MA marking criteria 2021-22
MA marking criteria for engagement and participation
These are the 2021-22 academic year criteria. To refer to the new criteria please see engagement and participation criteria.
Please note that these criteria apply to the engagement component of 30 credit core and option modules.
These marking criteria are to be read in conjunction with the advice given to students about the nature and purpose of the prescribed tasks in the module descriptions.
Distinction
90+
In addition to all the criteria required for a distinction in the 80-89 range, candidates will show intellectually independent, original and insightful engagement that suggests major revisions to our understanding. Demonstrates a command of language and material that expands the boundaries of existing historiography.
80-89
Candidates will demonstrate all the qualities required for a distinction in the 70-79 range, but will show exceptional insight, weight, and sophistication in their engagement, including thoroughly original comments.
70-79
Candidates performing at this level should show perceptive and independent engagement, which demonstrates accuracy, insight and analytical rigour. Their contributions should show the capacity for original thought and, where relevant, a nuanced command of historiographical issues and the ability to handle historical concepts and methods with confidence. They should work imaginatively in groups, where relevant, contributing extensively to the success of the task. Respectful and responsive to others’ contributions.
Merit
60-69
Candidates should show clear critical skill and some independence in their engagement, demonstrating a reasonable breadth of historical knowledge, thoughtfulness and an awareness of nuance and complexity. Identifies key issues and, where appropriate, the ability to handle conflicting opinions and frame cogent arguments. Willing to participate in general debate and has respect for others' contributions, works effectively and constructively in groups, where relevant.
Pass
50-59
Candidates’ engagement should show understanding of key issues, historical concepts and knowledge and, where relevant, the ability to engage with existing scholarly work, although these qualities may not be maintained consistently. Their language or prose should be effective for the task(s) set, although in places there may be imprecision, inaccuracy, or lack of clarity in contributions. Some evidence of effective group work, where relevant.
Fail
30-49
Candidates will have failed to understand the task(s) set, or will have shown a bare minimum level of engagement. They may have some signs of relevant knowledge, but at an elementary level and with little to suggest analytical awareness. Inaccuracies in presentation and contributions that are, for the most part, confused or poorly expressed. Scant evidence of the ability to work in groups, or to participate in general debate.
1-29
No serious attempt to engage with the task(s) assigned. Little understand or knowledge of the course.
0
Indicates no engagement, or at a level unworthy of marking.