Embedded Files
Frequencies
Frequencies
The HE corpus contains 55,794 occurences of the concept Protection.
Distribution by Region
Distribution by Region
Distribution by Organisation Type, Document Type, Region and Year
Distribution by Organisation Type, Document Type, Region and Year
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownProtection occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by North America, Asia, Africa and Mena with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO, RC, NGO_Fed and Net organisations.
IGO, NGO, RC, NGO_Fed and Net documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe.
Definitions
Definitions
Summary of Definitional Elements
Summary of Definitional Elements
Abstracted from definitions and related concepts. Please scroll down for more details.
Definitional Contexts
Definitional Contexts
Related Concepts
Related Concepts
Frequent Collocations
Frequent Collocations
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO, RC, NGO_Fed and Net organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocates Over Time
Collocates Over Time
Collocational data for Protection was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 5 top collocates were obtained:
promotion;
eviction;
civilian;
sub-cluster;
centrality
IGO documents generated sub-cluster (from Child Protection Sub-Cluster) as top collocate in 2010.
NGO documents generated defender as top collocate in 2009 with the highest overall score. Other top NGO collocates include CPN (Community Protection Network) and desk (protection desk ).
RC documents generated emblem which obtained the highest overall score in 2006 Other top RC collocates include civilian and afford.
NGO_Fed documents generated breakthrough as top collocate for 2013. GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation ) and child-sensitive are other top collocates of Protection.
Net documents generated onshore (onshore protection) as top collocate for 2011. Other top collocates for Net are NCPT (Nairobi Child Protection Team ) and deficient.
Unique Collocates by Organisation Type
Unique Collocates by Organisation Type
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about Protection that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
humanity
coverage
eviction
industry
inter-american
procap (Protection Standby Capacity Project)
stability
intellectual
UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency)
favourable
NGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
wall
desk
PI (Protection International)
ICMC (International Catholic Migration Committee)
HRD (human rights defender)
RCK (Refugee Consortium of Kenya)
PA (Protection Act)
facilitation
Mindanao (An island in the Philipines)
RC documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
KCHF (Expenditure in KCHF)
emblem
overhead
tracing
UAMS
health-care
final
detainee
self-protection
relocation
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
hotline
breakthrough
Simukai (Simukai Child Protection Programme)
supervisor
inquiry
strain
child-sensitive
DCI (Defence for children international)
neglect
telecommunications
Net documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
DGPC (General Directorate for Civil Protection)
meteorological
IDMC (Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre)
ANPPCAN ( African Network for the Prevention and Protection against Child Abuse and Neglect)
Toronto
onshore
MTC (Mae Tao Clinic)
inland
NCPT (Nairobi Child Protection Team)
APRRN (Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network)
Shared Collocates by Organisation Type
Shared Collocates by Organisation Type
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss Protection. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
witness (NGO + IGO)
floor (NGO_Fed + IGO)
discrimination (RC+ NGO)
sub-cluster (NGO + IGO)
nairobi (NGO + Net)
conservation (NGO + IGO)
GPC (Net + IGO)
GDPR (NGO_Fed + NGO)
minority (NGO + IGO)
defender (NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
empowerment (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
journalist (RC+ NGO + IGO)
consumer (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
centrality (NGO + Net + IGO)
survival (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
cultural (RC + NGO + IGO)
UNICEF (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
commissioner (NGO + Net + IGO)
division (RC + Net + IGO)
durable (NGO + Net + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
psychosocial (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
intervention (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
displacement (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
abuse (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
UNHCR (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
advocacy (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
personal (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
asylum (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
scheme (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
guarantee (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
safeguard (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
civilian (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
child (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
social (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
assistance (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
environmental (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
prevention (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
mechanism (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
promotion (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
cluster (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
right (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
Usage Over Time
Usage Over Time
HE Corpus
HE Corpus
The chart below represents the distribution of Protection between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
What's the relative frequency of a concept?
What's the relative frequency of a concept?
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of Protection were highest in 2016. Protection obtainined the highest relative frequency recorded in 2019 (175%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 98%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of Protection are Project, Net, WHS, C/B and RC.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences and strategy generated the highest relative frequency with 146%.
Google Ngram Viewer
Google Ngram Viewer
This shows the evolution of Protection and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Protection decreases until 1966. It then increases until the year 1976. It declines slightly and then starts to increase and reaches its peak in 1994. From then onwards its usage declines.
Synonyms
Synonyms
Discussion
Discussion
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.
Debates & Controversies
Debates & Controversies
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse