3-29-25 DailyBriefs.info   PODCAST
Key Ideas & Facts:

• Gates' Prediction: Bill Gates reportedly believes AI will eliminate most jobs, with exceptions for coders, energy experts, and biologists. The rationale provided by SIA NEWS and Oral.sk suggests programmers are needed to correct AI-generated code errors.

• Conspiracy Theories: The comment sections are dominated by highly negative and conspiratorial views of Bill Gates and AI. These include:

• AI as a tool for complete control by "globalist, parasitical, eugenic’s loving elititest scum."

• Fear that self-programming AI will turn against this elite, referencing the films "The Matrix" and "The Terminator." The commenter asks, "Why do we need the “ GLOBALIST, PARASITICAL, EUGENIC’S LOVING ELITITEST SCUM ??” …… “ELIMINATE ELIMINATE”."

• Accusations against Bill Gates related to Epstein Island, vaccine harms ("His jabs have killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of ppl."), and being "evil personified."

• Belief that AI will eventually eliminate Gates himself.

• Claims that Gates has been consistently wrong about past predictions.

• Overall Sentiment: The overwhelming sentiment in the comments is one of deep distrust, animosity, and conspiratorial thinking directed towards Bill Gates and the potential implications of AI.

Source 2: Excerpts from "Evidence of a Famine Plan (1).pdf"

Main Themes: Religious interpretation of end times prophecies, conspiracy theories about a planned famine and a "New World Order" orchestrated by a malevolent "Elite" in league with Satan.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• Biblical Prophecy of Famine: The author interprets biblical passages (Revelation, Lamentations, Zephaniah, Psalm, Micah, 2 Thessalonians, Isaiah) as prophecies of mass death and famine in the "End Time," with half the world's population dying over three to four years due to starvation and malnutrition-related diseases. Revelation 6:5-8, describing a "black horse" and balances, is cited as evidence of this.

• The "Great Day of the LORD": This period of wrath is distinguished from the "day of Christ," when believers ("his Bride") will be removed from the earth before God's judgment.

• Impending Doom and Preparation: The author suggests many sense this "impending event" and are preparing materially, while "born-again Christians remain steadfast in Christ."

• Underground Bunkers and the "Elite": The Gotthard Tunnel opening ceremony is interpreted as a "brazen but symbolic" advertisement of an agreement between the "Elite" and Satan, highlighting the role of underground tunnels in their plan to enslave mankind. Biblical references to people hiding in "holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth" (Isaiah 2:19-21, Revelation 6:15-17) are linked to these subterranean refuges.

• Historical Famines as Precedents: The text cites historical famines under Stalin, Franco, and in British India as examples of how rulers have used starvation to control populations.

• The "Mark of the Beast" and Controlled Food Supply: The author claims a future system involving a "mark" will control who can purchase goods, particularly food, creating a "worldwide famine" to impose the "New World Order." "No mark, no food. The system is therefore a means of creating a worldwide famine."

• Weather Manipulation and Crop Destruction: The text alleges covert use of technology to create extreme weather (hurricanes) and spoil crop harvests, attributing these to "global warming" propaganda.

• Mealworms and Chitin in Food Supply: Concern is raised about the inclusion of chitin from mealworm exoskeletons in food, questioning its safety and absorption by the human body.

• Biosludge Contamination: A significant portion of the excerpt details the practice of using treated human sewage ("biosludge") as fertilizer in North America and potentially Europe. The author claims the EPA's testing for heavy metals is inadequate, leading to deliberate deception and systematic pollution of agricultural soil, with pollutants entering the food chain. "The public is being deliberately deceived; Agricultural soil across America is being systematically polluted; The pollutants accumulate in the soil and enter the food chain; The EPA’s testing methodology is grossly inadequate."

Source 3: Excerpts from "Gaza protests: “Hamas terrorists,” “Hamas out” - The Expose"

Main Theme: The author's perspective on the Gaza situation, distinguishing between support for Gazan civilians and condemnation of Hamas as a terrorist organization.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• Author's Stance: The author clarifies their position as "pro-Gazan and ... always been anti-Hamas," supporting victims of terrorism worldwide but not the terrorists themselves.

• Critique of Western Media Narrative: The author contrasts their view with a perceived prevailing narrative in the UK media that denies the terrorist nature of Hamas and labels armed individuals as "freedom fighters," contributing to the "Israel has committed genocide" mantra.

• Hamas's Impact on Gazans: The author asserts that "Hamas is an terrorist organisation which operates out of Gaza that not only terrorises Israelis but also terrorises Gazans."

• Call for Gaza's Liberation: The author believes Gaza needs to be freed from Hamas, other Islamic State organizations, and the UN (due to its alleged cooperation with Hamas).

• Proposed Solutions: The author suggests Egypt should dismantle its border wall and take responsibility for Gaza if Gazans do not want to become a US protectorate.

Source 4: Excerpts from "Is Racial Discrimination Illegal or Not?, by Jared Taylor - The Unz Review"

Main Themes: Discussion on racial discrimination, government equality, and commentary reflecting racial and political biases.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• Government Treatment and Perceived Inequality: The discussion touches upon the idea that if the government treats races equally, people might assume they are equal, and thus, perceived unequal outcomes are attributed to prejudice ("bigotry, structural racism, the old boy’s network, a glass ceiling, male chauvinism, and so on").

• Comments Reflecting Racial Bias: The comment section contains numerous posts expressing racist, antisemitic, and xenophobic sentiments. Examples include:

• Derogatory remarks about single white women.

• Antisemitic slurs and conspiracy theories ("naming the hebe").

• Concerns about "invading hispanics" and negative stereotypes associated with various ethnic groups ("filthy neighborhoods, backstabbing, sneakiness, perversion and child molestation").

• Beliefs in racial inequality and questioning who decides racial worthiness.

• Statements about Jewish control ("JewSA").

• Critique of "Luxury Beliefs": One commenter argues that the legal profession is no longer neutral due to the "long march through the institutions" and the influence of left-leaning "Luxury beliefs," undermining the "rule of law."

• Mentions of Censorship and Surveillance: There are references to PayPal's past policy on "misinformation," Bank of America and Chase providing records to the FBI, and a link to an article titled "pathway-to-gulag-amerika-amidst-prison-planet-chaos."

• Views on Political Parties and Race: One commenter makes controversial claims about Democrats and race, including attributing the 1993 crime bill and welfare to anti-Black motivations.

Source 5: Excerpts from "Some New Tales From the Darkside, by Philip Giraldi - The Unz Review"

Main Themes: Allegations of Israeli violence against Palestinians, criticism of Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), and broader commentary reflecting anti-Israel and anti-Western sentiments.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• Alleged Assault by Israeli Settlers: The article recounts an incident where armed Israeli settlers allegedly assaulted a Palestinian filmmaker, Hamdan Ballal, with Israeli soldiers present but not intervening initially. Ballal and others were reportedly detained and abused by the IDF.

• Criticism of the IDF: The IDF is referred to sarcastically as the "“Most Moral Army in the World”," with commenters suggesting alternative, negative names like "Izzie Death Force?" and "Inhumanly Devilish Fiends?"

• Reference to "Clown World": A commenter contrasts the current situation ("Clown World days") with a perceived better past.

• Concerns about Surveillance: There's a reference to "CIA wannabes in the Phoenix, uh fusion centers need Stasi practice," linking US security efforts to authoritarian tactics.

• Condemnation of Bombing of Yemen: The repeated bombing of Yemen is described as part of a "morally perverse, upside-down world" and "insane and evil rules," serving to "execute and shield a genocide that the West is co-perpetrating together with Israel."

• Yemeni Military Actions: Reports of Yemeni military operations targeting Ben Gurion Airport, military targets near Yaffa, and US warships in the Red Sea (including the USS Truman) are presented as retaliation for "US aggression" and in support of Palestinians.

• Call to End Support for Israel: One commenter suggests taking power away from banks and financial services by not voting for elites aligned with them.

• Antisemitic and Anti-Jewish Sentiments: The comment section contains highly antisemitic content, including:

• Claims that "Jews conquered the West and Palestine via shenanigans."

• Accusations of a "Jewish Mafia" controlling corporations and engaging in predatory practices.

• Belief that the "antisemitism witch-hunt" is ignoring the "genocidal Gaza Holocaust."

• Conspiracy theories about Jewish power and control of media ("BibiC has Long been Zionazi occupied territory").

• Dehumanizing language towards Israelis and Jews in general, including comparing them to "human beasts" and vermin.

• Accusations that the IDF rewards personnel for harming non-military "targets" and that Jewish teachings regard non-Jews as "subhuman." "In fact IDF military personnel are taught to regard Palestinian, Arab and Christian men, women and children as “subhuman”."

• Calls to murder Jews. "Nothing changes until we start murdering the Jews responsible."

