The HE corpus contains 25,059 occurrences of the concept sanitation.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownSanitation occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by North America, Asia, Africa and Oceania with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are NGO, C/B, RC, IGO and Net organisations.
NGO and RC documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from occurrences from activity reports published in Europe. C/B documents were mostly obtained from general documents published in Europe.
IGO documents generated occurrences mostly in general documents published in North America. Occurrences from Net were mostly found in activity reports published in North America.
is a/an
human right
major focus of programming work
crucial human development goal
critical first step in improving community health
key part of eliminating poverty in communities
essential for life, health and dignity
part of the Sustainable Development Goal 6
element of water provision
activity
area
type of assistance
essential
health-related issue
type of infrastructure
type of intervention
type of measure
necessity
need
priority
sector
service
type of support
can be described as
adequate
inadequate
improved
environmental
community-led
entails
isolating human excreta from the living environment
disposing human excreta
vector control
waste disposal
drainage
requires clean/safe water
is delivered by means of facilities
when inadequate
leads to
open defecation
drinking unsafe water
epidemics, outbreaks
breeding sites for mosquitoes
death
malnutrition
school closures
female absenteeism
negative impact on livelihoods
negative impact on quality of life
affects billions of people
refugees
poor people
women and girls traditionally responsible for fetching water
children
when adequate
leads to
improved health
increased education opportunities, safety and dignity
reduced burden of unpaid care work on women
reduced flood risk
reduced water pollution
demographic growth
With a total of 27 definitional contexts identified, explicit descriptions of sanitation are scarce. A first prominent conceptualisation regards sanitation as a set of activities concerning the treatment and disposal of human waste, isolating human excreta from the living environment being the most salient activity. Below is one of the few explicit definitions, as found in reference to the Sphere Handbook.
The term 'sanitation', throughout the Sphere Handbook, refers to excreta disposal, vector control, solid waste disposal and drainage.
Another relevant conceptualisation describes access to sanitation as a human right.
According to international human rights law, access to water and sanitation is a human right.
Access to water and sanitation is a fundamental human right and is essential for life, health and dignity.
Lastly, sanitation is also considered as an element of human development, being described both as a goal or a cornerstone. Not only is sanitation seen as a requisite to improve community heath, but it is also regarded as a key component of a vicious circle of poverty and malnutrition (See Poverty in the Debates & Controversies section).
Water and sanitation is a cornerstone of development, underpinning all of the MDGs, in particular those concerning health, education and economic growth.
Improving access to safe water and sanitation is a critical first step in improving community health, reducing child mortality and transforming the lives of women.
The HE corpus contains numerous contexts in which sanitation is described implicitly. For the most part, sanitation is categorised as a part, a type or an area of humanitarian intervention. Other prominent descriptions frame it as a kind of service, need or priority, as well as a type of infrastructure. Based on a selection of 132 contexts, the following summary details an implicit categorisation of sanitation. It also includes its sibling concepts within each category.
aid activity: shelter, public health, food security
crisis response activity: water, shelter, health
healthcare, health, food supply, water, psychological support, protection, child empowerment, livelihoods, nutrition, hygiene
key area: personal hygiene
programme area: agriculture, education
complementary area: health, water, hygiene, nutrition, HIV, livelihoods, education, shelter, child protection, child empowerment
technical area: water, hygiene, nutrition
key need area: nutrition, health
intervention area: water, education, food security
sector area: health, water, sponsorship, education
water, healthcare, shelter, health services, supply of medicines, non-food relief items
humanitarian assistance: water, shelter, food, nutrition support, essential survival items, cash-for-work projects, vital health services
integrated assistance: non-food items, water, HIV/AIDS prevention to IDPs
emergency assistance: food, water
non-food assistance: water, primary health care, shelter, livelihood
relief assistance: water, medical assistance
item of assistance: food, shelter, water
water, shelter, food, hygiene, medicines
basic essential: water
health, hygiene, water
water, water supply, fire-safety, electricity, roads, drainage, bridges
basic infrastructure: transport, road transport, health provision, markets, warehouses, processing plants, water supply, electricity, information technology communication, urban low-income housing, rural infrastructure,
infrastructure construction: water
hard infrastructure: drainage, water supply, roads
shelter, education, water, food security, health
