humans living to 150 years old. (PDB - Trump Rages)

convert_to_textConvert to source

welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series.

Today, we're going to delve into a series of pressing global issues and domestic concerns, drawing insights from recent reports and analyses. We'll cover everything from new forms of warfare to geopolitical shifts and critical discussions on public health and political accountability.

First, let's turn our attention to the war in Ukraine, where a profoundly disturbing new weapon has emerged. According to reports, children are being harnessed by both sides as tools of sabotage. This isn't the traditional image of child soldiers; it's a "modern twist" involving children recruited online, blackmailed, and pushed into missions. These young individuals are described as vulnerable, easy to manipulate, and considered expendable by cynical intelligence officers. Their tasks can range from seemingly harmless acts like snapping photos of police cars or spraying graffiti to much more dangerous assignments such as tossing Molotov cocktails, planting bombs near police stations, or setting fires at railway yards. Shockingly, children as young as 12 years old are carrying out these sabotage missions in a war they barely comprehend. Recruitment messages often appear on platforms like Telegram, WhatsApp, or even within video game chats, promising quick money for simple tasks. For instance, a Russian boy was reportedly told he would help a factory collect insurance if he set fire to an airplane, and another advertisement even framed it as a "Pokemon Go for money". Handlers on the other end of these communications are identified as Russian or Ukrainian intelligence officers, and what begins as a small act quickly escalates. Reporting documents dozens of these cases, including a 17-year-old Russian boy who was offered the equivalent of $12,000 to torch a warplane and later received an 8-year sentence in a penal colony after faking a video of burning grass. A Ukrainian teenager, believing he was involved in an insurance scam, set fire to railway equipment and was subsequently beaten in custody until he confessed to working for the enemy. In both instances, their lives were essentially destroyed before adulthood. Ukraine's security service reports detaining approximately 175 minors implicated in sabotage operations organized by Russian agents, while human rights activists estimate at least 100 similar cases on the Russian side involving Ukrainian recruiters. Some of these children end up in psychiatric facilities, others face years in prison, and in "at least a few instances," Russian operatives reportedly tried to kill recruited children by remotely detonating explosives while the children carried them. This grim development is attributed to both sides searching for cheap, deniable ways to strike inside enemy territory in a war that has lasted over three years, as missiles and drones are expensive, but children are not. This practice is characterized as "hybrid warfare at its ugliest".

Moving on, we'll examine Europe's ongoing dependence on Russian oil and the pressure from President Trump to curb it. President Trump is advocating for Europe to cease buying Moscow's oil as a strategy to financially pressure the Kremlin. He is specifically demanding that European allies join the United States in imposing tariffs on nations that continue to purchase Russian oil. Financial analysts have consistently highlighted that Europe's continued "addiction" to Russian energy undermines Ukraine's efforts to defend against Moscow's aggression and helps prevent Putin from facing financial ruin. A White House official relayed that Trump emphasized Europe must stop purchasing Russian oil, which is funding the war, and also apply economic pressure on China for its role in funding Russia's war efforts. Since the February 2022 invasion, European countries, in collaboration with the US, have worked to reduce their reliance on Russian fossil fuels by imposing sanctions to stop direct oil imports. However, progress has been slow, with a "gaping loophole" in the sanctions allowing countries to legally buy Russian crude if it is first refined elsewhere. A report from a Helsinki-based think tank revealed that the EU annually spends more money on purchasing Russian fossil fuels (approximately 21.9 billion euros in 2024) than on financial aid to Ukraine (roughly 18.7 billion euros). Much of these Russian fuel products reach Europe through trade with countries like Turkey, India, and China, which have maintained open economic relations with Moscow despite the conflict. For example, G7 countries purchased around 18 billion euros worth of oil products from refineries in India and Turkey in the third year of the war, with at least 9 billion euros of that oil refined from Russian crude, generating an estimated 4 billion euros in tax revenue for the Kremlin. Oil and natural gas exports constitute roughly a quarter of Russia's entire federal budget. During a call with European leaders, Trump reportedly questioned their sincerity as they continue to fuel Russia's economy and war, asserting that it is "not his war" and Europeans must "step up". A senior aide to Ukrainian President Zelensky expressed belief that European allies would join the US if Trump moves to implement additional sanctions against Russia and its energy buyers. While Trump has previously held back on secondary tariffs against China due to trade negotiations and against Russia for diplomatic reasons, Putin's continued attacks on Kyiv have diminished hopes for a quick peace deal. The Trump administration recently imposed an additional 25% tariff on India's exports due to their ongoing purchases of Russian oil, raising India's total tariff rate to 50%. India has become Moscow's second-largest oil customer, following China. If Europe can collectively manage to curb its decades-old dependence on Russian energy, the economic impact on Russia could be significant, especially given that Russian exports of crude and refined products have already fallen to their lowest seasonal levels in five years, raising serious doubts about Russia's long-term production capacity should the war persist.

Our next topic sheds light on a failed top-secret US Navy SEAL mission into North Korea and a thwarted assassination plot in Israel. A new report from the New York Times has disclosed the details of a top-secret Navy SEAL Team 6 mission in 2019 that ended in chaos and resulted in the deaths of three unarmed North Koreans. The mission, authorized by President Trump during his first term, aimed to plant an electronic device to intercept the communications of Kim Jong-un as Trump was engaged in nuclear talks with the North Korean dictator. Members of SEAL Team 6's Red Squadron, the same team responsible for killing Osama bin Laden, were chosen for this complex mission, which involved placing commandos directly on North Korean soil. The stakes were exceptionally high, as detection or capture could have derailed diplomatic engagement, triggered a hostage crisis, or even led to retaliation by the nuclear-armed nation, which possesses an arsenal of 50 nuclear weapons and missiles capable of reaching America's West Coast. US Joint Special Operations Command reportedly saw a rare opportunity to address a strategic blind spot in US intelligence gathering capabilities regarding North Korea. The intelligence community had developed a new electronic device that could intercept communications of North Korea's top leaders, but it required manual placement. The operation involved a nuclear-powered submarine transporting the SEAL team into North Korean waters, from which two mini-subs carried the seals to the shoreline. Eight seals swam ashore to install the device, but the mission "went sideways" when a North Korean boat emerged nearby and began searching the area. Believing they had been spotted, the SEAL team reportedly opened fire on the vessel, killing all aboard, and aborted the mission. Evidence later showed that the North Korean boat was a fishing vessel carrying two or three unarmed civilians. This operation was never publicly acknowledged by either the US or North Korea, and the details remained highly classified. US satellites did detect large-scale movements of North Korean troops in the immediate aftermath. The New York Times' disclosure, based on interviews with two dozen anonymous sources, is believed to provide the Kim regime with invaluable insights into US covert operations. The report suggests that politics likely played a role in the newspaper's decision to reveal information that could have severe ramifications for US national security and foreign policy.

In other international news, Israeli intelligence services recently thwarted a plot by Hamas to assassinate National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir with explosive drones. The Shin Bet, Israel's security agency, announced the arrest of three members of a Hamas-linked cell operating out of Hebron in the southern West Bank. Shin Bet officials described this as "one of the most serious attempts against a senior Israeli minister in recent years". The cell reportedly received financial support from Hamas officials based in Turkey, which funded the procurement of two drones equipped with explosives and a laptop used to track Ben-Gvir's movements on social media. They planned to strike during the upcoming Jewish holiday season when Ben-Gvir was expected to visit the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron. The plan was abandoned after technical difficulties with the drones. The group then considered using firearms for shooting attacks at Israeli government institutions but feared exposure by surveillance cameras. One suspect, who moved to Turkey three years prior and established ties with Hamas operatives, conceived the assassination idea, taking inspiration from the war in Gaza. Senior Hamas operatives were granted safe haven in Turkey following a 2011 prisoner exchange with Israel, and some have even been granted Turkish citizenship, raising questions about the extent of latitude Turkey grants Hamas leadership. Turkey maintains open diplomatic ties with Hamas and permits clandestine operations in Istanbul, including cyber and intelligence units. Turkish President Erdogan has publicly supported Palestinians and Hamas since the war in Gaza began, cutting all ties with Israel and meeting with senior Hamas figures. Shin Bet emphasizes that Hamas's overseas command, particularly its leadership residing in Turkey, remains a key driver of terror plots against the Jewish state.

Next, we look at President Trump's strong reactions to the recent display of unity by authoritarian leaders and a bizarre conversation on immortality. President Trump has vehemently accused Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Kim Jong-un of "conspiring against America" following their show of unity at Xi Jinping's massive Victory Day parade in Beijing. This parade, commemorating the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II, was seen by many as a clear message to the West that a bloc of authoritarian powers is prepared to defy the US and its allies on the battlefield and the international stage. Trump sarcastically extended his "warmest regards" to Putin and Kim as they "conspire against the United States of America". Western leaders were noticeably absent from the celebration. Trump highlighted the "massive amount of support and blood" the US provided to China during World War II, noting that "Many Americans died in China's quest for victory and glory". Xi, flanked by Putin and Kim, delivered an address commemorating victims of Japan's occupation and called for eradicating global conflict, which was noted for its irony given Putin's role in the Ukraine war and China's actions in Taiwan and the South China Sea. The parade showcased a wide array of munitions, military hardware, and "next-generation weapons" like China's hypersonic anti-ship missiles, capable of sinking US aircraft carriers. Trump's immediate response has involved continued appeals for diplomacy alongside "vague threats". He expressed "disappointment" in President Putin following their Alaska summit, which ended without a major breakthrough on ending the war in Ukraine. Trump suggested he might impose fresh sanctions on Russia if a peace deal is not reached soon, though details remain unclear. He defended his past "threats" by pointing to the recent secondary sanctions imposed on India for purchasing Russian oil, stating, "You call that no action and I haven't done phase two and phase three yet". Trump is scheduled to speak with Ukrainian President Zelensky later today.

During the same parade, a bizarre and disturbing exchange between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin was captured on a hot mic, revealing their discussion about organ transplants and human immortality. On a live stream of Chinese state media, Putin's translator was heard saying, "Biotechnology is continuously developing human organs can be continuously transplanted the longer you live the younger you become". Putin reportedly added, "You can even achieve immortality". Xi's translator responded that "Some predict that in this century humans may live to 150 years old earlier people rarely live to 70 but these days at 70 years you are still a child". Both Putin and Xi are 72 years old. The audio of this exchange was only available on the live stream for less than a minute before it dropped out.

In domestic UK news, a free speech fight has erupted after comedian Graham Linehan was arrested over social media posts criticizing trans activists. Linehan, the Irish writer and co-creator of the popular British comedy "Father Ted," was detained at London's Heathrow airport under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting violence. His arrest stemmed from several posts, one of which stated, "If a trans-identified male is in a female only space he is committing a violent abusive act make a scene call the cops and if all else fails punch him in the balls". Linehan insisted his comment was a serious point made with humor, not an incitement to violence. He was released on bail but was issued a "legal gag order" preventing him from using X, with his next police interview scheduled for October. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley defended his officers but publicly "begged lawmakers to step in," arguing that current legislation compels police to treat perceived threats against protected groups as prosecutable offenses. The arrest immediately triggered political fallout, with conservative leader Keir Starmer blasting it as "politics not policing". Other public figures, including Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling, slammed the arrest as "totalitarianism" and "utterly deplorable". The Free Speech Union pledged to bankroll Linehan's legal defense, drawing attention to police priorities by noting that only one in five UK shoplifting cases are solved and three-quarters of burglary cases are abandoned, yet five armed officers were dispatched for a joke. Linehan himself framed the incident as evidence of a "deeper woke rot" in Britain, asserting that the UK has become "a country hostile to freedom of speech hostile to women and far too accommodating to the demands of violent entitled abusive men who have turned the police into their personal goon squad". For many, Linehan's arrest has become a symbol of Britain's "warped priorities," where "tweets treated like terrorism" and "punchlines like public safety threats".

Shifting our focus to public health, we have critical information regarding COVID-19 vaccine risks and the suppression of related information. In May 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandated that Pfizer and Moderna expand the warning labels on their COVID-19 vaccines to include a heightened risk of heart inflammation, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis, in males aged 16 to 25. The risk of myocarditis is described as a "potential 'ticking time bomb'" due to its frequently symptomless nature. Myocarditis, an immune-driven inflammation of the heart muscle, can impair the heart's ability to pump blood and lead to blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrest, and sudden death. This "deadly risk" was allegedly known to the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) from the very beginning, but they "failed to act," fully endorsing and internationally imposing the mRNA vaccine. A confidential Pfizer study, conducted from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 and later made public, reportedly confirmed the "deadly nature" of the mRNA injection, detailing over 1,200 reported deaths and tens of thousands of adverse events, including more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders. This report was available to the FDA in early March 2021. Michel Chossudovsky claims the FDA was "complicit" and that Pfizer's worldwide marketing and distribution of the vaccine after February 2021 amounted to an "act of murder" given their awareness of mortality risks from their own study. The FDA's recent action followed a 2024 FDA-funded study published in The Lancet, which showed surging myocarditis cases after the second vaccine dose in young males and persistence of abnormal heart scan findings months post-vaccination. New product labels for Comirnaty (Pfizer) and Spikevax (Moderna) in the US now include approximate incidence rates for myocarditis and/or pericarditis after vaccination, specifically noting about 8 cases per million doses in individuals 6 months to 64 years and approximately 27 cases per million doses in males 12 to 24 years of age, and also stating that the long-term clinical and prognostic significance of persistent abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) findings is unknown. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) product information, last updated in August 2025, also acknowledges an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, primarily occurring within 14 days after vaccination, more often after the second dose, and more frequently in younger males, with some cases requiring intensive care support and fatal cases observed. However, the EMA's reported excess risk figures (e.g., about 0.265 to 0.56 extra cases per 10,000 in younger males) appear to "downplay" the "up to 1 in 10,000 people" risk mentioned elsewhere on its Comirnaty page, leading some to conclude that the EMA's product information is "at best, spin and, at worst, part of the propaganda machine". The article further states that censorship prevented corporate media from informing the public, and scientists and medical doctors who revealed the truth were targeted. It also points out that Pfizer has a criminal record with the US Department of Justice from 2009 for healthcare fraud.

Further concerning revelations involve mRNA vaccines and a significant increase in cancer cases. A substantial cohort study conducted in Italy, published in the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, identified a 36% increased incidence of hospitalization for all cancers among individuals who had received at least one COVID-19 vaccination compared to the unvaccinated population. This study tracked cancer hospitalization records for 296,015 individuals (aged 11 and above) in Italy's Pescara province from June 2021 to December 2023, comparing the 83% vaccinated population with the 17% unvaccinated. When examining individual cancer types, the study found statistically significant increased incidences of hospitalization among the vaccinated for: bowel cancer (54% higher), breast cancer (54% higher), and bladder cancer (105% higher). Other cancer types also showed increased incidence, including uterine (+93%), ovarian (+105%), thyroid (+30%), and hematological (blood) cancers (+50%), though these were not statistically significant due to smaller case numbers. No increase was observed in lung and prostate cancers. The study's authors emphasize the need for more work to fully evaluate the extent of cancer risks, especially since some cancers develop over longer periods than the 30-month study duration, implying that the longer-term incidence could be even higher. The study excluded cancers not resulting in hospitalization and cases of cancer recurrence, a phenomenon that senior oncologists in the UK have already flagged as a risk of COVID vaccination observed in their practices. Interestingly, the Italian study found that individuals who had a COVID-19 infection before vaccination showed a lower increase in cancer hospitalization rates, potentially suggesting a protective effect from prior infection against adverse outcomes of subsequent vaccination on the immune system. There are "sound scientific reasons" to suspect that mRNA vaccination can lead to long-term genetic instability, which is known to be associated with cancer incidence. Despite these findings, New Zealand Health authorities are reportedly "still maintaining the fiction that covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective," and data for 2023 cancer outcomes is not expected until the end of the year, with no attempt made to compare cancer outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. This stance is described as "gaslighting the public". New Zealand has experienced over 7000 excess deaths during the pandemic years, including an additional 950 excess deaths in the 12 months leading up to June 2025. The article questions whether the New Zealand Medical Council, which pretends to "zero risk" from COVID-19 vaccination, is similar to those who have lied and covered their tracks in past miscarriages of justice. Parliament in New Zealand is proposing a Gene Technology Bill to deregulate biotechnology, which "pretends, against all evidence, that forms of gene editing are inherently safe" and includes a provision to exonerate those involved from criminal liability. This is seen as legitimizing the government's right to ignore substantial loss of life resulting from its own actions. This proposed bill is also viewed as ignoring the provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights, with courts failing to uphold medical choice, compensation, and employment rights during the pandemic. The Italian cancer study "only underlines that there are continuing risks and effects which need robust investigation and assessment," and continued obfuscation and delay could have "fatal consequences on an even larger scale". The article concludes that ignoring, suppressing, or distorting scientific information "places the New Zealand government on the bottom rung of intelligence, caution and effective public healthcare".

Our next segment addresses the pervasive issue of global propaganda and its control mechanisms. The article argues that propaganda has transformed into a relentless, worldwide phenomenon, no longer confined to specific episodes or national boundaries. It describes a "mind-numbing strategy of serial bombardment," where "one cataclysmic fuss after another" occurs, reminiscent of openly totalitarian rule. For example, throughout 2020, the "Covid crisis" intensely used "terror of 'the virus'" to compel lockdowns, masking, and social distancing, despite scientific facts indicating these measures often did "more harm than good" and did not "slow the spread" of respiratory viruses. Masking, ostensibly for safety, paradoxically heightened fear and anger among people. The media actively fostered divisions, from political "red"/"blue" divides to racial melodrama, exemplified by the George Floyd incident and the BLM movement, which was "ostentatiously extolled" by wealthy figures not typically known for their concern for black lives. Anti-lockdown protests were condemned as "lethal 'super-spreader events'," while large BLM protests were applauded, even when many participants were unmasked. The January 6, 2021, incident at the US Capitol is described as an "FBI-backed 'insurrection'" that served to demonize opponents of stringent Covid measures as "extremists" and advance those measures. The "vaccination" program, rolled out as the "most fascistic 'Covid measure' of them all," was promoted as "safe and effective" and even "an act of love". This propaganda persisted through 2021 and into 2022, even as data from various countries, independent research, and the manufacturers' own clinical trials increasingly disproved claims of safety and effectiveness, and as "ever-rising global toll in 'sudden deaths' and incapacitating 'vaccine injuries'" mounted. Abruptly, the Covid propaganda seemed to halt, replaced by a new, equally pervasive "Ukraine propaganda" drive. This new campaign similarly fixated public attention on Ukraine's struggle against "the monster Putin," portraying those who "stand with" Ukraine as benevolent and those who don't as evil. The article also notes other potential crises floated by media and heads of state to maintain fear and anger, including cyber-attacks, supply chain breakdowns, food shortages, the "climate crisis," "terrorist" attacks, and new pandemics. The author advocates for a critical study of propaganda to combat disinformation and expose how the "West's 'free press'" has transformed into a "propaganda juggernaut". This juggernaut is characterized as a corporate media cartel with "interlocking boards" heavily reliant on advertising revenues from giants like Amazon, Big Pharma (especially Pfizer), and their own parent companies, with assets managed by BlackRock, Vanguard, and UBS. This commercial system has also maintained and tightened "covert relations with the military and 'intelligence community'". Furthermore, "public" media and "alternative" press outlets are described as having been absorbed into this juggernaut through funding from "CIA pass-throughs" such as the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Open Society Institute. Bill Gates' "strategic media partnerships" and "fact-checking" operations are highlighted as further ensuring propaganda services. Global PR firms and "journalists" prioritizing "social justice" also contribute, and this "false and hateful 'content'" is amplified enormously on "social media," where millions act as "avid vectors of the propaganda" while dissidents are censored and defamed. The article references Julian Assange as a "ravaged brother" whose "long, brutal punishment" for revealing truths anticipated the abuse now threatening anyone who challenges the dominant propaganda narrative. Dissidents face various punishments, including firing, delicensing, jailing, involuntary psychiatric confinement, and even death, to protect the narrative. The author calls for the reconstruction of democratic institutions, journalism that reports news, a medical establishment that focuses on healing, and an Academy that teaches critical thinking about propaganda. The ultimate goal is for "We the People" to understand propaganda, leading to freedom and self-rule.

Our next topic focuses on criticism directed at CDC leadership and a defense of RFK Jr. An op-ed published in the New York Times by former directors of the Centers for Disease Control, titled "We Ran the CDC: Kennedy Is Endangering Every American’s Health," has drawn sharp criticism. The article points out the irony of these former CDC directors speaking out, given "how sick Americans are after years and years of the leadership of people like my friends and me". Dr. Joseph Marine is quoted, describing the CDC's performance during the pandemic as a "Chernobyl-level catastrophe," asserting that they "cannot credibly argue that the CDC saved a single life" and that their message remains rooted in "fearmongering". He concludes that they have "learned nothing at all from the pandemic". The article highlights former CDC director Mandy Cohen's approach to policy, which involved casual phone conversations with friends about what they were doing, then making that into policy, rather than relying on scientific rigor. For example, she recounted a conversation where a colleague asked if they would allow professional football, and her response, "nope," led to the colleague saying, "okay, neither are we," which she recounted with a laugh. Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, who recently resigned from the CDC, is also criticized. Despite advocating for "pointless shutdown of society over Covid," Daskalakis claimed in 2023 that homosexuals did not need to modify their behavior in response to the monkeypox situation. He defended the Biden administration's stance of "support[ing] peoples’ joy as opposed to calling them ‘risky,’" stating that "one person’s idea of risk is another person’s idea of a great festival or Friday night". This is framed as ruining others' lives while protecting personal enjoyment. The article argues that these "tone-deaf oafs," instead of accepting responsibility for the unprecedented rate of chronic disease among Americans, are blaming RFK Jr., who advocates for "new blood" and fresh perspectives in public health leadership.