• Claims that Talmudic Judaism is a "pagan religion" and that Abrahamism is problematic.

• Critique of US Foreign Policy: Some commenters criticize US support for Israel and military actions in the Middle East.

• Efforts to Revoke Visas of "Pro-Hamas" Students: There is a report that the US State Department will use AI to revoke visas of foreign students deemed "pro-Hamas."

Source 6: Excerpts from "The deep state loves the “no virus” narrative - The Expose"

Main Themes: Promotion of the "no virus" narrative regarding SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, along with conspiracy theories about PCR tests and vaccines.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• Rejection of Virus Isolation: The article title and implied content suggest a belief that SARS-CoV-2 has not been properly isolated and characterized.

• Counter-Argument in Comments: A detailed comment (attributed to John McGowan) directly refutes the "no virus" claim, providing links to GISAID, COG-UK, and a company selling purified viral lysate as evidence of isolation and sequencing. The comment explains the difference between isolating a virus and isolating a disease, stating, "What I see a lot being written or claimed by a lot of people is “covid19 has not been isolated….”, which is a schoolboy error or a pseudo misunderstanding and like chickenpox, cold sores and colds which are all diseases you dont isolate diseases, you isolate herpes, varicella, rhinoviruses and sars-cov2 which are all the viruses that cause the diseases."

• Conspiracy Theories about PCR Tests and Vaccines: Other comments allege:

• PCR test kits and masks were contaminated with Graphene Oxide.

• Refusal of hospital entry in the UK for not taking a PCR test.

• PCR tests causing harm by puncturing the brain.

• COVID-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide, which supposedly removes iron from the blood, creating magnets and leading to blood clots and sudden deaths in athletes. "The C19 fluid has Graphene Oxide in it. The GO takes iron out of the blood and makes a magnet. When a few of these magnets are made, they stick together to make a clot. These clots can block veins and arteries, causing sudden death."

Source 7: Excerpts from "WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating - LewRockwell"

Main Themes: Criticism of the World Economic Forum (WEF) Davos meeting, portraying it as a platform for robotization, depopulation, and inhumane visions for the future.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• Security Measures at Davos: Extensive security measures are planned for the WEF Davos 2025 conference, including the deployment of up to 5,000 army soldiers, hundreds of police, armed fighter jets on patrol, ground-based air defense, and an extensive radar system, in cooperation with Austria and Italy. This is seen as evidence of Davos becoming a "security stronghold."

• Call to Exit the UN System: The article argues that the "ONE call for a People’s New World Order" should be to "Exit the UN system," as this would supposedly cause organizations like the WEF to collapse.

• Anticipation of Inhumane Visions: The author suggests that the WEF Davos debates will produce "inhumane visions for the future of mankind," urging readers to stay tuned and prepared.

Source 8 & 9: Excerpts from "What my Enemies will never Tell You by miles mathis.pdf" and "https://milesmathis.com/enemies.pdf" (identical content)

Main Themes: Self-promotion by Miles Mathis, claiming censorship and obstruction of his "groundbreaking" scientific work by the mainstream due to its inability to refute him scientifically.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• Censorship and Slander: Mathis claims he has been censored by the mainstream (particularly Google in recent years) for at least 25 years and subjected to slander ("crank and a crackpot") because they cannot address his scientific arguments.

• Past Online Success: He asserts that before Google's censorship, hundreds of his papers were "superviral," outperforming Wikipedia and dictionaries on their topics, providing a link to screenshots as evidence. "Don't believe me? Go here, where I have many screenshots. So when they tell you I have no support and no reach, they are lying. The truth is I am the only individual in history who has done that, outranking Wikipedia and the university sites with no institutional links and no promotion."

• Support from a Mainstream Physicist: Mathis states that his first physics book had an introduction written by a mainstream physicist from Oxford, John Hopkins, and NASA, who later went silent due to institutional pressure.

• Ignoring Key Work: He complains that his critics focus on trivial matters instead of engaging with his most important papers, particularly his successful diagramming of the atomic nucleus, which he claims has been confirmed and explains previously mysterious phenomena. "But you should know I am the first to successfully diagram the atomic nucleus, and that this diagramming has been confirmed many times since then, allowing me to explain many things that were previously mysterious—even to explain some things that weren't thought to be explainable."

Source 10: Excerpts from "Who Gives Two Hoots About the Houthis! - LewRockwell"

Main Themes: Criticism of US foreign policy, particularly the bombing of the Houthis in Yemen, arguing it is unnecessary, not in America's interest, and driven by a pro-Israel agenda.

Key Ideas & Facts:

• NATO Expansion Questioned: The author mocks the military capabilities of the newer NATO members, suggesting their inclusion is a "bad joke."

• Criticism of Trump's Foreign Policy Team: Trump is criticized for hiring advisors who favor interventionist policies, reminiscent of John Bolton, despite his past rhetoric against the Iraq War ("“Obviously, the war in Iraq was a big, fat mistake. … We spent $2 trillion, thousands of lives … George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes. But that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the Middle East.”").

• Houthis as a Limited Threat: The Houthis are portrayed as a local force with limited military capabilities ("no blue water Navy, no Air Force, no regular Army and just some odds and sots of coastal patrol boats and short range drones and missiles") posing no significant threat to the US homeland. Their controlled territory has a small GDP.

• Unnecessary US Military Presence: The author argues that maintaining global freedom of navigation and preventing nuclear blackmail do not require extensive foreign military presence or bases. America's nuclear deterrent is robust and self-sufficient.

• US Intervention Driven by Pro-Israel Agenda: The bombing of the Houthis is attributed to the US wading into the Israel-Arab conflict, which the author believes does not threaten global peace or commerce. The most affected parties (Saudi Arabia, China, Egypt) have not requested US intervention.

• Gaza as a "Garrison State": The article discusses Israel's policy towards Gaza, describing it as a "Garrison State" requiring significant but manageable costs. The author highlights Netanyahu's strategy of supporting Hamas to prevent a two-state solution. "Whoever opposes a Palestinian state must support delivery of funds to Gaza (cash in suitcases from Qatar) because maintaining separation between the PA in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.”

• Netanyahu's Role in Funding Hamas: Netanyahu is accused of recklessly funding Hamas (with Qatari money) as part of a strategy to undermine the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Overall Observations and Recurring Themes:

• Prevalence of Conspiracy Theories: A significant number of the sources and their comment sections are rife with conspiracy theories, ranging from AI being a tool for global control and planned famines orchestrated by elites, to the "no virus" narrative and hidden agendas behind US foreign policy.

• Deep Distrust of Institutions and Elites: There is a pervasive distrust of governments, mainstream media, scientific institutions, and global organizations like the UN and WEF, often portrayed as malicious and deceptive.

• Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Sentiment: Several sources, particularly those from The Unz Review, contain strong antisemitic and anti-Israel sentiments, including dehumanizing language, conspiracy theories about Jewish control, and calls for violence.

• Focus on Geopolitical Conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict and US involvement in the Middle East (Yemen) are prominent topics, often viewed through a critical lens of US foreign policy and its motivations.

• Alternative Interpretations of Events: The sources frequently offer alternative and often contradictory interpretations of current events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, AI development, and geopolitical conflicts, diverging significantly from mainstream narratives.

• Self-Promotion and Claims of Censorship: Miles Mathis's excerpts highlight a recurring theme of individuals claiming to be censored and misunderstood by the mainstream despite believing their work is groundbreaking and widely supported (at least historically).

• Concerns about Technology and Control: AI and related technologies are viewed with both skepticism about their impact on employment and fear of their potential for social control.

•

Evidence of a Famine Plan (1).pdf: A detailed action plan exists (Agenda 21) to transfer control of all earth's resources, including agriculture and food production, to a central governing authority, embodying Marxist goals1 . The document suggests this plan involves monopolizing food supply, suppressing independent production, restricting resources, and substituting harmful alternatives2 . It also highlights concerns about hazardous pollutants entering the food chain through practices related to biosolids3 ....

•

Excerpts from "Bill Gates says AI will eliminate most jobs except for coders, energy experts and biologists - The Expose": Bill Gates believes that AI will eliminate most jobs, with the exception of coders (who will fix AI errors), energy experts, and biologists [Title, 4]. However, The Expose suggests that even these professions may eventually be deemed useless by figures like Gates6 . The publication also solicits reader support due to alleged censorship by governments and Big Tech6 .

•

Some New Tales From the Darkside, by Philip Giraldi - The Unz Review: A Signal group chat among top national security officials regarding air strikes against the Houthis in Yemen raised concerns about ignorance of the target, the inclusion of a journalist with ties to Israel, the security of the Signal technology, and Donald Trump's knowledge of the meeting7 . This event demonstrates a perceived lack of knowledge within the Trump national security team8 . The article also mentions the Israel Lobby's efforts to silence critics of Israel8 .

