The HE corpus contains 10,453 occurrences of the concept crime.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownCrime occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by Africa, North America, MENA and Asia with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO, State, RC and NGO_Fed organisations.
IGO documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe. Occurrences from NGO were mostly obtained from activity reports published in MENA.
State documents mostly generated occurrences in activity reports published in North America. Occurrences from RC were mostly found in activity reports published in Europe. Lastly, occurrences from NGO_Fed were obtained from activity reports published in North America.
is a/an
offence
problem
event/behaviour
strategy
dynamic condition
risky socioeconomic process
is categorised by
nature
scale
gravity
location
perpetrator
status
has many types and subtypes, especially relevant to humanitarians being
war crimes
crimes against humanity
organised crime
transnational crime
international crime
violent crime
hate crime
property crime
non-violent, violent
lesser: fraud, vandalism, graffiti, damage to property
serious: burglary, larceny, theft, arson
urban crime
Israeli crimes
has victims, especially
civilians, Palestinians, journalists, children, women
has root causes, which are
varied & context-dependent
debated
identified with studies and/or theoretical stances
mostly traced to income inequality, e.g.
flawed development approaches
unjust arrangements
chronic hunger
is addressed by organisations via
youth outreach
advocacy
training & assistance
building relationships
knowledge production
has specific reduction strategies
citizen security & social inclusion
social crime prevention
broad-based responses
environmental design
partnerships between sectors
global arms trade treaties
has contested or unclear definitions for types & subtypes
war crime
organised vs. street gang crime
violence against women
crime as a donor-defined concept
is unaddressed for various reasons
perpetrators have impunity
IHL offers only theoretical protection
slow war crimes case resolution
challenges documenting hate crimes
humanitarian work being criminalised
exists within humanitarian organisations
e.g., corruption
Despite its relatively high frequency, crime has few definitional contexts and explicit definitions, perhaps because the concept is rather universal and defined contextually. It is categorised as a type of problem and event, as well as a strategy taken by actors to achieve goals or needs.
The single explicit definition below elaborates on this with the related concepts of law, state, and punishment, as well as providing additional background regarding crime prevention.
A crime is fundamentally defined as an antisocial act that violates a law and for which a punishment can be imposed by the state or in the state’s name; the resulting range of punishable acts is extraordinary and varies across jurisdictions and cultures. Within this context, crime prevention approaches and classification schemes have focused on offenders, on punishment, on policing, on corrections, on victims, and on sociological, cultural and economic contexts of the criminal event. These emphases have produced an extensive literature12 of prevention strategies relative to addressing offenders’ moral, psychological, economic and social conditions, devising police tactics, assessing the efficacy of prisons and correctional systems, remedying urban slums and addressing physical and management issues relative to urban planning and design.
offence
problem
number one problem
cause for concern
significant business constraint
problem relating to the causes of conflict
negative aspect of urbanization
critical social issue
threat
event/behaviour
antisocial act
incident
risky event
strategy
way of life
dead end
survival strategy
dynamic condition
risky socioeconomic process
Although the various types of crime listed below could be organised semantically in a number of manners, there are several clear categories for the function of modifiers preceding crimes:
nature
war, organised, violent, hate, property, financial...
scale
international, urban, transnational, national, local...
gravity
serious, petty, heinous, common...
location
British, Jamaican, Caribbean, Hong Kong...
perpetrator
Israeli, youth, gang-related, juvenile, military...
status
alleged, reported, past, possible, future, suspected...
The list below enumerates types of crime by frequency, excluding those with fewer than 5 hits. This sample offers a fairly complete perspective on the general categories to be found, although many other types exist. As can be seen, just a few types of crime clearly dominate the interest of humanitarian authors, with war crimes having by far the highest frequency.
over 800
war
600-799
organized
200-300
violent
transnational organized
international
hate
100-199
urban
50-99
transnational
serious
property
israeli
10-49
financial
cyber
youth
social
israeli war
honour
petty
heinous
national
drug-related
cross-border
common
domestic war
sexual
environmental
local
tax
residential
gang-related
gender-based
economic
contact
5-9
major
international organized
human trafficking
general
serious international
atrocity
juvenile
armed
sex
global
gang
street
British
cross-border organized
national war
honour
torture
region-specific
ordinary
jamaica
political
drug
personal
situational
The distribution of each type of crime in the corpus may be more or less concentrated in specific areas, meaning that a high frequency does not imply that it is a widely covered topic across text types. For three of the highest frequency results, each is largely concentrated in specific areas:
war crimes is mostly found in NGO, IGO and RC activity reports in MENA
organized crime is mostly found in IGO and State general documents in CCSA
violent crime is mostly found in IGO general documents in CCSA
This is also true of other multiword terms, which are common with crime. Israeli war crime, alleged war crime, and domestic war crime are the most frequent, but they are largely found in NGO activity reports in MENA.
The list below includes types of crime that are explicitly given hierarchies in the HE corpus. These subtypes are not meant to be exhaustive, and some may belong to multiple hierarchies. Types of crime and their examples have been collected using purely linguistic criteria: apparent contradictions may exist.
The examples given may range from being representative (identity theft as a common cyber crime) or atypical in some fashion. For instance, the inclusion of subtypes may be meant to erase any doubt that a crime indeed belongs to a parent category. An example might be sexual and gender-based crimes, which are referred to as international crimes against humanity, often to affirm a legal position and not because they are the most prototypical example.
crimes against public order
anti-social behaviour, sexual offences, corruption, trafficking of human beings, firearms and drugs
atrocity crimes
sexual violence, crimes against humanity, war crimes
benign crime
jewellery snatching, pick-pocketing
contact crime (also personal crime)
homicides, assaults, robbery, rape, kidnapping, minor offences (pick-pocketing), intimate partner violence, child abuse
crimes against humanity
widespread, systematic attacks against a civilian population
murder, torture, deportation, extermination
sexualised wartime violence
sexual and gender-based crimes
cyber crime
identity theft
economic/financial crime
fraud, bribery, tax crime/evasion, money laundering, corruption, organized crime
hate crime
sexual orientation and gender identity-based, racial and homophobic crime and domestic abuse
honor crimes
killing of women
international crime
human rights violations and abuses
grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, crimes against humanity, genocide, torture, terrorism, IHL violations, war crimes
organized crime
illicit arms transfers/trafficking/smuggling, drugs/narcotics production/trafficking/trade, trafficking human beings/migrant smuggling, cyber crime/high-tech crime, irregular migration, money laundering, corruption, sexual exploitation, extortion, child pornography, white collar crime, and corruption
petty crime
pickpocketing
property crime
non-violent, violent
lesser: fraud, vandalism, graffiti, damage to property
serious: burglary, larceny, theft, arson
sex crimes
attempted rape, carnal knowledge of girls between 12 and 13 years of age, rape, indecent assault, buggery, abduction, incest, attempted incest, acts of gross indecency, bigamy
sexual and/or gender-based crime
sexual harassment, rape
see the gender-based violence entry
social crime
trafficking, child pornography, corruption, embezzlement
state-committed crime against IHL
systematic disappearances and torture, forced displacement, extra-judicial killings
tourist crime
child sex tourism
transnational (organized) crime
intellectual property crime, cyber crime, (online) money laundering, financial crime, human trafficking, trading/trafficking drugs and illicit arms, piracy and armed robbery at sea, terrorism, financing terrorism
violent crime
murder/homicide, attempted murder, assault, armed assault, assault with grievous bodily harm, sexual and gender-based violence, gun violence, theft, robbery, rape, shootings, mugging, car jacking, housebreaking, physical and sexual assault
war crimes
murder, genocide, intentional/wilful killing of civilians, extrajudicial executions, summary executions, killing of media personnel
attacks on media facilities and offices, attacking a UN aid convoy
torture, inhumane treatment, unlawful or arbitrary detention, taking hostages, using human shields
sexual violence, mass rape
deliberate starvation, forced population transfer/forcible transfer, Israeli settlement activities, shooting rockets at civilian locations, extensive and wanton destruction of civilian property, drastically reducing fuel supplies to a population, pillage, house looting
The causes of crime are equally as varied as types of crime, as well as being subject to debate (see Debates & Controversies for more information). In most of these contexts, the concept of crime is limited and excludes regional conflict-related crime (such as large-scale IHL violations). General Documents also have a disproportionate role in this discussion.
The most universal root cause spoken of was economic inequality, although the methodologies used to make assessments can be divergent. Some sources cite studies, others rely on theoretical stances, some provide no evidence, and still others highlight the challenge of making simplistic conclusions in the first place.
But there seems to be a general agreement that crime and violence in Papua New Guinea are caused by five main factors – namely, a general lack of economic opportunities; the drive to acquire material wealth; the inability of law enforcement institutions to address criminal behaviour in the city effectively; a general decline of traditional cultural practices that assist with conflict resolutions and the maintenance of law and order; and the abuse of the wantok system and the impact of urbanization – wantok literally means 'people who speak your language'.
Unlike the due process model, the social justice model is a powerful critique of existing social arrangements as they affect crime and punishment. The social justice approach assumes that crime is caused, in large part, by unjust social arrangements and unequal power relations.
Studies have shown that income inequality – which is highest in Africa and Latin America – is much more strongly associated with violent crime than poverty.
Exclusionary and jobless growth and, especially, high rates of youth unemployment, coupled with unrealistic expectations and high levels of inequality, tend to result in high rates of crime, including violent crime. Particular countries may thus deviate from the general pattern or average effect of the impact of growth rates on crime rates or crime patterns. The relationship is policy and context sensitive. High rates of violent crime and gender violence may be regarded as the outcome of a wrong approach to development that marginalizes large sections of the population.
Chronically hungry people are more likely to riot, clash with other groups or migrate to urban centres, straining their infrastructure and causing crime .
As with the variable nature of different types of crime, strategies identified in HE documents on preventing, reducing or otherwise addressing crime is quite context-dependent. That said, there is a notable emphasis across organisations on minimising violent crime, crimes committed by youth, and IHL violations.
An important caveat is that just two documents dominate frequencies, with GD-201 (focusing on the Caribbean) and GD-240 (focusing on urban environments) each containing over 1,000 cases, roughly more than 10 times the next highest frequencies.
This is not to say that crime is ignored elsewhere in the corpus: The list below amasses crime prevention/reduction strategies promoted by or executed by organisations, exclusively from activity reports. This is limited to statements pertaining to actual activities, as opposed to abstract discussion. Lastly, single types of crime have been specified where possible.
youth outreach
character development
career guidance
mediation training
alternatives to crime
youth local councils
supporting better parenting
encouraging crime reporting
advocacy
petitions
promoting international standards against juvenile detention
advocating for justice reinvestment, against torture
encouraging deterrence against war crimes
training & assistance
public courses
public information campaigns
training police & officials
assisting institutions
appointing staff with specific goals
local capacity building
establishing national committees for genocide prevention
building relationships
meetings, seminars, expert discussions
improving relationships across society
promoting cooperation for multiple levels/regions
dispatching security advisory missions to countries
strengthening local organisation and cooperation with authorities
knowledge production
information systems, proactive crime models
guidebooks, resource guides, reports, research, reviews, assessments
identifying child sex tourism prevention strategies
providing timely information
direct funding
bearing expenses for alarm systems, guards
threat
socioeconomic threat, cyber-war
terrorism, trafficking, climate change
hunger, disease, unemployment, human rights violations, environmental challenges
problem
relating to the causes of conflict
poverty, peace, security, HIV/AIDS, corruption, bad governance
infectious disease, environmental degradation
traffic accidents
poverty, homelessness, social pathologies
risky behavior
substance abuse, violence
negative aspect of urbanization
violence
risky event
forced eviction, disasters
risky socioeconomic process
violence, social exclusion
dynamic condition
violence, disasters
critical social issue
rapidly rising debt burden
high unemployment
poor skills in the labour market
excessive energy costs
concentration of productive activities in few sectors
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO, State, RC and NGO_Fed organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for crime was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 4 top collocates were obtained:
hate;
organized;
transnational; and
violent
IGO documents generated organized as top collocate in 2012.
NGO documents generated hate-related as top collocate in 2005 with the highest overall score. Other top NGO collocates include perpetrate and henious.
State documents generated transnational as top collocate in 2018 obtaining the highest overall score. Other top State collocates include drug and destruction.
RC documents generated repression as top collocate for 2007.
