2.4 Clean technology

Essential idea: 

Clean technology seeks to reduce waste/pollution from production processes through radical or incremental development of a production system.

Nature and Aims of Design

Nature of design:

Clean technology is found in a broad range of industries, including water, energy, manufacturing, advanced materials and transportation. As our Earth’s resources are slowly depleted, demand for energy worldwide should be on every designer’s mind when generating products, systems and services. The convergence of environmental, technological, economic and social factors will produce more energy-efficient technologies that will be less reliant on obsolete, polluting technologies. (1.11, 1.16, 2.10)

Aims:

Aim 5: The legislation for reducing pollution often focuses on the output and, therefore, end-of-pipe technologies. By implementing ideas from the circular economy, pollution is negated and waste eliminated.

Guidance

As DP Design Technology student you should:


Concepts and principles

Incremental and radical solutions

Incremental Solutions

Radical Solutions

Advantages for manufacturers

Disadvantages for manufacturers

Clean technology is a broad term that describes products and processes that reduce waste and use as little  non-renewable materials and energy as possible. This can encompass a range of technologies and strategies, all with the goal of minimizing environmental impact.

Designer's perspective

Clean technology is focused on sustainable production. Concepts and strategies such as cradle-to-cradle, circular economy, life cycle analysis (LCA), lightweighting, use of recycled materials, etc, play a role in clean technology to meet the goal of sustainable, non-polluting production.

As the world's non-resources continue to be consumed, and the associated environmental, economic, and social pressures grow, designers can play an important role in designing for a sustainable future.


Drivers for cleaning up manufacturing

Manufacturers may choose to implement clean technology for a variety of reasons. 


Factors that influence how and why a company may implement clean technologies can include:

International legislation and targets for reducing pollution and waste

Various international targets have been set for reducing pollution and waste.

For designers, it is important to understand that these are just another driver that would influence a company's decision to incorporate green/clean technologies into its manufacturing process.

Resources:

End-of-pipe technologies

End-of-pipe (EOP) technologies are focused on reducing or eliminating pollutants at the last step of the manufacturing phase.

EOP technologies do not eliminate the production of a harmful substance; rather, the goal is to prevent or minimize the release of the substance into the natural environment.

While EOP technologies do minimize environmental impact, from a sustainability point of view they may not be the best choice. Designers and manufacturers should focus on a more wholistic approach to design which eliminates the need for the production of hazardous or harmful substances in the first place.  In this regard, cradle-to-cradle approaches to design are more sustainable.  

From our perspective as socially and environmentally conscious designers, EOP technologies are really a last choice--our focus should be on engineering or designing out processes, materials, and waste that are harmful, benefits can be reached.

Comparison of End-Of-Pipe and Clean Manufacturing

System level solutions

System level solutions refer to solutions that address the whole system, not just the components. These solutions are regulator in manner (taxes, tax benefits, legislation, etc.) that aim to reduce consumption of raw materials, decrease pollution and waste throughout the manufacturing process, and increase the use of sustainable energy, materials and practices. 

System level solutions, like cradle-to-cradle design and circular economy solutions, are complex and require participation from a range of stakeholders, some of who may have opposing interests. 



Resources:

Two articles from the Harvard Business Review with interesting perspectives on "going green":