•

Weaponizing Words - The Duke Report: The Israel-Hamas conflict is being fought with words as much as weapons, with a fierce struggle for narrative control using techniques like neurolinguistic programming (NLP), schismogenesis, loaded language, and complex equivalencies9 .... An example is given of an X post that attempts to manipulate perception and polarize opinions using these methods10 .... The article also discusses strategies to counter such manipulative rhetoric by applying critical thinking and reframing techniques19 ....

•

WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating - LewRockwell: The article calls for exiting the UN system, suggesting that organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) would then become irrelevant26 . It advises readers to stay informed and prepared regarding the WEF's debates and visions for the future26 .

•

Who Gives Two Hoots About the Houthis! - LewRockwell: The article questions the rationale behind Donald Trump's bombing of Houthi installations in Yemen, suggesting it is not related to US national security but rather to the profits of Petro-State producers and costs to European consumers27 .... It criticizes funding wars that do not benefit America's homeland security and perpetuating wars on behalf of allies unwilling to pay29 .

•

☕️ ACCOUNTABILITY ROBOTS ☙ Friday, March 28, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠: The new HHS Secretary under RFK Jr. is suggesting significant changes at the CDC, including a focus on reversing chronic disease, publishing all datasets and peer reviews, and "following the science" related to vaccines30 .... The author expresses optimism that this reorganization will help make America healthy again and believes an "accountability day" is coming for past actions by health agencies31 ....

•

The deep state loves the “no virus” narrative - The Expose: Despite some claims to the contrary, there has been significant falsification of information regarding almost every aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic, leading some to question the virus's reality33 . The article includes a comment arguing for the existence and isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus34 and notes the author's (Dr. Meryl Nass) history of challenging established medical narratives35 .

•

Is Racial Discrimination Illegal or Not?, by Jared Taylor - The Unz Review: This article from The Unz Review discusses the question of whether racial discrimination is illegal, referencing Donald Trump as a current example36 . A comment suggests that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives imply the need to remove "pointless white guys" to make progress37 . Another comment connects the reversal of perceived discrimination against white males to competition from China38 .

•

https://milesmathis.com/enemies.pdf / What my Enemies will never Tell You by miles mathis.pdf: The author claims to be censored by mainstream search engines (except Yandex) for decades and that critics avoid his most important work, such as his successful diagramming of the atomic nucleus, instead focusing on superficial criticisms39 .... He suggests that the mainstream's reaction to his work indicates its significance39 ....

•

Gaza protests: “Hamas terrorists,” “Hamas out” - The Expose: This source primarily features the title "Gaza protests: “Hamas terrorists,” “Hamas out”" and standard website elements like sharing options and support requests43 .... The key takeaway is the reporting of protests with the stated slogans, reflecting a specific perspective on the Gaza situation.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

• One commenter suggests that advanced AI, described as a fast "gathering tool," could be used in the future for complete control and may lead to machines questioning the necessity of a perceived "globalist, parasitical, eugenic’s loving elitist scum," potentially leading to their "elimination."

• The "Evidence of a Famine Plan" cites Revelation 6:5-8 and Lamentations 2:20 and 4:9-10, interpreting them as prophecies indicating mass death from starvation and diseases caused by malnutrition during the End Time.

• Rhoda Wilson states she is pro-Gazan but anti-Hamas, viewing Hamas as a terrorist organization operating out of Gaza that terrorizes both Israelis and Gazans. She believes Gaza needs to be freed from Hamas and the UN, which she accuses of aiding Hamas.

• One commenter on Jared Taylor's article sarcastically suggests that single white women vote for Democrats not out of resentment but due to "rational economic self-interest," seeing the welfare state as potentially indispensable for their survival.

• PayPal reportedly planned to fine users for spreading "misinformation," and Bank of America and Chase allegedly opened their client records to the FBI regarding the January 6th investigation, raising concerns about financial surveillance and potential targeting based on political views.

• The article by Philip Giraldi describes Israeli settlers assaulting Palestinian filmmaker Hamdan Ballal while Israeli soldiers stood by. The author implies a bias by labeling the IDF as the "Most Moral Army in the World" ironically, given their inaction during the assault and subsequent detention of the Palestinians.

• Commenters on Philip Giraldi's article accuse the IDF of being the "Izzie Death Force" or "Inhumanly Devilish Fiends," rewarding personnel for harming non-military targets, regarding Palestinians as "subhuman," and lacking a moral compass.

• "The deep state loves the 'no virus' narrative" provides links to databases (Gisaid.org, sars2.cvr.gla.ac.uk) showing numerous virus isolations and sequences, as well as examples of purified viral lysate available for purchase, and a study claiming to meet Koch's postulates for SARS-CoV-2.

• The LewRockwell article suggests that the "ONE call for a People’s New World Order" is to "Exit the UN system," arguing that organizations like the WEF would then lose their influence.

• According to Miles Mathis, his critics and the mainstream media primarily resort to name-calling, slander, and libel, ignoring his most important scientific papers and focusing on weaker points instead of engaging with his actual scientific arguments and findings, such as his diagramming of the atomic nucleus.

Glossary of Key Terms

• AI (Artificial Intelligence): The theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and translation between languages.

• Biosludge: Treated human sewage that meets certain environmental standards and can be used as fertilizer in some cases. The provided text raises concerns about potential contaminants in biosludge entering the food chain.

• Deep State: A body of unelected government officials who are not publicly acknowledged but are believed to be secretly manipulating or controlling government policy.

• Eugenics: The pseudoscientific belief and practice aimed at improving the genetic quality of a human population by excluding people and groups judged to be inferior and promoting those judged to be superior.

• Graphene Oxide: A material composed of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen atoms arranged in a single layer. In the provided texts, it is mentioned in the context of alleged contamination of PCR test kits and COVID-19 vaccines, with claims of magnetic effects in the body.

• Hamas: A Palestinian Sunni-Islamist fundamentalist organization currently governing the Gaza Strip. It has an armed wing and is considered a terrorist organization by many countries.

• Houthis: A Zaidi Shia Muslim group based in Yemen that has been involved in a long-running conflict. They have gained attention for attacks on ships in the Red Sea.

• IDF (Israel Defense Forces): The military forces of the State of Israel, comprising the army, air force, and navy.

• New World Order: A conspiracy theory referring to a secret cabal of global elites believed to be working to establish totalitarian world government.

• PCR Test: Polymerase Chain Reaction test, a molecular test used to detect the presence of specific DNA or RNA sequences, often used for identifying infectious pathogens like viruses. The provided text mentions alleged contamination of these tests.

• Rule of Law: The principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable under the law that is fairly applied and enforced. The provided text suggests this principle is weakening due to tribalism in the legal profession.

• WEF (World Economic Forum): An international organization that brings together business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas. Davos is the location of its annual meeting.

convert_to_textConvert to source

•

Bill Gates says AI will eliminate most jobs except for coders, energy experts and biologists - Rhoda Wilson from https://expose-news.com/2025/03/28/bill-gates-says-ai-will-eliminate-most-jobs/ 

•

Evidence of a Famine Plan (1).pdf - Jeremy James from the local file.

•

Gaza protests: “Hamas terrorists,” “Hamas out” - Rhoda Wilson from https://expose-news.com/2025/03/29/gaza-protests-hamas-terrorists-hamas-out/ 

•

Is Racial Discrimination Illegal or Not? - Jared Taylor from https://www.unz.com/jaltaylor/is-racial-discrimination-illegal-or-not/ 

•

Some New Tales From the Darkside - Philip Giraldi from https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/some-new-tales-from-the-darkside/ 

•

The deep state loves the “no virus” narrative - Rhoda Wilson from https://expose-news.com/2025/03/28/the-deep-state-loves-the-no-virus-narrative/ 

•

WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating - Peter Koenig (Global Research) from https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/03/peter-koenig/wef-davos-2025-more-grotesque-than-ever-robotizing-and-depopulating/ 

•

Weaponizing Words - The Duke Report from https://thedukereport.substack.com/p/weaponizing-words 

•

What my Enemies will never Tell You - Miles Mathis from the local file https://milesmathis.com/enemies.pdf 

•

https://milesmathis.com/enemies.pdf - Miles Mathis from https://milesmathis.com/enemies.pdf 

•

☕️ ACCOUNTABILITY ROBOTS ☙ Friday, March 28, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 - Jeff Childers from https://www.jeffchilders.substack.com/p/accountability-robots 

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

EXTENDED BRIEF

What my Enemies will never Tell You by miles mathis.pdf

Summary

This document, titled "What my Enemies will never Tell You," is a self-published piece by Miles Mathis in which he argues that the mainstream scientific community has deliberately censored and slandered his groundbreaking work across various scientific fields for decades. Mathis presents a list of specific instances, supported by dates and claims of mainstream acknowledgements or retractions, which he believes demonstrate the validity of his theories and the dishonesty of his critics. His purpose is to inform new readers and counter negative portrayals by highlighting his alleged successes in challenging and overturning established scientific paradigms, emphasizing his independent achievements and the purported suppression of his ideas.

