The HE corpus contains 16,286 occurrences of the concept shelter.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownShelter occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by North America, Asia, Africa and MENA with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed, RC and C/B organisations.
NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed and RC documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe.
C/B documents only generated occurrences in general documents published in Europe.
is a
physical object/structure
state of being protected from weather, hazards
service that provides housing, protection
material necessity, foundation of life
human right
issue, concern
sector
crisis response activity
form of aid, assistance
is characterised by permanence
temporary
transitional
permanent
has various qualities
adequate
makeshift
sustainable
secure
affordable
has locations
urban
is offered in response to events
emergency
cyclone
disaster
is provided by groups
humanitarians
Global Shelter Cluster
is offered according to inhabitant
family
women
homeless
refugee
is supplied via materials to be used on site
metal roofing, thatch, plastic sheets
is offered in kits
tents, tarpaulins
assorted construction and repair materials
is offered along with
tools, equipment
household items
mattresses, blankets, mosquito nets
includes permanent structures
individual housing units
large buildings
underground structures
can refer to a designated building
school, church
is supported via microfinance
has challenges for living conditions
overcrowding
hygiene, outbreaks medical support
privacy
safety, vulnerability, protection
is often unavailable due to
supply & delivery issues
exclusionary practices
premature closing
has construction challenges
inadequate results
structural maintenance
distance from community
differing cultural needs
has socioeconomic challenges
cost of materials for vulnerable groups
investing sufficient financial resources
social role of state
has legal challenges
documentation, tenure
land & property rights
has organisational challenges
inappropriate interventions
lack of a transition to permanent solutions
top-down approach
lack of participation
requires response frameworks
neighbourhood approach
mixing methodologies
integration with dispute resolution, gender issues
requires planned transitions to permanent solutions
requires improvements to conditions
hygiene kits, upgrading facilities
better accessibility (e.g., ramps)
requires beneficiary participation
especially from women, disabled people
While no explicit definitions of shelter exist, numerous definitional contexts offer a detailed picture of how the concept fits within humanitarian terminology. As seen in the summary below, shelter has both many parent and sibling concepts, with much overlap between them.
The parent concepts for shelter can be linked together in several ways, the example below being just one formulation:
shelter is a material necessity for basic survival
which is an asset that is the foundation of life, family, and community
which is a human right
which is a recurring issue and concern in humanitarian work
to the extent that it is a distinct sector, cluster, operational component, and crisis response activity
which focus on providing shelter as a service and form of aid or assistance
These parent concepts point to shelter as generally being considered
a physical object or structure
a state of being protected from weather and hazards
a service that provides 1 and 2
A distinct meaning is shelter as a service provider, as in women's shelter, although this appears much less frequently.
Many of the above parent concepts share similar child concepts. However they are used, shelter commonly appears alongside water, food, health care, sanitation, and protection. In specific cases it is also associated with concepts like non-food item, livelihood, or institutional capacity building.
This resource assists the Red Cross in meeting the immediate needs– such as shelter, food and critical mental health counseling–of individuals and families affected by catastrophic disasters like the hurricanes of 2005 and other disasters like house fires, floods, tornadoes and winter storms.
There were 113 participants in total and a number of other clusters including Shelter, Protection and WASH participated.
Meanwhile, women and girls in Uganda formed community watch groups, identifying survivors of sexual and GBV, and referring women to shelters and other service providers.
