The HE corpus contains 8,430 occurrences of the concept transition.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownTransition occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by North America, Asia, Africa and Oceania with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO, NGO_Fed, State and RC organisations.
IGO, NGO, NGO_Fed, State and RC documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe.
is defined only in reference to key types
has many low frequency types
includes periods, phases, stages
has agents / populations experiencing transition
countries
organisations
individuals
has norms / initial phases
humanitarian assistance, aid, relief
planned economies
has objectives / subsequent phases
recovery & development
market economies
a universal development agenda
a low-carbon economy
the process of which has characteristics
smooth
successful
peaceful
effective
occurs on timescales
early
ongoing
rapid
gradual
occurs in politics
e.g., democratic transition
including elections & negotiated power transfers
which suffers from violence & fragility
which can cause insecurity & stalled progress
which can lead to growth & progress
occurs in demographics
i.e., shifts in mean population age
which can have demographic dividends
which can cause labour shortages
which is often not understood or planned for adequately
which can cause crises
which affects or will affect every country
occurs in economies
usually from planned to market economies
also to low-carbon / green economies
which causes challenges for social protection
the impact of which can be measured (transition impact)
which has challenges, e.g.,
groups being excluded
managing countries’ needs that are shared / unique
negative results for services, employment, gender equality
the slow pace of change
occurs in humanitarian response
usually from aid, assistance, relief, conflict & crisis (short-term)
usually to development, recovery & peace (long-term)
which may or may not be linear
in which organisations can shift to prioritise one or both phases
which has a recovery gap
which has systemic / operational challenges, e.g.,
relief & development being siloed
coordination within & across organisation types / levels
systematising transition & exit planning (far in advance)
which has funding challenges, e.g.,
mechanisms not being suitable for fragile countries
mechanisms being too inflexible
securing transition funding
lack of data on transition funding
can include a transformational justice approach
is sometimes grouped with or synonymous to recovery
e.g., transition and recovery programming
Beyond transition being a process, few definitional contexts were found offering descriptions for the broad sense of the term. Rather, such contexts are highly restricted to the type of transition in question (economic, demographic, etc.). Plain usages of the term are quite frequent, but they always correspond to the types described below.
Transition has many low frequency types, with political transition being the most common at just 250 cases. Despite low frequencies for individual types, modifiers do precede transition in several thousand cases and there are similar numbers for patterns like “transition from X” and “transition to Y.” While this high degree of specificity resists generalisation, the following list broadly categorises types by identifying characteristic (asterisks indicate those with over 100 cases).
Given that most frequencies are low, some of the types below amount to phrases repeated in single documents or organisations. Others may be more spread out and be part of larger constructions, the best example being transition from humanitarian assistance (see Transition from Relief to Development).
agent
country's transition
area
political transition *
demographic transition *
democratic transition *
economic transition
nutrition transition
low-carbon transition
post-conflict transition
energy transition
urban transition
leadership transition
epidemiological transition
school-to-work transition
market transition
security transition
social transition
legal transition
norm (i.e., transition from X)
transition from humanitarian assistance
objective (i.e., transition to Y)
transition to a universal development agenda
transition to a low-carbon economy
transition to secondary school
transition to an ecological age
transition to a green economy
transition to market economies
transition to sustainable development
process
smooth transition *
successful transition
peaceful transition
effective transition
major transition
difficult transition
seamless transition
important transition
advanced transition
significant transition
critical transition
sustainable transition
key transition
timescale
early transition *
ongoing transition
rapid transition
gradual transition
Political transition is a process in where governmental power is transferred through elections, negotiations, and other mechanisms. Humanitarians show interest in political transitions as processes to observe or directly support. They have common challenges (violence, fragility), can cause challenges for actors (conflict, insecurity, stalled progress), and improve conditions for populations and humanitarians. Democratic transition and other related types can be grouped under this concept.
Political transitions can exacerbate resource scarcities and create inter-communal divisions which lead to more intense, prolonged and intractable conflict.
Significant challenges remain, including defining the sphere of humanitarian action during political transition .
Our project aimed to strengthen and protect the political transition process by bolstering the NDC's implementation and follow-up dialogue processes.
South Africa's political transition was a negotiated settlement with inherent compromises that left the socio-economic disparities of apartheid largely unresolved.
In Myanmar, continuing political transition since 2011 has provided scope for embedding gender equality in new democratic institutions and processes, including elections.
Political transitions , even towards democracy, can provoke violence, with competition over "who sits at the table" and "who gets what".
Demographic transition (168 cases) appears in 35 documents, most often UN_OPA General Documents, with almost two thirds of cases from GD-214. It is discussed as a key factor for understanding the future of human populations and development issues. The contexts below offer a sample of information regarding its definition, causes, effects, and implications.
A demographic dividend is the potential for economic growth that can result from shifts in a population's age structure, when the share of the working-age population expands relative to the non-working-age population. A demographic dividend is linked to a demographic transition, which begins when child and infant death rates decrease in response to increased access to vaccines, antibiotics, safe water, sanitation and better nutrition.
The demographic transitions occurring in different populations, such as the ageing process in many high-income countries and the large youth populations in developing and emerging countries, in particular, in sub-Saharan Africa, have led to labour shortages in the North and high youth unemployment and underemployment rates in the South.
In East Asia, the rapid rate of the demographic transition is now common knowledge, but the social and economic implications of these changes are far less known.
Without planning for these demographic transitions and seizing their benefits, governments will be forced to operate in a permanent crisis mode, reacting to demographic challenges as they arise – which is typically more costly and less effective.
By 2050, the world as a whole and every continent except Africa are projected to have more elderly people (at least 60 years of age) than children (below 15). This is a natural consequence of the decline in death rates and the somewhat slower decline in birth rates that has occurred in most developing countries, a well-known phenomenon known as the 'demographic transition'.
It has become increasingly clear that every country in the world, regardless of its population size, has experienced or will experience a 'demographic transition '.
The term economic transition is not used frequently, with just 43 cases, despite it amounting to one of the key types of transition. Lacking more explicit evidence, it may be more fruitful to approach economic transition by considering the compounds further below, like transition country and transition economy, as well as implicit contexts.
Another source of cases are phrases like “transition to a X economy.” In 167 such cases, a market economy is the most common objective, with low-carbon, green, and other similar terms also being frequent. Beyond these two areas, other economic models are mentioned in just a handful of cases, including service-based and informal economies.
The economic transitions of the 1990s presented huge challenges for these social protection systems. The emergence of extensive labour-market informality and large irregular migration flows, often combined with demographic trends that have increased the numbers of pensioners relative to the workforce, have threatened the financial sustainability of contributory pension schemes and left growing numbers of workers uncovered (in part or in full) by social insurance systems.
As part of the cooperation to support Mongolia's transition to a market economy, JICA implemented the Establishment of Tax Education System Project from 2006 to 2008.
These measures need to be considered within an overall framework of a global transition to a low-carbon economy in order to minimize the risk of dangerous climate change taking place in the coming decades.
Unlike the above types of transition, which are relatively fixed terms, this type has no single dominant phrasing. Nonetheless, hundreds of contexts reference a transition from aid/assistance/relief/conflict/crisis activities and models to development- and recovery-oriented ones. When grouped together, they constitute a key type of transition otherwise hidden among low frequency phrases.
The phrase transition from humanitarian retrieves nearly 50 cases that fall under this type of transition and mention some type of development as the objective to strive toward (development aid, sustainable development, development activities, etc.). Their differences notwithstanding, recovery and development are both mentioned in the same fashion and sometimes paired together.
Transition in this context often implies moving from emergency response to development as part of a linear progression of activities after a crisis. Some authors, however, decry this linear thinking as unrealistic and problematic. In some cases, transition also refers to a permanent organisational shift in priorities, where humanitarians optimise their longer-term development capacities and minimise aid-based work.
Principle 9 Provide humanitarian assistance in ways that are supportive of recovery and long-term development, striving to ensure support, where appropriate, to the maintenance and return of sustainable livelihoods and transitions from humanitarian relief to recovery and development activities.
In support of the transition process from relief to development, particularly in the Pool region, the 2006 CAP included transition as one of its main humanitarian strategies.
Transition in this context refers to the transition of countries out of conflict towards sustainable development, greater national ownership and an increased state capacity. Traditionally falling between “humanitarian” and “development” categories, transition activities includes recovery, reconstruction, security-related and peacebuilding activities.
Much of this support is based on the assumption of a linear transition out of conflict, involving a gradual increase in development assistance as humanitarian and peacekeeping expenditures decline. However, data shows that this scenario is the exception rather than the rule. About 50% of humanitarian aid is long-term (more than eight years) and goes to large countries experiencing patterns of cyclical violence: Sudan, Iraq, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Afghanistan.
From recovery to resilience In 2013, ACTED is to continue its efforts for a transition from humanitarian aid towards a development approach, while maintaining the capacity for an emergency humanitarian response if need be.
The transition from humanitarian response to long-term development is far from seamless. Once a conflict is over, the expectation is that the development sector will take the lead in addressing IDPs' needs. In reality, however, the gap between relief and development continues to be hard to bridge. Aggravating factors include different operational mandates and timeframes for engagement and results, a shortage of coordination mechanisms, diminishing investment, competition for funding and failure to incorporate IDPs' needs into recovery and development plans.
Compounds with transition include a broad array of lower frequency terms. Some are tied exclusively to one type of transition, as with transition impact, which measures the effectiveness of activities promoting a country’s transition to a market economy.
Other compounds are more vague, like transition process, which could have any number of uses, referring to organisational change, democratic elections, economic growth, energy infrastructure, etc.
Two main types of transition, political and economic, are the most represented in compounds. Other terms may refer to topics outside the scope of this analysis, i.e., transition homes for children.
The following list has compounds with a minimum of 10 cases. Asterisks indicate those with at least 100 cases.
transition country *
transition process *
transition impact *
transition period *
transition economy
transition region
transition impact rating
transition phase
transition challenge
transition plan
transition strategy
transition year
transition rate
transition mandate
transition date
transition team
transition situation
transition assistance
transition gap
transition activity
transition experience
transition recession
transition progress
transition home
transition context
transition financing
transition objective
transition issue
transition programme
transition planning
Transition country has over 300 cases and is the highest frequency compound. Its use is mostly limited to Europe, Africa, IGO_Reg and UN_OPA texts, particularly those from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Various lower frequency compounds, like transition economy (68 cases), are linked to this topic.
In EBRD contexts, transition refers to a country’s adoption of a market economy as a substitute for a planned one. The EBRD meaning of transition has been expanded over time to include six qualities (competitive, well-governed, green, inclusive, resilient, and integrated).
Transition country is frequently grouped or contrasted with developing country, as well as post-conflict country, fragile state, and industrialized country. Three stages for countries are also commonly mentioned: early, intermediate and advanced.
The EBRD, owned by 61 countries and two intergovernmental institutions, aims to foster the transition from centrally planned to market economies in 29 countries from central Europe to central Asia.
In 2016 the EBRD Board of Directors approved a new way of conceptualising the transition to a market economy, the process that the EBRD seeks to promote through investment projects and policy dialogue. This change reflects the global evolution, since the Bank was established 26 years ago, in the definition of a successful market economy to include an emphasis on strong markets as well as state institutions. The modernised transition concept gives more weight to the desired outcome of the transition process. In other words: what does a sustainable market economy look like? As EBRD countries of operations each have diverse needs for reform, the answer to this question requires country- specific responses.
Transitional justice is another related compound term offering perspective on transition. See its respective sections in the linguistic report on justice.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO, NGO_Fed, State and RC organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for transition was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 6 top collocates were obtained:
adulthood;
smooth;
demographic; and
period
IGO documents generated demographic as top collocate in 2016.
NGO documents generated adulthood as top collocate in 2014 with the highest overall score.
NGO_Fed documents generated smooth as top collocate in 2012.
State documents generated smooth as top collocate for 2011.
RC documents generated demographic as top collocate for 2014.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about transition that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following unique top ten collocates:
low-carbon
rating
EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development)
insight
exit
school-to-work
chart
accelerate
recession
universal
NGO documents feature the following unique top ten collocates:
agroecology
agroecological
autonomous
triple
authoritarian
homelessness
orchid
TCRS (Tankanyika Christian Refugee Service)
ultimate
HIVOS (international cooperation organization)
NGO_Fed documents feature the following unique top ten collocates:
Austcare
SCI (Save the Children International)
womanhood
restate
autonomy
onerous
GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles)
ADP (Area Development Program )
kindergarten
CordAid (development organization)
State documents feature the following unique top ten collocates:
generational
circular
frontline
demobilization
steady
underlie
post-disaster
smart
progressive
anticipate
RC documents feature the following unique collocates:
post-election
evacuation
politics
career
site
ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross)
volunteer
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss transition. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are :
FRS (Financial Reporting Standard) (NGO_Fed + NGO)
OTI (Office of Transition Initiatives) (State + NGO)
low-emission (State + IGO)
economy (State + IGO)
SORP (Statement of Recommended Practice) (NGO_Fed + NGO)
post-crisis (NGO + IGO)
stage (NGO + IGO)
retention (NGO_Fed + NGO)
underway (NGO + IGO)
gradual (NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are :
adulthood (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
seamless (RC + NGO + IGO)
demographic (RC + NGO + IGO)
post-conflict (State + NGO + IGO)
ease (RC + NGO + IGO)
secondary (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
adjustment (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
market (State + NGO + IGO)
impact (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
energy (State + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are :
peaceful (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
succesful (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
period (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
early (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
independence (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
manage (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
facilitate (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
complete (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
difficult (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
sustainable (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are :
smooth (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
undergo (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
democracy (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
democratic (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
phase (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
political (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
process (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
recovery (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
relief (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
power (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of transition between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of transition were highest in 2016. However, this concept obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2006 (107%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and CCSA generated the highest relative frequency with 103%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of transition are IGO, Project, Found, State and C/B.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences and general documents as the highest relative frequency with 108%.
This shows the evolution of transition and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Transition increases and reaches its peak in 1994. From then onwards it declines until 2019.
Since transition is a heavily context-dependent concept, its debates and challenges are usually compartmentalised by type (economic, demographic, etc.). Regardless of type, texts often reflect how transitions tend to require substantial planning and effort, with time being a key factor, and can result in a variety of positive and negative consequences.
The most salient discussions of transition are focused on either economic transition (often linked to green transition) or transitioning from relief to development. These contexts are concentrated in General Documents, particularly IGO texts. Overall, addressing the “recovery gap” between relief and development receives much more attention than other types of transition, e.g., political transition.
The list below summarises contexts discussing the relief-to-development transition, grouping challenges into those that are operational/systemic in nature or related to funding. For more information, see the full data set in the link further below.
operational & systemic
the "recovery gap"
relief and development being siloed
coordination within and across organisation types/levels
systematising transition and exit planning (far in advance)
collective risk management mechanisms
clusters being phased out while covering residual needs
slow resource mobilisation and distribution
foreign aid networks exiting areas
lack of qualified, international staff
adherence to or abandonment of humanitarian principles when transitioning to development
funding
mechanisms not being suitable for fragile countries
mechanisms being too inflexible
securing transition funding
lack of data on transition funding
lack of early recovery financing
improving existing mechanisms before creating new ones
high cost of relief systems (e.g., water distribution)
4. Transitional Financing A final whole-of-government issue is that of transitioning from humanitarian assistance to the use of longer-term development aid. The challenge is to ensure that life-saving activities are continued while the foundations for sustainable recovery, peace building and state capacity are built. The transition period often imposes difficult coordination and cooperation challenges between different operational and policy communities. It requires a mix of humanitarian and development instruments (without compromising humanitarian principles), and a flexible and pragmatic approach. Integrated approaches across the international system are needed where different actors (humanitarian, development, security) need to work simultaneously to address different but complementary objectives. The lack of conclusive definitions and data on the levels of transition financing is a major obstacle to progress. However, the UN estimates that on average less than 50 percent of development funds required for the early recovery financing period are pledged by donors, compared to a shortfall of 25 percent for humanitarian requests (see Table 0.1).
Challenges to the application of donor commitments are particularly apparent in transition and stabilisation activities. Donor policy frameworks emphasise the importance of links and smooth ‘transitions’ between humanitarian action and early recovery and stabilisation efforts. At the same time, a policy agenda around building resilience is gaining ground. In practice, the overlap between the phases of transition, and the fact that it is neither a linear nor predictable process, can make it difficult to safeguard principled humanitarian funding. Humanitarian funds are often ‘stretched’ to encompass both humanitarian and early recovery activities, and many international NGOs are engaged simultaneously in delivering humanitarian and recovery/development assistance. Adherence to humanitarian principles suggests the separation of humanitarian financing and action from other areas of policy. Yet ensuring a transition to recovery and supporting enhanced resilience requires greater coherence and sequencing between these processes and alignment with host government frameworks. Donors are increasingly colocating the management of humanitarian and transition or stabilisation policy and activities within the same department, and are integrating humanitarian and development planning at country level.