Discuss Mainstream censorship.

Based on the sources, mainstream censorship is a significant concern across various topics and platforms1 ....

Entities Involved in Alleged Censorship:

•

Governments and Big Tech: The Exposé claims that governments and Big Tech organizations like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and PayPal are actively trying to censor their reporting1 .... They believe this is an attempt to control information and serve their own needs1 ....

•

Mainstream Media: The Expose suggests that the mainstream media publishes "lies and propagandas" on behalf of the government and refuses to report certain facts2 .... The "Evidence of a Famine Plan" document mentions that an OIG report was "glossed over" and received no serious consideration in the mainstream media8 .

•

Financial Institutions: Banks are reportedly allowed to refuse service to customers merely for being conservative9 . PayPal allegedly planned to fine users and freeze their funds for spreading "misinformation" and has withheld funds for "non woke" political content10 .... Bank of America and Chase reportedly opened their records to the FBI regarding the January 6 investigation11 ....

•

Israel Lobby: Philip Giraldi, writing in The Unz Review, asserts that the Israel Lobby has been "eminently successful" under both the Biden and Trump administrations in silencing, imprisoning, and deporting critics of Israel or Jewish group behavior in mainstream media3 . He notes that a film documenting the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians was blocked from distribution in the US13 . He also points out the lack of discussion about Israel in a House Intelligence Committee hearing despite significant online discussion14 . The BBC's coverage of Israel allegedly became less critical after its Director General met with the Israeli leader15 .

•

Academic and Scientific Institutions: Miles Mathis states that the mainstream has been censoring his scientific work for over two decades by deleting his websites and censoring him in search engine results5 .... He argues that his groundbreaking papers are ignored because the mainstream cannot respond scientifically5 .... He claims that even when his theories are later supported by mainstream findings, he is not credited, and the information is sometimes "memoryholed" if it contradicts existing dogma18 .... A mainstream physicist who initially supported Mathis was allegedly silenced20 ....

•

Deep State: The Expose publishes an article suggesting that the "deep state" loves the "no virus" narrative and runs a psyop to promote it, implying censorship of alternative views on the origins of viruses22 ....

Reasons and Methods of Alleged Censorship:

•

Serving Specific Agendas: The Expose believes that censorship is used by governments and Big Tech to serve their own needs and push a "Globalists' agenda"1 ....

•

Suppressing Dissenting Views: The Israel Lobby's actions are aimed at silencing critics of Israel3 .... PayPal's actions were related to suppressing "non woke" or "misinformation"10 ....

•

Controlling Narratives: The analysis of "Cheryl's" post in The Duke Report highlights the use of neurolinguistic programming (NLP), loaded language, and complex equivalencies as tools for "narrative control" in the Israel-Hamas conflict, effectively shaping perceptions and discrediting opposing viewpoints26 ....

•

Protecting Mainstream Dogma: Miles Mathis argues that his scientific work is censored because it challenges and contradicts mainstream theories in physics18 ....

•

Financial and Reputational Control: Scientists supporting alternative views may face being "fired and having your life ruined"20 .... Funding for research may be biased towards studies supporting certain narratives, as seen with COVID-19 grants33 .

•

Distraction: The "no virus" narrative is suggested as a potential distraction from the true origin of the virus and gain-of-function research23 .

Examples of Alleged Censorship:

•

Deletion of Miles Mathis's websites by Yahoo and his continued censorship on Google16 ....

•

Mainstream media's lack of serious consideration for an OIG report8 .

•

Blocking the distribution of a documentary critical of Israel in the US13 .

•

The absence of discussion about Israel in a House Intelligence Committee hearing14 .

•

The BBC's alleged shift in reporting on Israel15 .

•

PayPal withholding funds based on political views and planning to fine for "misinformation"10 ....

•

Corporate media allegedly ignoring a study showing increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections post-vaccination34 .

•

HHS pulling the plug on COVID-19 grants related to contracts that aimed to influence opinions on vaccines and masking35 ....

It is important to note that these sources present specific perspectives and allegations regarding mainstream censorship. Independent verification of these claims would be necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Scientific predictions.

The sources contain several discussions and claims related to scientific predictions:

•

Bill Gates' predictions on job displacement due to AI: Bill Gates has "predicted" that within the next decade, artificial intelligence will advance to the point where humans will no longer be needed for "most things"1 . He specifically identified three occupations he believes will remain safe from AI: coders, energy experts, and biologists1 ....

◦

He argues that coders will be necessary because while AI can generate code, it makes errors that human programmers are needed to correct, refine, and debug3 .... However, the source The Expose questions the long-term usefulness of coders3 .

◦

Regarding energy experts, Gates claims that the complexity of managing power grids and critical infrastructure necessitates human oversight for safety and strategic decisions5 . Again, The Expose questions the longevity of this need5 .

◦

For biologists, Gates believes they rely on creativity, intuition, and critical thinking, qualities he thinks AI has yet to master and may never possess6 . He suggests these human qualities are essential for pushing the boundaries of medical research and understanding life's complexities6 . The Expose expresses skepticism about Gates' reasoning6 .

•

Counter-arguments and alternative views on AI's impact on coding: Kevin Okemwa, writing for Windows Central, mentions multiple reports suggesting that coding might become obsolete due to AI. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang reportedly advised against pursuing software engineering, suggesting better prospects in biology, education, manufacturing, or farming5 .

•

Miles Mathis' claims of successful scientific predictions: Miles Mathis, in his publication "What my Enemies will never Tell You," claims to have made several successful scientific predictions that were initially rejected or ignored by the mainstream:

◦

He claims to have made a bold prediction about the Solar Cycle in February 2020, forecasting its strength and monthly peaks coinciding with planetary conjunctions. He states that he has accurately predicted six of these points over five years, in contrast to mainstream predictions of a weak cycle7 ....

◦

He asserts that in 2012, he correctly diagrammed the atomic nucleus, explaining experimental data9 ....

◦

He claims to be the first to unify gravity and electromagnetism, showing that existing equations were already unified11 ....

◦

He states he discovered a simple visual explanation of superposition13 ....

◦

In March 2014, he reportedly attacked the Bicep2 gravity wave claim, which was later retracted by the mainstream13 ....

◦

In 2012, he argued against faulty historical equations of lift, and by 2020, Scientific American allegedly admitted there was no agreement on how planes stay in the air15 ....

◦

In 2009, he published a paper arguing against the existence of singularities, which Roy Kerr reportedly later admitted was correct15 ....

◦

In 2009, he claimed the atmosphere was held up by charge, and NASA allegedly admitted this in the following year17 ....

◦

Before 2010, he reportedly stated that Dark Matter is just charge/light, which scientists at Lawrence Livermore supposedly confirmed in 2019. He also claims to have correctly challenged the bullet cluster interpretation17 ....

◦

In the early 2000s, he claims to have used Einstein's equivalence principle to solve General Relativity problems more efficiently, which PBS Spacetime later allegedly acknowledged19 ....

◦

In 2012, he criticized the Higgs announcement, and by 2014, the mainstream allegedly admitted it was premature19 ....

◦

In 2013, he challenged the rule that photons couldn't interact, and Princeton researchers reportedly proved him right a year later21 ....

◦

Mathis concludes that current mainstream research is confirming his theory of charge recycling, leading to the decline of mainstream physics23 ....

•

Study on COVID mRNA vaccines and antibody response: A peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Infection reportedly concluded that repeated COVID mRNA shots, particularly the third and subsequent doses, can shift the immune response towards IgG4 antibodies, which are less effective at fighting the virus and may be associated with an increased risk of reinfection25 .... This finding is noted to align with earlier "conspiracy theories" suggesting successive vaccine waves might make people more susceptible to infection27 . This study presents findings based on observed data, which could be seen as a prediction of the long-term effects of repeated vaccination, although the source frames it as an observation of a trend.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Proven theories.

Based on the sources, the concept of "proven theories" is complex and viewed differently within them, particularly concerning the scientific claims of Miles Mathis.

Miles Mathis repeatedly asserts the validity and correctness of his own scientific theories, often in contrast to what he calls the "mainstream." While he does not explicitly state that his theories are "proven" in the sense of universal scientific consensus, he provides numerous arguments and examples that he believes demonstrate their accuracy1 ....

Here's a breakdown of how Mathis presents his theories:

•

Evidence through Prediction: Mathis highlights his Solar Cycle theory, claiming to have accurately predicted multiple monthly occurrences and the overall strength of the cycle, in contrast to mainstream predictions4 .... He presents this as strong evidence for his theory.