The full categorisation of shelter is offered below, along with a link to more definitional contexts. These tend to come from Activity Reports and General Documents from Europe and North America, with strong representation from NGO_Fed organisations.
area, topic
healthcare
water
food
sanitation
education
emergency relief
vital, immediate, basic, core, humanitarian need, necessity
food, nutrition
health care, critical mental health counseling
education
water
sanitation
protection
sanitation facilities
survival necessity
item, supplies, material consideration
aid items
non-food item (NFI)
clothing, blanket, bedding, cleaning materials, cooking utensils, fuel
tools, hygiene kits
food, water
right
basic human right
term included in the right to adequate housing
sector
non-food
health
water/sanitation
food
medical assistance
legal counselling
protection
humanitarian sector likely affected by land issues
human rights protection
agricultural and rural livelihoods
foundation, stage
for life, family, community
for economic reintegration
crisis response activity
water
sanitation
health
problem, concern
[the lack of which is a] form of severe deprivation
sanitation
information
water
food
health
education
recurrent hazard
recovery issues
operational component
WASH
health
livelihood
institutional capacity building
cluster
WASH
water and sanitation
education
nutrition
non-food items
emergency telecommunications
protection
material, humanitarian aid
food
medical, health care
water (clean drinking, etc.)
sanitation
immediate support
protection
lifesaving relief
humanitarian service, relief, vital assistance
food
medicine
protection
healthcare
clean water
sanitation
cash transfers
asset
physical component of protection
service provider
haven, safe space
While shelter can refer to several concepts (as an object, state, service, or service provider), in practice these are often collapsed together. The various types of shelter below may broadly refer to the first two meanings, but each can be contextualised differently. For example, types labelled by inhabitant generally refer to service providers (women's shelter), whereas those labelled by quality usually correspond to objects/structures (durable shelter).
Emergency, temporary, and transitional shelter account for over a third of the contexts (over 2,100) that specify shelter type. There are also many more low frequency types that tend to fall within the same categories, like bomb, portable, two-story shelter, etc. This of course underscores the wide range of structures shelter includes, from tarpaulins to large complexes housing thousands of individuals.
permanence / time frame
temporary shelter
transitional shelter
permanent shelter
new shelter
immediate shelter
post-disaster shelter
night shelter
quality
adequate shelter
safe shelter
makeshift shelter
sustainable shelter
basic shelter
good shelter
appropriate shelter
durable shelter
secure shelter
decent shelter
proper shelter
affordable shelter
inadequate shelter
location
urban shelter
event
emergency shelter
cyclone shelter
disaster shelter
flood shelter
evacuation shelter
provider / service
humanitarian shelter
inhabitant
family shelter
women's shelter
homeless shelter
refugee shelter
household shelter
IDP shelter
youth shelter
community shelter
collective shelter
communal shelter
structure type
tent shelter
Shelter has no high frequency compound terms, with shelter materials being the most common at just over 300 cases. The top ten compounds are listed below:
shelter material
shelter kit
shelter solution
shelter assistance
shelter construction
shelter microfinance
shelter support
shelter programme
shelter home
shelter response
Shelter materials, along with shelter kits, are referenced almost entirely as relief items that humanitarians supply to affected populations. They are commonly distributed along with other non-food items, food, and water. “Materials” can refer to a variety of objects, some of which more appropriately fall under essential household items:
rudimentary but complete shelter solutions
tarpaulins, tents
objects to repair or improve existing shelters
metal roofing, nails, eucalyptus, bamboo, thatch, plastic sheets, groundsheet, rope, sealant, wiring, tools, personal protective equipment, water tanks, sandbags
household items and furnishings
mattresses, blankets, bedding, emergency lights, solar lamps, mosquito nets, jerry cans, aqua tabs, water filter
A few weeks later, our ECHO-funded shelter program distributed medium-term shelter materials such as corrugated iron sheeting, and provided tools, training and shelter safety messages through additional partnerships with Child Health and Environment Save Society (CHESS) Nepal and BBC Media Action.
GOAL, in partnership with the UK Department for International Development (DfID), distributed emergency shelter kits composed of corrugated galvanized iron (CGI) sheets, flat sheet, various nails, sealant and tie wire and an unconditional cash transfer of Php16,000 (€306) in two tranches to 1,500 households.