Next, we delve into a critical perspective on Israel, US support, and predictions of an impending collapse. The article asserts that the State of Israel, since its inception in 1948, has proven itself to be a "devilish, murderous, barbaric people", described as a "plague of racism, hatred, ethnic cleansing, war and genocide upon the world". It contends that God's promises to Old Covenant Israel were conditional, not everlasting, and were broken, leading to Israel's expulsion from the land "forever". The text states that modern Israelis are "NOT Biblical Israelites," "NOT the biological descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob," and "NOT God’s chosen people," possessing "ZERO God-given land covenant in Palestine". It further claims that the United States' increasing "entanglement" with Israel—economically, militarily, morally, and spiritually—has brought "the curse of God" upon America, reducing it to "little more than a vassal state of the most vile, wicked and bloodthirsty country on the planet". The article states that both Israel and the United States are held in "utter contempt" globally due to "two years of supporting Israel’s maniacal genocide in Gaza". Donald Trump is characterized as being "as much or more of a lackey for Israel as Joe Biden", and "nothing more than a pimp for Israel," refusing to end the "slaughter of innocents in Gaza" despite having the capability to do so. His financial benefactors are described as "Jewish billionaires". The article predicts that Israel's collapse is "certain—and probably imminent". Recent events cited include Yemen's Houthis delivering a "devastating missile attack against Israel," targeting Tel Aviv with a combination of "long-range missiles and advanced drones". This attack is highlighted as a demonstration of "reach, precision and the growing boldness of non-state actors". It "successfully stressed Israel’s air defense systems," exposing "gaps in coverage" even within the "most sophisticated defense networks" like the Iron Dome. The Houthis' operation showed "meticulous planning and technological evolution," synchronizing multiple missile launches with drone operations, and demonstrating a "significant extension of Houthi range capabilities" and an integrated approach "rarely seen from non-state actors". The "psychological impact" on Israel and the international community is deemed "immense". The article claims Israel is "hemorrhaging economically, militarily, culturally, politically, psychologically, emotionally and internationally". Geopolitical, academic, military, and intelligence experts are cited as "unanimous" in their opinion that Israel's collapse will occur "sooner than later". Netanyahu and his "fellow fascists" are said to intend to "slaughter or remove all 2 million Palestinians in Gaza," "ethnically cleanse the West Bank," and conquer Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, and Eastern Egypt for a "Greater Israel," but these "devilish designs for a Greater Israel are falling apart". It states that Israelis are "fleeing the country" by the thousands, recognizing that the nation is "on its last legs".

We now turn our attention to President Trump's drug-war actions in the Caribbean and concerns about his use of power. President Trump is credited with the intentional military killings of eleven people in international waters near Venezuela as part of a drug-war operation. This action is compared to former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's drug-war playbook, where accused drug-war offenders were reportedly killed on sight without arrest, prosecution, trial, or due process. Trump, according to the article, ordered his military "drug-war goons" to "blow a boat out of the water" without stopping or searching it, or making any arrests, "killing, Trump proudly claimed, eleven people in the process". The author characterizes this as "murder, pure and simple," albeit legalized, noting the lack of likelihood for Trump's Justice Department to pursue criminal charges. The article emphasizes that drug-war offenses are federal criminal offenses, not acts of war, and that under constitutional government, people are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It states that the US Constitution prohibits federal officials from depriving anyone of life without due process of law, which requires, "at a minimum, formal notice of criminal charges and a trial". None of the eleven people killed by Trump's military drug-war actions were convicted in a court of law; they were "knowingly, intentionally, and deliberately deprived them of life" based on suspicion of drug-related offenses. This is contrasted with previous US drug-war policy in international waters, where the Coast Guard would stop, board, search, and then transport suspects for trial in US District Court. The presence of US military warships off Venezuelan waters is questioned, with the author asserting that they are not effectively fighting the "perpetual war on drugs". Drug legalization is presented as the only way to "win" the war on drugs. The author suggests that Trump's actions, reminiscent of Roman emperors initiating foreign wars to suppress internal rebellions, serve to "suppress the rebellion relating to the continued secrecy of the Jeffrey Epstein files". A warning is issued about a potential "Gulf of Tonkin-like 'attack'" as a pretext for invading Venezuela, capturing its president, and effecting a regime-change operation, which would divert public attention from the Epstein scandal. The combination of the "war-on-terrorism racket with the drug-war racket" is deemed dangerous, as it risks extending "omnipotent power to kill drug-war suspects in international waters" to the United States itself, thereby contributing to the destruction of American liberty.

Finally, we explore the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, its alleged use for blackmail, and claims of Israeli control over American leaders. The article highlights Donald Trump's "self-destructive Jeffrey-Epstein-related blurt-outs and blunders" as indicative of his behavior during his presidency. Following Elon Musk's tweet linking Trump to the Epstein files, Trump reportedly dismissed the entire issue as a "hoax" orchestrated by Democrats and claimed the files were "made up" by Barack Obama and James Comey, despite Epstein's arrests and prosecutions occurring during the Bush II and Trump I administrations. Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly informed Trump that his name was in the Epstein files, leading to an FBI team tasked with redacting Trump's name and those of other "luminaries" from "300 gigabytes of records and physical evidence". Trump then allegedly instructed his followers to "erase Epstein’s name from their memories," declaring that anyone who maintained an interest in the "Mossad blackmailer" was no longer a Trump supporter. Roy Black, Epstein’s lawyer, died at an "interesting moment," and other individuals connected to the Epstein case have reportedly faced threats or disappeared from public view. Ghislaine Maxwell, identified as Epstein’s "Mossad handler" and the daughter of "Israel’s biggest super-spy," was moved to a "country-club minimum-security facility," which the article suggests was "in preparation for early release in return for covering for Trump". Transcripts of Maxwell's interviews with Trump's Justice Department were released, in which she "unconvincingly denied everything," claiming there was no client list, Prince Andrew never had sex with underage girls in her home, a photo of her with Prince Andrew and teenage Virginia Giuffre was "literally fake," and that Trump was "entirely innocent," "never inappropriate with anybody," and "a gentleman in all respects". Virginia Giuffre's family expressed outrage at Maxwell's "ludicrous transcript," calling it a "travesty of justice". Giuffre, an "outspoken Epstein victim," was reportedly "stolen" by Epstein from Trump's Mar-a-Lago, where she worked as a spa attendant, and subsequently sexually trafficked to prominent figures such as Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. The article claims Trump was "fully aware" of Epstein’s activities, including his "stealing" Giuffre and other underage girls from him. Furthermore, Hunter Biden claimed Epstein introduced Trump to his current wife, Melania, a claim Melania Trump reportedly threatened to sue over. Despite a "mainstream media frenzy" surrounding these "salacious revelations," the media has reportedly "studiously avoided the most important aspect of the Epstein story": that Epstein and his accomplices, beginning with Maxwell, "were Israeli spies tasked with blackmailing the American political and financial elite". This aspect is referred to as the "proverbial elephant in the living room". Jay Lefkowitz, described as a "high-powered attorney" and "frequent visitor to Israel" connected to "Jewish oligarchs" and Les Wexner’s "Mega" ring of "billionaire Israeli spies," allegedly ordered Florida prosecutor Alex Acosta to "lay off Epstein" in 2007. Lefkowitz is positioned as one of the "Jewish-Zionist handlers of American political leaders". The article suggests that Israel controls American leaders through blackmail and "other unsavory methods," which explains why the United States "refuses to stop the genocide of Gaza" despite having the power to do so. Trump is described as "the most abject slave of Israel ever to occupy the Oval Office," and Epstein as his "best friend for ten years" and a "Mossad blackmailer". The current situation is labeled the "Jeffrey Epstein Genocide," wherein the American executive branch, allegedly compromised by Trump's "viciously raped teenage virgins in front of Israeli spy cameras," refuses to intervene in Gaza.

thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info

I. "A Shocking New Weapon Emerges In The Ukraine War & Europe's Addiction To Russian Oil" by Mike Baker

1. A weapon being used in the war in Ukraine, harnessed by both sides, is children.
   
   This is not a missile or a drone, but kids being recruited, manipulated, and used as tools of sabotage.
   
   

2. Children are recruited online through messages on Telegram, WhatsApp, or even video game chats.
   
   The pitch often appears harmless, offering quick money for simple tasks like taking photos or spraying graffiti.
   
   

3. Tasks for recruited children quickly escalate from minor acts to serious sabotage.
   
   Examples include throwing Molotov cocktails, planting bombs near police stations, or setting fires at rail yards.
   
   

4. The consequences for these children are severe, including years in penal colonies or psychiatric facilities.
   
   In some cases, Russian operatives reportedly tried to kill recruited children by remotely detonating explosives while the children carried them.
   
   

5. Both sides in the war are searching for cheap, deniable ways to strike inside enemy territory.
   
   Children are seen as vulnerable, easy to manipulate, and expendable by cynical intelligence officers.
   
   

6. This is described as a modern twist on child soldiers, a form of hybrid warfare at its ugliest, where children are recruited online and pushed into sabotage, rather than carrying rifles.
   
   Ukraine's security service has detained around 175 minors implicated in sabotage operations organized by Russian agents, and human rights activists estimate at least 100 cases on the Russian side involving Ukrainian recruiters.
   
   

7. President Trump is pressuring the EU to stop buying Moscow's oil as part of a strategy to squeeze the Kremlin financially.
   
   Financial analysts have long stated that Europe's continued dependence on Russian energy undermines Ukraine's efforts and helps Putin avoid financial ruin.
   
   

8. Despite sanctions, a "gaping loophole" allows European countries to legally buy Moscow's crude if it is first refined elsewhere.
   
   Many Russian fuel products reach Europe through trade with countries like Turkey, India, and China, who maintain open economic relations with Moscow.
   
   

9. A Helsinki-based think tank found that the EU is spending more money annually on purchasing Russian fossil fuels than on financial aid to Ukraine.
   
   Specifically, EU countries spent roughly 21.9 billion euros on Russian oil and gas in 2024, compared to 18.7 billion euros for direct financial support to Kyiv.
   
   

10. Trump has imposed an additional 25% tariff on India's exports over their ongoing purchases of Russian oil, raising the country's total tariff rate to 50%.
    
    Since the war began, India has become Moscow's second-largest oil customer after China.
    
    

11. North Korean hackers are intensifying campaigns to steal billions in cryptocurrency to fund their sanctioned weapons programs.
    
    They use fake job offers, dubbed "contagious interview," where recruiters approach individuals on platforms like LinkedIn or Telegram.
    
    

12. The scam directs applicants to download code for "skills tests" or record video interviews, leading to malware installation and the draining of digital wallets.
    
    Chain Analysis estimates North Korea stole at least $1.3 billion in cryptocurrency last year, with a single heist of $1.5 billion from the Bybit exchange in February.
    
    

13. Stolen digital assets are laundered through shadowy brokers and converted into hard currency, providing Pyongyang a reliable lifeline for its weapons programs.
    
    The FBI warned that North Korea is "aggressively targeting the industry with complex and elaborate social engineering schemes".
    
    

14. Trump appears to be pumping the brakes on his plans to deploy federal troops to Chicago, instead floating New Orleans as a potential next target for his crime crackdown.
    
    This strategy is credited with driving down violence in Washington D.C., where crime is reportedly down 11% with nearly 1,700 arrests.
    
    

15. Democratic leaders, such as Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, have rejected Trump's plan for federal deployments, while Republican leaders, like Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, are eager to partner with the administration.
    
    Trump stated that in states led by Democrats, he will "pretty much wait until we get asked".
    
    

II. "Heart inflammation caused by covid “vaccines” is a potential time bomb" by Rhoda Wilson

1. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered Pfizer and Moderna to expand warning labels on their COVID-19 vaccines due to a heightened risk of heart inflammation.
   
   Specifically, the FDA highlighted myocarditis and pericarditis risks, particularly in males aged 16 to 25.
   
   

2. The risk of myocarditis associated with COVID-19 vaccines is characterized as a potential "ticking time bomb" because of its often-symptomless nature.
   
   Myocarditis is an immune-driven inflammation of the heart muscle that can reduce the heart’s ability to pump blood and may cause blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrest, and sudden death.
   
   

3. Michel Chossudovsky asserts that the "deadly risk" of myocarditis from mRNA injections was known to the FDA and CDC from the outset, but they failed to act.
   
   He states that the mRNA vaccine was fully endorsed and imposed, nationally and internationally, despite this knowledge.
   
   

4. A confidential Pfizer study, focusing on the vaccine's impacts from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021, confirmed the "deadly nature" of the mRNA injection regarding mortality and morbidity.
   
   This report was available to the FDA in early March 2021.
   
   

5. By the end of February 2021, Pfizer had received over 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.
   
   These results were known to the FDA and CDC, but they "closed their eyes," leading to the worldwide launch and distribution of the vaccine.
   
   

6. Michel Chossudovsky suggests that Pfizer's worldwide marketing and distribution of the vaccine beyond February 28, 2021, constitutes an "act of murder" due to criminal intent, as they were aware of the mortality from their own study.
   
   He argues that the FDA was complicit, being fully aware that the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA injection would result in an upward trend in mortality and morbidity.
   
   

7. The author calls for the unconditional cancellation of the mRNA vaccine and an inquiry into the matter.
   
   The corporate media, instead of informing the public, applied censorship and targeted scientists and medical doctors who revealed the truth.
   
   

8. Pfizer has a criminal record with the US Department of Justice from 2009, being the only Big Pharma company with such a record in the US.
   
   This was not a civil lawsuit; Pfizer was put on probation.
   
   

9. An FDA-funded study, published in The Lancet in 2024, showed surging myocarditis cases following the second vaccine dose in young males.
   
   This study also revealed continued abnormalities in heart scans in some patients months after experiencing post-vaccination myocarditis.
   
   

10. The FDA's new directive requires vaccine makers to inform patients that the long-term significance of MRI findings related to cardiac injury is unknown.
    
    The Department of Health and Human Services stated that "Americans deserve radical transparency around the safety and efficacy of covid vaccines".
    
    

11. The product information for Pfizer's Comirnaty and Moderna's Spikevax vaccines in the US now includes specific text about the estimated incidence of myocarditis and/or pericarditis.
    
    It notes approximately 8 cases per million doses for individuals 6 months through 64 years of age, and approximately 27 cases per million doses in males 12 through 24 years of age, following administration of the 2023-2024 Formula of mRNA covid-19 vaccines.
    
    

12. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) downplays the risk of heart inflammation in its product information for Comirnaty.
    
    While stating an increased risk, EMA notes that "available data indicate that most cases recover" and describes the risk as "up to 1 in 10,000 people".
    
    

13. There is a discrepancy between EMA's general statement of "up to 1 in 10,000 people" for heart inflammation and its product information's "extra cases" per 10,000 (0.265 and 0.56).
    
    The author concludes that EMA's product information is, "at best, spin and, at worst, part of the propaganda machine".
    
    

III. "I Support India Now. I’m All-In. I’ve Started Shitting in the Street to Show Solidarity." by Andrew Anglin

1. Southeast Asian countries, including Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia, harbor significant animosity towards Indians and Pakistanis.
   
   This sentiment is often attributed to experiences of being scammed by Indians, which is not a minority view in these regions.
   
   

2. A significant majority of scams targeting Americans originate from India.
   
   These scams include identity theft and bank account draining from elderly people, accounting for nearly $40 billion annually, and "sextortion" of teenagers.
   
   

3. The US government, influenced by geopolitics, is more concerned with Chinese corporate espionage than Indian scams.
   
   Silicon Valley, with State Department endorsement, screens Chinese nationals and ethnic Chinese for tech jobs, while there are no similar actions regarding Indian scams or Israeli spying.
   
   

4. Historically, India and China maintained intense cultural, religious, and economic cooperation for over 2,000 years, with India playing a key role in trade.
   
   Relations only deteriorated in 1959 when India decided to harbor the "Dalai Lama," leading to border conflicts and the first military conflict in 1962.
   
   

5. The US foreign policy is characterized by a "bulwark-oriented" strategy, constantly playing countries against one another to prevent alliances that could challenge its hegemony.
   
   India was seen as a key "bulwark against China" due to its large population and advanced enough economy to absorb manufacturing.
   
   

6. President Trump imposed a 50% tariff on India for refusing to stop buying Russian oil, severely damaging the US-India relationship.
   
   This action is widely viewed in India as an attack on their sovereignty and has roused ultranationalist sentiment.
   
   

7. Indian Prime Minister Modi is now engaging with China, including a trip to meet with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) for the first time in seven years.
   
   The SCO is envisioned by Russia and China as a counterbalance to NATO, and India's military cooperation with the US has been a hurdle to its cohesion.
   
   

8. The author argues that tariffs imposed by Trump are not for reshoring US manufacturing, but are a new type of sanctions.
   
   This is seen as "extreme international belligerence" that demonstrates the US is not a safe guarantor of the global order.
   
   

9. The article posits that Modi's project as an "anti-liberal ethnoreligious nationalist" is incompatible with democracy.
   
   India faces an "existential demographic issue" with Muslims having more children than Hindus, which could lead to Muslims wielding political power in a few decades.
   
   

10. The author asserts that "democracy is an unnatural system" that the West, particularly the US, forces upon other countries.
    
    It is described as the "most corrupt system" and the "most tyrannical," used by the US to manipulate and control nations through institutions.
    
    

11. Trump's "tariff" sanctions provide Modi with the support and excuse to distance India from the West and from the democracy system.
    
    Modi's ability to achieve this will depend on forming a strong relationship with China, which "seems to be going very well".
    
    

12. The SCO meeting, attended by leaders from various nations targeted by the US, represents the coming together of countries explicitly allied against the US as a "bully country".
    
    China, as the head of this new world order, promotes a universally appealing message that countries of different political systems can "get along and make money together instead of having wars".
    
    

13. The potential outcomes of this geopolitical shift include fewer H-1B visas to the US for Indians.
    
    Indians would be less inclined to come to a country they view as an enemy, and the US might be less likely to admit them if they are classified similarly to the Chinese.
    
    

14. The weakening of the American Empire, as a result of these developments, is viewed as beneficial for everyone on Earth, especially Americans and Europeans.
    
    The author states, "the collapse of the empire is the only news story that really matters".
    
    

IV. "Large Italian study finds mRNA injections have significantly increased the number of cancer cases" by Rhoda Wilson

1. A large cohort study in Italy found a 36% increased incidence of hospitalisation for all cancers among those who received at least one covid vaccination compared to the unvaccinated.
   
   The study, published in the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, followed 296,015 people (aged 11+) in Pescara province from June 2021 to December 2023.
   
   

2. The Italian study found statistically significant increased incidence of hospitalisation for bowel cancer (54% higher), breast cancer (54% higher), and bladder cancer (105% higher) among the vaccinated.
   
   Other cancer types, including uterine (+93%), ovarian (+105%), thyroid (+30%), and haematological (blood) (+50%), also showed increased incidence but were not statistically significant due to small case numbers.
   
   

3. The authors of the Italian study urge that more work needs to be done to evaluate the full extent of cancer risks from COVID-19 vaccines for the wider population.
   
   They note that some cancers develop over longer time periods than the 30-month study duration, suggesting the longer-term incidence could be higher.
   
   

4. The study excluded any cancers not resulting in hospitalization and any cases of cancer recurrence.
   
   Cancer recurrence has already been flagged by senior oncologists in the UK as a risk they have observed following COVID vaccination in their practices.
   
   

5. The Italian study found that individuals who had a COVID-19 infection before receiving vaccination experienced a lower increase in cancer hospitalization rates compared to those who did not have a prior infection.
   
   This may imply that prior COVID-19 infection conferred some degree of protective effect against any adverse outcome of subsequent vaccination on the overall immune system.
   
   

6. There are "sound scientific reasons" to suspect that mRNA vaccination can cause long-term genetic instability, which is known to be associated with cancer incidence.
   
   A review paper in the Journal of Precision Sciences titled "Unintended Genetic Consequences of mRNA Vaccines" evaluates risks of transcriptional disruption, HLA alteration, and genomic integration.
   
   

7. Dr. Guy Hatchard states that the increases reported in Italy are "substantial and alarming," yet New Zealand Health authorities are "maintaining the fiction that covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective".
   
   New Zealand lacks cancer incidence data for 2023 and has made no attempt to compare cancer outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.
   
   

8. The author highlights a historical "infamous miscarriage of justice" in New Zealand, where a Royal Commission found Air New Zealand engaged in a "plan of deception" regarding a plane crash.
   
   This case, involving 257 lives, is presented as a precedent for government obfuscation, dwarfed by pandemic deaths and excess deaths.
   
   

9. The New Zealand government is criticized for remaining silent on the implications of COVID-19's gain-of-function origin and the effect of mass mRNA vaccinations on public health.
   
   The author questions how the New Zealand Medical Council, which pretends to "zero risk" from COVID-19 vaccination, differs from those who lied in the Erebus disaster.
   
   

10. Parliament in New Zealand is proposing the Gene Technology Bill, which deregulates biotechnology and contains a provision exonerating those involved from any criminal liability.
    
    This bill is seen as legitimizing the government's right to ignore substantial loss of life resulting from its actions.
    
    

11. The proposed Gene Technology Bill is criticized for ignoring the provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights, particularly concerning medical choice, compensation, and employment rights.
    
