Post-Panoptic
Boyne (2000) spoke of post-panopticism (qtd. in Jewkes, 2004: 196).
According to Zureik (2003), Boyne (2000) provides five arguments for being post-Panopitic: 1) the many are watching the few (not the other way around); 2) monitoring is unnecessary because of self surveillance; 3) visualization is now second to simulation and prevention; 4) total institutions are fallible; and 5) empirical evidence challenges a docile workforce (p. 41).
References:
Jewkes, Y. (2004). Media & crime: Key approaches to criminology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zureik, E. (2003). "Theorizing surveillance; The case of the workplace." In D. Lyon Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination. New York: Routledge.