One low frequency compound is shelter microfinance, which stands out as being the most specialised among high frequency compounds. Some of its definition and history are summarised in the following excerpt:
In particular, shelter microfinance and community finance mechanisms have grown considerably during recent decades. This chapter discusses the use of microfinance approaches to shelter lending. The loans are almost universally to individuals, generally those with some security of tenure, for investment (construction, improvement and extension) in housing rather than land and infrastructure. ■ The growth of microfinance for shelter The growth of microfinance agencies since their inception during the 1980s has been considerable and there are now many such organizations. To exemplify the situation in one country, in India the number of such grassroots-level organizations engaged in mobilizing savings and providing micro-loan services to the poor is estimated to be in the range of 400 to 500 organizations. Evaluations of microfinance organizations have demonstrated that, whatever the loans were taken for, a proportion as large as 25 per cent could be diverted for shelter investments. Findings such as these have encouraged the exploration of microfinance lending specifically for shelter.
Shelter appears in a number of organisational labels, such as Global Shelter Cluster and Nepal Shelter Cluster. Altogether, "cluster" appears in close proximity to shelter in under 300 contexts. Most cases refer to activities like logistics, coordination, standardisation (e.g., of emergency shelters), and assessment. While some reference is made to challenges related to the Shelter Cluster, detailed content is lacking. One exception is discussion of Shelter Cluster actions in Haiti, as seen in the following documents.
The Global Shelter Cluster (GSC) is co-led by UNHCR during conflict-related emergencies and by the IFRC during natural disasters. In 2017, UNHCR led 12 and co-led one of the 28 activated country-level shelter clusters. UNHCR supported the coordination of 417 partners providing shelter and NFI support to more than 8 million people. To facilitate sector coordination within countries and on a global scale, UNHCR hosted the annual GSC coordination workshop–bringing together 122 participants from 38 different organizations–and a GSC meeting, providing a forum for shelter cluster coordination teams and GSC partners to share best practices and develop tools and methodologies.
In Haiti, 59 organisations were listed on the UN's shelter cluster website, though this number probably does not include all those involved in the sector. Despite the considerable involvement of small and local organisations in on-the-ground implementation of post-disaster response and reconstruction, most organisations listed on the shelter cluster site are large and based in the global North. To understand how organisations responding to the 2010 earthquake acted on the Sphere standards, the authors interviewed representatives of 14 organisations presenting a cross-section of those working on post-disaster shelter issues in Port-au-Prince.
Where clusters have been implemented, national authorities have recognized their value in bringing more structure, accountability and professionalism to response and in providing a focal point for the authorities on humanitarian programming. 29. For example, the emergency shelter clusters that operated in Indonesia, Lebanon, Pakistan and Somalia improved coordination with and support to national efforts by providing a single interface for national Governments on shelter response.
This article questions whether the humanitarian cluster system’s mechanisms for strategic thinking really allow plans to be adapted as situations change, with a particular focus on the Shelter Cluster during the Haiti earthquake response Using strategy documents, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)’s Financial Tracking Service and minutes of the Strategic Advisory Group (SAG) of the Haiti Shelter Cluster (the coordination structure for shelter agen- cies), we ask whether different decisions could have been made in early 2010.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed, RC and C/B organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for shelter was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 3 top collocates were obtained:
adequate;
transitional; and
temporary
NGO documents generated transitional as top collocate in 2007.
IGO documents generated non-food as top collocate in 2016 with the highest overall score.
NGO_Fed documents generated transitional as top collocate in 2010. ¡
RC documents generated temporary as top collocate for 2016.
C/B documents generated transitional as top collocate for 2007.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about shelter that others do not.
NGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
NRC (Norwegian Refugee Council )
al-Aman (From al-Aman Shelter)
winterization
orphan
installation
intermediate
ICMC (International Catholic Migration Commission )
ICLA (Information Counselling and Legal Aid )
self-reliance
CHF (Swiss francs)
IGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
microfinance
chernobyl
GSC (Global Shelter Cluster)
CCCM (camp coordination and camp management )
country-level
incremental
afford
poach
mortgage
affordability
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
shelterbox
warmth
flood-resistant
islander
placement
sub-total
livesaving
CARITAS
shelterkit
one-room
RC documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
ICRC-provided ( ICRC: International Committee of the Red Cross)
ICRC-supplied
ICRC-donated
comfort
soap
NGO-run
government-run
refurbish
guatemalan
pig
C/B documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
two-storey
CRS (Catholic Relief Services )
post-disaster
inappropriate
belt
Aceh (Province in Indonesia)
sphere
self-help
advisor
propose
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss shelter. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are :
self-recovery (NGO + C/B)
UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency) (NGO + IGO)
night (RC + NGO_Fed)
affordable (NGO + IGO)
evacuate (RC + NGO)
bedding (NGO_Fed + NGO)
erect (NGO + IGO)
communal (NGO_Fed + NGO)
UNHCR (NGO + IGO)
mattress (RC + NGO_Fed)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are :
blanket (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
post-disaster (NGO + IGO + C/B)
overcrowd (RC + NGO + C/B)
winter (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
decent (RC + NGO + IGO)
bath (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
rehabilitate (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
refuge (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
necessity (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
psychosocial (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are :
NFI (Nonfood item) (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
homeless (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
evacuation (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
survivor (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
distribute (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + C/B)
IDP (internally displaced people ) (RC + NGO + IGO + C/B)
rehabilitation (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
displace (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
storm (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
stay (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are :
temporary (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
non-food (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
transitional (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
makeshift (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
kit (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
item (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
settlement (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
tent (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
clothing (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
adequate (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO + C/B)
The chart below represents the distribution of shelter between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of shelter were highest in 2017. However, this concept obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2005 (133%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and North America generated the highest relative frequency with 88%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of shelter are Project, C/B, NGO_Fed, RE and NGO.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences and general documents generated the highest relative frequency with 102%.
This shows the evolution of shelter and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Shelter declines in 1962 until 1972. It then increases until 1983 and declines again until 1995. From then onwards it increases until it reaches it peak in 2019.
Shelter challenges tend to revolve around six key areas, which are both universal and highly specific. This perhaps stems from the fact that shelter is both an urgent, acute need, as well as a long-term, systemic issue.
living conditions
overcrowding
hygiene, outbreaks medical support
privacy
safety, vulnerability, protection
gender-based violence
comfort
lack of dignity
lack of facilities
accessibility issues
within settlements
exterior crowd control
availability
failure to provide to refugees
lack of shelters
delayed shipping, construction
exclusion of land vulnerable groups
exclusion of disabled people
premature closing, unmet needs
construction
inadequate & uninhabitable results (i.e., when rushed)
structural maintenance
distance from community
integration with urban planning
cultural factors that introduce design flaws
possible need for relocation
socioeconomic concerns
cost of materials for vulnerable groups
investing sufficient financial resources
challenges of shelter microfinance, loan security
importance of savings & investment in shelter development
reducing costs
economic model & existence of poverty
social role of state
underlying corruption
legal concerns
lack of legal documentation
requirement to prove tenure
land ownership & interaction with beneficiaries
integration of housing, land & property rights into shelter programs
organisational concerns
inappropriate interventions
lack of a transition to permanent solutions
role of agencies in temporary vs. permanent response
missed opportunities
top-down approach
lack of participation
supply chain
foreign manufacturing
importation
data collection & utilization
improving standards, organizational power dynamics
inadequacy as part of other key humanitarian challenges
The hygiene conditions in the temporary shelters were deplorable, access to safe drinking water, sanitary facilities and food was inadequate at best.
While living in temporary shelters, women are more vulnerable to sexual violence and lack basic privacy.
The traditional model of building transitional shelters solely for those with access to land must adapt to meet the needs of the 'land vulnerable'.
Emergency shelters often exclude persons with disabilities.
Its major role is in reducing lender risk and it is widely recognized that a key challenge for shelter microfinance is that of loan security.
