W

• WACHTER (1998) = Rudolf Wachter, “Ein schwieriges rhodisches Graffito”, ZPE, 121 (1998) 90-93.
• WACKE (1989) = Andreas Wacke, “Vom Hermaphroditen zum Transsexuellen. Zur Stellung von Zwittern in der Rechtsgeschichte”, en H. Eyrich, Heinz – W. Odersky – F. J. Säcker (eds.), Festschrift F. K. Rebmann zum 65. Geburtstag, Múnich, 1989, pp. 861-903.
• WAGNER (1988) = Beate Wagner-Hasel, “Geschlecht und Gabe. Zum Brautgütersystem bei Homer”, ZRG, 105 (1988) 32-73.
• WAGNER (1997) = Ead., “Ehebruch, Griechenland”, NP, 3 (1997) 900-901.
• WAGNER (1998) = Ead., “Frau. Griechenland und Rom”, NP, 4 (1998) 634-637.
• WAGNER (1998b) = Ead., “Geschlechterrollen. Griechenland”, NP, 4 (1998) 1008-1011.
• WAGNER, VEYA & VUICHARD (1998) = Delphine Wagner, Léonore Veya & Nathalie Vuichard, “Femme le jour, guenon la nuit”, Chronozones, 4 (1998) 62-65.
• WALCOT (1978) = Peter Walcot, “Herodotus on rape”, Arethusa, 11 (1978) 137-147.
• WALCOT (1987) = Id., “Romantic love and true love: Greek attitudes to marriage”, AnSoc, 18 (1987) 5-33.
• WALCOT (1991) = Id., “On widows and their reputation in antiquity”, SO, 66 (1991) 5-26.
• WALCOT (1998) = Id., “Plutarch on Sex”, G&R, 45 (1998) 166-187.
• WALIN (2009) = Daniel Walin, “An Aristophanic slave: Peace 819-1126”, CQ, 59 (2009) 30-45.
• WALKER (A-1992) = Andrew Walker, “Eros and the eye in the love-letters of Philostratus”, PCPhS, 38 (1992) 132-148.
• WALKER (B-2006) = Jonathan Walker, “Before the name: Ovid’s deformulated lesbianism”, CompLit, 58 (2006) 205-222.
• WALKER (C-2012) = Paige Walker, “Genital Depilation and Power in Classical Greece”, Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics, 1.1 (2012) 13 pp. (sin paginar).

A lo largo de la Grecia clásica, las convenciones artísticas de ilustración superficial del vello púbico iluminar visión más profunda de la vida griega contemporánea. En la estatuaria desnudo masculino, la evolución de cuidadosamente esculpidas y pelo púbico estilizado desenfrenado a mechones revela el cambio de definición de la masculinidad. Ya no valorar lo ostentoso ornamentación púbico de aristócratas, la democracia recién fundada griego vuelve a abrazar el vello púbico de la hombre de la calle. Con este cambio, cada ciudadano puede alcanzar austeridadcorporal tal como él puede alcanzar influencia en su gobierno. En un fiel reflejo del ideal clásico, su auto-contención le dota de poder masculino. él suprime cualquier posible amenaza a su poder,una forma de pensar no se limita meramente a sus hombres rivales. También se puede aplicar este concepto de dominación patriarcal a la práctica de la depilación genital femenina, la más potente y por lo tanto más mujeres que amenazan eliminar una mayor cantidad de vello púbico, mientras que las hembras más inocuos no necesita practicar depilación tal. Esto se aplica a las diosas, que carecen de vello púbico completamente, las esposas, que se enorgullecen de su genitales cuidadosamente podados, el hetaerai que depilarse parcialmente para aumentar el erotismo, y los esclavos comunes, que como propiedad inofensivo novio no extensamente. Dominio púbico del hombre se queda atestiguado, sin embargo, en los floreros que incluir escenas con otros machos. Si bien estos temas podrían poner en peligro el patrón masculino con una proliferación de vello púbico, en su lugar le yuxtaponen con su calvicie relativa. A través de esta representación, el artista al mismo tiempo evita alusiones siniestras castración y ofrece al espectador con erômenoi homoerótica juvenil que le garantizamos su dominio eterno. La acumulación de evidencia textual y visualdefine la forma del pubis pelo en la Grecia clásica refleja el espíritu de la época contemporánea, representando visualmente los ideales de los sectores público y ámbito privado.

Throughout Classical Greece, the superficial artistic conventions of pubic hair illustration illuminate deeper insight into contemporaneous Greek life. In nude male statuary, the evolution of carefully sculpted and stylized pubic hair to unbridled tufts reveals the shifting definition of masculinity. No longer valuing the ostentatious pubic ornamentation of aristocrats, the newly founded Greek democracy turns to embrace the pubic hair of the everyman. With this change, every citizen can attain bodily austerity just as he can attain influence in his government. In a true reflection of the Classical ideal, his self-containment endows him with masculine power. He suppresses any potential threat to this power, a mindset not limited to merely his rival men. One also can apply this concept of patriarchal dominance to the practice of female genital depilation; the most powerful and therefore most threatening women remove greater quantities of pubic hair, while the more innocuous females need not practice such depilation. This applies to the goddesses, who lack pubic hair completely; the wives, who take pride in their neatly pruned genitalia; the hetaerai who partially depilate to augment eroticism; and the common slaves, who as harmless property do not groom extensively. The man’s pubic dominance remains unattested, however, in vases that include scenes with other males. While these subjects could threaten the patron with a masculine proliferation of pubic hair, they instead juxtapose him with their relative hairlessness. Through this portrayal, the artist simultaneously avoids ominous castration allusions and provides the viewer with youthful homoerotic erômenoi who assure him of his eternal dominance. The accumulation of both textual and visual evidence elucidates how pubic hair in Classical Greece reflects the contemporaneous zeitgeist, visually portraying the ideals of both public and private spheres.

• WALLACE (A-1991) = Kristine G. Wallace, “Women in Tacitus, 1903-1986”, ANRW, II 33.5 (1991) 3556-3574.
• WALLACE (B-1997) = Robert W. Wallace, “On not legislating sexual conduct in fourth-century Athens”, en G. Thür – J. Vélissaropoulos-Karakostas (eds.), Symposion 1995. Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte, Colonia-Viena, 1997, pp. 151-166.
• WALLACE (B-1998) = Id., “Unconvicted or potential atimoi in ancient Athens”, Dike, 1 (1998) 63-78.
• WALLNER (2006) = Gustavus Wallner, “De athletarum morbis”, VoxLat, 163 (2006) 118-123.
• WALSH (1985) = Patrick Gerard Walsh, “Catullus 17 and the priapean”, en Studia in honorem Iiro Kajanto, Helsinki, 1985 (= Arctos, suppl. 2), pp. 315-322.
• WALTER (1998) = Uwe Walter, “Soziale Normen in den Epigrammen Martials”, en F. Grewing (ed.), Toto notus in orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Stuttgart, 1998, pp. 220-242. [vista premia limitada en Google Books]
• WALTERS (1997) = Jonathan Walters, “Soldiers and Whores in a Pseudo-Quintilian Declamation”, en T. Cornell – K. Lomas (eds.), Gender and Ethnicity in Ancient Italy, Londres, 1997, pp. 109-114.
• WALTERS (1997b) = Id., “Invading the Roman body: manliness and impenetrability in Roman thought”, en HALLET & SKINNER (1997), pp. 29-43.
• WALTERS (1998) = Id., “Juvenal, Satire 2: Putting Male Sexual Deviants on Show”, en L. Foxhall – J. Salmon (eds.), Thinking Men. Masculinity and its Self-Representation in the Classical Tradition, Londres-Nueva York, 1998, pp. 148-154. [vista previa restringida en Google Books]
• WALTERS (1998b) = Id., “Making a Spectacle: Deviant Men, Invective, and Pleasure”, Arethusa, 31 (1998) 355-367.
• WARDLE (1998) = David Wardle, “Caligula and his wives”, Latomus, 57 (1998) 109-126.
• WARDROP (2012) = Alex Wardrop, “Teaching Rape and Sexual Violence in the Classics Classroom: Reflections and Responsabilities”, CUCD Bulletin, 41(2012) 15-20.
• WARFIELD (1918) = Benjamin B. Warfield, “The terminology of love in the New Testament”, Princeton Theological Review, 16 (1918) 1-45 y 153-203.
• WARREN (2009) = James I. Warren, “Aristotle on Speusippus on Eudoxus on Pleasure”, OSAPh, 36 (2009) 249-281.
• WASER (1907) = O. Waser, “Eros”, RE, 6, 1 (1907) 484-542.
• WASER (1994) = Christa Waser, “Frau – Erotik – Sexualität. Zur Praesenz des Weiblichen beim satiriker Persius”, GB, 20 (1994) 127- 163.
• WASHBOURNE (1999) = Rose Washbourne, “Aphrodite Parakyptousa and «the Woman at the window»: the Cypriote Astarte-Aphrodite's fertility role in the sacred prostitution and rebirth”, RDAC, (1999) 163-177.
• WASHBOURNE (1999) = Ead., “Hesiod’s smile-loving, member-loving Aphrodite”, PP, 54, nº 305 (1999) 135-145.
• WATANABE (2003) = Akihiko Watanabe, “The masculinity of Hippothoos”, AncNarr, 3 (2003) 1-42. [resumen]
• WATERS (1995) = Sarah Waters, “«The most famous fairy in history»: Antinous and homosexual fantasy”, JHSex, 6.2 (1995) 194-230.
• WATKINS (1973) = Calvert Watkins, “Latin suppus”, JIES, 1 (1973) 394-399.
• WATKINS (1975) = Id., “La famille indo-européenne de grec ὄρχις: linguistique, poétique et mythologie”, BSL, 70 (1975) 11-25.