•

Confirmation through Mainstream Admission: He states that in several instances, mainstream science has eventually admitted to findings that align with his earlier theories, such as on the non-existence of the singularity, the atmosphere being held up by charge, and Dark Matter being charge/light8 .... He sees these admissions as confirmations of his work.

•

Explanation of Unexplained Phenomena: Mathis claims to be the first to successfully diagram the atomic nucleus, explaining previously mysterious phenomena5 .... He also states his diagram of Sr2CuO3 explained data from a mainstream experiment6 ....

•

Critique of Mainstream Theories: He argues that his work often exposes flaws in existing mainstream theories and offers more accurate explanations, citing examples in lift, gravity waves, and the Higgs announcement7 ....

•

Unification of Physics: Mathis claims to be the first to unify gravity and electromagnetism by demonstrating that existing equations were already unified6 ....

•

Censorship as Implicit Endorsement: Mathis argues that the mainstream's alleged censorship of his work is an indirect indication of its validity, as they cannot supposedly refute it scientifically2 ....

Despite Mathis's strong claims and the examples he provides, it is crucial to note the following:

•

Lack of Independent Verification: The excerpts from Mathis are self-published and do not provide evidence of independent peer review or widespread acceptance of his theories within the broader scientific community.

•

Characterization by Mathis: Mathis's perspective is that of someone who believes his work is groundbreaking yet unjustly ignored or suppressed by the mainstream1 ....

•

Absence in Other Sources: The other sources provided do not corroborate Mathis's claims of his theories being proven or widely accepted. They focus on different topics and do not engage with the specifics of his scientific arguments.

Therefore, while Miles Mathis presents compelling arguments and examples that he believes demonstrate the correctness of his theories, and even suggests that some have been implicitly validated by mainstream admissions, the provided sources do not offer external validation or characterize these theories as universally "proven" within the established scientific community.

The other sources in the set do not primarily engage with the concept of "proven theories" in a scientific sense. They discuss alleged plans, events, and the use of rhetoric, without delving into the proof or validation of specific academic theories25 ....

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Physics disagreements.

Based on the sources, the most significant discussion of physics disagreements centers around the claims made by Miles Mathis regarding his alternative theories and his criticisms of mainstream physics1 .... Mathis contends that there is a substantial disagreement between his groundbreaking work and the established views within the scientific community1 ....

Here are some key areas of disagreement highlighted by Mathis:

•

Censorship and Lack of Engagement: Mathis claims that the mainstream has been censoring his scientific work for over two decades, resorting to name-calling and ignoring his arguments instead of engaging with them scientifically1 .... He provides examples of his websites being deleted and his work being censored in search engine results3 .... He believes the "state of their argument is perhaps the best argument in my favor"3 ....

•

Superviral Reach Before Censorship: Mathis states that before Google allegedly started censoring him, hundreds of his papers were "superviral," outperforming even Wikipedia on their subjects, indicating a prior level of support and reach that contradicts claims of him having none5 ....

•

Stephen Hawking Impostor Theory: Mathis claims to have proven in 2015 that Stephen Hawking had been replaced by an impostor, a theory he asserts was later implicitly validated by the lack of legal action against the Daily Mail after they published an article admitting he was right7 ....

•

Solar Cycle Prediction: Mathis highlights his 2020 prediction of the Solar Cycle's strength and monthly peaks, which he claims has been accurate, contrasting with the mainstream's incorrect prediction of a weak cycle8 .... He considers this one of the "greatest predictions in the history of science"8 ....

•

Diagramming the Atomic Nucleus: Mathis asserts he was the first to successfully diagram the atomic nucleus, explaining previously mysterious phenomena, and claims his critics avoid addressing this11 ....

•

Analysis of Mainstream Experiments: He states that contrary to critics' claims, he deeply analyzes mainstream experiments, such as the Schlappa et al experiment on Sr2CuO3 published in Nature, identifying problems and offering rewritten explanations13 ....

•

Unification of Gravity and EM: Mathis claims to be the first to prove that Newton's gravity equation, the Lagrangian, and Maxwell's equations were already unified, a discovery made by breaking down these old equations13 ....

•

Superposition Explanation: He suggests he has discovered a simple visual explanation of superposition, which the mainstream deliberately ignores15 ....

•

Critique of Bicep2 Gravity Wave Claim: Mathis mentions being the only scientist to attack the Bicep2 gravity wave claim in 2014, which was subsequently retracted by the mainstream15 ....

•

Theory of Lift: He contends his 2012 paper showed faults in historical equations of lift, a view he claims was later supported by Scientific American17 ....

•

Singularity Existence: Mathis published a paper in 2009 arguing against the existence of singularities, a view he believes was later admitted by Roy Kerr17 ....

•

Atmosphere Held by Charge: He claims to have shown in 2009 that the atmosphere is held up by charge, a concept he says NASA later acknowledged19 ....

•

Dark Matter as Charge/Light: Mathis states he has been arguing since before 2010 that Dark Matter is charge/light, a view allegedly admitted by scientists at Lawrence Livermore in 201919 ....

•

Reinterpretation of General Relativity: He claims to have used Einstein's equivalence principle to simplify GR problem-solving, a manipulation he alleges PBS Spacetime later used without proper credit21 ....

•

Critique of the Higgs Announcement: Mathis asserts he demonstrated the Higgs announcement was a "total conjob," a view he believes the mainstream eventually conceded21 ....

•

Photon Interaction and Quantum Mechanics: He wrote a 2013 paper challenging the non-interaction of photons, a finding he says was later proven by Princeton researchers, which he believes should have significant implications for quantum mechanics23 ....

Mathis concludes by asserting that thousands of experiments support his theories over mainstream ones, and that current mainstream findings often inadvertently confirm his theory of charge recycling, leading to a "freefall" in mainstream physics25 ....

It is important to acknowledge that these are the views and claims presented by Miles Mathis in the provided sources. The sources do not offer mainstream physics perspectives on these disagreements, nor do they provide independent verification of Mathis's claims.

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down

Discuss Historical analysis.

The sources engage with historical analysis in several ways, primarily by using past events as evidence or context for understanding present circumstances. Here's a discussion of this engagement:

•

Using Historical Examples to Support Claims of a Contemporary "Famine Plan": The document "Evidence of a Famine Plan (1).pdf" heavily employs historical analysis by drawing parallels between past famines and a perceived ongoing "sinister agenda" of food control1 .

◦

It cites the Holodomor in Ukraine (1932-33), where at least 4 million people died of starvation, suggesting it was a deliberate atrocity2 . This historical event is presented as an example of how food can be weaponized, highlighting the disbelief and subsequent confirmation of its occurrence2 .

◦

The Cambodian genocide under Pol Pot (1975-79), where an estimated 1.5 million people died mainly from starvation and malnutrition, is also mentioned as an example of mass starvation caused by a regime3 .

◦

The Irish Famine (1845-47) is analyzed, stating that the British elite, who ruled Ireland, did little to help and even continued to export Irish agricultural products for profit3 .... The famine is presented as a deliberate act or a consequence of policies aimed at reducing the Irish population4 ....

◦

The Bengal famine of 1943 under British rule is similarly discussed, arguing that the continued export of grain to England led to the death of about three million Bengalis5 . This is also framed as a "genocidal approach"5 .

◦

These historical examples serve to provide "hard evidence that their sinister agenda has been progressing in plain view for many decades"1 , with the current focus allegedly being on monopolizing the food supply and restricting independent production6 . The author encourages understanding End Time prophecies by comparing the goals and methods of the "Wicked" in Scripture with their "actual activities as we approach the End Time"7 .

•

Providing Historical Context for Discussions on Discrimination: The article "Is Racial Discrimination Illegal or Not?" engages in historical analysis by referencing the historical backdrop of discrimination in the context of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives8 .

◦

The brief supporting DEI mentions it as "critical in mitigating the harmful effects of centuries of discrimination"8 . This statement uses a broad historical lens to justify the need for DEI policies.

◦

Furthermore, the discussion about a teacher using a computer to teach the history of Jim Crow laws illustrates how historical analysis of past discriminatory practices is seen as distinct from current DEI initiatives that some consider discriminatory9 .

•

Other Isolated Historical References:

◦

A comment in "Some New Tales From the Darkside" refers to "America's good old days" when genocide was considered the most heinous crime10 , implying a contrast with the present perceived acceptance or investment in it11 .

◦

The same source mentions Hilaire Belloc's historical analysis in his book The Jews, describing the British Empire as a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy12 .

◦

"Weaponizing Words - The Duke Report" notes the origin of the phrase "The pen is mightier than the sword" in 183913 , providing a historical anchor for its discussion on narrative control. It also frequently references biblical history and Jesus' teachings in the Sermon on the Mount to provide a framework for understanding and countering manipulative rhetoric14 ....

◦

"Who Gives Two Hoots About the Houthis!" briefly references Woodrow Wilson's declaration of war in 1917 and its alleged negative consequences, including the rise of Hitler and World War II19 , using historical causality to warn against current military actions.