Transition from War to Peace and Linking Relief to Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) In transition situations, Finland aims to effective linking of peace building, humanitarian assistance, reconstruction and development cooperation. Implementing this linkage is challenging as the international aid architecture and organisations are often divided into the separate sectors of humanitarian assistance and development cooperation, with different objectives, principles, legislation and timetables guiding their functioning and funding. In post-conflict situations, development cooperation often starts slowly in hazardous environments, leaving a gap between humanitarian assistance and development aid [....] Effective transition requires a common plan with commitment from the national administration of the partner country and the entire donor community. The plan should include clear priorities and its implementation has to involve flexible use of all aid instruments. Expediting the initiation of development cooperation requires a realistic understanding of the risks involved as well as effective collective risk management mechanisms. As during the transition phase the responsibility for development is increasingly shifted from international actors to the national administration, special attention should be given on strengthening the national capacity. Managing transition requires donors to adopt a flexible approach. In addition to post-conflict transition, it is important to ensure effective linking of relief to rehabilitation and development also when it comes to situation of post-natural disasters.
Approaches to transition: Development partners provide significant amounts of humani- tarian and development aid to transition financing in conflict-affected states. However, there is evidence that the transition between these instruments could be improved, and that development partners should focus less on the instruments and approaches available within particular managerial structures, and more on the actual objectives that they are trying to support. Pooling mechanisms, in particular, are useful tools to encourage more holistic and effective approaches to transition situations. Recognising these benefits, there has been a dramatic increase in the use of pools. However, more needs to be done to manage trade-offs between quick delivery and longer-term sustainability, to avoid fragmentation of instruments, and to better co-ordinate across humanitarian, development and defence budget lines.
groups being excluded (from the benefits of market economies, from climate adaptation)
managing countries’ needs that are both shared and unique
negative results for services, employment, gender equality (and its monitoring), and social capital
the slow pace of change
the need to redefine the role of the state
elite interests acting as obstacles to progress
setting emissions targets
creating incentive structures for low-carbon growth
creating low-carbon policy
cities switching to post-fossil fuels systems
By contrast, because employment facilitates inclusion, functional and accessible labour market institutions were found to be important. A major lesson from two decades of transition is that the state has a critical role in creating an environment for inclusive growth and societies. Abruptly abandoning areas of responsibility by the state or insisting on rapid privatization of all state-owned companies may prove very costly for societies in the long run.
One strand of the political economy literature of transition has argued that the major challenge and obstacle for successful completion of liberal economic reforms is the emergence of elite interest groups.40 These actors, including enterprise directors, some government officials, bankers and mafias, surfaced during the initial phase of political and economic 'partial' liberalization.
But the EBRD's countries of operations vary widely in their transition challenges, requiring in-depth country knowledge and targeted geographical initiatives to overcome the obstacles to recovery and growth.
Second, leaving no one behind entails managing the transition in a manner that supports stranded workers and communities, as economies shift away from fossil fuels, so as to make sure that everyone benefits from the transition to low-emission, climate-resilient economies.
There are no blueprints for identifying in advance the appropriate policies to create an enabling environment for low-carbon transition .
As pointed out in one context, transition and recovery (especially early recovery) are sometimes grouped together as a single area, e.g., transition and recovery programming.
The fact that many war-affected societies experience conflict, transition (also referred to as early recovery or recovery) and development simultaneously rather than in consecutive phases, has underlined the need for a concerted and coherent response from relief and development actors from the onset of a conflict.
OCHA has recognized that it must work strategically with development partners to address the funding gap for early recovery and transition .
In 2015, IOM's crisis-related activities (from preparedness to emergency response, movement, transition and recovery, among others) directly reached some 22.7 million beneficiaries, and budgetary expenditures on emergency, post-crisis and movement activities reached almost USD 760 million.
Rather, it is the result of a continual process, from preparedness planning through to response, and on to transition / recovery programming.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.