NGO_Fed documents generated violence as top collocate for 2013. Other top NGO_Fed collocates include war and prevention.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about crime that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
victimization
robbery
proceeding
burglary
independence
jamaica
delinquency
trend
survey
victimize
NGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
IOF (Israeli Occupation Forces)
Israeli
Quebec
civilian
Palestinian
hate-related
willful
confront
condemn
file
State documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
region-specific
CIA
residential
intragovernmental
UNTOC
narcotic
standpoint
traffic
kidnapping
maritime
RC documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
repression
repress
penalize
curb
unrest
expansion
federal
revise
application
connection
NGO_Fed documents feature the following unique collocates:
addiction
bureau
committee
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss crime. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
hate (NGO + IGO)
accuse (RC + NGO)
cyber (State + IGO)
fear (NGO + IGO)
perpetrate (NGO + IGO)
tackle (State + IGO)
organised (NGO_Fed + NGO)
atrocity (State + NGO)
cross-border (State + IGO)
illicit (RC + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
perpetrator ( RC + NGO + IGO)
terrorism ( State + NGO + IGO)
punishment ( RC + NGO + IGO)
combat ( State + NGO + IGO)
gang-related ( State + RC + IGO)
honour ( RC + NGO + IGO)
petty ( NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
impunity ( NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
drug-related ( RC + NGO + IGO)
trial ( RC + NGO + IGO)
suspect ( RC + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
transnational ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
genocide ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
gang (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
investigate ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
corruption ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
investigation ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
prosecution ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
trafficking ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
organise ( State + RC + NGO + IGO)
witness ( RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
UNODC ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
war ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
prosecute ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
violent ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
humanity ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
crime ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
commit ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
prevention ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
criminal ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
drug ( State + RC + NGO_ Fed + NGO + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of crime between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of crime were highest in 2007, also obtaining the highest relative frequency recorded (378%).
Europe and North America generated the greatest number of occurrences and CCSA generated the highest relative frequency with 1516%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of crime are IGO, State, NGO, WHS and Project.
General documents provided the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 182%.
This shows the evolution of crime and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Crime reaches its peak in 2000. Then it starts to decrease ever so slightly until 2019.
The debates, controversies, and lessons learned for a subject as varied as crime are highly context-dependent. Nonetheless, the excerpts below have been included to represent some of the main areas of discussion in the HE corpus. This includes two large topics (crime reduction and war crimes/crimes against humanity), as well as other more unique matters (such as preventing corruption within humanitarian organisations).
Despite their disparities, a notable trend is also the constant negotiation of definitions of types of crime, from war crimes to violence against women (see the related Gender-Based Violence concept entry).
A key message of the report is that Caribbean countries need to focus on a model of security based on the human development approach, whereby citizen security is paramount, rather than on the traditional state security model, whereby the protection of the state is the chief aim. Indeed, the contrast between prevention on the one hand and repression and coercion on the other is ill conceived. Social inclusion to help prevent crime and violence and efficient and effective law enforcement are by no means incompatible or mutually exclusive. In a truly democratic society, broad based social inclusion and swift criminal justice–or “prevention” and “coercion”—serve to reinforce and complement each other. This is one of the most important lessons to be taken from this report – and not only for the Caribbean but for all of Latin America as well.
Likewise, the outcomes in terms of crime reduction have no apparent association with expenditure. The expenditure of Trinidad and Tobago on security is relatively high, but the country's serious crime rate remains high. Financial investment is not a sufficient condition for crime reduction. Much depends on the mix of policies, the public support for the policies and the capacity to implement the policies effectively. The right mix of policies means rebalancing policy to give appropriate emphasis to social crime prevention.
There is often substantial confusion and debate over the terms street gang and organized crime. The difference between the two is important, however, not only for diagnosing the related issues accurately, but also for the implementation of effective and efficient responses.
The most important policy trend in the field over the past two decades or so has been the move away from the idea that crime prevention and tackling violence are essentially matters for the police and the criminal justice system, and towards the idea that these are complex phenomena which require broad-based responses.
Thus, land-use juxtapositions, street layouts, building and site design, transportation system planning, infrastructure improvements – especially lighting and facility and landscape maintenance, as well as activity and space scheduling – have been shown to have variable impacts on crime opportunity and on the subsequent incidence and fear of crime.157 The lack of integration of crime prevention strategies within comprehensive city planning practices has been cited as a factor in facilitating opportunities for urban crime.158 Physical planning can make a difference in terms of crime prevention/reduction, to more effective policing, to informal surveillance and to the protection of persons and property.
