Friendship or romantic relationships between two people who have unequal financial situation may be awkward:
What do you do when one person can afford to do something and the other doesn't?
If a person is aware of the other person's financial hardship they can offer to do something that doesn't require much money, the goal here is to spend time with the person.
How do you communicate your financial situation without making it uncomfortable for the other person?
The goal here is open communication. Explaining that you can't really afford to do things while accounting for the needs of other person is important. You may not need to go into details why your situation is like that, just make sure you get that there are some things that you may not be able to do and offer more economic ways to spend time
How does the person who has more money offer to pay for the other person without making them inferior or uncomfortable?
it's important to give a choice to the other person, ask them if they are comfortable that you pay for them. A person with low finances already feel less control and giving them a choice allows them to feel more control over the situation.
What do you do if this situation continues for indefinite future?
One may be conflicted about it - on the one hand I may want to spend time with this person, on the other hand if there are too many limitations to us having fun it may not work at the end. See Conflicted" how to deal with conflicting needs.
After trying to tell roommates to be quiet the conversation became a little aggravated. Later the roommates expressed that they would like to have a more peaceful way of resolving conflicts.
How do you address this situation?
Both parties have feelings and needs.
Roommates felt threatened, because their need for civility was not met.
The person who brought up the issue felt annoyed because their need for quiet was not met.
The way to address this is to first understand what the roommates feel and need and then once they feel gotten, express your feelings and needs. This may lead to mutual understanding and agreement on how to deal with it in case this happens again.
The professor raises voice when trying to explain something. This makes students feel that they did something wrong. How do you communicate it to the professor?
It is important to take responsibility on how professor's communication is interpreted. You don't want to bring your judgements, for example, "when you scream at us" is a judgement, "when you raise your voice" is more of a fact.
You could say something like this: when you want to say something important and raise your voice I feel scared because it reminds me of people yelling at me and blaming me. As a result I can't really listen attentively to what you are saying. I understand that you raising your voice is your way of pointing to something important, and it's not really working for me and some of the other students. Would it be possible to communicate important points without raising your voice so that we actually are able to listen them carefully?
Consequences. We are responsible for the consequences of our communication. We may have all the best intention but if we piss off the professor and get an F, this is the risk we are taking.
What do you do if there is someone in your family you have to take care of, possibly for the rest of your life, and at the same time you want to live your life fully?
This is an example of being conflicted. There are two different needs: support and love for my relative and personal fulfillment and I don't see how I can meet both of these needs. I feel that if I take care of one need, I will have to sacrifice the other need, and I don't want to do that.
It is important to understand that there may be more choices in life than "either / or". Once I understand these two needs I can start seeing other ways to address them, without sacrificing either of them. For example, I can hire somebody to help. See Conflicted" how to deal with conflicting needs.
Sometimes we are talking to someone or working on a project and the next thing we know we are out of it. We either disengage from the conversation or we are no longer working on the project. What happened? What prevented us from continuing our participation?
It is important to understand our limits of participation, for example,
boredom
working too hard, spending too much energy
no joy
failure, something is not going the way I want it to
distraction
Once I know what my limits are, I can keep an eye on it, instead of automatically reacting to these triggers. And then I may be able to stay in the conversation or on my project, if I am very clear what takes me away from it, and what I can do to keep myself engaged.
Homework: notice what makes you disengage from a conversation or a project.
Notice the limits of your engagement / participation
Notice situations during your week that's worth discussing in the next class