In summary, while most sources focus on contemporary issues, "Evidence of a Famine Plan (1).pdf" makes the most extensive use of historical analysis by presenting past famines as evidence for a current agenda. "Is Racial Discrimination Illegal or Not?" uses the broad history of discrimination to frame the discussion around DEI. Other sources contain more isolated historical references used for context or to draw parallels with present events. It's important to note that the interpretations and conclusions drawn from these historical analyses can be subjective and are presented within the specific arguments of each source.

TRANSCRIPT OF PODCAST
Welcome to the Lenny and Maria March 29th deep dive podcast show produced by daily brief.info. I'm your host and um with me as always is our expert guide.

Hey everyone, glad to be here. Looking forward to digging into these documents today. Some interesting stuff to unpack.

Yeah, there's definitely a lot to cover. We've got uh this one piece that lays out a whole theory about like a planned famine and societal collapse. It kind of ties it to biblical prophecy and uh observations of what they call elite activities.

And then we've got uh this discussion about racial discrimination in the US specifically focuses on uh claims of discrimination against whites uh in the context of like affirmative action and DEI initiatives.

Right. Right.

And then we'll wrap up by looking at uh some different perspectives on the World Economic Forum's 2025 Davos meeting and uh the recent restructuring of the US Department of Health and Human Services. So quite a range. Let's jump right in. This first document about a famine plan. The author really goes all in on this theory.

Yeah. They don't hold back. They start right off the bat talking about biblical prophecies, especially in Revelation, pointing to this future period where they say there's going to be mass death, famine and disease playing a huge role. They say it could last like 3 to four years.

Wow.

And they tie it to their interpretation of the scriptures,

right? And they make this distinction between what they call the day of his wrath and the day of Christ. So basically suggesting this timeline where divine judgment comes after uh the removal of Christ's followers.

Exactly. It's like a specific theological framework that they use to support their arguments.

Okay. So then from there they build on this idea that a global elite is actually orchestrating a societal collapse. Like it's not just happening naturally.

Yeah. And their goal supposedly is to enslave humanity.

Yeah.

Pretty heavy stuff.

So one of the first pieces of evidence they bring up is the Georgia Guidestones. They talk about how it was demolished and they connect its message about limiting the world population to 500 million to what they believe are Masonic principles. for this postcolapse society, a society that would then worship the antichrist. And that's a pretty bold connection to make from a demolished monument,

right? What do you think the author really wants us to take away from linking the Georgia guidest planned famine?

Well, I think they want you to see the guidest like a physical representation of this elites plan to reduce the population. You know, it's like their blueprint. And they might interpret the demolition in a few different ways. Maybe as a sign that the plan is moving forward. or that they don't need the original blueprint anymore.

Mhm. Interesting.

So then this idea of a planned post collapse world kind of extends to this theory about these underground tunnels and caverns. They suggest these are being secretly built by the elite like hidden under the guise of military installations or whatever.

So they can hide out during this coming catastrophe. Just them and their chosen few,

right? And it's interesting how they use existing infrastructure like military bases and kind of repurpose them within this narrative of a planned disaster and elite survival.

Yeah. Plays into that fear of hidden agendas and powerful groups operating in secret.

Which leads us to the opening ceremony of the Gothur Tunnel in Switzerland. The author interprets this whole public event as an Illuminati occult ritual attended by all these politicians and world leaders. And supposedly they were honoring these demonic entities that are involved in these underground construction projects. I mean, this was a publicly broadcast event and they're put this whole spin on it.

Yeah. So, in this theory, these tunnels aren't just for transportation. They're part of a much bigger and darker plan.

Exactly. They're asking you to look at these seemingly normal events, even grand events, through a totally different lens. Like, there's this hidden sinister meaning behind everything.

Right. And that supports their theory of a planned collapse.

Then they bring up predictive programming. The idea that stuff like the Harry Potter and Hunger Games series, those aren't just entertainment. They're tools to brainwash young people and make them more accepting of future dystopia

like they identify with these narratives and it subconsciously prepares them for hardship and control.

Exactly. So according to the author, the fact that we see so many themes of scarcity, control, and societal breakdown in popular culture, that's not accidental. It's a deliberate tactic to shape our perceptions. Make this future controlled by an elite seem inevitable

or even normal. A scary thought.

Okay, so then we get to UN Agenda 21. The author points out all these mentions of food and related terms in this UN document and they question whether the regulations they propose will actually increase or decrease the food supply. It seems like any international effort related to food security is suspicious in their eyes.

Yeah, they're basically saying that these mentions of food within UN Agenda 21, those aren't genuine efforts towards sustainability or equitable distribution. They're potentially mechanisms for future control

where food production and access are controlled by this elite. Consolidating their power even more.

It all fits together in their theory

to kind of back up this idea of planned famine. The document lists several examples of man-made famines throughout history. The Holodmer in Ukraine, the famine under Polepot in Cambodia, the Irish famine, the Bengal famine of 1943, the Great Chinese famine, starvation in Soviet goologs, and the years of hunger in Spain under Franco. It's a pretty stark reminder of how political decisions can lead to mass starv. What do you think? Do these historical examples make the author's concerns about our modern food supply seem more valid?

Well, they definitely show that famine isn't always a natural disaster. It can be a direct result of political and economic policies.

So, by highlighting these tragic events, the author is arguing that intentional manipulation of the food supply for political reasons, that's not a new thing. It's happened before and it could happen again.

Makes you think. So, the document then outlines eight methods that they claim the elite are using to control the food supply. First up, farmland ownership restrictions. They give examples in the Netherlands and the UK where policies are supposedly forcing farmers to sell their land,

right? They see those policies as attempts to undermine independent farming.

Then there's the contamination of farmland with toxic waste, specifically biosudge,

which is treated sewage sludge, often used as fertilizer.

Yeah.

And yeah, it is regulated by the EPA,

but the author brings up this 2018 report by the EPA's Office of the Inspector General That report pointed out some gaps in the regulations and a lack of data on certain pollutants found in bioolids. It also raised concerns about how the EPA communicated the safety of bioolids to the public. And apparently the EPA's response to that report wasn't considered adequate.

So the author's point is that even if there are regulations, are they really thorough enough? Are they effective in ensuring safety?

Good question.

Their third method is GMOs, but they present them not as a way to increase food production, but as nutritionally deficient. in a way for corporations to control the food supply.

Right?

Then there's the concentration of ownership within the food industry itself. They name companies like Craft Heights, General Mills, Cargill, and Walmart. The argument is that this consolidation gives a small number of corporations way too much control over the entire food system.

Makes sense.

The fifth method they list is environmental regulations and restrictions. But the author sees those as based on a global warming hoax. They claim things like restrictions on fertilizers and stricter testing standards are just ways to make farming harder and reduce output.

Okay,

then we get to atmospheric spraying or chemtrails as some people call them. The author says these springs contain stuff like strontium, barerium, and aluminum which harm the soil and the food supply. They also point out that the planes involved are supposedly unmarked and not trackable on those flight radar websites. Seventh on their list is livestock diseases and vaccines. They actually use bird flu as an example. They say it could be a deception to justify calling livestock and disrupting the food supply. They even compare it to what Stalin did in Ukraine.

Wow.

And finally, they bring up weather weapons, things like microwave technology, harp, and cloud seeding. They say those could be used to create extreme weather events that damage crops. That's quite a list.

It's a lot to take in.

Yeah.

And pretty alarming if you believe it all.

Definitely a detailed and unsettling theory. Okay, let's switch gears now and look at this second article. Is racial discrimination illegal or not? This one tackles a completely different issue, but it's just as complex.

Yeah. This article dives into the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Yeah.

Which, as you know, prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin when it comes to hiring. But the author's argument is that despite this law, there's still widespread official discrimination against whites. And they say this is happening through things like affirmative action and DEI initiatives.

DEI being diversity, equity, and inclusion. The article mentions a legal case in involving executive orders to ban DEI and it shows how judges appointed by different presidents have very different opinions on this. One judge appointed by Biden ruled that the orders were unconstitutionally vague and a violation of free speech. Another judge appointed by Obama expressed support for DEI and a judge appointed by Trump said that a judge's personal views on DEI shouldn't affect their legal judgment. So there's clearly a lot of tension surrounding these policies.

Yeah. How do you balance addressing historical inequality qualities through affirmative action and DEI with the idea that everyone should be treated equally under the law. It's a tough question. Some people argue that these policies, even though they're meant to promote diversity, end up discriminating against majority groups, while others say they're absolutely necessary to level the playing field.

And the author actually goes even further. They say that individuals and private companies should have the right to discriminate on any grounds they want. They see the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as infringing on the right to choose who you associate with. So now we're talking about individual liberty versus societal efforts to prevent discrimination. It's a tricky balance.