But the move from supplying tents to the construction of transitional shelters is much longer and more complicated and all the more so for long-term construction. Coordination is currently focused on the supply of transitional shelters, which has been held up a great deal. This area has met with numerous difficulties in parallel to a major effort being made to use shelters of a high technical standard in terms of cyclone and earthquake resistance which are adaptable to different types of terrain... About a third of the planned 110 000 shelters have been built. The slow supply of materials held up at the border, the foreign prefabrication of parts for assembly, the production of rarely modular, uniform units and the training of staff to assemble the units has not produce the expected dynamism during the reconstruction, particularly as the installation of these shelters in urban contexts creates numerous land ownership problems. Furthermore, repetitive housing units which are placed side-by-side horizontally are not adapted to urban densification which rather should be based on vertically overlapping housing units.
A wide variety of strategies and recommendations address the challenges involving shelter. Such contexts tend to be particularly dense in General Documents from UN and NGO_Int texts dedicated specifically to shelter, housing, and settlement. These include GD-241 GD-313, and GD-29, which share nearly 1,300 contexts.
response frameworks
taking a neighbourhood approach rather than a sectoral one
using multiple methodologies and types of support
combination with dispute resolution
integration of gender issues
ensuring incremental progress
secure tenure in shelter strategies
having proper knowledge of legal systems/factors before operations
increasing preparedness
fostering successful transitions to permanent solutions
transitional shelter as a foundation, first step
conversion of shelters into secondary assets
improving conditions
distribution of hygiene kits
upgrading, improving facilities
adding ramps, accessibility features
increasing beneficiary participation
of women, disabled people
in management, committees, and design
increasing availability
policy enforcement (for quality assurance)
joint ownership for female empowerment
developing an efficient housing finance system
reducing payment costs
increasing worker income
The review also highlighted the effectiveness of combining dispute resolution approaches with shelter programming, which ensures that our projects don't increase harm and that they provide more sustainable outcomes. Applying dispute resolution methodologies is also key to facilitating access to housing and land. Our DRC programme helped internally displaced people negotiate temporary access to land for agriculture and sustenance. In Jordan, ICLA teams facilitated agreements between refugees and landlords to pre-empt disputes that could lead to eviction.
USAID's Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance has promoted the idea of shelter and settlements, arguing that it is necessary to consider the wider spatial needs of 'settlement-based assistance' and a 'neighbourhood approach' to engaging with communities, as opposed to being driven by sectoral priorities such as shelter (USAID/ OFDA, 2013).
Participation of beneficiaries in shelter reconstruction enhances the appropriateness of housing. For example, involving women in house design can correct misconcep- tions about family life and thus prevent inappropriate interventions, such as the design of nuclear houses for extended families. Active participation can also help to improve local skills and industry, re-establish social networks and relationships, and promote psychological recovery. Disaster survivors almost always would prefer to be engaged in reconstruction than be made passive recipients of aid in refugee camps. The most provocative question raised by a number of authors commenting on the Indian Ocean Tsunami is why relief agencies should contemplate doing housing recon- struction at all.54 Why not meet the need for shelter through temporary provision and leave more permanent solutions to the developmental sector, private businesses or the govern- ment, once the immediate, acute disaster phase has passed? UN-Habitat’s Sustainable Relief and Reconstruction proposal recognizes that the transition from relief to reconstruction is not always clear on the ground.
Any response should be informed by the steps taken by the affected population to provide temporary or permanent shelter using their own capacities and resources. Shelter responses should enable affected populations to incrementally upgrade and/or make the transition from emergency to durable housing solutions. The repair of damaged public buildings or the provision of temporary structures to serve as schools, healthcare centres and other communal facilities may also be required. The sheltering of livelihood assets such as livestock may be an essential complement to the provision of household shelter for some affected populations. The response should be informed by existing shelter and settlement risks and vulnerabilities regarding location, planning, design and construction, including those made worse by the disaster or due to the impact of climate change. Consideration of the environmental impact of settlement solutions and shelter construction is also critical to minimising the long-term impact of a disaster. Better shelter, settlement and non-food items disaster response is achieved through better preparedness.