• WATKINS (1978) = Id., “ἀνόστεος ὂν πόδα τένδει”, en Étrennes de septantaine. Travaux de linguistique et de grammaire comparée offerts à M. Lejeune, París, 1978, pp. 231-235.
• WATKINS (1982) = Id., “A Greco-Hittite Etymology”, en J. Tischler (ed.), Serta Indogermanica. Festschrift für G. Neumann zum 60. Geburtstag, Innsbruck, 1982, pp. 455-457.
• WATSON (A-1983) = Lindsay C. Watson, “Problems in Epode 11”, CQ, 33 (1983) 229-238.
• WATSON (A-2004) = Id., “Making water not love: Apuleius, Metamorphoses 1.13-14”, CQ, 54 (2004) 651-655.
• WATSON (A-2006) = Id., “Catullus and the poetics of incest”, Antichthon, 40 (2006) 35-48.
• WATSON (A-2008) = Id., “Of Hernias and Wine-Jugs: Catalepton 12”, Mnemosyne, 61 (2008) 245-256.
• WATSON (A-2010) = Id., “The echeneis and erotic magic”, CQ, 60 (2010) 639-646.
• WATSON (B-1983) = Patricia A. Watson, “Puella and Virgo”, Glotta, 61 (1983) 119-143.
• WATSON (B-1992) = Ead., “Erotion: Puella Delicata?”, CQ, 42 (1992) 253-268.
• WATSON (B-2000) = Ead., “Martial on the wedding of Stella and Violentilla”, Latomus, 58 (1999) 348-356.
• WATSON (B-2003) = Ead., “Martial’s Marriage. A new approach”, RhM, 146 (2003) 38-48.
• WATSON (B-2005) = Ead., “Non tristis torus et tamen pudicus: The Sexuality of the Matrona in Martial”, Mnemosyne, 58 (2005) 63-86.
• WATSON (B-2009) = Ead., “Chione's bikini: affectation or normal bathing attire?”, Antichthon, 43 (2009) 137-144.
  • Marcial 3.87 ataca a una prostituta que, aunque técnicamente virgen, de hecho se especializa en la felación. Para resaltar que es la boca lo que es impuro en ella, Marcial sugiere que, al bañarse, debe cubrir la parte que en su caso tiene un uso sexual, es decir, la boca, mediante la transferencia, desde su entrepierna a su rostro, de su subligar (taparrabos). Aunque la cuestión es muy discutida, la evidencia externa al epigrama sugiere que el uso de un traje de baño por parte de Quíone -al menos para una mujer de su clase- ha de ser visto no como una práctica normal, sino como una aberración. Debemos preguntarnos, pues, por qué Marcial imagina a Quíone vestida con un taparrabos. La respuesta radica en el énfasis puesto en el rumor. Nadie sabe a ciencia cierta que Quíone es técnicamente virgen, pero hay un fuerte rumor en ese sentido. Este rumor surge porque Quíone, aunque es una meretrix, lleva un traje de baño. Es de suponer que esa exhibición de modestia afectada por parte de Quíone es un intento de ocultar su verdadera depravación.
• WATT (1984) = William S. Watt, “Notes on Martial”, LCM, 9 (1984) 130-131.
• WATTS (1973) = William J. Watts, “Ovid, the Law and Roman Society on Abortion”, AClass, 16 (1973) 89-101.
• WEBER (1985) = Ekkehard Weber, “Das Bleitäfelchen mit einem Liebeszauber aus Mautern an der Donau”, en Bericht über den sechzehnten österreichischen Historikertag im Krems/Donau veranstaltet vomVerband österreichischer Geschichtsvereine in der Zeit vom 3. bis 7. September 1984, Viena, 1985, pp. 62-65.
• WEDECK (1943) = Harry E. Wedeck, “Synonims for meretrix”, Classical Weekly, 37 (1943-44) 116-117.
• WEDECK (1980) = Id., Roman morals: A survey of depravity, Lawrence, Kansas, 1980.
• WEEBER (1995) = Karl-Wilhelm Weeber, “Bordell”, en Alltag im Alten Rom. Ein Lexikon, Zúrich, 1995, pp. 59-62.
• WEEBER (1995b) = Id., “Liebesbrief”, en Alltag im Alten Rom. Ein Lexikon, Zúrich, 1995, p. 240.
• WEEBER (1995c) = Id., “Prostitution”, en Alltag im Alten Rom. Ein Lexikon, Zúrich, 1995, pp. 287-291.
• WEEBER (1995d) = Id., “Sexualität”, en Alltag im Alten Rom. Ein Lexikon, Zúrich, 1995, pp. 319-323.
• WEEBER (1995e) = Id., “Vergewaltigung”, en Alltag im Alten Rom. Ein Lexikon, Zúrich, 1995, pp. 383-385.
• WEEBER (1997) = Id., Flirten wie die alten Römer, Düsseldorf-Zúrich, 1997.
• WEEBER (2004) = Id., Nachtleben im alten Rom, Primus Verlag : Darmstadt, 2004 (trad. Italiana: La vita notturna nell’antica Roma, Newton & Compton editori : Roma, 2005).
