2013 S 7854
NY Bill
2013- S 7854
Previously 2014- HR 4701
October 29, 2014- NY Patients and Advocates, calling themselves the NY Voices of Lyme (see below), are attempting to have a bill (several #'s - see below) passed after Governor Cuomo made the decision not to sign it without an amendment.
From NY Voices of Lyme:
Q. Is the bill number S7854 or A7558B?
A. Just call it the Lyme Bill. (The NY Senate and the Assembly each had their own bill number for the exact same bill.) It’s also referred to as S7854/A7558B. Senate version is S7854 and Assembly version is A7558B. All of these are fine.
***
Some of the organizations that have been working on getting this bill passed and signed are:
(in alphabetical order)
Adirondack Lyme Disease Foundation www.adirondacklymediseasefoundation.com
Empire State Lyme Disease Association www.empirestatelymediseaseassociation.org/
Hudson Valley Lyme Disease Association
www.lymediseaseassociation.org/index.php/about-us/lda-associated-organizations-/hudson-valley-ldab
Lyme Disease Association, Inc.
www.lymediseaseassociation.org
New York City Lyme Disease Support Group
Tick Borne Disease Alliance
Bill S7854-2013
Prohibits the investigation of any claim of medical professional misconduct based solely on treatment that is not universally accepted by the medical profession
Prohibits the investigation of any claim of medical professional misconduct based solely on treatment that is not universally accepted by the medical profession.
Details
Actions
- Jun 19, 2014: returned to senate
- Jun 19, 2014: passed assembly
- Jun 19, 2014: ordered to third reading cal.646
- Jun 19, 2014: substituted for a7558b
- Jun 18, 2014: referred to health
- Jun 18, 2014: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 18, 2014: PASSED SENATE
- Jun 18, 2014: ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1571
- Jun 14, 2014: REFERRED TO RULES
Meetings
Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE: - Rules - Jun 18, 2014
Ayes (24): Skelos, Libous, Bonacic, Carlucci, Farley, Flanagan, Hannon, Larkin, LaValle, Marcellino, Maziarz,Nozzolio, Seward, Valesky, Little, Stewart-Cousins, Breslin, Dilan, Hassell-Thompson, Krueger, Montgomery,Parker, Perkins, Gianaris
Excused (1): Espaillat
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE: - Jun 18, 2014
Ayes (59): Addabbo, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Boyle, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Farley, Felder,Flanagan, Gallivan, Gianaris, Gipson, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Hoylman, Kennedy, Klein,Krueger, Lanza, Larkin, Latimer, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Marchione, Martins, Maziarz, Montgomery,Nozzolio, O'Brien, O'Mara, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Sampson, Sanders,Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousins, Tkaczyk, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Excused (2): Espaillat, Golden
Memo
BILL NUMBER:S7854
TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the public health law, in relation to the identification, charging, reporting and investigation of charges of professional misconduct by health care professionals
PURPOSE: To ensure that the Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OPMC) shall not identify, investigate, or charge a practitioner based solely on their recommendation or provision of a treatment modality that is currently not universally accepted by the medical community
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section one of the bill amends Section 230 of the public health law by adding a new subdivision 9-b to ensure that neither the board for professional medical conduct nor the office of professional medical conduct shall identify, charge, or cause a report made to the director of such office to be investigated based solely upon the recommendation or provision of a treatment modality by a licensee that is not universally accepted by the medical profession, including but not limited to, varying modalities used in the treatment of Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases.
Section two of the bill provides for an immediate effective date.
JUSTIFICATION:
In New York State, the Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OPMC) is charged with ensuring that appropriate medical care is given to all New York residents, through the investigation and prosecution of professional misconduct by physicians, physician assistants and specialist assistants. Because the medical profession is one that continually evolves with scientific breakthroughs, it is important that the OPMC maintains a flexible, case-specific, investigations policy - particularly where new treatments and acceptance by the medical community do not align.
This has been relevant to concerns raised regarding the investigation of alternative medical treatment of Lyme and tick-borne disease with modalities not universally accepted by the medical community. As the debate surrounding acceptable protocols continues, it is important that the State takes a treatment-neutral approach where possible in order to ensure that medical professionals remain the discerning voice in defining appropriate medical care. To that end, recognizing that the determination of appropriate diagnosis and treatment on a case-by-case basis is a responsibility solely held by a medical professional, it is also critical to ensure that bodies such as the OPMC do not inadvertently endorse or preclude innovative treatments with rules that may dissuade medical professionals from pursuing new methods.
In a memo dated June 15, 2005, the Director of the Office of Professional Medical Conduct "memorialized and endorse(d)" these very principles. The memo, circulated to the staff members of the OPMC advised that so long as a treatment modality effectively treats a medical condition, within certain specifications, its recommendation or provision cannot, by itself, constitute professional misconduct.
Thus, the determination of effective and appropriate treatment remains in the hands of the proper entity, the medical professional. As such, this legislation codifies the existing policy of the OPMC to clarify that the OPMC shall not identify, investigate, or charge a practitioner based solely on their recommendation or provision of a treatment modality that is currently not universally accepted by the medical community.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
New Bill.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
No fiscal implications.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 7854 IN SENATE June 14, 2014 ___________
Introduced by Sen. HANNON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules AN ACT to amend the public health law, in relation to the identifica- tion, charging, reporting and investigation of charges of professional misconduct by health care professionals THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 230 of the public health law is amended by adding a new subdivision 9-b to read as follows: 9-B. NEITHER THE BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL CONDUCT NOR THE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL CONDUCT SHALL IDENTIFY, CHARGE, OR CAUSE A REPORT MADE TO THE DIRECTOR OF SUCH OFFICE TO BE INVESTIGATED BASED SOLELY UPON THE RECOMMENDATION OR PROVISION OF A TREATMENT MODALITY BY A LICENSEE THAT IS NOT UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED BY THE MEDICAL PROFESSION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, VARYING MODALITIES USED IN THE TREATMENT OF LYME DISEASE AND OTHER TICK-BORNE DISEASES. AS USED IN THIS SUBDIVI- SION THE TERM "LICENSEE" SHALL MEAN A PHYSICIAN, PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANT, AND SPECIALIST'S ASSISTANT. WHEN A LICENSEE, ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH E OF SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION SIXTY-FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY-SEVEN OF THE EDUCATION LAW, RECOMMENDS OR PROVIDES A TREATMENT MODALITY THAT EFFECTIVELY TREATS HUMAN DISEASE, PAIN, INJURY, DEFORMITY OR PHYSICAL CONDITION, THE RECOMMENDATION OR PROVISION OF THAT MODALITY SHALL NOT, BY ITSELF, CONSTITUTE PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT. THIS PROHIBI- TION SHALL NOT EXONERATE SUCH LICENSEE FROM OTHERWISE APPLICABLE PROFES- SIONAL REQUIREMENTS. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.