Shelter and settlement responses use a variety of methodologies. These include in-kind support of materials (for example, plastic sheeting, timber, nails, bamboo or bricks), products (such as tents or shelter kits), tools, labour assistance, cash, vouchers or market interventions, advocacy and sharing of technical guidance and infor- mation. The GSC advocates for responses which combine different methodologies in order to meet the different needs of affected populations. Rarely does one single methodology meet all needs [....]
Shelter support:
• Technical and cross-cutting guidance.
• Strengthening of technical capacity and capacity building.
• Cash and markets-based shelter responses.
• Emergency, temporary and transitional shelter.
• Housing repair, construction and reconstruction.
• Rental support.
• HLP support.
• Advocacy
Housing and shelter are inextricably linked concepts in humanitarian documents. While they are sometimes used interchangeably as types of structures, they have many differences beyond the scope of this analysis.
The terms appear in close proximity at least 500 times, often paired together or used to avoid repetition:
She currently lives in a makeshift shelter, but plans to improve her housing with the additional income she will earn.
Both the refugee housing unit and the new self-standing family tent offer better shelter solutions and protection-related improvements.
Fundamentally, all housing is shelter but not vice versa. A shelter can at times be described as a type of housing (as in the first example above), but this is less frequent.
Shelter encompasses the broadest sense of humans inhabiting structures of any type, be that momentarily or permanently, whether in response to an emergency or not. Housing, in contrast, more commonly refers to permanent structures and non-crisis development activities.
For example, UN-Habitat’s 2005 report “Financing Urban Shelter,” which has the highest frequencies of both terms in a single document, adheres to this hierarchy. Despite shelter being the title’s keyword, housing is used 3.5 times as often, at 2,620 cases to 754. Here shelter is the underlying objective even while housing is the main subject matter.
Housing has a frequency similar to shelter, with about 13,000 cases. Since both terms co-appear frequently in texts, usage patterns across types of documents are unclear. Still, it can be noted that shelter is by far most frequent in European Activity Reports, whereas housing is particularly dense in African General Documents.
As with shelter, housing tends to lack explicit definitions. The clearest characterisations come from a Sphere definition of adequate housing:
International law specifically protects the right to adequate shelter The right to access adequate housing is protected by international law. It is the right to live somewhere in security, peace and dignity. This right contains freedoms such as the right to choose one’s residence and entitlements such as security of tenure. It enshrines protection principles such as protection from forced eviction. States are obliged to ensure this right when individuals or groups, including refugees and internally displaced persons, are unable to access adequate housing, including in crises ⊕ see Annex 1: Legal foundation to Sphere. The concept of “adequacy” means that housing is more than four walls and a roof. It underlines the importance of including a settlement lens, cultural identity and the availability of services in a shelter response. “Adequate” housing or other forms of shelter should provide security of tenure and be: • affordable, allowing the household to attain other essential goods and services to live in dignity; • habitable, providing physical safety, protected and adequate living space, access to safe drinking water, adequate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) facilities, and food preparation and storage; • culturally acceptable; • accessible and usable, including for persons facing mobility barriers; and • located to provide access to livelihoods opportunities and essential community services.
Refuge can be a synonym for shelter and has similar, if narrower, uses, including as a location that offers safety and as a service provided by others. It is a much lower frequency concept, with 1,700 cases, most of which include the verbs seek, take, find, and provide.
Rather than being restricted to a single structure, refuge applies to areas of land and countries, as in country of refuge. Together with collocation data, this suggests a stronger association with refuge as a need stemming from violence and conflicts more than natural disasters.
With other government departments, we welcomed 25,000 Syrians to Canada, reconnecting with our proud tradition as a country of refuge .
School must be a refuge in times of crisis, a place where children can reclaim some sense of normalcy and begin to heal.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.