    The courts are said to remain "deferential to authority and accepting of injustice" as they did after the Erebus disaster 40 years ago.
    
    

V. "Only When We Know What Propaganda Is, And How It Works, Will We Be Free to Live Our Lives and Rule Ourselves" by Clark Barnes

1. Propaganda in the "democratic" West has transformed from episodic, wartime practice to a continuous, global "serial bombardment" of crises.
   
   The author notes that there has never been so much material for propaganda analysis, nor a greater need for this expertise.
   
   

2. Throughout 2020, the "Covid crisis" utilized terror of "the virus" to bully people into lockdowns, masking, and social distancing.
   
   These "measures" were propagated fiercely by media, despite scientific facts suggesting they did more harm than good or were ineffective.
   
   

3. The media propagated and exacerbated divisions, such as the "red"/"blue" divide and the "sanctimonious division" between maskers and "anti-maskers".
   
   The George Floyd incident and the "cult of BLM" were also ostentatiously extolled globally, while anti-lockdown protests were denounced.
   
   

4. The January 6, 2021, events at the US Capitol were stridently misrepresented as an "attempted coup" by Democrats and media.
   
   This served to demonize opponents of stringent "Covid measures" and make it "practically illegal to voice any doubts about Joe Biden’s inexplicable election 'victory'".
   
   

5. The "vaccination" program was rolled out in Year Two of the Covid crisis, promoted as "safe and effective" and "an act of love".
   
   This propaganda continued despite "blithe assurances" being disproved by data, independent research, and rising "sudden deaths" and "vaccine injuries".
   
   

6. The propaganda drive shifted abruptly from Covid to Ukraine, but maintained essentially the same pattern of obsession, benevolence, and demonization.
   
   Just as "Covid once had everyone applauding... 'frontline workers'," Ukraine propaganda now urges solidarity through vigils, petitions, money, and blue-and-yellow symbols.
   
   

7. Terroristic forecasts of imminent crises, such as a cyber-attack, global supply chain breakdown, climate crisis, "terrorist" attacks, or new plagues, are floated to keep widespread fear and anger simmering.
   
   These "looming sequels" could inflict vast suffering, with "Covid propaganda... arguably killed or injured millions" and "Ukraine propaganda... could bring on a nuclear war".
   
   

8. The role of propaganda analysts is to uncover truths blacked out by propaganda, going beyond the "quick and sloppy work" of "fact-checkers".
   
   This includes investigating the origins of the Covid crisis, the lethality of SARS-CoV-2, the efficacy and harms of "Covid measures," and the "ever-growing global toll of the experimental 'vaccination' program".
   
   

9. The "West’s 'free press'" has been turned into a "propaganda juggernaut" through a corporate media cartel with "interlocking boards" and dependence on advertising revenues from giants like Amazon and Big Pharma.
   
   Its assets are closely managed by BlackRock, Vanguard, and UBS, and it maintains covert relations with the military and "intelligence community".
   
   

10. "Public" media (NPR, PBS, BBC, CBC) and "alternative" press outlets have been absorbed into this propaganda system through funding from "CIA pass-throughs" like the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Open Society Institute.
    
    Bill Gates's "strategic media partnerships" and "fact-checking" operations further assure propaganda services.
    
    

11. "Social media" enormously amplifies the "false and hateful 'content'" pumped out by the "wholly-owned 'free press'".
    
    Millions serve "for free" as "avid vectors of the propaganda," while those who contradict or question it are censored and defamed.
    
    

12. Dissidents, including Julian Assange, doctors, scientists, journalists, and academics, face severe punishments for going "off-script".
    
    These punishments include being blacked out on social media, kept off the air, canceled, fired, delicensed, jailed, involuntarily consigned to psychiatric wards, and "evidently, even killed".
    
    

13. The author emphasizes the need to re-conceive and rebuild democratic institutions, including journalism, the medical establishment, and academia.
    
    New schools must teach students "about propaganda: how to recognise it when it’s everywhere they look".
    
    

14. The article concludes that "only when We the People finally know what propaganda is, and how it works, will we be free at last to live our lives and rule ourselves".
    
    This understanding is presented as crucial for regaining freedom and self-governance.
    
    

VI. "RFK Will Kill You, Say Losers" by Tom Woods

1. A New York Times op-ed by former CDC directors, titled "We Ran the CDC: Kennedy Is Endangering Every American’s Health," criticized RFK Jr..
   
   The author sarcastically suggests these former directors should "avoid the spotlight for the rest of my life" out of "shame and embarrassment" given the state of American health under their leadership.
   
   

2. Dr. Joseph Marine characterized the CDC's performance during the pandemic as a "Chernobyl-level catastrophe".
   
   He argued that the US "would have been better off with no CDC at all" and that they "cannot credibly argue that the CDC saved a single life".
   
   

3. Former CDC director Mandy Cohen's policy development involved informal phone conversations with friends about what they were doing.
   
   She recounted a conversation where she decided against professional football, with her friend agreeing, and laughed about it.
   
   

4. Dr. Demetre Daskalakis resigned from the CDC after favoring the "pointless shutdown of society over Covid".
   
   However, in 2023, he stated it was not necessary for homosexuals to modify their behavior regarding monkeypox, defending the Biden administration's aim to "support peoples’ joy".
   
   

5. Daskalakis justified not disturbing "a fun Daskalakis Friday night" even if it meant ruining "YOUR life".
   
   This highlights a perceived hypocrisy in public health leadership prioritizing personal enjoyment over public health restrictions for specific groups.
   
   

6. Americans are suffering from "chronic disease at an unprecedented rate".
   
   The author criticizes "tone-deaf oafs" within the CDC for refusing to accept responsibility and instead blaming those like RFK Jr. who advocate for "new blood".
   
   

VII. "The Zionist Experiment Is Over" by Chuck Baldwin

1. The author asserts that God gave "NO everlasting unconditional promise of national perpetuity" to Old Covenant Israel, contrary to Christian Zionist beliefs.
   
   God's promises of blessings to Old Covenant Israel were conditional on their obedience.
   
   

2. The unconditional everlasting promise was given to Abraham and fulfilled in the Person of Jesus Christ.
   
   To the nation of Old Covenant Israel, no such promise of national perpetuity was given.
   
   

3. Moses made it "crystal clear" that God's covenant with Israel was conditional, predicting curses, destruction, and removal from the promised land "forever" due to disobedience.
   
   Moses predicted the destruction of Israel by Assyrians, Judah by Babylonians, and the Judahite remnant by Romans.
   
   

4. The author claims that "Old Covenant Israel violated its covenant with God, and God did what Moses declared He would do: He expelled them from the promised land and destroyed their nation forever".
   
   The Israelis in Palestine today are explicitly stated as "NOT Biblical Israelites; they are NOT the biological descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; and they are NOT God’s chosen people".
   
   

5. The State of Israel, since its inception in 1948, is described as a "devilish, murderous, barbaric people" and a "plague of racism, hatred, ethnic cleansing, war and genocide upon the world".
   
   The author states that US entanglement with Israel has invoked a "curse of God upon it to the point that today America is little more than a vassal state".
   
   

6. The author contends that Donald Trump has proven to be "as much or more of a lackey for Israel as Joe Biden".
   
   Trump is described as the "one man in the world that has the capability to put an end to Israel’s slaughter of innocents in Gaza and the West Bank, but he refuses to do it".
   
   

7. The article declares that Israel's "collapse is certain—and probably imminent," stating that "The Zionist experiment is over".
   
   It claims that Israel is "hemorrhaging economically, militarily, culturally, politically, psychologically, emotionally and internationally".
   
   

8. Yemen's Houthis launched a "devastating missile attack" against Israel, targeting Tel Aviv with long-range missiles and advanced drones.
   
   This attack demonstrated the Houthis' "reach, precision and the growing boldness of non-state actors in the modern battlefield".
   
   

9. The attack successfully stressed Israel’s air defense systems, creating gaps that allowed some missiles to reach their targets, and had a significant "psychological blow" on Israel.
   
   The Houthis are portrayed as the "brave little David who stood courageously against the Zionist Goliath—and won".
   
   

10. Geopolitical, academic, military, and intelligence experts are "unanimous" in the opinion that Israel’s collapse will come sooner than later.
    
    Opposition to Israel among the US population is "two to one," and Donald Trump’s favorability rating is "worse" than Joe Biden’s, mainly due to his "sycophantic support for Israel".
    
    

11. Netanyahu and his "fascists in Israel" are intent on "slaughtering or removing all 2 million Palestinians in Gaza" and then ethnically cleansing the West Bank.
    
    Their "devilish designs for a Greater Israel" also include conquering Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and seizing parts of Jordan, Eastern Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.
    
    

12. Israelis are fleeing the country by the thousands, knowing "the nation is on its last legs".
    
    Netanyahu is depicted as a "demon-possessed madman" who keeps Israel at war to stay out of prison, trying to drag the United States into "all-out war".
    
    

13. Trump's "slavish devotion" to "Jewish billionaires" who have been his "financial benefactors" throughout his life means it is a "fantasy to think that Trump would put the interests of the United States above those of Israel".
    
    The article suggests both Donald Trump and Israel are "on life support".
    
    

VIII. "Top Secret SEAL Team 6 Mission in North Korea Ends in Chaos & Israel Thwarts An Assassination" by Mike Baker

1. A New York Times report revealed details of a top-secret Navy SEAL mission into North Korea in 2019 that "ultimately unraveled" and resulted in the deaths of three unarmed North Koreans.
   
   This disclosure is seen as having "grave implications for already fraught us relations with the nuclear armed kim regime".
   
   

2. The mission, authorized by President Trump during his first term, aimed to plant an electronic device to intercept Kim Jong-un's communications during nuclear talks.
   
   Members of SEAL Team 6's Red Squadron, the same team that killed Osama bin Laden, were chosen for the complex mission.
   
   

3. The operation carried high stakes, risking not only derailing diplomatic engagement but also triggering a hostage crisis or retaliation by North Korea, which has 8,000 artillery pieces and 50 nuclear weapons.
   
   US Joint Special Operations Command saw a "rare opportunity" to address a strategic blind spot in US intelligence gathering capabilities regarding North Korea.
   
   

4. The details of the operation were described as "something straight out of a James Bond movie," involving a nuclear-powered submarine and two mini-subs to get the SEAL team to shore.
   
   Eight seals swam ashore to install the device, which had to be manually planted.
   
   

5. The mission "went sideways" when a North Korean boat emerged, and the SEAL team "reportedly opened fire on the vessel, killing all aboard".
   
   Evidence later showed the boat was a fishing vessel carrying two or three unarmed civilians, and the mission was aborted.
   
   

6. The incident was never publicly acknowledged by either the US or North Korea, and the details remained "highly classified" until the New York Times report.
   
   The Times' disclosure is criticized for potentially giving the Kim regime "invaluable insights" into America's covert operations.
   
   

7. The Shin Bet (Israeli security agency) recently thwarted a plot by Hamas to assassinate National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir with explosive drones.
   
   Officials described it as "one of the most serious attempts against a senior israeli minister in recent years".
   
   

8. Hamas officials based in Turkey funneled funds to a Hamas-linked cell operating out of Hebron for the procurement of two drones equipped with explosives and a laptop to track Ben-Gvir's movements.
   
   The attack was planned for the upcoming Jewish holiday season when Ben-Gvir would visit the Tomb of the Patriarchs.
   
   

9. The plot was abandoned after the cell encountered "technical difficulties" during a trial run, leading to an accidental explosion while assembling a drone.
   
   One cell member proposed selling the drones for firearms for shooting attacks at Israeli government institutions, but this idea was also abandoned due to fear of surveillance cameras.
   
   

10. A suspect told interrogators he moved to Turkey three years prior and established ties with Hamas operatives there.
    
    He was inspired by the war in Gaza to plan the assassination of Ben-Gvir, a hardline member of Netanyahu's coalition.
    
    

11. Senior Hamas operatives were granted "safe haven" in Turkey following a prisoner exchange in 2011.
    
    Turkey has also granted citizenship to several of these "terrorists," raising questions about the "latitude Turkey actually grants Kamas leadership behind the scenes".
    
    

12. Turkey maintains open diplomatic ties with Hamas, serving as a "safe hub for international outreach and coordination".
    
    Turkish President Erdogan has taken a public stance in support of Palestinians and Hamas, cutting all ties with Israel since the war in Gaza began.
    
    

IX. "Trump Rages At Putin, Xi, And Kim & Free Speech Fight In The UK" by Mike Baker

1. President Trump accused Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Kim Jong-un of "conspiring against the United States of America" after their show of unity at Xi Jinping's Victory Day parade in Beijing.
   
   The parade, marking the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II, featured missiles, drones, advanced weaponry, and over 10,000 troops, sending a message to the West.
   
   

2. A "notable omission" at the parade commemorating Japan's surrender was the absence of any Western leaders.
   
   Trump seized on this, noting the "massive amount of support and blood that the US gave China in order to help free them from a quote very unfriendly foreign invader" during World War II.
   
   

3. Xi Jinping, flanked by Putin and Kim, "glossed over that inconvenient history" during the proceedings.
   
   He gave a brief address commemorating victims of Japan's occupation and called for "the eradication of the root causes of global conflict".
   
   

4. Trump's response to this "unified display by America's most powerful adversaries" for now involves "continued appeals for diplomacy alongside some vague threats".
   
   He is cautious not to disrupt "high-stakes trade negotiations" with China and has reiterated his desire to meet with Kim Jong-un, though North Korea has not returned his diplomatic overtures.
   
   

5. Trump expressed disappointment in President Putin's "intrigue" regarding ending the war in Ukraine, especially after their Alaska summit yielded no major breakthrough.
   
   He suggested he might impose "fresh sanctions on Russia" if a peace deal is not reached soon, though he was "light on any details".
   
   

6. Trump pushed back against criticisms of "empty threats" against Russia by pointing to the "recent secondary sanctions imposed on India for buying Russian oil".
   
   He remarked, "You call that no action and I haven't done phase two and phase three yet," without clarifying what those phases might involve.
   
   

7. The UN's nuclear watchdog chief, Raphael Gross, warns that inspections must resume within days or risk a "total collapse of continuity" in tracking Iran's "near weapons-grade uranium".
   
   Iran's "crown jewels" of enrichment infrastructure, Fordo, Natans, and Isvan, have been inaccessible since mid-June US-Israeli air strikes.
   
   

8. Iran is demanding secrecy on the locations of its enriched stockpile and has passed a law suspending cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
   
   A confidential IAEA report indicates Iran has an estimated 440 kg (18 lbs) of uranium enriched up to 60%, enough to fuel "around 10 nuclear weapons".
   
   

9. Britain, France, and Germany referred Iran back to the UN Security Council, "setting the stage for snapback sanctions" if an alternative outcome is not met.
   
   Iran has countered with threats to withdraw from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty altogether unless Washington guarantees no further air strikes.
   
   

10. Comedian Graham Linehan, co-creator of Father Ted, was arrested at London's Heathrow airport over social media posts criticizing transgender activists.
    
    He was detained under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting violence for posts like "If a transidentified male is in a female only space he is committing a violent abusive act make a scene call the cops and if all else fails punch him in the balls".
    
    

11. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley defended his officers but "practically begged lawmakers to step in," arguing that current legislation forces police to treat perceived threats against protected groups as prosecutable offenses.
    
    The incident ignited a "firestorm over free speech and policing priorities," with critics calling Britain "a total laughingstock" and questioning "At what point did we become North Korea?".
    
    

12. Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling slammed the arrest as "totalitarianism and utterly deplorable".
    
    She posted, "what the fuck has the UK become," and the Free Speech Union pledged to bankroll Linehan's legal defense, mocking police priorities given unsolved shoplifting and burglary cases.
    
    

13. A "hot mic" captured a "bizarre and rather disturbing exchange" between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin during the Beijing parade, where they discussed "organ transplants and human immortality".
    
    Putin's translator was heard saying, "Biotechnology is continuously developing human organs can be continuously transplanted the longer you live the younger you become," with Putin reportedly adding, "You can even achieve immortality".
    
    

14. Xi's translator reportedly responded, "Some predict that in this century humans may live to 150 years old earlier people rarely live to 70 but these days at 70 years you are still a child".
    
    The conversation unfolded as Kim Jong-un looked on, smiling, though it is unclear if it was translated for him.
    
    

X. "Trump’s Drug-War Murders in the Caribbean" by Jacob G. Hornberger

1. President Trump claimed credit for the "intentional military killings of eleven people in international waters near Venezuela".
   
   The author likens Trump's actions to former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte's "drug-war playbook," where Duterte allegedly ordered killings of accused drug offenders without due process.
   
   

2. Trump ordered his military to "blow a boat out of the water" without stopping it, searching it, making arrests, or conducting trials.
   
   The author describes this as "murder, pure and simple," despite it being "legalized murder" within the US system.
   
   

3. Under the US Constitution, federal officials are "prohibited from simply killing people who they suspect have committed a crime" without due process of law.
   
   The Fifth Amendment expressly prohibits depriving anyone of life without due process, which requires "formal notice of criminal charges and a trial".
   
   

4. Prior to Trump, US drug-war policy in international waters involved the Coast Guard stopping, boarding, and searching suspected boats, then transporting occupants to the US for indictment and trial.
   
   Trump's actions departed from this, bypassing legal processes by simply blowing up the boat "with the obvious intent to kill all of its occupants".
   
   

5. The author argues that the "war on drugs" is not a "war in the true sense of the term" but rather federal criminal offenses.
   
   He asserts that "Nothing — repeat nothing! — will ever win the war on drugs, except drug legalization".
   
   

6. The presence of US military warships off Venezuelan waters is questioned, with the author sarcastically dismissing the idea that they are "enforcing the drug war".
   
   The "war on drugs" is characterized as a "perpetual racket that will go on forever" due to the many people dependent on it, including drug cartels and the US drug-war governmental bureaucracy.
   
   

7. The author warns that Trump might use a "foreign war" to suppress domestic rebellion, drawing a parallel to Roman emperors starting foreign wars to divert public attention.
   
   He explicitly links this potential strategy to the "continued secrecy of the Jeffrey Epstein files".
   
   

8. The author warns against the dangers of combining the "war-on-terrorism racket with the drug-war racket," which he sees Trump doing to justify killings.
   
   He states that the "omnipotent power to kill drug-war suspects in international waters under the rubric of waging the 'war on terrorism' can easily be extended to the United States" and destroy American liberty.
   
   

XI. "We Are Living Through "the Jeffrey Epstein Genocide", by Kevin Barrett - The Unz Review"

1. Donald Trump's response to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is characterized by "eyeball-rolling" and "textbook 'guilty demeanor'".
   
   Trump asserted the whole Epstein issue was a "hoax" invented by Democrats and that the files were "made up" by Barack Obama and James Comey, despite Epstein's arrests and prosecutions occurring under Bush II and Trump I.
   
   

2. Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly informed Trump that his name is in the Epstein files, leading to an FBI team being tasked to redact his name and other "luminaries" from 300 gigabytes of records.
   
   Trump subsequently ordered his followers to erase Epstein's name from their memories, stating that anyone interested in the "Mossad blackmailer" was no longer a Trump supporter.
   
   

3. Epstein's lawyer Roy Black died at an "interesting moment," and other individuals connected to the Epstein case have faced threats or "chosen to disappear from public view".
   
   Ghislaine Maxwell, described as Epstein’s "Mossad handler" and daughter of "Israel’s biggest super-spy," was moved to a "country-club minimum-security facility," allegedly in preparation for early release in exchange for covering for Trump.
   
   

4. Trump's Justice Department released transcripts of its interviews with Maxwell, which "appears that those interviews were arranged for the purpose of having Maxwell 'exonerate' Trump".
   
   Maxwell's testimony in these interviews, denying everything and claiming Trump was "a gentleman in all respects," was deemed "ludicrous" and "unconvincingly denied everything".
   
   

5. The family of Virginia Giuffre, an "outspoken Epstein victim" who was "suicided last spring," was outraged by Maxwell's testimony.
   
   They released a statement that Maxwell's "travesty of justice entirely invalidates the experiences of the many brave survivors".
   
   

6. Giuffre was "stolen" by Epstein from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago, where she worked as a spa attendant, and later "sexually trafficked" to Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and others.
   
   Trump's statements indicate he was "fully aware of Epstein’s activities," including "stealing" Giuffre and other underage girls from him.
   
   

7. Hunter Biden claimed that Jeffrey Epstein introduced Trump to his current wife, Melania, which prompted Melania to threaten a billion-dollar lawsuit.
   
   Hunter Biden welcomed the prospective lawsuit, stating it would force testimony from both Trumps through "sworn depositions".
   
   

8. The mainstream media has "studiously avoided the most important aspect of the Epstein story": that Epstein and his accomplices were "Israeli spies tasked with blackmailing the American political and financial elite".
   
   The author criticizes the media for not highlighting that a "genocidal foreign nation is blackmailing US presidents as well as the donor class that selects them".
   
   

9. Jay Lefkowitz, described as a "high-powered attorney and frequent visitor to Israel" connected to Jewish oligarchs and Les Wexner’s "Mega" ring of billionaire Israeli spies, allegedly ordered Florida prosecutor Alex Acosta to "lay off Epstein" in 2007.
   
   Lefkowitz is presented as one of the "Jewish-Zionist handlers of American political leaders" with the power to shut down criminal investigations.
   
   

10. An analysis of the "Epstein suicide" prison video, which the FBI and DOJ claim is original and unaltered, indicates that three minutes of the video were cut out.
    
    This suggests the heads of the FBI and DOJ are "plainly guilty of conspiracy to obstruct justice…presumably in service to a genocidal foreign regime".
    
