Research ethics guidance for students

If you will be conducting research involving human participants or personal data (i.e. any information that relates to an identifiable living person and that is not already in the public domain), you must first submit an application for ethical approval via the University's online Ethics Application System

Do I need to submit an application for ethical approval?


Any research by students that involves human participants (for example, through interviewing or submitting questions, whether face-to-face or via telephone, email, paper or online questionnaire, or through observing material they post on social media) or personal data (i.e. any information that relates to an identifiable living person and that is not already in the public domain) is subject to a formal ethics review, in accordance with the University’s Research Ethics Policy. Research involving human participants or personal data of identifiable living people must not begin before research ethics review has taken place, and approval has been granted. Retrospective ethics review is not permitted.

The University’s Research Ethics Policy applies to research activities whether they take place within or outside University premises and facilities, and it also applies to research activities that are part of a work placement undertaken in fulfilment of a University degree award.


If you think that you may require ethical approval for your research, you should first have a discussion with your supervisor. Your supervisor will go over some key points with you to ensure that all of the relevant information is included in your application. If you or your supervisor have further questions about whether you need to submit an ethics application before beginning your research, please contact the Department of History Ethics Officer, Dr Simon Stevens.


There is further information below on research that requires ethical approval:

Useful links:


Lots of information and support can be found on the University's main ethics webpages, with various help sheets for student applications linked below.

We would advise that supervisors and students consult this checklist of points to make in your research application, which has been drawn up with History students in mind.

Human participants

Ethics approval is required before undertaking a research project that will involve interaction with people (including interaction by telephone, email, videoconference, paper or online questionnaire, or by observing material they post on social media) in order to collect their opinions and/or personal information as evidence that will be used to inform or support your argument and conclusions.

Ethics approval is not required for interaction with people whose opinions or information will not be used as evidence to inform or support your argument and conclusions. For example, it is not necessary to obtain ethics approval before asking for advice on how to design or conduct your research project from your supervisor, another member of staff in the History Department, or another academic elsewhere.

Personal data

The University’s Research Ethics Policy uses the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) definition of personal data:

‘personal data’: means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural (living) person (“data subject”); an identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that natural person.

Ethics approval is not required for research in published digital or print media (such as news reports or magazine articles) or public broadcasts, where the publication/broadcast has specifically been made available by an organisation for public consumption.

Ethics approval is not required for archival research in a publicly accessible archive or other formally constituted repository accessible to scholars (unless the archive itself requires you to obtain university ethics approval before beginning your research). Though most archival research involving the personal data of living people thus does not require ethics approval, you must still comply with any ethical and data protection requirements specified by the archive itself, and with all legal data protection responsibilities. These are set out in the University’s Research Ethics Policy Note on Archival Research.

Ethics approval is required before doing any archival research that involves accessing personal data in archival materials (for instance private family collections) that have not been deposited in other a publicly accessible archive or other formally constituted repository accessible to scholars. See the University’s Research Ethics Policy Note on Archival Research. 

Additional guidance on doing oral history legally and ethically

Oral history interviews are the most common form of research involving human participants and/or personal data that is undertaken by students in the Department of History. If you will be submitting an ethics application requesting approval to do oral history interviews, then you may also wish to consult the guidance available from the Oral History Society


In particular, the Oral History Society provides helpful guidance on conducting oral history legally and ethically, including preparation, first approach, during the interview, after the interview, archiving and storage, dealing with GDPR (the General Data Protection Regulation), frequently asked questions, and further reading. 

Submit your application:

Apply for ethical approval via the University’s Ethics Application System (available in My Services on MUSE), or via the link below. 

On the University’s central ethics webpages there is further guidance and information to help you apply for ethical approval. This includes A Brief Student Guide to Research Ethics, ten top tips to help you complete your ethics application, guidance for students on completing the application form, guidance for undergraduates and taught postgraduates and for PGRs on using the online ethics review system, guidance on how to compile an Information Sheet to help human participants decide whether to be involved in your project, and an example of a form for use when obtaining participants' consent to be involved in a project.

We would also advise that students consult this checklist of points to make in your research application, which has been drawn up with History students in mind.

Before you submit your ethics application, all applicants need to complete a suite of three online information security courses: Protecting Information (approx. 20 minutes), Protecting Personal Data (approx. 10 minutes), and Protecting Research Data (approx. 10 minutes). The online ethics application system will automatically check your training record and notify you which courses need to be completed before beginning your application. 

What happens next:


Undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate taught (PGT) applications will be reviewed by your supervisor, who will decide if your research should be classified as 'low risk' or potentially 'high risk'. If your research is deemed to be high risk (because it will involve particularly vulnerable participants or highly sensitive topics), a second ethics reviewer will be assigned by the Department of History Ethics Officer, in addition to your supervisor.


Supervised postgraduate (PGR) applications will be reviewed by a minimum of three ethics reviewers, nominated by the Department of History Ethics Officer. None of the ethics reviewers can have any conflict of interest with the application: this means, for instance, that the applicant’s doctoral supervisors cannot serve as ethics reviewers. 


You will be informed of the outcome of your application within three weeks (15 working days) of submission. There are three possible outcomes: ‘Approved,’ ‘Compulsory Changes Required’ (in this case the application will need to be re-submitted), or ‘Not Approved.’ 


If the outcome is that the reviewers require compulsory changes, your application will need to be revised, resubmitted, and then re-reviewed by the reviewers before the research can proceed. You should apply sufficiently far in advance to ensure that there is time before you plan to begin your research for the ethics reviewers to review your application, for you to make any compulsory changes they may require, and for those changes to then be re-reviewed.