I appealed to the city district court of Boryspil, due to the fact that in the morning, December 16, 2014, at the airport "Borispol", employees of the linear police department of the airport "Borispol" violated my rights and the current legislation of Ukraine, committing, in my opinion, malfeasance under Art. 365 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, at the same time, becoming participants in the crime under Part 2 of Article 115 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which, with the persistence of maniacs, for more than 20 years, has been committed against me by Dnepropetrovsk trashers.

Actually, what happened at the Boryspil airport can be seen here:

I ask you to pay attention to the facial expressions of the policemen. It's not garbage. This is the police. According to the Constitution of Ukraine, these are representatives of the Executive Power of Ukraine. They are the executive power. And before you are representatives of this very executive power, in the performance of their official duties. On behalf of the state. Or pseudo-states? Or no state at all? Because the state is people who decide to live by the law...

In general, I sent my complaint about the inaction of the investigator to the city district court of Boryspil on December 30, 2014, by mail. At first, the trial was scheduled for January 13, but I was ill and the trial was postponed to January 20, 2015.

During the entire time preceding the consideration of my complaint in the City District Court of Boryspil, I and my property were subjected to continuous attacks, the purpose of which was to prevent me from preparing for the trial. Violating my rights assigned to me by Art. 13, 14, 15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine and thereby committing crimes against me under Art. 115, 359 and 365 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, garbage saw what evidence I was preparing and acted ahead of the curve, artificially creating "everyday" problems for me, preventing me from defending myself.

As I later understood, there was an initial agreement with Judge Muranova-Lesiv that if I did not provide a video recording on a CD, then the judge would use this as a formal reason to deny me my legitimate request... 

And so it happened...

In general, what happened in the city district court of Boryspil cannot be called a court. I have repeatedly said and repeat it again: a court in which human rights are violated, the fundamental law of the state is violated - the Constitution is not a court, but a criminal rule! If the rule proclaims its decisions in the name of the state, and the state does not oppose this, then this is not the state, but a criminal community posing as the state!

Part 1 Art. 306 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine determines the procedure for considering complaints about the inaction of an investigator or prosecutor. According to part 3 of Art. 318 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, a court session must be held in a specially equipped room - a courtroom. When considering my complaint, the court session was held in the judge's office, and not in the courtroom. Also, when considering my complaint, the prosecutor was absent, who, on behalf of the state, was obliged to support my lawful demand.

In the reasoning part of the ruling, instead of establishing that the police officers exceeded their official powers and issue a private ruling on bringing the policemen to criminal responsibility, the court itself committed exactly the same crime, went beyond its powers and violated the law, since on the basis of Part 3 of Article 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, all police, internal departmental documents that limit or contradict the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine are invalid. The reference to these documents has no legal force, and the use of these documents, instead of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by representatives of the authorities, for the performance of their official duties, is an official crime.

On the recording of the court session, you can hear how a policeman is trying to provide the Court with documents from some police database that is not registered, in the manner prescribed by law, with the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, that allegedly I applied to the police 21 times. You can hear me informing the Court about the illegal collection of information, you can hear the judge trying to find out if the police are legally collecting information about me and refusing to accept these documents, on the grounds that the policeman cannot confirm the legality of their origin. According to Article 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, the collection of information about a person is possible only within the framework of a pre-trial investigation, on a written order from an investigator or prosecutor. The city district court of Boryspil, represented by investigating judge Muranova-Lesiv, does not even try to find out from a police officer under what pre-trial investigation the police are collecting information about me.

But the most creative twist of the judicial legal thought, in my opinion, is the fact that the Court, having recognized, confirmed by the video recordings of the surveillance cameras of the airport "Borispol", the fact of persecution of me in the building of the airport "Borispol" by the Dnepropetrovsk operas - specialists in suppression through psychological terror , all the same, he refused me my undeniably legitimate request.

The very content of this ruling of the Court does not provide for an appeal against it in a Ukrainian court. No hope for objectivity...

http://bit.ly/3WtGbm6

##https://goo.gl/dNYiS9