• WEHRLI (1962) = Claude Wehrli, “Les gynéconomes”, MH, 19 (1962) 33-38.
• WEILL (1966) = Nicole Weill, “Adôniazousai ou les femmes sur le toit”, BCH, 90 (1966) 664-698.
• WEINREICH (1928) = Otto Weinreich, “Martial XI 43, Petron. 140-5 und Pariser Zauberpapyrus Z.326”, RhM, 77 (1928) 112.
• WEINREICH (1941) = Id., “Zwei Epigramme: Dioskorides V, 138 und Krinagoras IX, 429”, WS, 49 (1941) 61-88.
• WEISS (1996) = Michael Weiss, “An Oscanism in Catullus 53”, CPh, 91 (1996) 353-8.
• WEISS (1998) = Id., “Erotica: On the Prehistory of Greek Desire”, HSPh, 98 (1998) 31-61.
• WEISS (2009) = Wolfgang Weiß, “Porneia und Prostitution aus dem Blickwinkel neutestamentlicher Autoren”, en SCHEER (2009), pp. 85-125.
• WEITENBERG (1975) = Joseph J. S. Weitenberg, “Hethitisch kuša-”, IF, 80 (1975) 66-70.
• WEITENBERG (1976) = Id., “Griechische ἴκταρ, ὑπερικταίνοντο und hethitisch ikt- «Bein»”, Mnemosyne, 29 (1976) 225-232.
• WELSH (2005) = Jarrett T. Welsh, “The Splenetic Leno: Plautus, Curculio 216-45”, CQ, 55.1 (2005) 306-309.
• WELTER (1911) = Hubert Welter, Supplementum et Index lexicorum eroticorum linguae latinae, París, 1911 (reimpr. Bolonia, 1970).
• WENDER (1973) = Dorothea Wender, “Plato: Misogynist, Paedophile, and Feminist”, Arethusa, 6 (1973) 75-90.
• WENDER (1974) = Ead., “The Will of the Beast: Sexual Imagery in the Trachiniae”, Ramus, 3 (1974) 1-17.
• WENGST (1993) = Klaus Wengst, “Fast eine Fehlanzeige: Sexualität und Erotik im Neuen Testament”, en BINDER-EFFE (1993), pp. 93-104.
• WENHAM-MACCONVILLE (1980) = Gordon J. Wenham & J. Gordon Macconville, “Drafting techniques in some Deuteronomic laws”, VT, 30 (1980) 248- 251.
• WENZEL (1999) = Michael Wenzel, “Zwischen Wahn und Wirklichkeit. Zu Martial XII 86”, Gymnasium, 106 (1999) 43-49.
• WERNER (1989) = Jürgen Werner, “Keine ‘individuelle Geschlechtsliebe’ in der Antike?”, Klio, 71 (1989) 528-538.
• WEST (A-1970) = Martin L. West, “Burning Sappho”, Maia, 22 (1970) 307-330.
• WEST (A-1984) = Id., “New fragments of Ibycus’ love songs”, ZPE, 57 (1984) 23-27.
• WEST (A-1994) = Id., “Some Oriental Motifs in Archilochus”, ZPE, 102 (1994) 1-5.
• WEST (A-2008) = Id., “A vagina in search of an author”, CQ, 58 (2008) 370-375.
• WEST (B-2001) = Stephanie West, “Phoenix’s antecedents: a note on Iliad 9”, SCI, 20 (2001) 1-15.
• WEST-MERKELBACH (1974) = Martin L. West & Reinhold Merkelbach, “Ein Archilochos-Papyrus”, ZPE, 14 (1974) 97-113.
• WHEELER (A-1910) = Arthur L. Wheeler, “Erotic Teaching in Roman Elegy and the Greek Sources”, CPh, 5 (1910) 440-450 y 6 (1911) 56-77.
• WHEELER (B-1997) = Stephen M. Wheeler, “Changing Names: the Miracle of Iphis in Ovid Metamorphoses 9”, Phoenix, 51 (1997) 190-202.
• WHELTON (1998) = James Whelton, Literary representations of prostitution in the late first century A.D., tesis, Loyola University, Chicago, 1998.
• WHITBECK (1984) = Caroline Whitbeck, “Θεωρίες για τη διαφορά των φύλων”, Hypathia: Feminist Studies (Atenas), 2 (1984) 33-60.
• WHITE (1979) = Heather White, “Theocritus’ Idyll XX”, QUCC, 32 (1979) 117-130.
• WHITE (1981) = Ead., “The fever of love in Theocritus”, CL, 1 (1981) 129-135.
• WHITE (1993) = Ead., “An obscene epigram by Leonidas of Tarentum”, Habis, 24 (1993) 29-32.
• WHITE (1997) = Ead., “Eight convivial and satirical epigrams”, Minerva, 11 (1997) 67-71.
• WHITE (1997b) = Ead., “Two erotic epigrams by Asclepiades”, Veleia, 14 (1997) 369-371.
• WHITE (1997c) = Ead., “Leonidas and love”, Myrtia, 12 (1997) 87-88.
• WHITE (1998) = Ead., “Two obscene epigrams by Rufinus”, Veleia, 15 (1998) 393-396.
• WHITE (1998b) = Ead., “Notes on Hellenistic Texts”, Myrtia, 13 (1998) 89-101.
• WHITE (1998c) = Ead., “Notes on Palladas”, Myrtia, 13 (1998) 225-230.
• WHITE (2000) = Ead., “Further textual problems in Greek poetry”, Orpheus, 21 (2000) 175-188.
• WHITE (2001) = Ead., “Notes on the poetry of Sappho and Theocritus”, Orpheus, 22 (2001) 280-287.
• WHITE (2002) = Ead., “Notes on Greek Lexicography”, Myrtia, 17 (2002) 327-330.
• WHITE (2009) = Ead., “Notes on Horace’s Epodes”, Myrtia, 24 (2009) 345-350.
• WHITE (2009b) = Ead., “Observations on the Text of Propertius”, Myrtia, 24 (2009) 351-360.
• WHITEHORNE (1979) = John E. G. Whitehorne, “Sex and society in Greco-Roman Egypt”, en J. Bingen – G. Nachtergael, Actes XV^e Congr. Papyr., vol. IV, Bruselas, 1979, pp. 240-246.
• WHITEHORNE (1990) = Id., “Filthy Philainis (P. Oxy. XXXIX 2891): A Real Lady?”, en M. Capasso – G. Messeri Savorelli – R. Pintaudi (eds.), Miscellanea philologica in occasione del bicentenario dell’edizione della Charta Borgiana, Florencia, 1990, vol. 2, pp. 529-542.
• WHITMAN (1969) = Cedric H. Whitman, “Ληκύθιον ἀπώλεσεν”, HSPh, 73 (1969) 109.
• WHITMARSH (2005) = Tim Whitmarsh, “The Lexicon of Love: Longus and Philetas Grammatikos”, JHS, 125 (2005) 145-148.
• WHITTAKER (2009) = Tony Whittaker, “Sex and the sack of the city”, G&R, 56 (2009) 234-242.
• WHITTON (1982) = J. Whitton, “A Neglected Meaning for σκεῦος in 1 Thessalonians 4.4”, NTS, 28 (1982) 142-143.
• WICK (1975) = Terry E. Wick, “The Importance of the Family as a Determiner of Sexual Mores in Classical Athens”, Societas, 5 (1975) 133-145.
• WIEDEMANN (1986) = Thomas E. J. Wiedemann, “An early Irish eunuch?”, LCM, 11 (1986) 139-140.
• WIEMER (2005) = Hans-Ulrich Wiemer, “Die gute Ehefrau im Wandel der Zeiten – von Xenophon zu Plutarch”, Hermes, 133 (2005) 424-446.
• WIEMER (2006) = Id., “Konkurrierende Geschlechterdiskurse in der Spätantike: der Lehrer Libanios und der Prediger Chrysostomos”, en R. Rollinger – C. Ulf (eds.), Frauen und Geschlechter. Bilder - Rollen - Realitäten in den Texten antiker Autoren der römischen Kaiserzeit, Viena-Colonia-Weimar, 2006, pp. 379-404.
• WIERSMA (1984) = Sytze Wiersma, “Women in Sophocles”, Mnemosyne, 37 (1984) 25-55.
• WIESEN (1981) = David S. Wiesen, “A decency corruption in Juvenal”, Eranos, 79 (1981) 99-103.
• WIGGERS (1972) = Nancy E. P. Wiggers, Heroic love: a study of Propertius’ adaptation of erotic tradition to personal poetry, tesis, Brown University, 1972.
• WIJSMAN (1992) = Henri J. W. Wijsman, “Female power in Georgics 3.269/270”, HSPh, 94 (1992) 259-261.
• WILBURN (2005) = Andrew T. Wilburn, “Excavating Love Magic at Roman Karanis”, PapLup, 14 (2005)355-370.
• WILCOX (2006) = Amanda Wilcox, “Exemplary grief: gender and virtue in Seneca’s consolations to women”, Helios, 33.1 (2006) 73-100.
• WILDBERGER (2010) = Jula Wildberger, “Male Youths as Objects of Desire in Latin Literature: Some Antinomies in the Principate Model of Roman Sexuality”, en FEICHTINGER-KREUZ (2010), pp. 227-254.
• WILDFANG (2001) = Robin L. Wildfang, “The Vestals and Annual Public Rites”, C&M, 52 (2001) 223-256.
• WILES (1989) = David Wiles, “Marriage and prostitution in classical New Comedy”, Themes in Drama, 11 (1989) 31-48.
• WILGAUX (2010) = Jérôme Wilgaux, “Le mariage des élites dans le monde grec des cites”, en L. Capdetrey & Y. Lafond (eds.), La cité et ses élites: pratiques et représentation des formes de domination et de contrôle social dans les cités grecques. Actes du colloque de Poitiers, 19-20 octobre 2006, Pessac: Ausonius, 2010, pp. 345-358.