emergency intervention: water, hygiene, emergency shelter, logistics, distribution
public health intervention: water, essential medicines, cholera treatment, food aid, food security
key intervention: hygiene, gender-based violence programmes, emergency mental health, psychosocial support
quarantine, immunisation
preventive measure: education, immunisation, nutrition, support, safe water, hygiene
broader public health measure: water
water, hot meals, shelter, personal hygiene items, non-food item
life-sustaining necessity: water, nutrition, healthcare
basic necessity: water supply, electricity, education, vocational training, healthcare
lifesaving necessity: water, food, shelter, medical care
critical protection, shelter, water, health, nutrition
fundamental need: water, food
pressing need: food security, water, hygiene, health, psychosocial support, shelter, non-food items, education, protection
humanitarian need: water, hygiene, nutrition, health, child protection, education
key need: nutrition, health
basic need: food, shelter, water, health, livelihood security, education, food security, protection, non-food items, nutrition, hygiene, energy
highest priority: food, shelter, water
priority theme: gender equality, water, hygiene, climate change, geographical area
self-defined priority: economic empowerment, development, community infrastructure, water, agricultural development
conventional priority: water, shelter, basic healthcare, food
water, education, health, physical infrastructure, social infrastructure, infrastructure, education, municipal service, housing, agricultural productivity, education, food aid, shelter, financing, agriculture
priority sector: education, health, water, housing, shelter, camp management
rural industry sector: swine-raising, water, aquaculture, ecotourism, non-timber forest products
development cooperation's priority sector: health, vocational training, water
important sector: education, health, water
underfinanced sector: water
key sector: water, food, nutrition, health, education, child protection, vocational training
water, community sensitisation, mental health, psychosocial support, technical advice for nutrition, hygiene, medical assistance, housing, transportation, electricity, telecommunications
decentralised public service: water
essential service: healthcare, clean water
vital service: health, education
vital public service: healthcare, water
health service: emergency medicine, primary healthcare, secondary healthcare, nutrition, water
essential service: water, healthcare, education
essential municipal service: water, health
social infrastructure service: electricity
key services related to nutrition: primary health, early childhood education, water
water, food, shelter, protection
support mechanism: education, health, building, work, rehabilitation
live-saving support: water, shelter
practical support: water, cash voucher for food
livelihood support: multi-purpose cash, water, hygiene promotion, shelter, non-food items, protection, education
The HE contains numerous occurrences of different types of sanitation. As can be seen below, these can be categorised into 15 categories, revealing multiple dimensions of the concept. In terms of occurrences, the most predominant type is improved sanitation with 777 occurrences, followed by basic sanitation (333), adequate sanitation (269), environmental sanitation (253), poor sanitation (220) and proper sanitation (180). This section also examines the concepts of improved sanitation, environmental sanitation and community-led total sanitation (CLTS) in more detail.
Based on service adequacy/quality:
adequate sanitation
appropriate sanitation
proper sanitation
good sanitation
poor sanitation
inadequate sanitation
quality sanitation
decent sanitation
Based on effect, cleanliness & safety:
safe sanitation
clean sanitation
hygienic sanitation
healthy sanitation
Based on environmental impact:
environmental sanitation
sustainable sanitation
ecological sanitation
Based on medium:
air sanitation
water sanitation
mold sanitation
Based on managing agent:
community-led total sanitation
community-led sanitation
Based on geographic area:
urban sanitation
rural sanitation
Based on comparison with previous circumstances:
improved sanitation
better sanitation
unimproved sanitation
rehabilitated sanitation
Based on serviced facility:
school sanitation
household sanitation
prison sanitation
dedicated sanitation
Based on scope:
total sanitation
mass sanitation
national sanitation
Based on ownership:
public sanitation
private sanitation
Based on access:
accessible sanitation
equitable sanitation
Based on effect:
effective sanitation
Based on cultural acceptance:
culturally accepted sanitation
Based on situation:
emergency sanitation
Based on complexity:
basic sanitation
A selection of 10 definitional contexts for improved sanitation was identified. These include two mentions of official definitions by both the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (JMP) and the United Nations (UN).
Improved sanitation is conceptualised as an activity that separates human excreta from human contact by means of one or more types of facility, mainly flush or pour latrines connected to a septic tank or a sewer system. Some definitions specify that these facilities cannot be shared between two or more households to be considered improved.
Access to improved sanitation is defined by the United Nations as the separation of excreta from any human contact, whether by the use of flush toilets linked to a piped sewer system or a septic tank or by the use of an improved latrine.
