In the End
By: John Kazerooni
What truly matters in the end? Looking at a world increasingly tangled in cycles of violence, anger, and division, I often find myself drawn back to a story from my childhood—a simple tale that left a lasting impression, now more relevant than ever.
The story revolved around a struggle between good and evil. The “good” character wasn’t the strongest or most powerful; rather, they were guided by compassion, patience, and a dedication to peace. Their adversary, driven by hatred and an unyielding thirst for power, appeared unstoppable, believing that victory at any cost was the only way forward. Yet, as the story unfolded, it revealed a profound truth: those who wield anger and hatred, regardless of their strength, ultimately fall.
This theme—the self-destructive nature of hatred—stays with me, surfacing not just in tales but in real-life conflicts. Around the world, individuals and nations repeat the same mistakes, pouring immense resources, time, and energy into conflicts, building weapons, asserting control, and seeking revenge. We often label these actions as “defense,” but they are rooted in fear, anger, and the drive to dominate. While these pursuits might create a sense of strength, history shows that a path forged by hatred only leads to loss and suffering.
In the end, revenge yields no true victory. Nations that focus on overpowering others, aiming to defeat rather than understand, may seem triumphant briefly but eventually face isolation and weakness. Hatred carries a steep cost; it drains not only the one harboring it but everyone around them. It severs connections, fosters distrust, and leaves a legacy of broken bonds and hollow achievements.
When facing aggression and hostility, we are challenged with how to respond. In such times, we might ask ourselves: How can we protect and uplift those affected by the adversary’s actions? What non-violent paths can we take to counter the threat? Is there room for dialogue and negotiation, even amid conflict?
But what if negotiation fails? What if the opposition holds a rigid ideology that clashes with fundamental human values? What if they seek to impose their beliefs through force? When attempts at understanding are met with hostility or indifference, conflicts can escalate. In these moments, we confront the hard truth that some disputes may not be resolved through dialogue alone. This does not mean abandoning the pursuit of peace; rather, it calls for resilience and adaptability in our strategies.
In the face of persistent hostility, we must also reflect on how to hold onto our integrity and values. Even when talks falter, we can remain committed to compassion and understanding. This might mean exploring alternative solutions—building alliances with others who share a vision of peace, supporting grassroots movements that emphasize unity, or focusing on humanitarian efforts that address the immediate needs of those affected by conflict.
Ultimately, I find myself asking: which path will we choose? Will we, as humans, succumb to hatred, giving in to destructive impulses in moments of conflict? Or will we rise above, as the hero in the story did, embracing love, wisdom, and understanding over revenge? ...
The answers to these questions and more will shape not only our present but the future of generations to come. In the end, we must decide if our legacy will be one of division or unity, hatred or love. Every choice we make moves us closer to one of these outcomes. The world we leave behind will reflect not only what we created but, above all, who we chose to be.
Click on the link https://sites.google.com/view/johnkaz to explore Tapestry of My Thoughts
Medium Readers
Click on the link https://medium.com/@iselfschooling to explore Tapestry of My Thoughts