It definitely brings in that libertarian perspective prioritizing freedom of association even if it leads to discrimination which obviously clashes with the idea that we need anti-discrimination laws to ensure fairness and equal opportunity.

And the article includes comments from readers. And you can see how strongly people feel about these issues. There are debates about alleged discrimination in university admissions. discussions about the influence of certain groups. It's a very emotionally charged topic.

Yeah, you see the whole spectrum of opinions from those who say affirmative action is necessary to write past wrongs to those who see it as reverse discrimination. And then there are conversations about larger power dynamics in society. It's complex

for sure. The author also mentions a specific Supreme Court case, McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Company from 1976. This case established that title 7th of the Civil Rights act protects white individuals from racial discrimination just as much as it protects non-whites. So that's a key legal precedent when you're talking about reverse discrimination.

Yeah. It basically says that everyone is equally protected under the law when it comes to racial discrimination. And the author uses this to argue that if affirmative action or DEI policies result in a qualified white person being passed over for a less qualified minority candidate, then those policies could be illegal discrimination.

Interesting. At the end of the article, they bring up examples of banks allegedly refusing service to conservatives and the FBI scrutinizing bank records related to the January 6th investigation. So now we're not just talking about racial discrimination, but also potential discrimination based on political beliefs,

right? And it raises questions about whether discrimination can go beyond race to other categories like political affiliation. It also highlights concerns about potential bias in financial institutions and government investigations. It's a whole other can of worms.

Okay, so we've covered a lot regarding racial discrimination. Let's move on to this piece called some new tales from the dark side. This one seems to get into some more conspiracy theories surrounding US foreign policy.

Yeah, this one starts off by talking about a leaked signal meeting. Apparently, it involves some officials from the Trump administration and Jeffrey Goldberg from the Atlantic. And the topic was supposedly US plans to escalate conflict with a country that we weren't officially at war with. They imply it was Iran. The author thinks it's suspicious that Goldberg was there. He's known for being critical of the Trump administration and a strong supporter of Israel.

So, they're implying there might be some manipulation going on, maybe a a pro-Israel agenda at play,

right? They want you to question the motives behind US foreign policy decisions. Like maybe they're being influenced by individuals with their own agendas, even within administrations that might not seem aligned with those interests.

Interesting. The author also talks about this perceived lack of knowledge or competency within the Trump national security team based on what was said in this leaked meeting, but obviously that's just their interpretation,

of course.

Then the article shifts to talking about efforts to silence and deport critics of Israel or what they call Jewish group behavior. And they claim this happened under both Biden and Trump. They use the example of Romesa Ostk, a Turkish grad student who was arrested for co-writing an op-ed that was critical of Tus University's response to the pro Palestinian movement. She was advocating for divestment from Israeli companies. What do you think the author trying to get at with this example.

It seems like they're concerned about the suppression of free speech, especially for those who are critical of Israel. They're suggesting that there are powerful forces trying to silence disscent, maybe even through government action.

And they mentioned that Ostk's personal info ended up on Canary Mission, which is a website run by a Jewish extremist group that basically doxes critics of Israel. After that, the author claims that more and more people are starting to believe that Israel controls America.

Yeah, I see how Bringing up Canary Mission contributes to that sentiment. The author probably sees it as evidence of a coordinated effort to target and harm people who speak out against Israel and that combined with the alleged government actions makes it seem like there's this hidden hand controlling things.

The article also mentions a police raid on a Quaker meeting house in London where anti-genocide activists were arrested. They're drawing a parallel to the suppression of criticism related to the Israeli Palestinian conflict.

So, it's not just happening in the According to the author, it's a global phenomena.

And then they bring up Mark Thompson, the former BBC director general. He's married to a Jewish woman, and some people perceive him as being pro-Israel. The author suggests that his personal connections and beliefs might have influenced BBC coverage. So now we're talking about potential bias in the media as well.

Yeah, they're suggesting that the way news about Israel is presented to the public could be shaped by the personal views of those in charge.

This whole article definitely paints a picture of hidden influences and agenda. shaping both foreign policy and public discourse. Okay, let's move on to our next piece about the WF Davos 2025 meeting.

Okay, so this article is super critical of the World Economic Forum. The theme for the 2025 meeting was collaboration for the intelligent age, but the author immediately dismisses that as code lingo for digital goolog. They have a very dystopian view of technology and control.

So basically, they see the WEF as this secretive powerful organization that's not working in the best interests of ordinary people. They think the WEF is trying to create a future where everything is controlled by technology and only select few will benefit.

Right. They see it as very elitist and anti-democratic.

Yeah.

The author also makes fun of the extreme security measures at Davos. They mention the Swiss Army fighter jets that are there to protect the attendees. And they call it protection from illusionary terror attacks. They also point out the irony of climate change activists flying in on private jets to attend a forum about saving the planet.

Yeah. What do you think they're trying to say with those observations?

Well, they're trying to show the hypocrisy of it all. Like the elites are so worried about security, which implies they know people are unhappy with them, but then they don't seem to care about the environmental impact of their own actions. They're not practicing what they preach.

It's a good point. And they also mentioned the airspace restrictions over Davos during the forum, which just emphasizes how exclusive and isolated the event is. Regular people can't even get close.

Exactly.

In the end, the author calls the WF a tax-free NGO that only serves the super rich and powerful. And they say their goal is to dehumanize, robotize, digitize, and control the rest of us. That's a pretty harsh assessment.

It is. They basically present the WF as a key player in this alleged plot to control the world. A place where the elite can meet and plan our future without any accountability.

Okay. Last but not least, we have accountability robots. Friday, March 28, 2025, CNC News. SU. This one reports on some big changes happening at the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Yeah, this one's interesting. It announces that the HHS is being downsized big time. 20,000 jobs cut and the number of divisions reduced from 28 to 15. And they say this is all under the direction of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. His goal is apparently to refocus the agency on its core mission, which is reversing the chronic disease epidemic. He wants to do more with less and save taxpayers money.

What do you make of these changes?

I think the author sees them as a good thing, a much needed correction. They seem to think the HHS had gotten too bloated and focused on things that weren't its core responsibility.

Right. The article also mentions that the CDC and DOGE are clawing back 11 billion in CO 19 grants. They're trying to root out what they call censorship contracts. These were contracts that supposedly influenced public opinion on CO 19 vaccines and masking.

Yeah. So, the author probably sees this as an attempt to undo some of the damage they believe was done during the pandemic. They want more trans transparency and unbiased information.

He briefly mentioned John Stewart's reaction to how complicated the Biden administration's grant application process was, which I guess is an example of bureaucratic inefficiency.

Yeah, a bit of humor there.

They also note that Arkansas is the first state to approve over-the-counter ivormectin, and they question whether the FDA will go along with it.

It shows that the debate about alternative COVID treatments and the role of regulatory agencies is still going strong. The author seems to be in favor of more access to ivormect. and they think it's been unfairly restricted.

Interesting. The author ends by saying that we can't get complacent even with these changes. They urge people to stay vigilant. And then they discuss a Spanish study that suggests repeated mRNA shots could lead to a shift in antibodies towards IGG4. They call it a non-fighter antibbody. They're worried that it could make people more susceptible to reinfections and cause a long-term change in the immune system. They also raise concerns about research into the potential problems with mRNA vaccines being suppressed or under funded.

So, they're still worried about the long-term effects of the vaccines and they think there might be a cover up happening.

Well, we've definitely covered a lot today from global famine conspiracies to racial discrimination, elite agendas, and changes in our health agencies. There's a lot to think about. Thank you for listening to another session of the Lenny and Maria Deep Dive podcast show.

3-29-25 DailyBriefs-info.wav

button_magicSource guide

arrow_drop_up

Summary

This podcast episode from dailybrief.info, hosted by Lenny and Maria, delves into a range of controversial and interconnected topics. The hosts begin by examining a theory of a planned famine and societal collapse linked to biblical prophecy and perceived elite activities, using examples like the Georgia Guidestones and underground tunnel narratives. They then shift to a discussion on racial discrimination in the US, focusing on claims of anti-white bias within affirmative action and DEI initiatives, while also touching upon individual liberties regarding discrimination. Finally, the episode analyzes different perspectives on the World Economic Forum's 2025 Davos meeting, portraying it as a secretive and controlling entity, and concludes with a report on the restructuring of the US Department of Health and Human Services under Robert F. Kennedy Jr., highlighting a focus on chronic disease and skepticism towards past COVID-19 responses. The overall purpose appears to be to explore alternative narratives and raise critical questions about societal trends, government actions, and alleged hidden agendas.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

FOR EACH SOURCE list  IN BOLD TYPE  TITLE AND AUTHOR. AND ALSO in italics clickable source URL LINKS] 

Here is a summary of each source, with the title and author in bold and the clickable source URL in italics:

•

TITLE: 3-29-25 DailyBriefs-info.wav AUTHOR: Lenny and Maria (hosts of the podcast)* URL: No direct URL provided in the source.