• WILKINSON (1978) = Lancelot Patrick Wilkinson, “Classical Approaches IV: Homosexuality”, Encounter, 51.3 (1978) 20-31.
• WILKINSON (1979) = Id., Classical attitudes to modern issues. Population and family planning, women’s liberation, nudism in deed and word, homosexuality, Londres, 1979.
• WILLE (1964) = Irmgard Wille, “Catulls Gedicht 76 als Spiegelbild seines Liebeserlebnisses und seiner Liebesdichtung”, Altertum, 10.2 (1964) 89-95.
• WILLENBERG (1973) = Knud Willenberg, “Die Priapeen Martials”, Hermes, 101 (1973) 320-351.
• WILLIAMS (A-1986) = Charles K. Williams, “Corinth and the cult of Aphrodite”, en M. A. del Chiaro – W. R. Biers (eds.), Corinthiaca. Studies in honor of D. A. Amyx, Columbia, 1986, pp. 12-24.
• WILLIAMS (B-1992) = Craig A. Williams, Homosexuality and the Roman Man: A Study in the Cultural Construction of Sexuality, tesis, Yale University, 1992.
• WILLIAMS (B-1995) = Id., “Greek Love at Rome”, CQ, 45 (1995) 517-539.
• WILLIAMS (B-1997) = Id., “Pudicitia and Pueri: Roman Concepts of Male Sexual Experience”, en M. Duberman (ed.), Queer Representations. Reading Lives, Reading Cultures, Nueva York-Londres, 1997, pp. 25-38.
• WILLIAMS (B-1999) = Id., Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity, Nueva York-Oxford, 1999. [reseña en BMCR] [vista previa limitada en Google Books]
• WILLIAMS (B-2014) = Id., “Sexual Themes in Greek and Latin Graffiti”, en HUBBARD (2014), pp. 493-508.
• WILLIAMS (C-1983) = Dyfri Williams, “Women on Athenian Vases: Problems of Interpretation”, en CAMERON-KUHRT (1983), pp. 92-106.
• WILLIAMS (C-2006) = Id., The Warren Cup, Londres, 2006.
• WILLIAMS (D-1994) = Frederick Williams, “Cercidas, Caelius, and unsafe sex: ΤΥΝΔΑΡΕΟΙΟ ΓΑΜΒΡΟΣ (Cerc. fr. 2.28 Livrea)”, ZPE, 102 (1994) 76-80.
• WILLIAMS (E-1958) = Gordon W. Williams, “Some aspects of Roman marriage ceremonies and ideals”, JRS, 48 (1958) 16-29.
• WILLIAMS (F-2005) = Gareth D. Williams, “Interactions: Physics, Morality, and Narrative in Seneca Natural Question 1”, 100 (2005) 142-165.
• WILLIAMSON (1998) = Margaret Williamson, “Eros the Blacksmith: Performing Masculinity in Anakreon’s Love Lyrics”, en L. Foxhall – J. Salmon (eds.), Thinking Men. Masculinity and its Self-Representation in the Classical Tradition, Londres-Nueva York, 1998, pp. 71-82. [vista previa restringida en Google Books]
• WILLING (1994) = Matthias Willing, “Zwischen Oikos und Kosmos. Frauen im antiken Sparta”, Altertum, 39 (1994) 251-268.
• WILSON (A-1974) = A. M. Wilson, “A slang sense of φορμός to be inferred from Aristophanes?”, Mnemosyne, 27 (1974) 297-298.
• WILSON (B-1996) = Lyn Heatherly Wilson, Sappho’s Sweetbytter Songs. Configurations of Female and Male in Ancient Greek Lyric, Londres, 1996 (reseña en BMCR).
• WILSON (C-1995) = Paul F. Wilson, “A «Complete Catalogue of Sexist Slurs»: Juvenal’s Sixth Satire and Bob Dylan’s «Just Like A Woman»”, LCM, 20 (1995) 4-9.
• WILSON (D-1985) = Robert McLachlan Wilson, “Alimentary and sexual encratism in the Nag Hammadi tractates”, en U. Bianchi (cur.), La tradizione dell’enkrateia. Motivazioni ontologiche e protologiche. Atti del Colloquio internazionale, Milano, 20-23 aprile 1982, Roma, 1985, pp. 317-332.
• WILSON (E-1995) = Walter T. Wilson, “Sin as Sex and Sex with Sin: The Anthropology of James 1:12-15”, HThR, 95 (2002) 147-168.
• WINDEKENS (1982) = Albert J. van Windekens, “Grec νύμφη «femme enceinte»”, ZVS, 96 (1982-83) 93-94.
• WINKLER (A-1974) = John J. Winkler, In Pursuit of the Nymphs: Comedy and Sex in Nonno’s Tales of Dionysos, tesis, Univ. of Austin (Texas), 1974.