    

11. The author claims that "Israel controls American leaders through blackmail and other unsavory methods," which explains why the US "refuses to do so".
    
    Trump is described as the "most abject slave of Israel ever to occupy the Oval Office".
    
    

12. The current situation is labeled the "Jeffrey Epstein Genocide," where the US executive branch "refuses to do so".
    
    This is attributed to the chief officer (Trump) allegedly having "viciously raped teenage virgins in front of Israeli spy cameras".
    
    

XII. "Why Do Vaccines Cause the Illnesses They Prevent" by A Midwestern Doctor

1. Medicine often relies on "foundational axioms" that vaccines are "safe and effective," leading doctors to assume vaccinated individuals cannot catch a disease and that post-vaccination injuries are unrelated coincidences.
   
   This results in a "frequent failure by physicians to diagnose either of these".
   
   

2. The author and colleagues observed that many people contracted the flu after receiving the flu vaccine, and more concerningly, experienced severe illness, hospitalization, or death from COVID-19 after receiving the COVID vaccine.
   
   This observation was "denied" in medical circles, with typical responses citing "correlation is not causation".
   
   

3. Research from adverse event reporting databases showed that the two most common causes of death associated with COVID-19 vaccines were "heart issues (e.g., dying suddenly)" and COVID-19 itself.
   
   National trends also showed that COVID-19 cases and deaths "tended to spike after vaccination campaigns were conducted".
   
   

4. Initially, the author suspected a "hyper-inflammatory process" for vaccine complications, as many severe COVID-19 complications are due to the immune system's response rather than the virus itself.
   
   Shankara Chetty's model suggested COVID-19 complications were an allergic response to the spike protein, which proved effective in treating 7,000 people.
   
   

5. An "inconvenient discovery" with the HPV vaccine revealed that if someone was vaccinated for a strain of HPV they already had, it "significantly increased their risk of getting cervical cancer".
   
   This "glaring problem" was ignored, and HPV vaccination was recommended at a younger age (9-12) to precede first sexual exposure, despite the vaccine's "very high rate of severe side effects" and no lower dosage for younger children.
   
   

6. The author now believes the primary issue behind observed negative vaccine efficacy is "vaccine-induced immune suppression," rather than just excessive inflammation.
   
   Proposed mechanisms for this immune suppression include the COVID vaccine destroying hematopoietic stem cells and antibody-dependent enhancement.
   
   

7. "Original Antigenic Sin" (OAS) describes the phenomenon where vaccination against a different strain than what is circulating leads to a "worse immune response" than in unvaccinated individuals.
   
   OAS can affect "completely different species" and persist for at least a year after vaccination.
   
   

8. Multiple studies found a 40-166% increase in the likelihood of getting infected with a virus that differed from the vaccinated strain, and up to a 100-fold increase in viral load.
   
   Children who received a non-matching influenza vaccine were 267% more likely to be hospitalized for influenza, and another study found 29.0% developed a non-influenza upper respiratory virus infection compared to 3.4% of the unvaccinated.
   
   

9. OAS is thought to result from "off-target immunity leading to partial immune suppression," where the immune system, with finite capacity, becomes "hyper-primed to target one antigen," diverting focus from other necessary responses.
   
   Vaccine components, like immunostimulatory aluminum adjuvant, can persist in the body for prolonged periods, and with COVID vaccines, synthetic mRNA can lead to spike protein production for over a year.
   
   

10. Seasonal influenza vaccines frequently use the "wrong strain" due to production timelines, leading to ineffectiveness and often "exacerbating the existing flu season".
    
    A Cleveland Clinic study of 51,011 people showed "overt proof of OAS" as "more vaccinations were directly correlated to one’s susceptibility to repeating COVID infections".
    
    

11. Another Cleveland Clinic dataset of 53,402 employees showed that the influenza vaccine "actually increased ones likelihood of getting the flu".
    
    This "disease enhancement from a mismatching vaccine" is a "rarely discussed but well-known problem".
    
    

12. A "tragic example" of OAS immunosuppression came from Peter Aaby’s WHO studies, which found childhood DTwP vaccination in Guinea-Bissau caused children to be 5 times more likely to die.
    
    This increased mortality was largely due to succumbing to "lethal infectious diseases circulating in Subsaharan Africa," but this data was largely ignored by the global public health apparatus.
    
    

Strategic Global Assessment: Navigating a Fractured World and Eroding Trust

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive assessment of the current global strategic landscape, identifying critical challenges across geopolitics, public health, cybersecurity, and domestic policy, drawing on recent events and expert analyses. The findings reveal a period of profound instability characterized by shifting international alliances, heightened economic pressures, and a concerning erosion of public trust in established institutions. Key insights include:

• Geopolitical Realignments: The United States' traditional alliances are being tested, particularly with European partners on Russian energy dependence and with India following new US tariffs, pushing countries like India towards the Russia-China-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS. A unified bloc of authoritarian powers (China, Russia, North Korea) is openly challenging the US and Western allies.

• Public Health Crisis and Trust Deficit: Significant concerns have emerged regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including heightened risks of heart inflammation (myocarditis and pericarditis) and a statistically significant increase in various cancer incidences among vaccinated populations. There are accusations of widespread governmental and media propaganda and censorship contributing to this trust deficit.

• Escalating Cyber and Covert Threats: North Korean state-sponsored hackers are intensifying cryptocurrency theft campaigns to fund sanctioned weapons programs through elaborate social engineering, including fake job offers. Additionally, sensitive US covert operations, such as a SEAL Team 6 mission in North Korea, have been publicly disclosed by media, potentially compromising national security. Hamas-linked cells, supported by officials in Turkey, have attempted high-profile assassinations using explosive drones.

• Domestic Political and Societal Fractures: The US is witnessing intensified political crackdowns on crime, with debates over federal troop deployments and accusations of political motivations. Free speech is under pressure in Western nations, as exemplified by the arrest of a comedian in the UK over social media posts.

These interconnected challenges demand a re-evaluation of current strategies and a renewed focus on transparency, accountability, and the restoration of public confidence.

1.0 Global Geopolitical Landscape Under Pressure

The international arena is experiencing significant turbulence, marked by the emergence of new power blocs and a re-evaluation of long-standing diplomatic and economic relationships. The United States finds itself navigating complex challenges to its global influence.

1.1 Shifting Alliances and US Stance

President Trump has openly accused China, Russia, and North Korea of "conspiring against the United States of America" after their show of unity at a Victory Day parade in Beijing. This parade, commemorating the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II, was noted for the absence of Western leaders and featured a display of advanced military hardware, including hypersonic anti-ship missiles, signaling a direct challenge to the West. Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un were in attendance, presenting themselves alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping as architects of a rival world order.

Despite these tensions, Trump has maintained appeals for diplomacy with China due to ongoing high-stakes trade negotiations, and has expressed a desire to meet with Kim Jong-un, echoing his first term's direct diplomacy. However, North Korea, bolstered by its wartime alliance with Russia, has not reciprocated diplomatic overtures. Trump has also expressed disappointment in Putin regarding the war in Ukraine and has suggested imposing fresh sanctions on Russia if a peace deal is not reached, though such sanctions have yet to materialize.

A significant development is the strained relationship between the US and India. Trump recently imposed an additional 25% tariff on India's exports due to their ongoing purchases of Russian oil, raising the country's total tariff rate to 50%. This action, viewed as "extreme international belligerence," has soured India on the US and is perceived as an attack on Indian sovereignty. India, previously seen as a "bulwark against China," has since moved to strengthen ties with China and Russia, with Prime Minister Modi attending the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) meeting in China for the first time in seven years. The SCO is envisioned as a counterbalance to NATO, and India's participation suggests a potential shift towards exclusive military cooperation within this bloc, distancing itself from the US military. The author of one source believes this move is likely permanent and will significantly weaken the American Empire. Other nations, including Brazil and Iran, also attended the SCO meeting.

1.2 European Energy Dependence and US Pressure

President Trump is pressuring the European Union to stop buying Moscow's oil as part of a strategy to financially squeeze the Kremlin. Financial analysts have long noted that Europe's continued dependence on Russian energy undermines Ukraine's defense efforts and helps Putin avoid financial ruin. Despite sanctions aimed at stopping direct oil imports, a "gaping loophole" allows European countries to legally buy Russian crude if it is refined elsewhere, for example, in countries like Turkey, India, and China. A Helsinki-based think tank report found that the EU spent approximately 21.9 billion euros on Russian oil and gas in 2024, compared to 18.7 billion euros allocated for direct financial aid to Ukraine. This demonstrates Europe "playing both sides against the middle".

While most European countries have stopped directly importing Russian crude and fuel, the slow progress in phasing out Russian fossil fuels by the target of January 1, 2028, remains a concern. Trump questioned Europe's seriousness in fueling Russia's economy and war, stating, "this is not his war and the Europeans must step up as well". The economic hit to Russia could be significant if Europe curbs its dependence, as Russian oil and natural gas exports account for roughly a quarter of its federal budget.

1.3 US Interventionism and Rule of Law Concerns

The US is engaging in "extreme international belligerence" through actions such as imposing tariffs to pressure countries like Venezuela into political changes. President Trump has taken credit for the military killings of eleven people in international waters near Venezuela during a drug-war operation, which some sources describe as "murder, pure and simple". Critics argue that these actions bypass due process, as the individuals were killed without arrest, prosecution, or trial. This approach contrasts with previous US drug-war policy, where suspected boats were stopped, searched, and occupants transported for trial in the US. The "war on drugs" is characterized as a "perpetual racket" that will not be won without drug legalization.

Furthermore, the US government's actions, particularly its "unconditional support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza," are seen as undermining global trust in the US to maintain the global financial system and security architecture. The perception is that the US cannot be trusted to maintain international trade rules, as it can "kick you out of international trade" and "steal your dollar reserves" if it dislikes a country.

1.4 Regional Instability: Middle East & Cybersecurity

In Israel, the Shin Bet security agency recently thwarted a Hamas plot to assassinate National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir using explosive drones. Three members of a Hamas-linked cell were arrested in Hebron, having received funds from Hamas officials based in Turkey for drones, explosives, and a laptop to track the minister's movements. The plot involved targeting Ben-Gvir during a visit to a holy site, though technical difficulties led to abandoned plans. The incident has renewed scrutiny on Hamas officials living in Turkey, who were granted safe haven after a prisoner exchange in 2011 and have been granted citizenship by Turkey, raising questions about the latitude they are given to conduct military operations. Turkey maintains open diplomatic ties with Hamas and allows clandestine operations in Istanbul, including a cyber and intelligence unit.

North Korean hackers are ramping up cryptocurrency theft campaigns to fund Kim Jong-un's sanctioned nuclear weapons programs. The "contagious interview" scam involves recruiters on LinkedIn or Telegram offering fake job opportunities in cryptocurrency markets. Applicants are directed to download code for "skills tests" or video interviews, leading to malware installation, digital wallet drainage, and corporate system exposure. Over 230 targets were identified between January and March, including coders, consultants, and executives. Chain Analysis estimates North Korea stole at least $1.3 billion in cryptocurrency last year alone, with a single heist of $1.5 billion from the Bybit exchange in February. Stolen digital assets are laundered and converted into hard currency, providing a reliable lifeline for Pyongyang's weapons programs. This cyber offensive also includes infiltration via regime operatives posing as remote IT contractors using stolen identities, AI-generated resumes, and deep fake interviews.

2.0 Public Health: Erosion of Trust and Emerging Risks

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent vaccination campaigns have brought to light significant concerns regarding vaccine safety, official transparency, and the role of propaganda in public health messaging.

2.1 COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns

In May 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered Pfizer and Moderna to expand warning labels on their COVID-19 vaccines to include a heightened risk of heart inflammation, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis, in males aged 16 to 25. This risk is described by some as a potential "ticking time bomb" due to its often-symptomless nature. Myocarditis can reduce the heart's ability to pump blood, leading to blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrest, and sudden death.

Michel Chossudovsky notes that this "deadly risk" was known to the FDA and CDC from the "very outset" of the vaccine rollout. A confidential Pfizer study from mid-December 2020 to February 2021, later made public, reportedly confirmed the "deadly nature" of the mRNA injection, with over 1,200 reports of deaths and tens of thousands of adverse events, including 2,000 cardiac disorders, received by Pfizer by the end of February 2021. This report was available to the FDA in early March 2021. Chossudovsky asserts that if the FDA had acted then, "millions of lives would have been saved," and labels Pfizer's continued worldwide marketing and distribution beyond February 2021 as a "criminal act" and "act of murder".

The FDA's decision to update labels follows a 2024 FDA-funded study published in The Lancet showing surging myocarditis cases after the second vaccine dose in young males. Data cited indicated that nearly 60% of patients in a 333-person cohort still exhibited myocardial injury markers five months post-diagnosis, with the long-term significance of these findings unknown.

2.2 Increased Cancer Incidence Post-Vaccination

A large cohort study in Italy found a 36% increased incidence of hospitalization for all cancers among those who received at least one COVID-19 vaccination compared to the unvaccinated. The study, conducted in Pescara province from June 2021 to December 2023, compared hospitalization records of 296,015 people and found statistically significant increases in specific cancer types:

• Bowel (colon-rectum) cancer: 54% higher

• Breast cancer: 54% higher

• Bladder cancer: 105% higher

Other cancers showing increased, though not statistically significant, incidence included Uterine (+93%), Ovarian (+105%), Thyroid (+30%), and Haematological (Blood) (+50%). The study authors urge further investigation, noting that cancer development often occurs over longer periods than the 30-month study duration, suggesting potential for higher longer-term incidence. It also noted that prior COVID-19 infection was associated with a lower increase in cancer hospitalization rates among the vaccinated.

Dr. Guy Hatchard, commenting on the Italian study, highlights the "substantial and alarming" increases and criticizes New Zealand Health authorities for "maintaining the fiction that covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective". He notes that no attempt has been made in New Zealand to compare cancer outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, leaving the public uninformed. Concerns are also raised about the proposed Gene Technology Bill in New Zealand, which seeks to deregulate biotechnology and includes provisions to exonerate individuals from criminal liability for any resulting loss of life.

2.3 Mechanisms and Official Responses

Regarding potential mechanisms, some sources suggest a hyper-inflammatory process where vaccines stimulate an already stressed immune system into a dangerous hyperinflammatory state. This is linked to the Cell Danger Response, which underlies chronic conditions like long COVID and vaccine injuries. An example cited is the HPV vaccine, where vaccination for a strain already present significantly increased cervical cancer risk due to chronic inflammation.

More recently, the concept of Original Antigenic Sin (OAS) is proposed as a primary issue, referring to vaccine-induced immune suppression. OAS occurs when vaccination for a different strain than what is circulating leads to a worse immune response. Studies have shown that OAS can increase the likelihood of infection with non-matching strains and higher viral loads. This is attributed to off-target immunity, where the immune system's focus is diverted by constant stimulation from vaccine antigens, leading to a reduced capacity to respond to other threats. This issue is exacerbated by synthetic mRNA vaccines, as the body struggles to break down the mRNA and spike protein, leading to prolonged immune stimulation. A Cleveland Clinic study cited showed a direct correlation between more COVID-19 vaccinations and increased susceptibility to repeated COVID infections, and another study found the influenza vaccine increased the likelihood of getting the flu.

Despite these findings, public health officials are criticized for ignoring or suppressing scientific information and debate. The CDC's performance during the pandemic is described as a "Chernobyl-level catastrophe," with former directors accused of arrogance and making policy based on informal conversations rather than science.

2.4 The Role of Propaganda in Public Health

The "Covid crisis" is presented as a period where propaganda shifted from intensive episodic practice to a "global" and "mind-numbing strategy of serial bombardment". The media, both corporate and "alternative," fiercely propagated fear of the virus, justifying lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing despite scientific doubts about their effectiveness. This created a "sanctimonious division" between "benevolent maskers and self-centred 'anti-maskers'".

The rollout of vaccines intensified this, with propaganda instructing everyone to "get vaccinated" and certifying them as "safe and effective," even as independent research, clinical trials, and rising "sudden deaths" challenged these assurances. "Vaccination" was even framed as "an act of love". This propaganda drive, according to critical analysts, served to "demonize" opponents of "Covid measures" as "extremists".

The "free press" is characterized as a "propaganda juggernaut" that keeps millions "in ferocious ignorance". This system, influenced by interlocking corporate boards, dependence on advertising revenue from entities like Big Pharma (especially Pfizer), and covert relations with military and intelligence communities, is seen as corrupted "top to bottom". Funding from foundations like Ford, Rockefeller, and Open Society Institute is also implicated in absorbing public and "alternative" media into this system. The "fact-checking" operation, largely funded by figures like Bill Gates, is described as quick, sloppy, and serving to "debunk" narratives that contradict official government and media lines.

3.0 Key Incidents and Their Strategic Implications

Recent high-profile incidents highlight vulnerabilities in national security, the risks of intelligence operations, and the fragility of public trust.

3.1 Covert Operations and Disclosure Risks

A top-secret Navy SEAL Team 6 mission into North Korea in 2019 was revealed by the New York Times, a disclosure that "could have grave implications for already fraught US relations with the nuclear armed Kim regime". The mission, authorized by President Trump, aimed to plant an electronic device to intercept Kim Jong-un's communications during nuclear talks. SEAL Team 6's Red Squadron members infiltrated North Korean shores via nuclear-powered submarine and mini-subs.

The mission "went sideways" when the team encountered a North Korean fishing vessel with unarmed civilians, resulting in the deaths of "two or three unarmed civilians" after the SEAL team opened fire, believing they had been spotted. The mission was aborted, and the device was not planted. This operation had never been publicly acknowledged by either the US or North Korea and its details were highly classified, with not even key members of Congress overseeing intelligence operations being read in.

The New York Times' decision to publish this information, based on anonymous sources, is seen by some as a "reckless partisan display of irresponsibility" with "severe ramifications for us national security and foreign policy". US satellites detected large-scale movements of North Korean troops after the operation, and the Kim regime will now have a "pretty full picture" of the events, gaining "invaluable insights" into America's covert operations.

3.2 State-Sponsored Assassination Plots

The foiled Hamas plot to assassinate Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir with explosive drones underscores the persistent threat of state-sponsored terrorism and the complexity of regional conflicts. The involvement of Hamas officials based in Turkey, who funneled funds to the cell, highlights Turkey's controversial role in harboring and allegedly facilitating operations for the group. Despite Turkey's claims of monitoring these operatives, the granting of citizenship to some Hamas figures and maintaining open diplomatic ties raise "questions about how much latitude Turkey actually grants Hamas leadership behind the scenes". Turkish President Erdogan has taken a public stance in support of Palestinians and Hamas, cutting ties with Israel and meeting with senior Hamas figures.

3.3 Domestic Political Crackdowns and Free Speech Issues

President Trump appears to be "pumping the brakes" on deploying federal troops to Chicago for a crime crackdown, instead floating New Orleans as a potential next target. This strategy, credited with driving down violence in Washington D.C., faces resistance from Democratic governors but is welcomed by Republican governors like Louisiana's Jeff Landry. Trump stated he would "pretty much wait until we get asked" in Democrat-led states, while also bracing for potential courtroom battles over the legality of military involvement in domestic policing. This indicates a sharpening standoff between Republican and Democratic leaders over federal intervention in local crime issues.

In the United Kingdom, a "free speech fight" has erupted after comedian Graham Linehan was arrested over social media posts criticizing trans activists. Linehan, co-creator of Father Ted, was detained under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting violence. One post cited read, "If a transidentified male is in a female only space he is committing a violent abusive act make a scene call the cops and if all else fails punch him in the balls". Linehan insisted it was "serious point made with humor but not an incitement to violence". The arrest, despite low rates of solving other crimes like shoplifting and burglary, has been widely criticized by conservative leaders and writers like JK Rowling as "totalitarianism" and evidence of "Britain's warped priorities" and a "woke rot" hostile to free speech.

4.0 Overarching Themes and Strategic Implications

The convergence of these global and domestic pressures reveals several overarching themes with critical implications for stability and governance.

4.1 The Pervasiveness of Propaganda and Information Control

A recurring theme across the sources is the widespread and sophisticated use of propaganda to shape public opinion and control narratives. This is evident in:

• Public Health Messaging: The aggressive promotion of COVID-19 "measures" and "vaccinations" as "safe and effective," with dissenting voices censored and defamed. Critical analyses suggest this messaging disregarded scientific facts and contributed to "ferocious ignorance".

• Geopolitical Narratives: The framing of the Ukraine conflict, the demonization of adversaries, and the selective reporting of events to align with government agendas.

• Media Complicity: The "free press" is described as a "propaganda juggernaut" with corporate media cartels, intelligence community ties, and funding mechanisms (e.g., Bill Gates's "strategic media partnerships" and "fact-checking" operations) that ensure alignment with dominant narratives.

• Social Engineering: The use of social media to amplify propaganda and silence contradictory information, leading to the "cancellation" or punishment of dissidents.

The implication is that public understanding of critical issues is heavily influenced by controlled information flows, making it challenging for individuals to discern truth and for democratic institutions to function effectively.

4.2 Challenges to Democratic Institutions and Free Speech

The sources highlight a growing strain on democratic principles and institutions:

• Erosion of Rule of Law: Actions like the summary killings in the Caribbean and the unacknowledged SEAL team mission raise questions about adherence to legal frameworks and transparency. The suggestion that US administrations are controlled by foreign entities through blackmail, particularly regarding the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, further undermines faith in political leadership.

• Suppression of Dissent: The arrest of Graham Linehan in the UK and the blacklisting of scientists who presented data challenging official narratives (e.g., on vaccine efficacy) signal a worrying trend of curbing free speech and academic freedom in Western democracies.

