Processes to successfully recruit a workforce that has specific desired mindsets, knowledge, and skills to use the evidence-based practice(s) with fidelity.
Processes to successfully recruit a workforce that has specific desired mindsets, knowledge, and skills to use the evidence-based practice(s) with fidelity.
Staff selection is the starting point for building a competent workforce that has the knowledge, skills, and abilities to carry out evidence-based practices with benefits to consumers. Selection is all about having processes in place to successfully recruit a workforce that presents with specific desired abilities and qualities to use the evidence-based practice well. Implementation of effective programs on a useful scale requires:
• Specification of required skills and abilities within the pool of candidates,
• Methods for recruiting likely candidates that possess these skills and abilities,
• Protocols for interviewing candidates, and
• Criteria for selecting practitioners with those skills and abilities.
When we are integrating the Implementation Drivers into our work we have specific look fors for each Driver that will help inform us whether or not we are removing as many potential barriers and seizing all the opportunities to improve our program. Below are the specific look fors for this driver. It includes the following information:
Fully In-Place
A specific person is responsible for coordinating the quality and timeliness of recruitment and selection processes for staff supporting explicit instruction in literacy
-AND-
This person is able to execute the responsibilities related to his/her role in the selection process
Partially In-Place
A specific person is responsible for coordinating the quality and timeliness of recruitment and selection processes for staff supporting explicit instruction in literacy
Not Yet In-Place
There is not a specific person responsible for coordinating the quality and timeliness of recruitment and selection processes for staff supporting explicit instruction in literacy
Data Source(s)
Fully In-Place
A specific person is responsible for coordinating the quality and timeliness of recruitment and selection processes for staff supporting explicit instruction in literacy
-AND-
This person is able to execute the responsibilities related to his/her role in the selection process
Partially In-Place
A specific person is responsible for coordinating the quality and timeliness of recruitment and selection processes for staff supporting explicit instruction in literacy
Not Yet In-Place
There is not a specific person responsible for coordinating the quality and timeliness of recruitment and selection processes for staff supporting explicit instruction in literacy
Data Source(s)
Fully In-Place
Job descriptions are clear about expectations for the position
-AND-
Job descriptions explicitly align with the practices and competencies required for explicit instruction in literacy to be used competently
Partially In-Place
Job descriptions are clear about expectations for the position
Not Yet In-Place
Job descriptions are not clear about expectations for the position
Data Source(s)
Fully In-Place
Selection protocol includes all of the following:
• an assessment of core skills needed for position
• specific procedures (e.g., vignette, role play) for assessing individual capacity to perform key skills
• specific procedures for assessing capacity to use feedback provided during the interview to improve
• specific procedures to assess capacity to receive feedback professionally
• Review of adherence to the interview protocol is documented
• Ratings of individual’s responses are recorded
Partially In-Place
Selection protocol includes all of the following:
• an assessment of core skills needed for position
• review of adherence to the interview protocol is documented
• ratings of individual’s responses are recorded
Not Yet In-Place
Generic selection protocol (e.g., similar protocol for any position) exists
Data Source(s)
Fully In-Place
Selection processes are annually reviewed and revised as needed to improve the selection process
-AND-
The annual review examines at least three of the following:
• Selection results (e.g. protocol adherence; applicant responses)
• Pre-post training data for successful individuals
• Turnover data
• Fidelity data
• Exit interview results
Partially In-Place
Selection processes are annually reviewed and revised as needed to improve the selection process
-AND-
The annual review examines at least one of the following:
• Interview results (e.g. protocol adherence; applicant responses)
• Pre-post training data for successful applicants
• Turnover data
• Fidelity data
• Exit interview results
Not Yet In-Place
Selection processes are not annually reviewed and revised
-OR-
Selection processes are reviewed and revised but not based on data
Data Source(s)