Dr. Perry Orens
Dr. Perry Orens
Application for Restoration of License
Nov 24, 1999
The Orens family has given me permission to tell you the following and ask you for your help.
On the day before Thanksgiving Dr. Perry Orens of Great Neck, NY, had his license revoked. He was given only 7 days notice. The charges that led to this action were primarily overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Lyme disease with additions such as poor record keeping and overuse of testing thrown in. He was investigated for 7 years prior.
The medical license that hung on his wall for over 40 years was demanded returned. His wife took the physical document out of its frame and sent it back ending a lifetime of this dedicated physician's service to his patients. He is appealing this decision, and wants his license reinstated.
He was one of 17 Lyme doctors now under investigation. Many of those being investigated are charged by anonymous sources for undisclosed reasons.
The time for stopping the persecution of doctors who do not subscribe to conservative diagnosis and treatment protocols is long overdue.
A legal fund is set up with the Lyme Alliance to help with the overwhelming costs of services needed to fight this outrage.
You may send your donations to:
Lyme Alliance, Inc.
P.O. Box 454
Concord, MI 49237
Please make checks payable to Lyme Alliance and make sure you mark "for Legal Fund" or for
"Dr. Orens Legal Fund". Mark this also on the envelope.
You may also make your donation online server using Visa or Master Card.
* * *
November, 2002
Dear Lyme Community,
Last Thursday, November 14th, 2002, Dr. Perry Orens lost his appeal to the NYS Court of Appeals, and his license to practice medicine has been revoked. This is just the latest assault resulting from the New York State Office of Professional Medical Conduct's harassment of physicians who are willing to treat chronic Lyme disease. As a short-hand, we refer to these doctors as "LLMDs," or "Lyme-literate medical doctors."
The following is a history of the decision process to-date:
The Original Decision by the OPMC to Revoke Dr. Orens’ License Was Made in November 1999
Dr. Orens had more than a 40-year history of unblemished medical practice prior to this decision!! We believe that the investigation and the revocation of Dr. Orens’ license by the OPMC was clearly part of an overall witch hunt against physicians who treat chronic Lyme disease. The MAJORITY of those physicians in New York State have come under OPMC attack.
The announcement of the revocation of Dr. Orens' license galvanized the entire Lyme community, which had not previously been aware of the full extent of the persecution of LLMDs. The subsequent Lyme activism that has resulted in 1) two Assembly hearings, 2) an Assembly resolution, and 3) an introduction of OPMC reform legislation, occurred too late to be of much help in the Orens case.
Dr. Orens’ attorney then appealed the OPMC decision to revoke Dr. Orens’ license. He brought the case to the Appellate division of the NYS Supreme Court, raising six points on which the OPMC panel decision might be reversed.
In 2001, the Appellate Division of the NYS Supreme Court Reversed the OPMC Decision Based on One of the Following
The law requires that the OPMC panel that had judged Dr. Orens was supposed to have consisted of two physicians and one lay person. However, the so-called "lay person" on the Orens OPMC panel was a Physician’s Assistant. So, in 2001, the Appellate Division of the NYS Supreme Court reversed the decision of the OPMC panel. They ruled that a Physician’s Assistant could NOT be considered a lay person, and Dr. Orens’ license was returned to him.
OPMC Appeals the Decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court
After the above decision by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, the OPMC appealed the case in the next higher court (the Court of Appeals in NYS). The fact that a Physician’s Assistant is not a lay person in medicine seems pretty obvious to all of us. But the OPMC maintained that a Physician’s Assistant is actually a lay person and, therefore, the original decision to revoke Dr. Orens' license should stand.
Thursday, November 14, 2002, the Court of Appeals Revokes Dr. Orens License
In a vote of four to three, the Court of Appeals ruled that a Physician’s Assistant could be considered a lay person, and ordered Dr. Oren’s license be revoked
What Happens Now?
Dr. Orens’ case has been sent back to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for consideration of the other points that Dr. Orens and his attorney had raised in their original appeal. Since this Court had reversed the OPMC decision last year based on the first point (i.e., a Physician's Assistant is not a lay person), they had not considered the additional objections that Dr. Orens and his attorney had raised.
Although this represents another opportunity to obtain justice, this process will involve a huge amount of stress, energy, and financial strain. I spoke with Dr. Orens yesterday, and he is still going to fight!! Considering that the fight has already gone on for many years, and has left him in great financial debt (not to mention the toll it has taken on his well being), I believe his actions are truly heroic.
What Can We Do?
Dr. Orens is not able to afford legal representation for this next step. The case has already cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and his attorney has done much of the work without receiving payment. The Lyme community has helped greatly in the past with fund raisers and donations, but he still could use our help to continue his fight.
Please help by sending donations to the Orens Legal defense fund at:
Orens Legal Defense Fund
C/o Asher Fensterheim, Esq.
555 White Plains Road
Tarrytown NY 10591
Please make checks payable to Asher Fensterheim, Esq., and write "Orens Legal Defense" in the memo section of the check.
The loss of LLMDs based on OPMC harassment is a serious issue. Although Dr. Burrascano was able to basically win his case, the fact that other LLMDs, like Dr. Orens, are being brought down continues to create a situation where doctors will not dare to treat chronic Lyme disease. This is an issue that affects us all, and will continue to affect future Lyme victims.
Thanks,
Ellen
Voices of Lyme
For complete information on actions taken in this case, LymeInfo refers you to the following sources of information:
For Dr. Orens’ case decision, see:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/ctapps/decisions/135136opn02.pdf
2005 updated, Now see http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/slips/15755.htm
For background on OPMC harassment of Lyme-treating physicians, see:
http://www.lymeinfo.net/opmcissues.html
Link Here- http://www.lymeinfo.net/archive/orens.html