• Political Polarization and Distrust: The sharp divide in US domestic policy, with Democratic leaders accused of fighting federal crime crackdowns solely to "appease their hard-left base", exacerbates political polarization and diminishes the capacity for effective governance.

These challenges suggest a weakening of the foundational pillars of liberal democracy and an increasing authoritarian tendency within states attempting to maintain control in a tumultuous environment.

4.3 Economic Vulnerabilities and Geopolitical Leverage

Economic factors are intrinsically linked to geopolitical shifts and national security:

• Energy Dependence as a Geopolitical Tool: Europe's "addiction" to Russian energy is identified as a critical vulnerability that funds Russia's war efforts despite sanctions. US pressure on Europe and India through tariffs demonstrates the use of economic leverage to enforce foreign policy objectives.

• Cybercrime Funding for Adversaries: North Korea's sophisticated cryptocurrency theft operations provide a "reliable lifeline" of hard cash to fund sanctioned nuclear weapons programs. This illustrates how modern financial systems can be exploited to bypass international sanctions and support hostile state actors.

• Economic Realignments: The imposition of US tariffs on India has pushed the populous nation towards economic and security partnerships with China and Russia, potentially creating a powerful economic bloc that challenges US hegemony. This move may also lead to fewer H-1B visas for Indian professionals in the US, as India's tech sector could develop faster through cooperation with China, retaining talent domestically.

These economic dynamics underscore how financial policies and cyber vulnerabilities are integral battlegrounds in the ongoing struggle for global influence and national security.

Conclusion

The sources collectively paint a picture of a world in flux, characterized by increasing geopolitical competition, profound health and information crises, and a deep-seated distrust in institutions. The actions of major powers, combined with emerging threats from non-state actors and the pervasive influence of propaganda, are reshaping the international order and challenging the very foundations of democratic governance. Addressing these multifaceted challenges will require unprecedented transparency, a recommitment to rule of law, and a critical re-evaluation of information consumption to foster an informed citizenry capable of independent thought. The current trajectory suggests a continued period of instability unless fundamental shifts in approach are adopted by global leaders and populations alike.

Strategic Global Assessment: Navigating a Fractured World and Eroding Trust

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive assessment of the current global strategic landscape, identifying critical challenges across geopolitics, public health, cybersecurity, and domestic policy, drawing on recent events and expert analyses. The findings reveal a period of profound instability characterized by shifting international alliances, heightened economic pressures, and a concerning erosion of public trust in established institutions. Key insights include:

• Geopolitical Realignments: The United States' traditional alliances are being tested, particularly with European partners on Russian energy dependence and with India following new US tariffs, pushing countries like India towards the Russia-China-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS. A unified bloc of authoritarian powers (China, Russia, North Korea) is openly challenging the US and Western allies.

• Public Health Crisis and Trust Deficit: Significant concerns have emerged regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including heightened risks of heart inflammation (myocarditis and pericarditis) and a statistically significant increase in various cancer incidences among vaccinated populations. There are accusations of widespread governmental and media propaganda and censorship contributing to this trust deficit.

• Escalating Cyber and Covert Threats: North Korean state-sponsored hackers are intensifying cryptocurrency theft campaigns to fund sanctioned weapons programs through elaborate social engineering, including fake job offers. Additionally, sensitive US covert operations, such as a SEAL Team 6 mission in North Korea, have been publicly disclosed by media, potentially compromising national security. Hamas-linked cells, supported by officials in Turkey, have attempted high-profile assassinations using explosive drones.

• Domestic Political and Societal Fractures: The US is witnessing intensified political crackdowns on crime, with debates over federal troop deployments and accusations of political motivations. Free speech is under pressure in Western nations, as exemplified by the arrest of a comedian in the UK over social media posts.

These interconnected challenges demand a re-evaluation of current strategies and a renewed focus on transparency, accountability, and the restoration of public confidence.

1.0 Global Geopolitical Landscape Under Pressure

The international arena is experiencing significant turbulence, marked by the emergence of new power blocs and a re-evaluation of long-standing diplomatic and economic relationships. The United States finds itself navigating complex challenges to its global influence.

1.1 Shifting Alliances and US Stance

President Trump has openly accused China, Russia, and North Korea of "conspiring against the United States of America" after their show of unity at a Victory Day parade in Beijing. This parade, commemorating the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II, was noted for the absence of Western leaders and featured a display of advanced military hardware, including hypersonic anti-ship missiles, signaling a direct challenge to the West. Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un were in attendance, presenting themselves alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping as architects of a rival world order.

Despite these tensions, Trump has maintained appeals for diplomacy with China due to ongoing high-stakes trade negotiations, and has expressed a desire to meet with Kim Jong-un, echoing his first term's direct diplomacy. However, North Korea, bolstered by its wartime alliance with Russia, has not reciprocated diplomatic overtures. Trump has also expressed disappointment in Putin regarding the war in Ukraine and has suggested imposing fresh sanctions on Russia if a peace deal is not reached, though such sanctions have yet to materialize.

A significant development is the strained relationship between the US and India. Trump recently imposed an additional 25% tariff on India's exports due to their ongoing purchases of Russian oil, raising the country's total tariff rate to 50%. This action, viewed as "extreme international belligerence," has soured India on the US and is perceived as an attack on Indian sovereignty. India, previously seen as a "bulwark against China," has since moved to strengthen ties with China and Russia, with Prime Minister Modi attending the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) meeting in China for the first time in seven years. The SCO is envisioned as a counterbalance to NATO, and India's participation suggests a potential shift towards exclusive military cooperation within this bloc, distancing itself from the US military. The author of one source believes this move is likely permanent and will significantly weaken the American Empire. Other nations, including Brazil and Iran, also attended the SCO meeting.

1.2 European Energy Dependence and US Pressure

President Trump is pressuring the European Union to stop buying Moscow's oil as part of a strategy to financially squeeze the Kremlin. Financial analysts have long noted that Europe's continued dependence on Russian energy undermines Ukraine's defense efforts and helps Putin avoid financial ruin. Despite sanctions aimed at stopping direct oil imports, a "gaping loophole" allows European countries to legally buy Russian crude if it is refined elsewhere, for example, in countries like Turkey, India, and China. A Helsinki-based think tank report found that the EU spent approximately 21.9 billion euros on Russian oil and gas in 2024, compared to 18.7 billion euros allocated for direct financial aid to Ukraine. This demonstrates Europe "playing both sides against the middle".

While most European countries have stopped directly importing Russian crude and fuel, the slow progress in phasing out Russian fossil fuels by the target of January 1, 2028, remains a concern. Trump questioned Europe's seriousness in fueling Russia's economy and war, stating, "this is not his war and the Europeans must step up as well". The economic hit to Russia could be significant if Europe curbs its dependence, as Russian oil and natural gas exports account for roughly a quarter of its federal budget.

1.3 US Interventionism and Rule of Law Concerns

The US is engaging in "extreme international belligerence" through actions such as imposing tariffs to pressure countries like Venezuela into political changes. President Trump has taken credit for the military killings of eleven people in international waters near Venezuela during a drug-war operation, which some sources describe as "murder, pure and simple". Critics argue that these actions bypass due process, as the individuals were killed without arrest, prosecution, or trial. This approach contrasts with previous US drug-war policy, where suspected boats were stopped, searched, and occupants transported for trial in the US. The "war on drugs" is characterized as a "perpetual racket" that will not be won without drug legalization.

Furthermore, the US government's actions, particularly its "unconditional support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza," are seen as undermining global trust in the US to maintain the global financial system and security architecture. The perception is that the US cannot be trusted to maintain international trade rules, as it can "kick you out of international trade" and "steal your dollar reserves" if it dislikes a country.

1.4 Regional Instability: Middle East & Cybersecurity

In Israel, the Shin Bet security agency recently thwarted a Hamas plot to assassinate National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir using explosive drones. Three members of a Hamas-linked cell were arrested in Hebron, having received funds from Hamas officials based in Turkey for drones, explosives, and a laptop to track the minister's movements. The plot involved targeting Ben-Gvir during a visit to a holy site, though technical difficulties led to abandoned plans. The incident has renewed scrutiny on Hamas officials living in Turkey, who were granted safe haven after a prisoner exchange in 2011 and have been granted citizenship by Turkey, raising questions about the latitude they are given to conduct military operations. Turkey maintains open diplomatic ties with Hamas and allows clandestine operations in Istanbul, including a cyber and intelligence unit.

North Korean hackers are ramping up cryptocurrency theft campaigns to fund Kim Jong-un's sanctioned nuclear weapons programs. The "contagious interview" scam involves recruiters on LinkedIn or Telegram offering fake job opportunities in cryptocurrency markets. Applicants are directed to download code for "skills tests" or video interviews, leading to malware installation, digital wallet drainage, and corporate system exposure. Over 230 targets were identified between January and March, including coders, consultants, and executives. Chain Analysis estimates North Korea stole at least $1.3 billion in cryptocurrency last year alone, with a single heist of $1.5 billion from the Bybit exchange in February. Stolen digital assets are laundered and converted into hard currency, providing a reliable lifeline for Pyongyang's weapons programs. This cyber offensive also includes infiltration via regime operatives posing as remote IT contractors using stolen identities, AI-generated resumes, and deep fake interviews.

2.0 Public Health: Erosion of Trust and Emerging Risks

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent vaccination campaigns have brought to light significant concerns regarding vaccine safety, official transparency, and the role of propaganda in public health messaging.

2.1 COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns

In May 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered Pfizer and Moderna to expand warning labels on their COVID-19 vaccines to include a heightened risk of heart inflammation, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis, in males aged 16 to 25. This risk is described by some as a potential "ticking time bomb" due to its often-symptomless nature. Myocarditis can reduce the heart's ability to pump blood, leading to blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrest, and sudden death.

Michel Chossudovsky notes that this "deadly risk" was known to the FDA and CDC from the "very outset" of the vaccine rollout. A confidential Pfizer study from mid-December 2020 to February 2021, later made public, reportedly confirmed the "deadly nature" of the mRNA injection, with over 1,200 reports of deaths and tens of thousands of adverse events, including 2,000 cardiac disorders, received by Pfizer by the end of February 2021. This report was available to the FDA in early March 2021. Chossudovsky asserts that if the FDA had acted then, "millions of lives would have been saved," and labels Pfizer's continued worldwide marketing and distribution beyond February 2021 as a "criminal act" and "act of murder".

The FDA's decision to update labels follows a 2024 FDA-funded study published in The Lancet showing surging myocarditis cases after the second vaccine dose in young males. Data cited indicated that nearly 60% of patients in a 333-person cohort still exhibited myocardial injury markers five months post-diagnosis, with the long-term significance of these findings unknown.

2.2 Increased Cancer Incidence Post-Vaccination

A large cohort study in Italy found a 36% increased incidence of hospitalization for all cancers among those who received at least one COVID-19 vaccination compared to the unvaccinated. The study, conducted in Pescara province from June 2021 to December 2023, compared hospitalization records of 296,015 people and found statistically significant increases in specific cancer types:

• Bowel (colon-rectum) cancer: 54% higher

• Breast cancer: 54% higher

• Bladder cancer: 105% higher

Other cancers showing increased, though not statistically significant, incidence included Uterine (+93%), Ovarian (+105%), Thyroid (+30%), and Haematological (Blood) (+50%). The study authors urge further investigation, noting that cancer development often occurs over longer periods than the 30-month study duration, suggesting potential for higher longer-term incidence. It also noted that prior COVID-19 infection was associated with a lower increase in cancer hospitalization rates among the vaccinated.

Dr. Guy Hatchard, commenting on the Italian study, highlights the "substantial and alarming" increases and criticizes New Zealand Health authorities for "maintaining the fiction that covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective". He notes that no attempt has been made in New Zealand to compare cancer outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, leaving the public uninformed. Concerns are also raised about the proposed Gene Technology Bill in New Zealand, which seeks to deregulate biotechnology and includes provisions to exonerate individuals from criminal liability for any resulting loss of life.

2.3 Mechanisms and Official Responses

Regarding potential mechanisms, some sources suggest a hyper-inflammatory process where vaccines stimulate an already stressed immune system into a dangerous hyperinflammatory state. This is linked to the Cell Danger Response, which underlies chronic conditions like long COVID and vaccine injuries. An example cited is the HPV vaccine, where vaccination for a strain already present significantly increased cervical cancer risk due to chronic inflammation.

More recently, the concept of Original Antigenic Sin (OAS) is proposed as a primary issue, referring to vaccine-induced immune suppression. OAS occurs when vaccination for a different strain than what is circulating leads to a worse immune response. Studies have shown that OAS can increase the likelihood of infection with non-matching strains and higher viral loads. This is attributed to off-target immunity, where the immune system's focus is diverted by constant stimulation from vaccine antigens, leading to a reduced capacity to respond to other threats. This issue is exacerbated by synthetic mRNA vaccines, as the body struggles to break down the mRNA and spike protein, leading to prolonged immune stimulation. A Cleveland Clinic study cited showed a direct correlation between more COVID-19 vaccinations and increased susceptibility to repeated COVID infections, and another study found the influenza vaccine increased the likelihood of getting the flu.

Despite these findings, public health officials are criticized for ignoring or suppressing scientific information and debate. The CDC's performance during the pandemic is described as a "Chernobyl-level catastrophe," with former directors accused of arrogance and making policy based on informal conversations rather than science.

2.4 The Role of Propaganda in Public Health

The "Covid crisis" is presented as a period where propaganda shifted from intensive episodic practice to a "global" and "mind-numbing strategy of serial bombardment". The media, both corporate and "alternative," fiercely propagated fear of the virus, justifying lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing despite scientific doubts about their effectiveness. This created a "sanctimonious division" between "benevolent maskers and self-centred 'anti-maskers'".

The rollout of vaccines intensified this, with propaganda instructing everyone to "get vaccinated" and certifying them as "safe and effective," even as independent research, clinical trials, and rising "sudden deaths" challenged these assurances. "Vaccination" was even framed as "an act of love". This propaganda drive, according to critical analysts, served to "demonize" opponents of "Covid measures" as "extremists".

The "free press" is characterized as a "propaganda juggernaut" that keeps millions "in ferocious ignorance". This system, influenced by interlocking corporate boards, dependence on advertising revenue from entities like Big Pharma (especially Pfizer), and covert relations with military and intelligence communities, is seen as corrupted "top to bottom". Funding from foundations like Ford, Rockefeller, and Open Society Institute is also implicated in absorbing public and "alternative" media into this system. The "fact-checking" operation, largely funded by figures like Bill Gates, is described as quick, sloppy, and serving to "debunk" narratives that contradict official government and media lines.

3.0 Key Incidents and Their Strategic Implications

Recent high-profile incidents highlight vulnerabilities in national security, the risks of intelligence operations, and the fragility of public trust.

3.1 Covert Operations and Disclosure Risks

A top-secret Navy SEAL Team 6 mission into North Korea in 2019 was revealed by the New York Times, a disclosure that "could have grave implications for already fraught US relations with the nuclear armed Kim regime". The mission, authorized by President Trump, aimed to plant an electronic device to intercept Kim Jong-un's communications during nuclear talks. SEAL Team 6's Red Squadron members infiltrated North Korean shores via nuclear-powered submarine and mini-subs.

The mission "went sideways" when the team encountered a North Korean fishing vessel with unarmed civilians, resulting in the deaths of "two or three unarmed civilians" after the SEAL team opened fire, believing they had been spotted. The mission was aborted, and the device was not planted. This operation had never been publicly acknowledged by either the US or North Korea and its details were highly classified, with not even key members of Congress overseeing intelligence operations being read in.

The New York Times' decision to publish this information, based on anonymous sources, is seen by some as a "reckless partisan display of irresponsibility" with "severe ramifications for us national security and foreign policy". US satellites detected large-scale movements of North Korean troops after the operation, and the Kim regime will now have a "pretty full picture" of the events, gaining "invaluable insights" into America's covert operations.

3.2 State-Sponsored Assassination Plots

The foiled Hamas plot to assassinate Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir with explosive drones underscores the persistent threat of state-sponsored terrorism and the complexity of regional conflicts. The involvement of Hamas officials based in Turkey, who funneled funds to the cell, highlights Turkey's controversial role in harboring and allegedly facilitating operations for the group. Despite Turkey's claims of monitoring these operatives, the granting of citizenship to some Hamas figures and maintaining open diplomatic ties raise "questions about how much latitude Turkey actually grants Hamas leadership behind the scenes". Turkish President Erdogan has taken a public stance in support of Palestinians and Hamas, cutting ties with Israel and meeting with senior Hamas figures.

3.3 Domestic Political Crackdowns and Free Speech Issues

President Trump appears to be "pumping the brakes" on deploying federal troops to Chicago for a crime crackdown, instead floating New Orleans as a potential next target. This strategy, credited with driving down violence in Washington D.C., faces resistance from Democratic governors but is welcomed by Republican governors like Louisiana's Jeff Landry. Trump stated he would "pretty much wait until we get asked" in Democrat-led states, while also bracing for potential courtroom battles over the legality of military involvement in domestic policing. This indicates a sharpening standoff between Republican and Democratic leaders over federal intervention in local crime issues.

In the United Kingdom, a "free speech fight" has erupted after comedian Graham Linehan was arrested over social media posts criticizing trans activists. Linehan, co-creator of Father Ted, was detained under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting violence. One post cited read, "If a transidentified male is in a female only space he is committing a violent abusive act make a scene call the cops and if all else fails punch him in the balls". Linehan insisted it was "serious point made with humor but not an incitement to violence". The arrest, despite low rates of solving other crimes like shoplifting and burglary, has been widely criticized by conservative leaders and writers like JK Rowling as "totalitarianism" and evidence of "Britain's warped priorities" and a "woke rot" hostile to free speech.

4.0 Overarching Themes and Strategic Implications

The convergence of these global and domestic pressures reveals several overarching themes with critical implications for stability and governance.

4.1 The Pervasiveness of Propaganda and Information Control

A recurring theme across the sources is the widespread and sophisticated use of propaganda to shape public opinion and control narratives. This is evident in:

• Public Health Messaging: The aggressive promotion of COVID-19 "measures" and "vaccinations" as "safe and effective," with dissenting voices censored and defamed. Critical analyses suggest this messaging disregarded scientific facts and contributed to "ferocious ignorance".

• Geopolitical Narratives: The framing of the Ukraine conflict, the demonization of adversaries, and the selective reporting of events to align with government agendas.

• Media Complicity: The "free press" is described as a "propaganda juggernaut" with corporate media cartels, intelligence community ties, and funding mechanisms (e.g., Bill Gates's "strategic media partnerships" and "fact-checking" operations) that ensure alignment with dominant narratives.

• Social Engineering: The use of social media to amplify propaganda and silence contradictory information, leading to the "cancellation" or punishment of dissidents.

The implication is that public understanding of critical issues is heavily influenced by controlled information flows, making it challenging for individuals to discern truth and for democratic institutions to function effectively.

4.2 Challenges to Democratic Institutions and Free Speech

The sources highlight a growing strain on democratic principles and institutions:

• Erosion of Rule of Law: Actions like the summary killings in the Caribbean and the unacknowledged SEAL team mission raise questions about adherence to legal frameworks and transparency. The suggestion that US administrations are controlled by foreign entities through blackmail, particularly regarding the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, further undermines faith in political leadership.

• Suppression of Dissent: The arrest of Graham Linehan in the UK and the blacklisting of scientists who presented data challenging official narratives (e.g., on vaccine efficacy) signal a worrying trend of curbing free speech and academic freedom in Western democracies.

• Political Polarization and Distrust: The sharp divide in US domestic policy, with Democratic leaders accused of fighting federal crime crackdowns solely to "appease their hard-left base", exacerbates political polarization and diminishes the capacity for effective governance.

These challenges suggest a weakening of the foundational pillars of liberal democracy and an increasing authoritarian tendency within states attempting to maintain control in a tumultuous environment.

4.3 Economic Vulnerabilities and Geopolitical Leverage

Economic factors are intrinsically linked to geopolitical shifts and national security:

• Energy Dependence as a Geopolitical Tool: Europe's "addiction" to Russian energy is identified as a critical vulnerability that funds Russia's war efforts despite sanctions. US pressure on Europe and India through tariffs demonstrates the use of economic leverage to enforce foreign policy objectives.

• Cybercrime Funding for Adversaries: North Korea's sophisticated cryptocurrency theft operations provide a "reliable lifeline" of hard cash to fund sanctioned nuclear weapons programs. This illustrates how modern financial systems can be exploited to bypass international sanctions and support hostile state actors.

• Economic Realignments: The imposition of US tariffs on India has pushed the populous nation towards economic and security partnerships with China and Russia, potentially creating a powerful economic bloc that challenges US hegemony. This move may also lead to fewer H-1B visas for Indian professionals in the US, as India's tech sector could develop faster through cooperation with China, retaining talent domestically.

These economic dynamics underscore how financial policies and cyber vulnerabilities are integral battlegrounds in the ongoing struggle for global influence and national security.

Conclusion

The sources collectively paint a picture of a world in flux, characterized by increasing geopolitical competition, profound health and information crises, and a deep-seated distrust in institutions. The actions of major powers, combined with emerging threats from non-state actors and the pervasive influence of propaganda, are reshaping the international order and challenging the very foundations of democratic governance. Addressing these multifaceted challenges will require unprecedented transparency, a recommitment to rule of law, and a critical re-evaluation of information consumption to foster an informed citizenry capable of independent thought. The current trajectory suggests a continued period of instability unless fundamental shifts in approach are adopted by global leaders and populations alike.