•

This source is an excerpt from the Lenny and Maria deep dive podcast show produced by dailybrief.info1 . In this excerpt, they discuss several topics: a theory about a planned famine and societal collapse linked to biblical prophecy and observations of elite activities1 ; the question of the thoroughness and effectiveness of safety regulations, particularly in the food industry2 ; the presentation of GMOs as nutritionally deficient and a tool for corporate control2 ; the concentration of ownership in the food industry with companies like Craft Heights, General Mills, Cargill, and Walmart being named2 ; the mentioning of Canary Mission as contributing to a sentiment of a coordinated effort to harm critics of Israel, combined with alleged government actions suggesting a hidden control3 ; a police raid on a Quaker meeting house in London where anti-genocide activists were arrested, drawing a parallel to the suppression of criticism related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict3 ; the assertion that these phenomena are global4 ; and the discussion of Mark Thompson, the former BBC director general married to a Jewish woman, with the suggestion that his personal connections might bias BBC coverage of Israel4 .

•

TITLE: Bill Gates says AI will eliminate most jobs except for coders, energy experts and biologists - The Expose AUTHOR: Rhoda Wilson URL: No direct URL to the article excerpt provided; The Expose's homepage is https://expose-news.com/

•

This article from The Expose reports that Bill Gates has "predicted" that artificial intelligence (AI) advances will lead to humans no longer being needed for "most things" in the world over the next decade5 . He specifically mentioned coders, energy experts, and biologists as occupations that AI will not be able to replace5 . The article suggests that those who go along with the "Globalists’ agenda," such as doctors, teachers, and farmers, will face negative consequences6 . It also features reader comments expressing concerns about Bill Gates' motives and the potential for AI to be used for control rather than whistleblowing7 .... The Expose also claims to be heavily censored by governments and Big Tech and relies on reader support9 ....

•

TITLE: Evidence of a Famine Plan (1).pdf AUTHOR: Jeremy James URL: For further information visit www.zephaniah.eu (not directly clickable in this format)

•

This paper lays out an argument that "Agenda 21" is a detailed action plan to transfer complete control of all earth's resources, including agriculture and food production, to a central governing authority, embodying the goals of Marxism11 . The author claims that this plan involves monopolizing the food supply, suppressing independent production, restricting resource availability, and substituting nutritionally deficient or harmful alternatives12 . The author states that this is not speculation and that all cited information can be found online and verified by mainstream news sources12 . Despite its claims having no connection with Scripture, the paper is presented as a Bible study, comparing the goals and methods of the "Wicked" in Scripture with their actual activities as the "End Time" approaches13 .

•

TITLE: Gaza protests: “Hamas terrorists,” “Hamas out” - The Expose AUTHOR: Rhoda Wilson URL: No direct URL to the article excerpt provided; The Expose's homepage is https://expose-news.com/

•

This is a brief post on The Expose website, situated among other headlines and support appeals14 .... It lists "Gaza protests: 'Hamas terrorists,' 'Hamas out'" as one of the recent posts14 .... The author, Rhoda Wilson, describes her shift to full-time research and writing in response to the "global takeover" that became apparent with the introduction of COVID-19, aiming to raise awareness about a small group planning world domination17 ....

•

TITLE: Is Racial Discrimination Illegal or Not?, by Jared Taylor - The Unz Review AUTHOR: Jared Taylor URL: https://www.unz.com/johntaylor/is-racial-discrimination-illegal-or-not/

•

This article, published on The Unz Review, is written by Jared Taylor19 . It appears to be the main content around which user comments are organized19 .... The comments discuss a range of topics, including financial institutions and the BRICS alliance21 , links to external articles and videos22 , PayPal's planned policy on misinformation and bank scrutiny of January 6th attendees23 , and general commentary on the article's themes20 . The website also features a variety of columnists, bloggers, and categories covering topics like foreign policy, race/ethnicity, economics, and history24 .

•

TITLE: The deep state loves the “no virus” narrative - The Expose AUTHOR: Dr. Meryl Nass URL: No direct URL to the article excerpt provided; The Expose's homepage is https://expose-news.com/

•

In this article on The Expose, Dr. Meryl Nass discusses the claim that the COVID-19 virus is fake, referencing an article on Off-Guardian25 . She presents evidence for the existence of the virus, including its isolation, sequencing of hundreds of thousands of whole genomes by scientists worldwide with local mutations, and the need to grow these viruses for sequencing26 .... Dr. Nass argues that the widespread agreement among international scientists on these findings makes the "no virus" narrative highly improbable26 . She also notes the significant falsification of information during the pandemic, which has understandably led to suspicion about the virus's reality28 . The Expose includes a note with further scientific information supporting the isolation and sequencing of SARS-CoV-227 .

•

TITLE: WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating - LewRockwell AUTHOR: No Author (Original source: Global Research) URL: https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/wef-davos-2025-more-grotesque-than-ever-robotizing-and-depopulating/

•

This LewRockwell.com blog post, originally from Global Research, comments on the World Economic Forum (WEF) Davos 2025, characterizing it as "more grotesque than ever" and focusing on themes of robotization and depopulation29 . The article suggests that the discussions and visions emerging from WEF-Davos are inhumane29 . It advocates for exiting the UN system as a way to undermine organizations like the WEF29 . The LewRockwell website also features blogs, podcasts, books, and resources on various topics30 ....

•

TITLE: Weaponizing Words - The Duke Report AUTHOR: The Duke Report URL: https://thedukereport.substack.com/p/weaponizing-words

•

This article from The Duke Report analyzes the use of language, specifically neurolinguistic programming (NLP), schismogenesis, bafflegab, loaded language, and complex equivalencies, in the context of the Israel-Hamas conflict32 .... It dissects a promoted post on X by an account called “Cheryl E” as an example of narrative control through emotionally charged rhetoric and manipulative techniques33 .... The article discusses how NLP is used to craft emotional impact, schismogenesis to polarize, and bafflegab to obscure meaning while evoking strong emotions35 .... It also offers strategies to counter such manipulation by applying critical thinking (λόγος), Robert Dilts’ Sleight of Mouth reframing techniques, and drawing on Jesus’ teachings on meekness as restrained rationality38 ....

•

TITLE: What my Enemies will never Tell You AUTHOR: Miles Mathis URL: https://milesmathis.com/enemies.pdf

•

In this paper, Miles Mathis addresses "newbies" to his work and rebuts criticisms from the mainstream44 . He claims that the mainstream's censorship and name-calling are evidence in his favor45 . Mathis highlights that many of his papers were "superviral" before Google started censoring him, outperforming Wikipedia46 . He mentions that his first physics book had an introduction by a mainstream physicist who was subsequently "silenced"46 . Mathis asserts his success in diagramming the atomic nucleus47 and claims to consistently address mainstream data and experiments, citing his 2012 diagram of Sr2CuO3 explaining a Nature experiment48 . He also states he was the first to unify gravity and EM48 , discovered a visual explanation of superposition49 , and was the only scientist to attack the Bicep2 gravity wave claim before its retraction49 . Furthermore, he points to his 2012 paper on lift, which he says Scientific American later indirectly confirmed50 , and his 2009 paper on singularities, which Roy Kerr allegedly admitted was correct50 .

•

TITLE: Who Gives Two Hoots About the Houthis! - LewRockwell AUTHOR: David Stockman (Reprinted with permission from David Stockton’s Contra Corner) URL: https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/who-gives-two-hoots-about-the-houthis/

•

This blog post on LewRockwell.com, authored by David Stockman, criticizes the funding of wars that do not serve America's homeland security, using Ukraine as an example, and the perpetuation of wars on behalf of allies unwilling to pay for their own defense, referencing the conflict involving the Houthis51 . Stockman argues that the U.S.'s checking account is "massively overdrawn" and now is not the time for such foreign involvements51 . The LewRockwell website also contains a variety of blogs and other resources52 ....

•

TITLE: ☕️ ACCOUNTABILITY ROBOTS ☙ Friday, March 28, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 AUTHOR: Jeff Childers URL: https://jeffchilders.substack.com/p/accountability-robots-friday-march

•

This post from Jeff Childers' C&C News on Substack discusses a shift in the narrative around public health issues54 . It suggests that the "Superman Fallacy of government" is dangerous, especially when things seem to be going well, and advocates for a continued focus on local solutions54 . The post mentions a new peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Infection regarding post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associating with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections, noting that corporate media ignored it but it was published despite this54 . Childers suggests that censorship and funding dynamics are changing, with individuals like Kennedy supposedly laying off "narrative enforcers" and HHS pulling funding from certain studies, which he believes will lead to an "avalanche of pent-up scholarship" that was previously suppressed55 .

keep_pinSave to note

copy_all

thumb_up

thumb_down