• WINKLER (A-1990) = Id., The constraints of desire. The anthropology of sex and gender in ancient Greece, Nueva York-Londres, 1990 (trad. esp., Buenos Aires, 1994; trad. alem., Múnich, 1997). [reseña en BMCR]
• WINKLER (A-1990b) = Id., “Unnatural acts: erotic protocols in Artemidoro’s Dream Analysis”, en WINKLER (A-1990), pp. 17-44.
• WINKLER (A-1991) = Id., “The constrains of Eros”, en Ch. A. Faraone – D. Obbink (eds.), Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion, Nueva York, 1991, pp. 214-243. [se trata de una versión ampliada de su ensayo “The constrains of desire: erotic magical spells”, en WINKLER (A-1990), pp. 71-100] [reseña en BMCR]
• WINKLER (B-1982) = Martin M. Winkler, The liberal muse. Juvenal’s sexual persona and the purpose of satire, tesis, Univ. of Southern California, Los Ángeles, 1982.
• WINNINGTON (1982) = Reginald P. Winnington-Ingram, “Sophocles and Women”, en J. de Romilly (ed.), Sophocle. Sept exposés suivis de discussions (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, XXIX), Vandœuvres-Ginebra, 1982, pp. 171-197.
• WINSOR (1989) = Eleanor Winsor Leach, “Horace Carmen 1.8: Achilles, the Campus Martius, and the Articulation of Gender Roles in Augustan Rome”, CPh, 89 (1994) 334-343.
• WINTER (1973) = Thomas N. Winter, “Catullus Purified: A Brief History of Carmen 16”, Arethusa, 6 (1973) 257-265.
• WINTERER (2006) = Angelika Winterer, Verkehrte Sexualität: ein umstrittenes Pauluswort. Eine exegetische Studie zu Röm 1, 26f. in der Argumentationsstruktur des Römerbriefes und im kulturhistorisch-sozialgeschichtlichen Kontext, Berna-Frankfurt, 2005.
• WION (1970) = Frida Wion, “L’amour grec”, BAGB (1970) 249-258.
• WIRSHBO (1980) = Eliot Wirshbo, “Lesbia: A Mock Hypocorism?”, CPh, 75 (1980) 70.
• WIRTH (1986) = Theo Wirth, “Catull c. 2: passer und malum als Zeichen der Liebe”, RhM, 129 (1986) 36-53.
• WISCHMEYER (1978) = Oda Wischmeyer, “Vorkommen und Bedeutung von agape in der ausserchristlichen Antike”, ZNTW, 69 (1978) 212-238.
• WISCHMEYER (1983) = Ead., “Traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung der paulinische Aussagen über die Liebe (agápe)”, ZNTW, 74 (1983) 222-236.
• WISEMAN (1976) = Timothy Peter Wiseman, “Catullus 16”, LCM, 1 (1976) 14-17.
• WITCZAK (2004) = Krzysztof T. Witczak, “Theocritean humour: a case of homorrothoi”, Eos, 91 (2004) 345-347.
• WITKE (1980) = Charles Witke, “Catullus 13”, CPh, 75 (1980) 325-331.
• WIT-TAK (1967) = Thalien M. de Wit-Tak, Lysistrata: Vrede, Vrouw, en Obsceniteit bij Aristophanes, Groninga, 1967.
• WIT-TAK (1968) = Ead., “The function of obscenity in Aristophanes Thesmophoriazusae and Ecclesiazusae”, Mnemosyne, 21 (1968) 357-365.
• WLOSOK (1975) = Antonie Wlosok, “Amor and Cupido”, HSPh, 79 (1975) 165-179.
• WOHL (1993) = Victoria J. Wohl, “Standing by the Stathmós: The Creation of Sexual Ideology in the Odyssey”, Arethusa 26 (1993) 19-50.
• WOHL (1997) = Ead., “Scenes from a Marriage: Love and Logos in Plutarch’s Coniugalia Praecepta”, Helios, 24 (1997) 170-192.
• WOHL (1999) = Ead., “The Eros of Alcibiades”, ClAnt, 18 (1999) 349-385.
• WOHL (2002) = Ead., Love Among the Ruins. The Erotics of Democracy in Classical Athens, Princeton, 2002. [vista previa limitada en Google Books]
• WÖHRLE (2000) = George Wöhrle, “Essen und Sexualität in der frühgriechischen, besonders iambischen Dichtung”, RhM, 143 (2000) 113-118.
• WOLFF (1944) = Hans Julius Wolff, “Marriage law and family organization in ancient Athens. A study on the interrelation of public and private law in the Greek city”, Traditio, 2 (1944) 43-95.
• WOLFF (B-2008) = Étienne Wolff, “L’amour chez Martial”, en FONTANIER (2008), pp. 187-196.
• WOLFF (B-2008b) = Id., “Sénèque face à la sexualité“, en D. Auger – E. Wolff (eds.), Culture classique et christianisme. Mélanges offerts à Jean Bouffartigue, Nanterre, 2008, pp. 159-165.