Briefing Document: "The Snitch" - Saturday, September 6, 2025

Date: September 6, 2025 Source: "☕️ THE SNITCH ☙ Saturday, September 6, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠" by Jeff Childers

This briefing document summarizes key themes and important developments from the September 6, 2025, edition of "The Snitch" by Jeff Childers, focusing on political shifts, rhetorical strategies, and emerging controversies.

I. Renaming the Department of Defense to the Department of War: A Strategic Shift Towards Clarity and Demolition of the "Deep State"

President Trump's executive order renaming the "Department of Defense" back to its original moniker, the "Department of War," is presented as a significant ideological and strategic move, not mere nostalgia.

• Rejection of Euphemisms: The author argues that the change is a deliberate "demolition" of the "sly progressive euphemism crafted to convince our enemies that all our aircraft carriers and ICBMs and Middle Eastern military bases are purely defensive in nature." This renaming aims to strip away the "subterfuge" and force a more honest perception of American military actions, both domestically and internationally.

• Plain English as a Threat to Progressive Ideology: The article posits that "Progressive ideology survives on language manipulation like chupacabras survive on blood." By using "plain English," Trump is "extinguish[ing] the spell" cast by euphemisms like "content moderation" for censorship or "gender-affirming care" for castration.

• Dismantling the Cold War "Deep State": The "Defense" label, introduced by Harry S. Truman in 1949, is described as a "Cold War distortion" that "metastasized into permanent military bases, permanent wars, and permanent excuses." The renaming is seen as the initial step in "prun[ing]" the military-industrial complex by revealing it as a "War Department, feasting on endless war." This "demolition" targets the "Truman-era Cold War scaffolding that layered a security-state bureaucracy atop our republic," ultimately aiming to "Kill the roots, and the whole deep state shrivels."

• Parallel with USAID: The author draws a parallel between the Defense Department renaming and Trump's "slaughtered USAID," which is described as the "progressives’ passive-aggressive War Department, wearing lipstick and a sundress," used for "regime-change operations as a philanthropy."

• Perception and Power: The author emphasizes that "Optics matter. What we call things and what they look like isn’t just cosmetic— it’s strategic." A clear, unambiguous name for the military, coupled with a "beautified" capital, is intended to project "resolve" and "strength," restoring "credibility" for allies and adversaries alike.

II. Washington D.C. Makeover: Aesthetics and Law & Order

President Trump's announced plans for a "beautification" of Washington D.C. are framed as another example of "actions over words," combining aesthetic improvements with a focus on law and order.

• Concrete Changes: Trump is quoted as saying, "We're going to clean up the place... We're going to put new grass in all the parks. We're going to re-grass them with the best guys in the country."

• Addressing Crime Through Infrastructure: The plan directly links physical upkeep to public safety, with Trump stating, "We're going to fix the curbs. I noticed some of your curbs are broken. You know why? They're hitting them with a hammer so they can pick it up and throw it at the police. But not anymore, they're not. Not anymore."

• Strategic Importance of Perception: The author reiterates that a capital city's appearance is not just cosmetic but "strategic." A "capital with parks that look like third-world dirt lots looks weak and structurally broken."

III. FCC to Allow Prison Cell Phone Jamming: Common Sense Over Bureaucracy

The FCC's decision to bypass Congress and allow prisons to jam contraband cell phones is presented as a triumph of "common sense" over political obstruction.

• Pervasive Problem: The article highlights the widespread issue of smuggled cell phones in prisons, used for "run[ning] gangs, coordinat[ing] drug shipments and riots, and even order[ing] hits."

• Congressional Failure: Congress is criticized for "years" of failed attempts to pass legislation due to "Democrats’ dumb objections."

• FCC's Executive Action: Trump’s new FCC Director Brendan Carr's decision to redefine prison phones as "unauthorized devices" to circumvent federal anti-jamming laws is lauded as a direct and effective solution.

IV. Speaker Johnson's Revelation: Trump as an FBI Informant on Jeffrey Epstein

Speaker Mike Johnson's "slip" about President Trump being an FBI informant in the Jeffrey Epstein case is presented as a potentially game-changing revelation that could upend Democratic narratives.

• Johnson's Statement: Speaker Johnson is quoted as saying, "When President Trump first heard the rumor, he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago... He was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down."

• Timeline of Events Supporting the Claim:2005: Trump bans Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.

• 2006: Epstein arrested in South Florida (under Obama's FBI, described as a "wrist slap").

• 2017 (three weeks after Inauguration): Trump signs an executive order targeting "Transnational criminal trafficking."

• 2019: Trump's DOJ arrests Epstein, seizes his island, and he dies in prison.

• 2020: Trump's DOJ arrests Ghislaine Maxwell, who receives a 20-year sentence.

• 2018: Epstein victims’ lawyer Bradley Edwards states Trump "voluntarily cooperated with their lawsuits since 2009," providing "very helpful information," and that there was "no sign" Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes.

• Democratic Silence: The article notes that "during eight years of Obama and four years of Biden, Democrats were mute about Epstein. They certainly never produced or even hinted at any connection to Trump."

• Implications and Speculation: The author speculates on the "awful possibility for Democrats: what if he can prove it?" and suggests Trump may have been "quietly sitting on his starring role in Epstein’s takedown, letting Democrats crawl further and further out on the conspiracy branch."

V. RFK Jr., HHS, and the Autism Report: Media Pre-Bunking and Pharma Propaganda

The Wall Street Journal's exclusive on a forthcoming HHS report linking autism to Tylenol use and folate deficiencies is heavily criticized for its speculative nature and perceived "pharma propaganda."

• Anonymous and Vague Reporting: The WSJ article is described as relying solely on "unnamed 'people familiar with the matter'" and using passive, non-committal language ("likely to suggest," "expected to be," "couldn’t be determined if the report will mention vaccines"). The official HHS response explicitly stated, "'Until we release the final report, any claims about its contents are nothing more than speculation.'"

• Market Impact and Irresponsible Journalism: The "rumor" immediately caused Tylenol maker Kenvue to lose 10% of its market value, leading the author to label it "textbook irresponsible journalism."

• Pre-Bunking and Pharma Influence: The Journal's "defensive and skeptical" framing, "essentially prebunking any Tylenol–autism connection in advance," is characterized as "pharma propaganda."

• Contradiction of Existing Research: The article highlights a recent peer-reviewed meta-study by Springer Nature that found "The majority of the studies (27 of 46) reported positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder, or Neurological Development Disorder in offspring," directly contradicting the Journal's "experts" who declared the "literature was mixed."

• Double Standard for Evidence: The author points out a double standard: "when they want to force you to take an experimental drug to 'slow the spread' of a common cold, then very little evidence is required. But when trying to get a handle on the autism epidemic, well, they require proof of links between autism and their profitable drugs beyond a shadow of a doubt first."

• Anticipation of the Real Report: Despite the criticism, the author expresses anticipation for the actual report from HHS, noting the "hysteria that a single rumor about the report provoked."

convert_to_textConvert to source

This article challenges the foundational assumption that vaccines are always "safe and effective," arguing that medical consensus often overlooks evidence of negative outcomes. The author presents personal observations and research suggesting that vaccinated individuals can still contract the very illnesses they were immunized against, and in some cases, experience more severe illness or death. The central theory proposed is "Original Antigenic Sin" (OAS), where prior vaccination, especially with a mismatched strain, can lead to a weakened or misdirected immune response, making individuals more susceptible to subsequent infections. This phenomenon, which the article claims has historical precedents, highlights a potential downside of vaccination that, according to the author, is often disregarded by the medical community for commercial or established-practice reasons. 

Discuss Trump Administration Actions.

The Trump Administration has undertaken several significant actions as detailed in the sources, covering changes to federal departments, urban beautification, regulatory adjustments, and addressing major societal issues.

Here's a breakdown of the actions:

• Renaming the Department of Defense to the Department of War: President Trump issued an order to restore the title of the "Department of Defense" to its original name, the "Department of War," established by President George Washington on August 7, 17891.... Trump's executive order clarified that the name "Department of War" better "ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend"3. This move reversed a change made by Harry S. Truman in 1949, who preferred the "Department of Defense" as a "sly progressive euphemism" to make U.S. military power appear purely defensive4. This renaming was viewed by a New York Times reporter as more than nostalgia, but a "message" and an "elegy to Cold War 'soft power' dirty tricks," which caused "liberals to lose their last grasp on sanity"1.... The source suggests this action ends the "era of euphemisms," aiming for directness and transparency in U.S. foreign policy, and is a form of "demolition" against the "Truman-era Cold War scaffolding" that fostered a security-state bureaucracy and a global empire mindset67. It is also seen as a way to expose the military-industrial complex and dismantle the "deep state" by stripping away misleading jargon89. The change is also intended to restore credibility and demonstrate resolve and strength1011.

• "Slaughtering" USAID: The Trump administration "slaughtered USAID," which the source describes as the "progressives’ passive-aggressive War Department" that used "friendly-sounding NGOs" to destabilize countries through "regime-change operations" disguised as "philanthropy"12. This action is presented as part of Trump's strategy to abandon "subterfuge" and operate with greater transparency, both internationally and for the American people, by no longer pretending foreign military involvements were "humanitarian projects or national-security musts"12.

• Beautifying Washington, D.C.: President Trump announced details of an "ongoing project to beautify Washington, DC"13. This includes cleaning up the city, replacing grass in all parks with new, high-quality turf, and fixing broken curbs10. Trump specifically noted that curbs were being fixed because they were used as projectiles against police, stating, "But not anymore, they're not. Not anymore"10. This initiative is considered strategic, as "optics matter," and a well-maintained capital projects strength and credibility to both allies and adversaries, and a "plain-talking government" to the American people1011.

• FCC Action on Prison Cell Phones: Trump’s new FCC Director, Brendan Carr, announced that the agency would "bypass Congress" to address the issue of contraband cell phones in prisons14. The FCC plans to redefine phones inside prisons as "unauthorized devices," which would remove them from federal anti-jamming laws14. This action aims to combat the widespread problem of inmates using smuggled phones for organized crime, such as running gangs, coordinating drug shipments, and instigating riots, as well as for social media activities1115. The source praises this as a return to "common sense"14.

• Alleged Role as FBI Informant on Jeffrey Epstein: Speaker Mike Johnson indicated that President Trump "may have been an FBI informant helping nail Epstein"114. Johnson stated that after Trump heard rumors about Epstein, he "kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago" in 200516. The source also notes that in 2017, just three weeks into his presidency, Trump signed an executive order targeting "Transnational criminal trafficking"16. Subsequently, in 2019, Trump’s DOJ arrested Epstein, leading to his death in prison, and in 2020, Trump’s DOJ arrested Ghislaine Maxwell, who received a 20-year sentence17. Bradley Edwards, a lawyer for Epstein's victims, confirmed in 2018 that Trump was the "only prominent figure who voluntarily cooperated" with their lawsuits since 2009, providing "very helpful information," and stated there was "no sign" Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes17. Victims have not sued Trump, unlike other high-profile figures and institutions18. The source suggests that the claim of Trump being an FBI informant is a more consistent theory than Epstein having blackmail on Trump, who then prosecuted him anyway18. The existence of an official paper trail, such as "source files, FD-1023 reports, handler notes, maybe even receipts for expenses," could potentially verify Johnson's claim19. The DOJ has remained silent on the matter20.

• RFK Jr. and an Autism Report: While the source critiques the Wall Street Journal's reporting on it, it mentions that "Secretary Kennedy" (referring to RFK Jr. in his role as HHS Secretary in the Trump administration) is expected to announce a link between Tylenol (acetaminophen) use in pregnancy and autism, and suggest that folinic acid might relieve symptoms in children with autism2021. The Journal, citing unnamed sources, also suggested the report would explore "other potential causes of autism"21. An HHS spokesman clarified that any claims about the report's contents before its release are "speculation"21. The author argues that a recent peer-reviewed meta-study supports a connection between prenatal acetaminophen use and neurological disorders, suggesting Kennedy is on "solid ground" if he makes such a link22. Kennedy reportedly "promised an autism report this month"23.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss "War Department" Renaming.

President Trump has renamed the Department of Defense back to its original moniker, the Department of War, an action that has been met with varied interpretations1.... This change is seen as a significant move away from the "sly progressive euphemism" of "Defense" towards a more direct and transparent approach to U.S. foreign policy45.

Historical Context and Trump's Rationale: The original "Department of War" was established on August 7, 1789, by President George Washington3. In 1949, President Harry S. Truman (D) changed the name to the "Department of Defense," which the source describes as a progressive euphemism designed to make other nations perceive U.S. military actions as "purely defensive"4.

Trump's executive order states that the name "Department of War," "more than the current ‘Department of Defense,’ ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend"3.

Reactions and Interpretations:

• Criticism from the Media: David Sanger of the New York Times penned an "anguished news analysis" titled "The Return of the ‘War Department’ Is More Than Nostalgia. It’s a Message." Sanger viewed the renaming as ignoring the "greatest accomplishment of the past 80 years: avoiding superpower conflict"6. The source criticizes Sanger for focusing heavily on the name change without quoting Trump's actual executive order and suggests that names are "super duper important" to liberals2. Sanger reportedly fretted that the name change would make enemies "catch on" to the ruse of purely defensive U.S. actions4.

• End of Euphemisms: The renaming is presented as a signal that the "era of euphemisms is over"7. The author argues that the "fancy new name" of "Department of Defense" was "already a sad joke," as other countries had long seen through the pretense, citing U.S. military excursions in Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, and others45. Trump's strategy, according to the source, is to stop America from pretending to be a "best buddy" while engaging in "surprise color revolution or ‘totally organic’ coup d’état"5. Instead, he aims for a policy where "if we shoot you, you’ll be awake, armed, and facing us. We won’t shoot you in the back"8.

• Demolition of Cold War Structures: The author agrees with Sanger that the renaming is "not nostalgia—it’s demolition"9. It is interpreted as knocking down the "Truman-era Cold War scaffolding that layered a security-state bureaucracy atop our republic"9. The euphemism "Defense" is seen as having "re-engineered the national mindset," allowing America to pretend it was always "responding" or "deterring" rather than admitting to running a "global empire," which led to "permanent military bases, permanent wars, and permanent excuses"9.

• Targeting the Deep State and Military-Industrial Complex: The renaming is portrayed as a crucial step in pruning the military-industrial complex and dismantling the deep state, which is described as a "Cold War creation"1011. By "stripping off the fig leaves" like "defense," "deterrence," and "humanitarian intervention," the public can see the "trillion-dollar machine for what it is: a War Department, feasting on endless war"10. The source suggests that this "plain English" approach is the "greatest national security threat" to the deep state, as it exposes the roots laid down in the Truman years—permanent intelligence agencies, surveillance, and overseas garrisons justified by "deterrence"11.

• Connection to USAID: The renaming is linked to Trump's earlier actions against USAID, which the author describes as the "progressives’ passive-aggressive War Department," disguising "regime-change operations as a philanthropy"8.

• Perception and Credibility: The source emphasizes that "optics matter" and that "perception shapes power"1213. A nation that names its military "Defense" while maintaining 750 bases abroad is seen as "sneaky and untrustworthy"12. By restoring the original name, Trump aims to restore credibility, showing resolve to allies, strength to adversaries, and a "plain-talking government" to the American people13.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Epstein Investigation Speculation.

Speculation surrounding the Epstein investigation primarily revolves around the recent suggestion that President Trump may have acted as an FBI informant, assisting in Jeffrey Epstein's takedown12.

This idea was brought to light by Speaker Mike Johnson, who, at a Rose Garden fundraiser, "let it slip" to reporters that Trump "was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down"23. Johnson also stated that when President Trump first heard the rumor about Epstein, he "kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago"3.

Here's a breakdown of the speculative points and related events:

• Trump's actions regarding Epstein:

    ◦ In 2005, Trump famously banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club3.

    ◦ A year later, in 2006, Epstein was arrested in South Florida, though the Obama administration's FBI gave him what is described as a "wrist slap"3.

    ◦ In 2017, only three weeks after his inauguration, President Trump signed an executive order targeting "Transnational criminal trafficking"3.

    ◦ In 2019, Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) arrested Epstein, seized his island, and he "literally died in prison"4.

    ◦ In 2020, Trump's DOJ arrested Ghislaine Maxwell, who later received a 20-year sentence for crimes against children4.

• Lawyer's testimony and lack of lawsuits against Trump:

    ◦ Bradley Edwards, an attorney for Epstein's victims, stated in 2018 that President Trump was the only prominent figure who had voluntarily cooperated with their lawsuits since 2009, providing "very helpful information"4.

    ◦ Edwards also said in 2018, after nine years on the case, that there was "no sign" Trump had been involved in any of Epstein’s crimes4.

    ◦ Epstein's victims have sued JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, but they have never sued Donald Trump5.

• Contrast with Democrats' silence:

    ◦ During the eight years of the Obama administration and four years of the Biden administration, Democrats were "mute about Epstein"5. They reportedly "never produced or even hinted at any connection to Trump," with "no subpoenas, no exposés, no whispered leaks"5.

• Theories surrounding Trump's role:

    ◦ The sources highlight two contrasting theories:

        1. That Epstein had blackmail material on Trump, but President Trump prosecuted him anyway5.

        2. That Trump had been assisting the FBI in trying to take Epstein down since as far back as 20055.

• Skepticism and demand for proof:

    ◦ "Low-information commenters on BlueSky" are noted as remaining skeptical of Johnson's claim6.

    ◦ The claim is described as "bold" if untrue, as a formal FBI informant would require an official paper trail including source files, FD-1023 reports, handler notes, and possibly expense receipts. These documents are logged and stored by regulation, and multiple FBI staff would likely have worked on such a file, meaning they "could also confirm (or deny) the claim"6.

    ◦ The possibility that Johnson could prove his claim is presented as an "awful possibility for Democrats"6.

    ◦ As of the report, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has remained "mum," and the corporate media has not been observed demanding answers from the DOJ7.

• Trump's potential strategy:

    ◦ The sources speculate that if Trump truly has been sitting on evidence of his role in Epstein's takedown, he might be letting Democrats "crawl further and further out on the conspiracy branch" before "lopp[ing] it off anytime he wants," suggesting his silence could be a strategic move7.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Autism Report Controversy.

The autism report controversy stems from an "exclusive" article published by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), which triggered a cascade of corporate media stories1. The article, titled "RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies," fueled speculation about an upcoming report from Secretary Kennedy12.

Here's a breakdown of the controversy:

• WSJ's Speculative Reporting: The WSJ article cited only unnamed "people familiar with the matter" and claimed that Secretary Kennedy "plans" to announce a link between Tylenol (acetaminophen) and autism, and will suggest that folinic acid may relieve some symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder2. The report was also "expected to suggest other potential causes of autism and suggest further study," though these were not named2. The article was characterized by highly speculative language, using terms like "likely," "expected," "couldn't be determined," and "might"2.

• HHS Response and Lack of Official Confirmation: The only "on-the-record" source, an HHS spokesman, explicitly stated, "Until we release the final report, any claims about its contents are nothing more than speculation"2. This suggested that the WSJ's "news" was based on anonymous whispers about what a future report might say, with no official confirmation23. The author interprets this as the media "pre-spinning" the public's reaction to a report not yet released3.

• Market Impact and Irresponsible Journalism: The WSJ's speculative article had immediate financial repercussions, causing Tylenol's maker, Kenvue, to lose 10% of its market value3. The source describes this as "textbook irresponsible journalism" for running a market-moving headline about autism, Tylenol, and folate without either the actual report or a named official standing behind the claims3.

• Narrative Framing and "Pharma Propaganda" Accusation: The WSJ's narrative framing was perceived as immediately defensive and skeptical, essentially "prebunking any Tylenol–autism connection in advance" without waiting for the HHS report4. The author argues that the Journal showed "no curiosity" about the potential contents of the report and instead adopted a "Kennedy is dumb" narrative, labeling this approach as "pharma propaganda"4.

• Contrasting Evidence and Double Standards: The controversy also highlights a perceived double standard in scientific evidence. The WSJ failed to report on a peer-reviewed meta-study published by Springer Nature just two weeks prior, which identified 46 studies, with "the majority of the studies (27 of 46) reported positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder, or Neurological Development Disorder in offspring"5. Despite this, the WSJ's "experts" reportedly declared that the "literature was mixed" and there was "not enough evidence"5. Dr. Christine Ladd-Acosta of Johns Hopkins stated there was "no conclusive evidence" that Tylenol "itself" causes autism "definitively," a standard of proof that the author notes is often not applied to "experimental drug[s]" or mRNA mandates6.

• Anticipation of the Actual Report: The source concludes that while the WSJ's "rumor report" generated significant controversy and financial loss, the actual contents of Kennedy's autism report remain unknown7. Kennedy had promised an autism report this month, and the author anticipates considerable "hysteria" once the real report is released7.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Media Criticism.

The sources contain significant criticism of various media outlets, accusing them of bias, spreading misinformation, acting as mouthpieces for certain agendas, and lacking genuine journalistic integrity.

Here's a breakdown of the media criticism presented:

• New York Times and David Sanger:

    ◦ The New York Times (NYT) and its reporter, David Sanger, are heavily criticized for their "anguished news analysis" regarding President Trump's renaming of the Department of Defense to the "Department of War"12. Sanger is labeled a "deep-state apparatchik"1 and accused of writing a "heartfelt elegy to Cold War ‘soft power’ dirty tricks"1.

    ◦ The source mocks Sanger for his extensive word count (nearly 3,000 words) compared to Trump's concise executive order (280 words), and for allegedly not quoting Trump's actual order2.

