Parallel processing is not magic, and cannot "just be used" in every situation; there are both practical and theoretical algorithmic design issues that must be considered when even thinking about incorporating parallel processing into a project.
However, the trouble associated with parallelism may very well be worth it in a given situation due solely to the potential of dramatic time-savings related to algorithm execution.
Over the past decade, neural networks have achieved state-of-the-art results in a wide variety of prediction tasks, including image classification, machine translation, and speech recognition. These successes have been driven, at least in part, by hardware and software improvements that have significantly accelerated neural network training. Faster training has directly resulted in dramatic improvements to model quality, both by allowing more training data to be processed and by allowing researchers to try new ideas and configurations more rapidly
CUDA is technically a heterogeneous computing environment, meaning that it facilitates coordinated computing on both CPUs and GPUs. The CUDA parallel programming framework from NVIDIA is a particular implementation of the GPGPU paradigm
CUDA uses SIMD(Single instruction multiple data) architecture and so, same instruction can be executed on multiple data in parallel.
For example, Remember that cost/error function in backpropagation uses summation operation and this summation can be done in parallel.
Model parallelism is, when you split the model among GPUs and use the same data for each model; so each GPU works on a part of the model rather than a part of the data.
While model parallelism makes it possible to train neural networks that are larger than a single processor can support, it usually requires tailoring the model architecture to the available hardware.
In this, data is split among GPUs and then after computation, it is combined together. In contrary to model parallelism, Data parallelism is model agnostic and applicable to any ML architecture
Data parallelism improves model accuracy as well. Speed is commonly known benefit.
To understand it, look at this. The shortcoming of stochastic gradient descent used in neural networks is that the estimate of the gradients might not accurately represent the true gradients of using the full dataset. Therefore, it may take much longer to converge.
A natural way to have a more accurate estimate of the gradients is to use larger batch sizes or even use the full dataset. To allow this, the gradients of small batches were calculated on each GPU, the final estimate of the gradients is the weighted average of the gradients calculated from all the small batches.
It depends on the model and dataset (Refer below picture)
In below left picture, A transformer neural network scales to much larger batch sizes than an LSTM neural network on the LM1B dataset. So, transformer model gets better benefit out of parallelism since it converges faster as batch size increases.
In below right picture, The Common Crawl dataset does not benefit from larger batch sizes than the LM1B dataset, even though it is 1,000 times the size.
Find real example
Cloud TPU is the custom-designed machine learning ASIC that powers Google products like Translate, Photos, Search, Assistant, and Gmail.
It is special kind of GPU designed for machine learning processing. Refer here for detail.
pytorch python library supports parallelism. Refer here for detail. Tensorflow also supports it. Same is the case with Numpy library.
??
Speed up computing
Improve accuracy
When training neural networks, the primary ways to achieve this are model parallelism, which involves distributing the neural network across different processors, and data parallelism, which involves distributing training examples across different processors and computing updates to the neural network in parallel.
https://www.kdnuggets.com/2016/11/parallelism-machine-learning-gpu-cuda-threading.html
https://images.app.goo.gl/STw7X4iTUwwVsjnz7
https://timdettmers.com/2014/11/09/model-parallelism-deep-learning/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/scaling-deep-learning-highlights-from-startupml-george-williams/
https://leimao.github.io/blog/Data-Parallelism-vs-Model-Paralelism/
https://ai.googleblog.com/2019/03/measuring-limits-of-data-parallel.html
https://cloud.google.com/tpu/
https://images.app.goo.gl/QZvGbRyxBgA8gA4P7
https://images.app.goo.gl/YuiSBMRKFpTUU8aZ6
https://www.telesens.co/2017/12/25/understanding-data-parallelism-in-machine-learning/
https://realpython.com/numpy-tensorflow-performance/
https://towardsdatascience.com/reasons-to-choose-pytorch-for-deep-learning-c087e031eaca
https://www.quora.com/How-does-NumPy-make-parallel-computations-Where-can-I-get-the-algorithms-of-NumPy-functions-and-their-implementations
https://sites.google.com/site/jbsakabffoi12449ujkn/home/machine-intelligence/dpu-high-performance-processing-unit-for-machine-learning
https://images.app.goo.gl/ZMfMrE4hTPo9yqsb7
https://www.oreilly.com/content/distributed-tensorflow/