The complexity of the causes and types of crime shows that policies and programmes aimed at addressing crime and violence in Port Moresby should foster a strong partnership between the government, NGOS and the community. The international community also has a key role to play in providing better training and equipment, and in supporting partnership approaches.
At an ICRC-organized workshop, parliamentarians began drafting a bill to amend the penal code; the definition of war crime – specifically, whether it should include abuses committed during non-international armed conflict – remained under discussion.
The longer such a conflict lasts, the more we observe a downward spiral of war crimes, retribution, hate and inhumanity on all sides.” In addition, this is aggravated by the public staging of war crimes. “Armed groups deliberately carry out their crimes against humanity and try to be highly visible in order to foster the impression that international humanitarian law is irrelevant.”
[....]
However, the world has so far not found a way to overcome the gap between the reality in conflict zones and the theoretical protection by international humanitarian law.
In mid-2012, the US walked away from an arms trade treaty in the 11th hour. We assessed what had gone wrong, refined our approach, and helped bring the US around. Just over eight months later, the world’s first international arms trade treaty was passed. Our objective Oxfam sought an international arms trade treaty (ATT). A robust and effective ATT would establish international standards to ban all arms transfers that could facilitate genocide, crimes against humanity, and serious war crimes.
The fight against impunity for the most serious international crimes such as war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity continues unabated. It is encouraging to note that an increasing number of local judges and prosecutors – thanks to our trainings and interventions – are convinced that impunity is unacceptable and that victims are entitled to redress.
Grave concerns, however, exist about the implementation of national war crimes strategies. This is especially the case with respect to Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the deadline for completing the prosecution of complex war crimes cases had to be extended by three years (to the end of 2018), and where barely any progress has been made in processing cases based on investigative materials transferred by the Tribunal five years ago. In addition, improved regional inter-State cooperation is needed with respect to establishing accountability for wartime atrocities.
She also underlined that while the international community shares a collective responsibility to prevent genocide, individual States have a primary role and a higher stake in putting a stop to the crime .
In conclusion, it is important that adequate control systems are in place in order to reduce risks of corruption and mismanagement of resources. NCA is committed to combating corruption in our work. However, in order to fight financial crime it is crucial that humanitarian organisations and their donors cooperate towards achieving the same results.
Because most countries have not established mechanisms to identify perpetrators or victims of hate crime, it is difficult to know how extensive the problem is or where to target resources to combat it.
Forwarding rights through the courts CCR was active in several cases before the courts, including as an intervener in an important series of cases at the Supreme Court dealing with the definition of human smuggling. The CCR argued that it should not be a crime for people acting on humanitarian motives to help refugees find asylum from persecution.
The anti-gang law and Supreme Court declaration describing gangs as terrorist groups also hampered partners’ work on violence prevention (if gangs are deemed terrorists, partners that work on rehabilitating former gang leaders or work with gangs on violence prevention would be taking actions considered illegal).
The term "sexual harassment" is understood internationally as the abuse of authority by persons in positions of power with the purpose of coercing persons under their authority into granting sexual favours. In general, Arab penal codes contain no concrete definition of the crime of sexual harassment.
For example, a Palestinian feminist initiative, the Committee for Resisting Women's Killing, has demanded the use of the term qatl al-nisa (femicide) so as to counter the legitimization and justification of these crimes and to respond to the reliance on the term "honour crime" by the Israeli authorities to promote the idea that such Young violence originates in Palestinian and Arab culture.
The lens offers a flexible and unified framework for thinking about the context-specific drivers, risk factors, protective factors and effects. It is also unconstrained by preconceived assumptions regarding donor-imposed categories such as “conflict”, “crime” or “fragile”.
While no synonyms are explicitly defined for crime, types of crime are also expressed through the use of illegal or criminal as modifiers of specific acts. That said, differences in their linguistic uses prevent simple equivalencies between these structures.
As adjectives, illegal and criminal distinguish between similar or even identical acts whose legality differs. In comparison, many crimes are inherently understood as such and never take these modifiers (*illegal murder). The highest frequency combinations below, then, logically only offer just a few examples of the large hierarchies shown earlier.
illegal: migration, logging, detention, settlement, activity
criminal: activity, violence
Many of them become victims of trafficking, child pornography and other social crimes and illegal activities.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.