    ◦ Sanger's concern that renaming the department would make enemies "catch on to the ruse" of U.S. military actions being "purely defensive" is presented as naive, given numerous historical military excursions3.

    ◦ The author states that Sanger's hyperventilation over the name change is because "by killing the euphemism, you extinguish the spell," terrifying progressives who rely on "plain English"4.

    ◦ Ultimately, Sanger is portrayed as the "deep state’s main man at the Times," upset because Trump is restoring the "War Department’s original, honest name," which is seen as a threat to the deep state5.

• Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and RFK Jr./Autism Report:

    ◦ The Wall Street Journal is accused of "irresponsible journalism" for publishing an "exclusive article" based on unnamed sources regarding RFK Jr.'s (as HHS Secretary) upcoming autism report67.

    ◦ The article, headlined "RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies," is described as based on "anonymous sources whispering about what a report might say sometime in the future"78.

    ◦ The author notes that the only "on-the-record source" (an HHS spokesman) stated, "'Until we release the final report, any claims about its contents are nothing more than speculation,'" effectively discrediting the WSJ's story78.

    ◦ The WSJ's article is characterized as "rumor dressed up as fact by repetition" and "literally textbook irresponsible journalism" for running a "market-moving headline" without the actual report or named officials backing the claims7.

    ◦ The source further criticizes the WSJ's "narrative framing," suggesting it aimed to portray "Kennedy is dumb" and was "defensive and skeptical from the start, essentially prebunking any Tylenol–autism connection in advance, without even waiting to see what HHS comes up with"9. This is labeled as "pharma propaganda"9.

    ◦ The WSJ is criticized for failing to report on a recent peer-reviewed meta-study that found "positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder, or Neurological Development Disorder in offspring," implying a selective reporting of evidence10. The WSJ's unnamed "experts" are contrasted with the study's findings, with the Journal's experts declaring the "literature was mixed"10.

• General "Corporate Media" / "Mockingbird Media":

    ◦ The "corporate media" is questioned for its silence on demands for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to confirm or deny Speaker Mike Johnson's claim that Trump was an FBI informant on Jeffrey Epstein6. The author asks, "Do they want to know?" implying a reluctance to pursue information that might be politically inconvenient for Democrats6.

    ◦ The "mockingbird media" is grouped with the WSJ in its "irresponsible journalism" regarding the RFK Jr. autism report speculation7.

    ◦ The source suggests that "low-information commenters on BlueSky" and the "dumb reporters at the Journal" are part of a broader trend of skepticism or lack of thoroughness in reporting911.

Overall, the sources present a narrative where established media outlets are either actively complicit with a "deep state" agenda (NYT) or demonstrate significant bias and lack of critical analysis, especially when reporting on politically sensitive topics or those that might challenge established narratives (WSJ on health, general media on Epstein)1....

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Trump Administration Actions.

The Trump Administration has undertaken several significant actions as detailed in the sources, covering changes to federal departments, urban beautification, regulatory adjustments, and addressing major societal issues.

Here's a breakdown of the actions:

• Renaming the Department of Defense to the Department of War: President Trump issued an order to restore the title of the "Department of Defense" to its original name, the "Department of War," established by President George Washington on August 7, 17891.... Trump's executive order clarified that the name "Department of War" better "ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend"3. This move reversed a change made by Harry S. Truman in 1949, who preferred the "Department of Defense" as a "sly progressive euphemism" to make U.S. military power appear purely defensive4. This renaming was viewed by a New York Times reporter as more than nostalgia, but a "message" and an "elegy to Cold War 'soft power' dirty tricks," which caused "liberals to lose their last grasp on sanity"1.... The source suggests this action ends the "era of euphemisms," aiming for directness and transparency in U.S. foreign policy, and is a form of "demolition" against the "Truman-era Cold War scaffolding" that fostered a security-state bureaucracy and a global empire mindset67. It is also seen as a way to expose the military-industrial complex and dismantle the "deep state" by stripping away misleading jargon89. The change is also intended to restore credibility and demonstrate resolve and strength1011.

• "Slaughtering" USAID: The Trump administration "slaughtered USAID," which the source describes as the "progressives’ passive-aggressive War Department" that used "friendly-sounding NGOs" to destabilize countries through "regime-change operations" disguised as "philanthropy"12. This action is presented as part of Trump's strategy to abandon "subterfuge" and operate with greater transparency, both internationally and for the American people, by no longer pretending foreign military involvements were "humanitarian projects or national-security musts"12.

• Beautifying Washington, D.C.: President Trump announced details of an "ongoing project to beautify Washington, DC"13. This includes cleaning up the city, replacing grass in all parks with new, high-quality turf, and fixing broken curbs10. Trump specifically noted that curbs were being fixed because they were used as projectiles against police, stating, "But not anymore, they're not. Not anymore"10. This initiative is considered strategic, as "optics matter," and a well-maintained capital projects strength and credibility to both allies and adversaries, and a "plain-talking government" to the American people1011.

• FCC Action on Prison Cell Phones: Trump’s new FCC Director, Brendan Carr, announced that the agency would "bypass Congress" to address the issue of contraband cell phones in prisons14. The FCC plans to redefine phones inside prisons as "unauthorized devices," which would remove them from federal anti-jamming laws14. This action aims to combat the widespread problem of inmates using smuggled phones for organized crime, such as running gangs, coordinating drug shipments, and instigating riots, as well as for social media activities1115. The source praises this as a return to "common sense"14.

• Alleged Role as FBI Informant on Jeffrey Epstein: Speaker Mike Johnson indicated that President Trump "may have been an FBI informant helping nail Epstein"114. Johnson stated that after Trump heard rumors about Epstein, he "kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago" in 200516. The source also notes that in 2017, just three weeks into his presidency, Trump signed an executive order targeting "Transnational criminal trafficking"16. Subsequently, in 2019, Trump’s DOJ arrested Epstein, leading to his death in prison, and in 2020, Trump’s DOJ arrested Ghislaine Maxwell, who received a 20-year sentence17. Bradley Edwards, a lawyer for Epstein's victims, confirmed in 2018 that Trump was the "only prominent figure who voluntarily cooperated" with their lawsuits since 2009, providing "very helpful information," and stated there was "no sign" Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes17. Victims have not sued Trump, unlike other high-profile figures and institutions18. The source suggests that the claim of Trump being an FBI informant is a more consistent theory than Epstein having blackmail on Trump, who then prosecuted him anyway18. The existence of an official paper trail, such as "source files, FD-1023 reports, handler notes, maybe even receipts for expenses," could potentially verify Johnson's claim19. The DOJ has remained silent on the matter20.

• RFK Jr. and an Autism Report: While the source critiques the Wall Street Journal's reporting on it, it mentions that "Secretary Kennedy" (referring to RFK Jr. in his role as HHS Secretary in the Trump administration) is expected to announce a link between Tylenol (acetaminophen) use in pregnancy and autism, and suggest that folinic acid might relieve symptoms in children with autism2021. The Journal, citing unnamed sources, also suggested the report would explore "other potential causes of autism"21. An HHS spokesman clarified that any claims about the report's contents before its release are "speculation"21. The author argues that a recent peer-reviewed meta-study supports a connection between prenatal acetaminophen use and neurological disorders, suggesting Kennedy is on "solid ground" if he makes such a link22. Kennedy reportedly "promised an autism report this month"23.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss "War Department" Renaming.

President Trump has renamed the Department of Defense back to its original moniker, the Department of War, an action that has been met with varied interpretations1.... This change is seen as a significant move away from the "sly progressive euphemism" of "Defense" towards a more direct and transparent approach to U.S. foreign policy45.

Historical Context and Trump's Rationale: The original "Department of War" was established on August 7, 1789, by President George Washington3. In 1949, President Harry S. Truman (D) changed the name to the "Department of Defense," which the source describes as a progressive euphemism designed to make other nations perceive U.S. military actions as "purely defensive"4.

Trump's executive order states that the name "Department of War," "more than the current ‘Department of Defense,’ ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend"3.

Reactions and Interpretations:

• Criticism from the Media: David Sanger of the New York Times penned an "anguished news analysis" titled "The Return of the ‘War Department’ Is More Than Nostalgia. It’s a Message." Sanger viewed the renaming as ignoring the "greatest accomplishment of the past 80 years: avoiding superpower conflict"6. The source criticizes Sanger for focusing heavily on the name change without quoting Trump's actual executive order and suggests that names are "super duper important" to liberals2. Sanger reportedly fretted that the name change would make enemies "catch on" to the ruse of purely defensive U.S. actions4.

• End of Euphemisms: The renaming is presented as a signal that the "era of euphemisms is over"7. The author argues that the "fancy new name" of "Department of Defense" was "already a sad joke," as other countries had long seen through the pretense, citing U.S. military excursions in Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, and others45. Trump's strategy, according to the source, is to stop America from pretending to be a "best buddy" while engaging in "surprise color revolution or ‘totally organic’ coup d’état"5. Instead, he aims for a policy where "if we shoot you, you’ll be awake, armed, and facing us. We won’t shoot you in the back"8.

• Demolition of Cold War Structures: The author agrees with Sanger that the renaming is "not nostalgia—it’s demolition"9. It is interpreted as knocking down the "Truman-era Cold War scaffolding that layered a security-state bureaucracy atop our republic"9. The euphemism "Defense" is seen as having "re-engineered the national mindset," allowing America to pretend it was always "responding" or "deterring" rather than admitting to running a "global empire," which led to "permanent military bases, permanent wars, and permanent excuses"9.

• Targeting the Deep State and Military-Industrial Complex: The renaming is portrayed as a crucial step in pruning the military-industrial complex and dismantling the deep state, which is described as a "Cold War creation"1011. By "stripping off the fig leaves" like "defense," "deterrence," and "humanitarian intervention," the public can see the "trillion-dollar machine for what it is: a War Department, feasting on endless war"10. The source suggests that this "plain English" approach is the "greatest national security threat" to the deep state, as it exposes the roots laid down in the Truman years—permanent intelligence agencies, surveillance, and overseas garrisons justified by "deterrence"11.

• Connection to USAID: The renaming is linked to Trump's earlier actions against USAID, which the author describes as the "progressives’ passive-aggressive War Department," disguising "regime-change operations as a philanthropy"8.

• Perception and Credibility: The source emphasizes that "optics matter" and that "perception shapes power"1213. A nation that names its military "Defense" while maintaining 750 bases abroad is seen as "sneaky and untrustworthy"12. By restoring the original name, Trump aims to restore credibility, showing resolve to allies, strength to adversaries, and a "plain-talking government" to the American people13.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Epstein Investigation Speculation.

Speculation surrounding the Epstein investigation primarily revolves around the recent suggestion that President Trump may have acted as an FBI informant, assisting in Jeffrey Epstein's takedown12.

This idea was brought to light by Speaker Mike Johnson, who, at a Rose Garden fundraiser, "let it slip" to reporters that Trump "was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down"23. Johnson also stated that when President Trump first heard the rumor about Epstein, he "kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago"3.

Here's a breakdown of the speculative points and related events:

• Trump's actions regarding Epstein:

    ◦ In 2005, Trump famously banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club3.

    ◦ A year later, in 2006, Epstein was arrested in South Florida, though the Obama administration's FBI gave him what is described as a "wrist slap"3.

    ◦ In 2017, only three weeks after his inauguration, President Trump signed an executive order targeting "Transnational criminal trafficking"3.

    ◦ In 2019, Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) arrested Epstein, seized his island, and he "literally died in prison"4.

    ◦ In 2020, Trump's DOJ arrested Ghislaine Maxwell, who later received a 20-year sentence for crimes against children4.

• Lawyer's testimony and lack of lawsuits against Trump:

    ◦ Bradley Edwards, an attorney for Epstein's victims, stated in 2018 that President Trump was the only prominent figure who had voluntarily cooperated with their lawsuits since 2009, providing "very helpful information"4.

    ◦ Edwards also said in 2018, after nine years on the case, that there was "no sign" Trump had been involved in any of Epstein’s crimes4.

    ◦ Epstein's victims have sued JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, but they have never sued Donald Trump5.

• Contrast with Democrats' silence:

    ◦ During the eight years of the Obama administration and four years of the Biden administration, Democrats were "mute about Epstein"5. They reportedly "never produced or even hinted at any connection to Trump," with "no subpoenas, no exposés, no whispered leaks"5.

• Theories surrounding Trump's role:

    ◦ The sources highlight two contrasting theories:

        1. That Epstein had blackmail material on Trump, but President Trump prosecuted him anyway5.

        2. That Trump had been assisting the FBI in trying to take Epstein down since as far back as 20055.

• Skepticism and demand for proof:

    ◦ "Low-information commenters on BlueSky" are noted as remaining skeptical of Johnson's claim6.

    ◦ The claim is described as "bold" if untrue, as a formal FBI informant would require an official paper trail including source files, FD-1023 reports, handler notes, and possibly expense receipts. These documents are logged and stored by regulation, and multiple FBI staff would likely have worked on such a file, meaning they "could also confirm (or deny) the claim"6.

    ◦ The possibility that Johnson could prove his claim is presented as an "awful possibility for Democrats"6.

    ◦ As of the report, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has remained "mum," and the corporate media has not been observed demanding answers from the DOJ7.

• Trump's potential strategy:

    ◦ The sources speculate that if Trump truly has been sitting on evidence of his role in Epstein's takedown, he might be letting Democrats "crawl further and further out on the conspiracy branch" before "lopp[ing] it off anytime he wants," suggesting his silence could be a strategic move7.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Autism Report Controversy.

The autism report controversy stems from an "exclusive" article published by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), which triggered a cascade of corporate media stories1. The article, titled "RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies," fueled speculation about an upcoming report from Secretary Kennedy12.

Here's a breakdown of the controversy:

• WSJ's Speculative Reporting: The WSJ article cited only unnamed "people familiar with the matter" and claimed that Secretary Kennedy "plans" to announce a link between Tylenol (acetaminophen) and autism, and will suggest that folinic acid may relieve some symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder2. The report was also "expected to suggest other potential causes of autism and suggest further study," though these were not named2. The article was characterized by highly speculative language, using terms like "likely," "expected," "couldn't be determined," and "might"2.

• HHS Response and Lack of Official Confirmation: The only "on-the-record" source, an HHS spokesman, explicitly stated, "Until we release the final report, any claims about its contents are nothing more than speculation"2. This suggested that the WSJ's "news" was based on anonymous whispers about what a future report might say, with no official confirmation23. The author interprets this as the media "pre-spinning" the public's reaction to a report not yet released3.

• Market Impact and Irresponsible Journalism: The WSJ's speculative article had immediate financial repercussions, causing Tylenol's maker, Kenvue, to lose 10% of its market value3. The source describes this as "textbook irresponsible journalism" for running a market-moving headline about autism, Tylenol, and folate without either the actual report or a named official standing behind the claims3.

• Narrative Framing and "Pharma Propaganda" Accusation: The WSJ's narrative framing was perceived as immediately defensive and skeptical, essentially "prebunking any Tylenol–autism connection in advance" without waiting for the HHS report4. The author argues that the Journal showed "no curiosity" about the potential contents of the report and instead adopted a "Kennedy is dumb" narrative, labeling this approach as "pharma propaganda"4.

• Contrasting Evidence and Double Standards: The controversy also highlights a perceived double standard in scientific evidence. The WSJ failed to report on a peer-reviewed meta-study published by Springer Nature just two weeks prior, which identified 46 studies, with "the majority of the studies (27 of 46) reported positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder, or Neurological Development Disorder in offspring"5. Despite this, the WSJ's "experts" reportedly declared that the "literature was mixed" and there was "not enough evidence"5. Dr. Christine Ladd-Acosta of Johns Hopkins stated there was "no conclusive evidence" that Tylenol "itself" causes autism "definitively," a standard of proof that the author notes is often not applied to "experimental drug[s]" or mRNA mandates6.

• Anticipation of the Actual Report: The source concludes that while the WSJ's "rumor report" generated significant controversy and financial loss, the actual contents of Kennedy's autism report remain unknown7. Kennedy had promised an autism report this month, and the author anticipates considerable "hysteria" once the real report is released7.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Media Criticism.

The sources contain significant criticism of various media outlets, accusing them of bias, spreading misinformation, acting as mouthpieces for certain agendas, and lacking genuine journalistic integrity.

Here's a breakdown of the media criticism presented:

• New York Times and David Sanger:

    ◦ The New York Times (NYT) and its reporter, David Sanger, are heavily criticized for their "anguished news analysis" regarding President Trump's renaming of the Department of Defense to the "Department of War"12. Sanger is labeled a "deep-state apparatchik"1 and accused of writing a "heartfelt elegy to Cold War ‘soft power’ dirty tricks"1.

    ◦ The source mocks Sanger for his extensive word count (nearly 3,000 words) compared to Trump's concise executive order (280 words), and for allegedly not quoting Trump's actual order2.

    ◦ Sanger's concern that renaming the department would make enemies "catch on to the ruse" of U.S. military actions being "purely defensive" is presented as naive, given numerous historical military excursions3.

    ◦ The author states that Sanger's hyperventilation over the name change is because "by killing the euphemism, you extinguish the spell," terrifying progressives who rely on "plain English"4.

    ◦ Ultimately, Sanger is portrayed as the "deep state’s main man at the Times," upset because Trump is restoring the "War Department’s original, honest name," which is seen as a threat to the deep state5.

• Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and RFK Jr./Autism Report:

    ◦ The Wall Street Journal is accused of "irresponsible journalism" for publishing an "exclusive article" based on unnamed sources regarding RFK Jr.'s (as HHS Secretary) upcoming autism report67.

    ◦ The article, headlined "RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies," is described as based on "anonymous sources whispering about what a report might say sometime in the future"78.

    ◦ The author notes that the only "on-the-record source" (an HHS spokesman) stated, "'Until we release the final report, any claims about its contents are nothing more than speculation,'" effectively discrediting the WSJ's story78.

    ◦ The WSJ's article is characterized as "rumor dressed up as fact by repetition" and "literally textbook irresponsible journalism" for running a "market-moving headline" without the actual report or named officials backing the claims7.

    ◦ The source further criticizes the WSJ's "narrative framing," suggesting it aimed to portray "Kennedy is dumb" and was "defensive and skeptical from the start, essentially prebunking any Tylenol–autism connection in advance, without even waiting to see what HHS comes up with"9. This is labeled as "pharma propaganda"9.

    ◦ The WSJ is criticized for failing to report on a recent peer-reviewed meta-study that found "positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder, or Neurological Development Disorder in offspring," implying a selective reporting of evidence10. The WSJ's unnamed "experts" are contrasted with the study's findings, with the Journal's experts declaring the "literature was mixed"10.

• General "Corporate Media" / "Mockingbird Media":

    ◦ The "corporate media" is questioned for its silence on demands for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to confirm or deny Speaker Mike Johnson's claim that Trump was an FBI informant on Jeffrey Epstein6. The author asks, "Do they want to know?" implying a reluctance to pursue information that might be politically inconvenient for Democrats6.

    ◦ The "mockingbird media" is grouped with the WSJ in its "irresponsible journalism" regarding the RFK Jr. autism report speculation7.

    ◦ The source suggests that "low-information commenters on BlueSky" and the "dumb reporters at the Journal" are part of a broader trend of skepticism or lack of thoroughness in reporting911.

Overall, the sources present a narrative where established media outlets are either actively complicit with a "deep state" agenda (NYT) or demonstrate significant bias and lack of critical analysis, especially when reporting on politically sensitive topics or those that might challenge established narratives (WSJ on health, general media on Epstein)1....

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

welcome to the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series.

Today, we're diving into a fascinating array of topics reported on September 6, 2025. Our first segment explores significant shifts in the United States government and its public perception.

Source 1: The Snitch - Introduction to Key Events This past Saturday, September 6, 2025, brought several major news items to the forefront. President Trump initiated a renaming of the Department of Defense, a move that has evidently caused considerable consternation among liberals. Alongside this, there are fresh reflections on the conclusion of the Cold War and plans for a long-anticipated makeover of Washington D.C.. Speaker Johnson made a revealing statement, suggesting that President Trump may have acted as an FBI informant in the case against Jeffrey Epstein, a claim that is certainly rattling Democrats and their midterm political strategies. Furthermore, intriguing rumors are circulating about an upcoming report from Secretary Kennedy concerning autism, which are described as flying around with the intensity of "rainbow streamers at a Pride parade".

Source 2: World News and Commentary - David Sanger's Reaction Turning our attention to the renaming of the Department of Defense, New York Times writer David Sanger published an "anguished news analysis" that morning. His article was notably titled, "The Return of the ‘War Department’ Is More Than Nostalgia. It’s a Message". Sanger’s piece served as a "heartfelt elegy to Cold War ‘soft power’ dirty tricks". He further elaborated in his sub-headline, stating that President Trump and his defense secretary expressed a desire to return to an era where America "won wars," yet, in Sanger's view, they "largely ignore the greatest accomplishment of the past 80 years: avoiding superpower conflict".

Source 3: Sanger's Extensive Commentary Versus Trump's Concise Order It's noteworthy to consider the scale of Sanger’s response to the renaming. He authored nearly 3,000 words, filled with "angst," concerning President Trump's order. This lengthy analysis contrasts sharply with President Trump’s executive order itself, which was considerably more concise, totaling just 280 words. Interestingly, despite the extensive nature of his analysis, Mr. Sanger did not include a single quote from Trump's actual executive order in his piece.