• WOLFSDORF (2009) = Id., “Empedocles and his Ancient Readers on Desire and Pleasure”, OSAPh, 36 (2009) 1-70.
• WOLFSDORF (2011) = Id., “Prodicus on the correctness of names: the case of τέρψις, χαρά and εὐφροσύνη”, JHS, 131 (2011) 131-145.
• WOLL (1986) = Dieter Woll, “Frz. «flatter», «flétrir» und Verwandtes. Etymologie und Wortgeschichte”, RomForsch, 98 (1986) 1-16.
• WOODBURY (1978) = Leonard Woodbury, “The gratitude of the Locrian maiden. Pindar, Pyth. 2.18-20”, TAPhA, 108 (1978) 285-299.
• WOODBURY (1979) = Id., “Gold Hair and Grey, Or the Game of Love: Anacreon Fr. 13: 358 PMG”, TAPhA, 109 (1979) 277-287.
• WOODFORD (1989) = Susan Woodford, “Herakles’ attributes and their appropiation by Eros”, JHS, 109 (1989) 200-204.
• WOODMAN (1980) = Anthony John Woodman, “The craft of Horace in Odes I.14”, CPh, 75 (1980) 60-67.
• WOODS (1998) = David Woods, “On the Death of the Empress Fausta”, G&R, 45 (1998) 70-86.
• WOOTEN (1984) = Cecil W. Wooten, “Petronius and ‘Camp’”, Helios, 11 (1984) 133-139.
• WORMS (2006) = Anne-Lise Worms, “Plotin: un anti-hédonisme?”, en LEFEBVRE-VILLARD (2006), pp. 147-158.
• WORP (2009) = Klaas A. Worp, “Οὐλαί on Women’s Thighs?”, ZPE, 170 (2009) 147-148.
• WORP (2010) = Id., “Οὐλαί on Women’s Knees”, ZPE, 173 (2010) 130.
• WORTHINGTON (1990) = Ian Worthington, “Aristophanic caricature and the Sam Wide group cups”, Eranos, 88 (1990) 1-8.
• WOUTERS (1987) = Alfons Wouters, “Irony in Daphnis’ and Chloe’s love lessons”, QUCC, 55 (1987) 111-118.
• WRAY (1996) = David L. Wray, Catullus: Sexual Personae and invective Tradition, tesis, Harvard Univ., 1996.
• WRENHAVEN (2009) = Kelly L. Wrenhaven, “The Identity of the ‘Wool-Workers’ in the Attic Manumissions”, Hesperia, 78 (2009) 367-386.
• WRIGHT (A-1984) = David F. Wright, “Homosexuals or Prostitutes? The Meaning of ἀρσενοκοῖται (I Cor., 6, 9; I Tim., 1, 10)”, VChr, 38 (1984) 125-153.
• WRIGHT (A-1987) = Id., “Holiness, sex, and death in the Garden of Eden”, Biblica, 77 (1996) 305-329.
• WRIGHT (A-1987) = Id., “Translating ἀρσενοκοῖται (I Cor. 6, 9; I Tim. 1, 10)”, VChr, 41 (1987) 396-398.
• WRIGHT (B-2006) = Jennifer Wright Knust, Abandoned to Lust: Sexual Slander and Ancient Christianity, Nueva York, 2006.
• WRIGHT (C-1921) = F. A. Wright, “Horace and Philodemus”, AJPh, 42 (1921) 168-169.
• WRÓBEL (1984) = Malgorzata Wróbel, “Fabula de puella cineraria primo a Strabone enarrata” (en pol., con resumen en lat.), Meander, 39 (1984) 161-168.
• WU (2007) = Tianyue Wu, “Did Augustine lose the philosophical battle in the debate with Julian of Eclanum on concupiscentia carnis and voluntas?”, Augustiniana, 57 (2007) 7-30.
• WYKE (1994) = Maria Wyke, “Women in the Mirror: The Rhetoric of Adornement in the Roman World”, en L. Archer – S. Fischler – M. Wyke (eds.), Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night, Londres, 1994, pp. 134-151.
• WYKE (1998) = Ead. (ed.), Gender and the Body in the Mediterranean Antiquity, Oxford, 1998.
• WYKE (1998b) = Ead., “Playing Roman Soldiers: The Martyred Body, Derek Jarman’s Sebastiane and the Representation of Male Homosexuality”, en M. Wyke (ed.), Parchments of Gender. Deciphering the Bodies of Antiquity, Oxford, 1998, pp. 243-266.
• WYPUSTEK (1999) = Andrzej Wypustek, “Un aspect ignoré des persécutions des chrétiens dans l’Antiquité. Les accusations de magie érotique imputées aux chrétiens aux IIe et IIIe siècles”, JbAC, 42 (1999) 50-71.
• WYPUSTEK (2009) = Id., “Spells, Potions, Husbands and Wives: A Contribution towards the Study of Greek Love Magic in Antiquity", Eos, 96.2 (2009) 207–223.