2011 06 22. Renunciation of Ukrainian citizenship.

“Citizenship of Ukraine is a legal connection between an individual and Ukraine,

which finds its expression in their mutual rights and obligations.

Law of Ukraine "On Citizenship of Ukraine"

Article 1. Definition of terms.

First some video:

My name is Alexander Mednik. I am 50 years old. I live in Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine.

I am not a journalist and not a former prime minister, I am an ordinary person, and since lawlessness and arbitrariness are widespread in Ukraine, it means that these very lawlessness and arbitrariness, in relation to me, did not interest anyone and do not interest.

Since about 1992, I began to be persecuted, as a result of which, in 1995, without sufficient grounds, I was arrested and detained for 111 days, some of which, after the end of the authorization for my arrest.

Then, in 2000, while trying to go to the West, I got a “conviction” certificate, although no one ever brought any charges against me and I was never in court, and because of this certificate, for many years I did not I can legally leave Ukraine – my “conviction” closed the door to the Free World for me.

Having no legal knowledge, I tried to “negotiate” by finding some lawyer or corrupt official so that he would take a bribe and give me the opportunity to just leave, leave this damned country - Ukraine, but all my attempts ended in nothing.

Then I did not know that the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine recruited my crazy biological mother, in whose family Delegated Munchausen syndrome is transmitted through the female line, and used a crazy maniac to misinform and suppress me. The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine just helped my crazy mother to serve her masturbation, nothing more. She did everything else herself. One example of this is described here: https://bit.ly/3gvjpqh

Having received such an instrument of influence on me, the garbage turned the destruction of my life into a ritual, garbage, fascist anti-Semitic crime. For example, one of these garbage had a sufficient external resemblance to Himmler. He admired himself, cut his hair like Himmler and wore glasses similar to Himmler's pince-nez and liked to talk with me, mocking that I did not give an account of what was happening then ...

Starting from 2006, I myself began to understand a little about jurisprudence and began to write statements about lawlessness, consistently, I turned to the police, prosecutors, the court, to the Ukrainian authorities, to President Yanukovych, to various organizations that declare themselves as human rights, and in the same way, to the human rights activists themselves, I turned to the media and ... I did not achieve any result, but what is there, the result ... they simply did not answer my appeals, that's all. Neither human rights organizations nor the press have any obligation to protect human rights. Based on my life experience, I concluded that the two real functions that they perform in Ukraine are receiving appropriate grants and creating the appearance of fighting lawlessness, which, in general, has no effect on the very problem of protecting human rights, but in In such a police state, which is Ukraine, it performs a completely opposite function, covering even more lawlessness, even more untying the hands of all kinds of police structures.

Being, throughout my life, deprived of my inalienable right to qualified legal assistance, all these years I tried to find a lawyer, a defender, but any lawyer I turned to in Ukraine was only interested in two questions: who are my enemies and where, how much and what kind of property I have.

I do not trust lawyers in Ukraine: I was arrested in the presence of one of these lawyers, and another, such a lawyer, demanded that I write a receipt stating that I have no claims against those who ordered a criminal case against me and plundered the property of my firm.

I also turned to foreign lawyers, known for their high-profile cases and statements, in Israel and Russia, but as soon as the magic phrase “human rights” was uttered, I immediately received parting advice and ... a refusal.

As an experiment, on June 21 and 22, 2011, I applied to all law firms located in the center of Kiev, near the office of N. Karpachova, but as soon as I uttered the words “human rights”, they told me: “We don’t deal with such cases ".

In general, on June 21, 2011, in the morning, having arrived in Kyiv, I came to the street. Institutska 21/8, I came to the office of the Commissioner of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine for Human Rights, N. Karpachova, on issues related to the long-term violation of my rights: illegal arrest, illegal, under torture conditions, detention and subsequent 19 years of persecution, in order to force myself, on my own, to plead guilty, without evidence of my guilt, on my own, to plead guilty, without trial and without a sentence, as well as by immersing me in all sorts of ways known since the time of the Inquisition, the Gestapo and the NKVD, in fear, to force me to flee to another country, leaving everything that I have to Ukrainian policemen, or to persons whom Ukrainian policemen, for a number of years, have been offering me, as subjects to whom, in the opinion of Ukrainian policemen, I could would trust.

First, in the lobby of the building on Institutskaya, for about 30 minutes, I watched a scene played out by operatives who followed me from Dnepropetrovsk to accompany me so that, God forbid, without their control, I would not go anywhere and say nothing superfluous, but then, I was received by Pavel Filimonovich Yevtushenko, who, not wanting to get acquainted with the evidence of facts of lawlessness and intimidation that I had, during the conversation, told me that if the representatives of the authorities, in any way, i.e. exerting physical and psychological pressure on me (Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), managed to prevent me from going to court to protect and restore my rights, which means that I myself am to blame for everything that happens to me.

Faced with such frank cynicism, demonstrative disregard for my fundamental and inalienable civil rights, in a state organization whose declared and declared function is to protect these very rights, and not lack of rights, I made the final decision - to renounce citizenship of Ukraine.

In Article 1 of the Law of Ukraine "On Citizenship of Ukraine", the term "citizenship of Ukraine" is defined, literally, as "a legal relationship between an individual and the state of Ukraine, which is manifested in their mutual rights and obligations."

From the documents I have attached, it is clear that in Ukraine I do not have and never had any rights, and the state of Ukraine does not and never had any obligations to me. Between the man, Oleksandr Mednik, and the state of Ukraine, there has never been a legal connection. The state of Ukraine, from the position of the owner - the slave owner, throughout my life, absolutely arbitrarily, cruelly and cynically disposes of me, my life and the lives of those who are dear to me. As for the property that belongs to me, throughout my life it has been subjected to continuous looting and demonstrative destruction, and police provocateurs monotonously impose on me the idea that, due to the fact that I am a Jew, all my property does not belong to me. to me, but to the Ukrainians, and I dispose of it only temporarily, until it, by primordial, historical right, passes to its “legitimate” owners.

Based on the definitions of the Law of Ukraine "On Citizenship of Ukraine", I concluded that I was a citizen of Ukraine only formally, and not objectively. Objectively, for Ukraine, I am neither a citizen nor a subject of law in general, because, as can be seen from the attached documents, the lawlessness against me is of a long-term, comprehensive and arbitrary nature.

I told Yevtushenko about this, but he told me that in our country, Ukraine, only one person decides such issues and pointedly pointed upwards.

The next day, June 22, 2011, I informed Karpachova's office in writing that I had renounced Ukrainian citizenship and left for Dnepropetrovsk.

After 2 days, on June 24, 2011, I found in my mailbox an answer in which civil servants, whose direct and immediate duties are the protection of human rights, violating, first of all, Art. 3 of the Constitution of Ukraine, refusing to take into account the message about my will, not to be a citizen of Ukraine, they informed me that I was a slave.

Ignoring a person's direct declaration of renunciation of citizenship is, in fact, an admission of slavery.

The Law of Ukraine “On Citizenship of Ukraine” does not provide for a procedure for renunciation of citizenship, at the initiative of a person, and this is a gross violation of the fundamental, inalienable rights and freedoms of a person assigned to each person by establishing the right, UN documents.

In addition, the response of the Commissioner of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine violates Article 19 of the Constitution of Ukraine: “... No one can be forced to do what is not expressly provided for by law.” and besides, he proclaims the President of Ukraine V. Yanukovych - a slave owner, from whom, allegedly, one must beg or buy one's freedom.

But, in general, the very facts of direct violation of the Constitution of Ukraine and the open recognition of slavery in the statement of the Ombudsman of the Ukrainian Parliament quite fully characterize the state of human rights in Ukraine.

I am not a slave, I do not belong to anything, including Ukraine, and citizenship of Ukraine is not a synonym for slavery, not slavish, against my will, my dependence on Ukraine, not my lifelong loss of rights.

The formal reason for the ongoing UN struggle against stateless persons cannot prevent me from renouncing citizenship, because no UN document, nor any part of such document, can be interpreted or used as a reason or basis for restricting the rights person, as directly and directly written in any such document.

http://bit.ly/3EKjK53