Source 4: President Trump's Executive Order for Renaming President Trump's executive order on the renaming provides clear rationale. He detailed that the United States Department of War was originally established on August 7, 1789, 236 years prior, by President George Washington. President Trump explicitly determined that the name "Department of War," more so than the current "Department of Defense," effectively "ensures peace through strength". He asserted that this name "demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend". Consequently, President Trump concluded that this Department "should once again be known as the Department of War and the Secretary should be known as the Secretary of War".

Source 5: The Origins of the "Defense" Euphemism The historical context of the name change reveals that it was Harry S. Truman, a Democrat, who in 1949 decided that George Washington’s original War Department title was "old-fashioned". Truman then preferred the name "Department of Defense," which is described as a "sly progressive euphemism" crafted to persuade other nations that all American military assets, such as aircraft carriers, ICBMs, and Middle Eastern bases, were "purely defensive in nature" and "nothing to worry about". Mr. Sanger reportedly "fretted" that reverting the name might cause enemies to "finally catch on to the ruse". However, the source suggests that after a history of military involvements, including Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, Libya, Ethiopia, Taiwan, and Bosnia, some nations might have already grown "a little suspicious" despite Truman’s original renaming trick.

Source 6: The End of Pretence in Foreign Policy The narrative suggests that the time for pretense is over, asserting that the "jig, as they say, was up" and the "game was over". The implication is that the "fancy new name" of "Defense" was "already a sad joke". The perspective offered is that President Trump’s strategy is straightforward: America will cease "pretending to be your best buddy and then shiv you in the back of the head while you’re asleep," which often manifested in the form of "a surprise color revolution or 'totally organic' coup d’état".

Source 7: Trump's Dismantling of Subterfuge, Including USAID The renaming of the Department of Defense is directly linked to President Trump’s previous decision to "slaughter" USAID. USAID is characterized as the "progressives’ passive-aggressive War Department," operating with "lipstick and a sundress". The agency is depicted as having funded "friendly-sounding NGOs that ripped countries apart more thoroughly than a heated barrage of cruise missiles". The current administration is described as "ditching the subterfuge," implying a shift to a more direct approach: "if we shoot you, you’ll be awake, armed, and facing us. We won’t shoot you in the back". For decades, the "Defense" label allowed Washington to present foreign actions as "humanitarian projects or national-security musts". USAID allegedly disguised its "regime-change operations as a philanthropy," while NATO missions were marketed as "peacekeeping," and drone strikes as "surgical". This "happy-sounding branding" reportedly "pacified voters at home while sowing chaos abroad".

Source 8: The End of Euphemisms and Language Manipulation President Trump’s name change signifies a promise that the "era of euphemisms is over". The new approach indicates that if America engages in conflict, it will be explicitly called "war," and "everyone will know it". The source posits that progressive ideology fundamentally relies on "language manipulation". It suggests that various "bad ideas" are cloaked in "hypnotic cover euphemisms," citing examples such as "birthing people" for women, "content moderation" for censorship, "gender-affirming care" for castration, and "humane migration policy" for open borders. The belief underpinning this is that by altering words, "reality" can be changed, at least "long enough to pass the bill, pocket the grant money, or stage the coup".

Source 9: The "Demolition" of Cold War Scaffolding David Sanger's strong reaction to the name change is attributed to President Trump "killing the euphemism," which is said to "extinguish the spell". The perspective offered is that "nothing terrifies progressives more than plain English". The source agrees with Sanger that the renaming is "not nostalgia," but rather "demolition". It’s viewed as an act of "knocking down the Truman-era Cold War scaffolding" that established a "security-state bureaucracy" over the republic. The euphemism "Defense" did not merely rename a department; it "re-engineered the national mindset," fostering a perception that America was "always 'responding,' always 'deterring,' never admitting it was running a global empire". This "Cold War distortion" is identified as having metastasized into "permanent military bases, permanent wars, and permanent excuses".

Source 10: Pruning the Military-Industrial Complex President Trump's rollback of the name signifies "enough" with jargon, aiming for a return to "blunt clarity" that existed before euphemisms, when "war was called war, and peace meant staying home". This action is presented as a method to "prune" the military-industrial complex. The strategy involves starting not by debating "weapons systems line-item by line-item," which is said to only benefit lobbyists, but by "stripping off the fig leaves hiding the whole racket in plain sight". By removing terms like "defense," "deterrence," and "humanitarian intervention," the public is believed to be able to perceive the "trillion-dollar machine" for what it truly is: a "War Department, feasting on endless war".

Source 11: Dismantling the Deep State Through Plain English The "deep state" is fundamentally characterized as a "Cold War creation". The argument is that once "language vines are hacked back and the forest of euphemism is cleared," then "pruning shears can finally get a grip on the roots themselves". These roots are identified as having been laid down during the Truman years, leading to "permanent intelligence agencies, permanent surveillance, permanent overseas garrisons," all justified by "deterrence" and wrapped in the "new jargon of 'national defense'". The assertion is that by "killing the roots," the "whole deep state shrivels". Therefore, "plain English is the greatest national security threat of all" to the deep state.

Source 12: Sanger's Upset and the DC Makeover Initiative The significant distress exhibited by reporter and "news analyst" David Sanger, described as the "deep state’s main man at the Times," is attributed to President Trump's restoration of the War Department’s "original, honest name". Beyond this, another example of "actions over words" was observed yesterday: President Trump announced the specifics of his ongoing project to "beautify" Washington, DC, described as involving "real changes that everyone can see and touch".

Source 13: Washington D.C. Makeover and the Importance of Optics President Trump detailed plans for the capital, stating, "We're going to clean up the place" and "put new grass in all the parks. We're going to re-grass them with the best guys in the country". He also touched upon the connection between law-and-order and "beauty," noting, "We're going to fix the curbs. I noticed some of your curbs are broken. You know why? They're hitting them with a hammer so they can pick it up and throw it at the police. But not anymore, they're not. Not anymore". The broader point made is that "optics matter" and that "what we call things and what they look like isn’t just cosmetic— it’s strategic". The text draws a parallel, suggesting that a nation naming its military "Defense" while maintaining "750 bases abroad looks sneaky and untrustworthy," just as a capital with parks resembling "third-world dirt lots looks weak and structurally broken".

Source 14: Perception and the FCC's Action on Prison Cell Phones President Trump's approach emphasizes that "perception shapes power". The belief is that by restoring the grass in the capital and reverting the department's name, "credibility" will be restored. This is seen as a way for allies to perceive "resolve," adversaries to see "strength," and the American people to experience a "plain-talking government that’s finally willing to stop hiding behind ever-denser lexicons of euphemism". Shifting gears, Broadband Breakfast published a story about the FCC's decision to permit prisons to jam "contraband cell phones". It's widely known that prisoners are prohibited from having phones, yet "thousands" are smuggled in. These phones are used for illicit activities, including running gangs, coordinating drug shipments, organizing riots, and even ordering hits, with drones now being employed for smuggling. Previously, prisons were unable to block these signals due to federal anti-jamming laws.

Source 15: The Pervasive Problem of Contraband Phones in Prisons The issue of smuggled mobile phones in prisons is described as highly pervasive, extending beyond organized crime. Inmates are documented creating rap videos, demonstrating "in-cell microwave cooking" in videos titled "caged heat," sharing "long-hauler pro-tips," and uploading "fugitive manifestos" to platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Despite years of efforts, Congress had "tried and failed" to pass legislation that would allow prisons to jam these cell phones. Consequently, a "digital crime wave" had been propagated over the airwaves from within federal custody, leaving guards and wardens "impotent to shut it off at the switch".

Source 16: FCC Director's Solution and Speaker Johnson's Epstein Revelation In response to this widespread problem, President Trump’s new FCC Director, Brendan Carr, tweeted that his agency would circumvent Congress. The plan is to "redefine phones inside prisons as 'unauthorized devices,'" thereby placing them outside the scope of federal anti-jamming law. This move is characterized as "common sense," which has been absent for some time. Separately, the UK Independent released what was called the "week’s most astonishing news," headlining their story, "Donald Trump was an FBI ‘informant’ on Jeffrey Epstein, Republican Mike Johnson claims". Speaker Johnson’s comment was less a direct claim and "more like he let it slip out, possibly accidentally".

Source 17: Speaker Johnson's Disclosure and Trump's Prior Actions Regarding Epstein Speaker Johnson animatedly informed reporters that "When President Trump first heard the rumor, he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago". Johnson then added a significant detail: "He was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down". Historically, Trump banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club in 2005. The following year, Epstein was arrested in South Florida, though "Obama’s FBI gave him a wrist slap". No further action occurred until Trump assumed office in 2017. Only three weeks after his inauguration, President Trump signed an executive order specifically targeting "Transnational criminal trafficking".

Source 18: Trump Administration's Role in Epstein's Takedown In 2019, under the Trump administration, the Department of Justice "arrested Epstein, seized his island, and threw him in jail," where Epstein "literally died in prison". The subsequent year, 2020, saw Trump’s DOJ arrest Ghislaine Maxwell, who was then sentenced to 20 years for crimes against children. Bradley Edwards, a lawyer representing Epstein’s victims, confirmed in 2018 that President Trump was the "only prominent figure who voluntarily cooperated with their lawsuits since 2009," providing information described by Edwards as "very helpful". Furthermore, Edwards stated in 2018, after nine years on the case, that there was "no sign" that Trump had been involved in any of Epstein’s crimes.

Source 19: The Lack of Legal Action Against Trump by Victims It is notable that while Epstein’s victims have successfully sued entities such as JPMorgan Chase, settling for $290 million, and Deutsche Bank, settling for $75 million, and Prince Andrew, who settled confidentially in 2022, and even litigated against Epstein’s attorney Alan Dershowitz for years, they "have never sued Donald Trump". Conversely, during the eight years of the Obama administration and four years of the Biden administration, Democrats remained "mute about Epstein". They "certainly never produced or even hinted at any connection to Trump" and initiated "no subpoenas, no exposés, no whispered leaks" regarding him. The question is posed as to which theory is more consistent: that Epstein possessed blackmail on Trump, yet President Trump still prosecuted him, or that Trump had been assisting the FBI in efforts to apprehend Epstein as far back as 2005.

Source 20: The Potential for Proof and a Democratic Predicament There is acknowledged skepticism among some regarding Speaker Johnson’s claim. However, the point is made that if President Trump was indeed a formal FBI informant, there would be an "official paper trail". This would include "source files, FD-1023 reports, handler notes, maybe even receipts for expenses". Such records, by regulation, "must be logged and stored," and "several FBI staff must have worked the file," who could either confirm or deny the claim. This situation presents an "awful possibility for Democrats": the potential for Trump to "prove it".

Source 21: DOJ Silence and the RFK Jr. Autism Report Rumors The Department of Justice has remained "mum" regarding the claims about Trump's potential FBI informant status. Separately, the Wall Street Journal published an "exclusive article" which subsequently "triggered a cascade of corporate media stories". The headline of this article was, "RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies".

Source 22: The Wall Street Journal's Speculative Report on Autism The Wall Street Journal article relied entirely on unnamed "people familiar with the matter". It claimed that Secretary Kennedy "plans" to announce a connection between Tylenol, which is acetaminophen, and autism, and would suggest that "folinic acid" might alleviate some symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder. The report was also "expected to suggest other potential causes of autism and suggest further study," though these "other potential causes" were not specified. The reporting was heavily characterized by passive voice and hedging language, using phrases like "likely to suggest," "expected to be," and stating that "It couldn’t be determined if the report will mention vaccines". An HHS spokesman provided the only on-the-record statement, explicitly saying, "Until we release the final report, any claims about its contents are nothing more than speculation".

Source 23: Critique of the Journal's Reporting as Irresponsible Journalism The "news" disseminated by the Wall Street Journal essentially amounted to "anonymous sources whispering about what a report might say sometime in the future". The only official source, HHS, cautioned against believing any of the claims at that point. This reporting was interpreted as a pre-emptive attempt to "pre-spin your reaction to the report anyway," even without access to the actual content or release date. The Journal’s "speculation was expensive," resulting in Tylenol’s manufacturer, Kenvue, losing 10% of its market value on the day the "news" broke. This is labeled as "textbook irresponsible journalism" for publishing a "market-moving headline about autism, Tylenol, and folate without either the actual report or a named official standing behind the claims".

Source 24: The Journal's Framing and Alleged Pharma Propaganda The critique extends to the Wall Street Journal's "narrative framing," which is summarized as "Kennedy is dumb". The Journal reportedly displayed "no curiosity" about the actual contents of the forthcoming report. Instead, its framing was "defensive and skeptical from the start," effectively "prebunking any Tylenol–autism connection in advance" without awaiting the findings from HHS. This approach is characterized as "pharma propaganda" rather than genuine journalism.

Source 25: A Peer-Reviewed Study Supporting a Link Ignored by the Journal Notably, the Wall Street Journal failed to report on a relevant peer-reviewed meta-study published by Springer Nature "just two weeks ago". This study, if considered, would place Secretary Kennedy "right on solid ground" if he indeed plans to make a connection between Tylenol and autism. The authors of this meta-study identified 46 studies for inclusion, and reported that "The majority of the studies (27 of 46) reported positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder, or Neurological Development Disorder in offspring". In contrast, the Journal’s own experts offered a different opinion, concluding that the "literature was mixed" and that there was "Not enough evidence!".

Source 26: The Double Standard in Demanding Evidence A clear double standard in the requirement for scientific evidence is highlighted. When advocating for individuals to take an experimental drug to "slow the spread" of a common cold, "very little" evidence is deemed necessary. However, when attempting to understand the "autism epidemic," a much higher bar is set, demanding "proof of links between autism and their profitable drugs beyond a shadow of a doubt". The expectation is to refrain from action, advice, or changing guidelines until "causation beyond any reasonable doubt" can be definitively proven. For example, Dr. Christine Ladd-Acosta is quoted stating that while associations exist, she has seen "no conclusive evidence" to show that Tylenol "itself" causes autism "definitively". Yet, there is "no record" of Dr. Ladd-Acosta or other mainstream epidemiologists demanding such "definitive proof" before supporting mRNA mandates.

Source 27: Anticipation for Kennedy's Actual Autism Report While the Journal’s "rumor report" did generate "reams of controversy" and "destroyed millions in shareholder equity," it is stressed that "we know nothing about what will be in Kennedy’s real autism report". Secretary Kennedy had previously promised to deliver an autism report this month, and with the month already underway, the author expresses anticipation for the public’s reaction to the actual findings, especially given the "hysteria that a single rumor about the report provoked".

thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Sanchez AUDIO AND VIDEO podcast series produced and archived at the website DailyBriefs.info

I. ☕️ THE SNITCH ☙ Saturday, September 6, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 by Jeff Childers

Trump's administration is renaming the Department of Defense back to the Department of War.

President Trump and his defense secretary say they want to return to the era when America won wars.

I have therefore determined that this Department should once again be known as the Department of War and the Secretary should be known as the Secretary of War.

II. Liberal Media's Anguished Response to the Renaming

The New York Times expressed distress over the change, perceiving it as more than just nostalgia.

New York Times deep-state apparatchik David Sanger penned an anguished “news analysis” this morning headlined, “The Return of the ‘War Department’ Is More Than Nostalgia. It’s a Message.”

Mr. Sanger fretted that, by changing the name back, our enemies might finally catch on to the ruse.

III. Historical Context of the Department's Name

The original name, "Department of War," was established centuries ago by the first U.S. President.

On August 7, 1789, 236 years ago, President George Washington signed into law a bill establishing the United States Department of War.

It was Harry S. Truman (D) who, in 1949, after chewing a bad oyster, decided that George Washington’s original war department title was too old-fashioned.

IV. Trump's Justification for Restoring the Original Name

Trump believes the name "Department of War" accurately reflects the nation's ability and willingness to engage in conflict.

The name ‘Department of War,’ more than the current ‘Department of Defense,’ ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend.

Trump’s name change is a promise that the era of euphemisms is over.

V. Critique of "Department of Defense" as a Euphemism

The term "Department of Defense" is viewed as a progressive euphemism intended to mask aggressive military actions.

He preferred the name we’ve all grown accustomed to, the sly progressive euphemism crafted to convince our enemies that all our aircraft carriers and ICBMs and Middle Eastern military bases are purely defensive in nature.

America will stop pretending to be your best buddy and then shiv you in the back of the head while you’re asleep — usually in the form of a surprise color revolution or “totally organic” coup d’état.

VI. The Ineffectiveness of the "Defense" Label

Adversaries are no longer fooled by the "Defense" moniker, seeing through the supposed pretense of peace.

Mr. Sanger fretted that, by changing the name back, our enemies might finally catch on to the ruse.

At this point, every time one of our diplomats solemnly intones “Department of Defense,” the stoic Russians start snickering, the Chinese swap wagered yen, and the Iranians take another round of shots.

VII. Connection Between Renaming and USAID's Role

The renaming of the Department of Defense is linked to Trump's actions regarding USAID.

Yesterday’s renaming is directly connected to the same reason Trump slaughtered USAID.

USAID disguised its regime-change operations as a philanthropy.

VIII. Trump's Shift Towards Transparency in Foreign Policy

Trump is abandoning covert operations and opting for a more direct and confrontational approach.

Trump’s now ditching the subterfuge.

He is saying, if we shoot you, you’ll be awake, armed, and facing us.

IX. Progressive Ideology and Language Manipulation

Progressives are characterized by their manipulation of language to advance their agendas and alter perceptions.

Progressive ideology survives on language manipulation like chupacabras survive on blood.

They believe if they change the words, they change reality — at least long enough to pass the bill, pocket the grant money, or stage the coup.

X. Renaming as a "Demolition" of Cold War Structures

The change is not merely nostalgic but a fundamental dismantling of the bureaucratic framework established during the Cold War era.

I agree with Sanger that the renaming is not nostalgia— it’s demolition.

Trump is knocking down the Truman-era Cold War scaffolding that layered a security-state bureaucracy atop our republic.

XI. Impact of Euphemisms on National Mindset and the Military-Industrial Complex

Euphemisms have reshaped America's self-perception, enabling a continuous expansion of military presence and conflict.

The euphemism “Defense” didn’t just rename a department, it re-engineered the national mindset: America was always “responding,” always “deterring,” never admitting it was running a global empire.

You start by stripping off the fig leaves hiding the whole racket in plain sight.

XII. The Deep State as a Cold War Legacy

The deep state's origins are traced back to the Cold War, justified by "deterrence" and "national defense" jargon.

The deep state is, at root, a Cold War creation.

That root system was laid down in the Truman years with permanent intelligence agencies, permanent surveillance, permanent overseas garrisons— all justified by “deterrence” and wrapped in the new jargon of “national defense.”

XIII. Trump's Project to "Beautify" Washington D.C.

President Trump announced a plan to clean up and enhance the aesthetics of the nation's capital.

At a Rose Garden fundraiser, President Trump announced details of his ongoing project to beautify Washington, DC.

“We’re going to clean up the place,” Trump said. “We’re going to put new grass in all the parks. We’re going to re-grass them with the best guys in the country.”

XIV. The Strategic Importance of Optics and Perception

The appearance of a nation and its capital, along with its terminology, significantly influences how it is perceived globally.

Optics matter.

A nation that names its military “Defense” while maintaining 750 bases abroad looks sneaky and untrustworthy; a capital with parks that look like third-world dirt lots looks weak and structurally broken.

XV. FCC's New Stance on Jamming Prison Cell Phones

The FCC announced a policy change allowing prisons to jam contraband cell phone signals.

Yesterday, Broadband Breakfast ran a story that was surprising only in that it needed to be said at all, headlined, “FCC to Let Prisons Jam Contraband Cell Phones.”

Yesterday, Trump’s new FCC Director Brendan Carr tweeted that his agency would bypass Congress, and just redefine phones inside prisons as “unauthorized devices,” which will place them outside the federal anti-jamming law.

XVI. The Pervasive Problem of Contraband Cell Phones in Prisons

Prisoners are extensively using smuggled cell phones for various illicit activities, causing a "digital crime wave."

Prisoners aren’t allowed to have phones.

They use cell phones to run gangs, coordinate drug shipments and riots, and even order hits.

XVII. Speaker Johnson's Claim about Trump as an FBI Informant on Epstein

House Speaker Mike Johnson made a significant, possibly accidental, disclosure regarding Trump's alleged role in Jeffrey Epstein's takedown.

Yesterday, the UK Independent ran the week’s most astonishing news below the headline, “Donald Trump was an FBI ‘informant’ on Jeffrey Epstein, Republican Mike Johnson claims.”

“He was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down.”

XVIII. Supporting Evidence for Trump's Alleged Role in Epstein's Takedown

Several past actions and statements lend credence to the possibility of Trump assisting in Epstein's prosecution.

In 2005, Trump famously banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club.

In 2018, Epstein victims’ lawyer Bradley Edwards said President Trump was the only prominent figure who voluntarily cooperated with their lawsuits since 2009, providing what the lawyer described as “very helpful information.”

XIX. Implications of Johnson's Claim for Democrats

The assertion that Trump was an FBI informant on Epstein presents a challenging scenario for Democrats, especially if verifiable proof emerges.

If Trump really was a formal FBI informant, there’s an official paper trail: source files, FD-1023 reports, handler notes, maybe even receipts for expenses.

Which raises an awful possibility for Democrats: what if he can prove it?

XX. Rumors Regarding RFK Jr. and HHS Autism Report

The Wall Street Journal reported on potential links between Tylenol use during pregnancy, folate deficiencies, and autism, attributed to an upcoming HHS report under RFK Jr.

Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal triggered a cascade of corporate media stories by running its exclusive article headlined, “RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies.”

The Journal’s speculation was expensive. Tylenol’s maker, Kenvue, lost -10% of its market value on the ‘news’ yesterday.