# 2014 10 17. Did not see.

In addition to the ruling of the Babushkinsky District Court of Dnepropetrovsk, the summons sent to me by the Court is of interest. By itself, this is a common agenda. There is nothing special about her. And the envelope itself is nothing special either. But, if we consider these two subjects together, then a strange question arises: how could the summons sent by the Court on October 15, 2014, end up in an envelope that was stamped on November 12, 2014? In my mailbox, the notice of this subpoena appeared, as follows from the inscription on the envelope, only on November 15, 2014. And what did the Babushkinsky District Court of Dnepropetrovsk mean by the phrase: “The applicant Mednick A.I. did not appear at the hearing, having been duly notified of the day, time and place of the consideration of the application” ... I hope that Shevtsova and Yuzhakov will be able to answer this, as well as other questions related to the violation of my rights by the Babushkinsky District Court of Dnepropetrovsk, when considering my, documented, substantiated challenge of the investigative department of the Dnepropetrovsk Regional Department of the SBU.

The ruling of the court is unjust, as it was issued contrary to the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine. In addition, the scam of court employees, with a subpoena, is another malfeasance - official forgery.

http://bit.ly/3WAIaVI

## https://goo.gl/Fx6YkY