An improved sanitation facility, defined according to the JMP, is one that hygienically separates human excreta from human contact and includes: flush or pour/flush facility connected to a piped sewer system; a septic system or a pit latrine; pit latrines with a slab; composting toilets; or ventilated improved pit latrines.
A total of 253 occurrences of environmental sanitation are found in the HE corpus. Synonymous expressions were also identified, namely sustainable sanitation and ecological sanitation, with 39 and 24 occurrences, respectively.
From a selection of 10 definitional contexts, environmental sanitation is understood as type of sanitation approach that recovers organic matter and nutrients from human excreta and kitchen waste without compromising the environment (e.g. by polluting groundwater). Two main products are said to be obtained: compost and cooking gas.
Community-led total sanitation and community-led sanitation accounts for 77 occurrences. Despite its comparatively low count, contexts provide rich conceptual descriptions.
Community-led total sanitation is found to be abbreviated to CLTS, suggesting a high degree of conceptual solidification. It is mostly described as a cost-effective approach or methodology adopted by humanitarians in their sanitation programmes and interventions.
Organisations using CLTS claim that they mobilise communities to improve their sanitary living conditions by:
encouraging households to build and maintain their own latrine and other sanitation facilities;
raising awareness by supporting communities in identifying open defecation areas and associated problems, as well as other unhygienic practices;
helping communities develop plans to eliminate the practice of open defecation; and
providing training on health, hygiene and water management.
CLTS is therefore characterised as an easily replicable model that results in positive behavioural change. It is also said to have been adopted by a government bodies as part of their national sanitation strategy.
Another conceptualisation regards CTLS as a goal—rather than a means—whereby communities dispose waste correctly, keep communal spaces clean and build and maintain their own sanitation facilities in an autonomous manner.
In general, humanitarian interventions concerned with sanitation are accompanied by water provision and hygiene promotion activities. These are undoubtedly interconnected areas and are therefore framed into one subsuming notion: WASH. The HE contains 4,119 occurrences of water, sanitation and hygiene and 6,870 occurrences of the acronym WASH.
The Sphere Minimum Standards for water supply, sanitation and hygiene promotion (WASH) are a practical expression of the right to access water and sanitation in humanitarian contexts.
For example, one aspect of providing safe or clean water to an affected population involves protecting the water source from contamination by human waste and other pollutant agents. This is where sanitation comes in. In addition to facilities, the role of training and educating communities on hygienic practices is described as the driver for behavioural change.
The final one, currently underway, will provide 107 water systems to 205 localities with a rural population of almost 150 000 inhabitants. Water provision also entails sanitation. Thus, at the end of the programme, and under this project, 1 050 toilets will be constructed for individual homes and 136 toilets in schools, community centres and mosques.
Hygiene Education (HE) is the key element that links the provision of water with improved sanitation as it ensures beneficiaries understand proper sanitation and correct use of the clean water to maintain their benefit into the future.
In humanitarian interventions concerning sanitation, efforts mainly go into building or supporting the building of facilities with either materials or knowledge. The most mentioned types of facility discussed are latrines and toilets:
latrines (latrines in IDP camps, public latrines, latrine blocks, pit latrines); and
toilets (toilets that use a wastewater recovery system, gender segregated toilets, community toilets and temporary toilets, flush toilets, composting toilets)
Other facilities include washing stations, hand-washing stations, showers and rubbish pits. In terms of specific activities conducted by humanitarians, the following were identified:
attaching of latrines into bio-digesters
supply of latrine hardware, tube-well installation
disinfection of wells
cleaning of ponds
digging of wells
disposal of garbage
cleaning of drainage
The HE Corpus contains a wealth of information on the consequences of lacking or inadequate sanitation and the benefits of adequate sanitation. Below is a summary abstracted from a selection of 81 contexts:
open defecation (defecation in fields, ditches and buckets, flying toilets)
outbreaks (outbreaks of water-borne diseases, spread of disease, water borne epidemics)
disease (infectious diseases, easily preventable diseases, cholera, diarrhoea, typhoid, cholera, malaria, hepatitis, deadly acute respiratory infections, waterborne diseases, parasitic diseases, kidney failure, dysentery)
death
child death (newborn deaths, children die before their fifth birthday
negative impact on livelihoods
negative impact on quality of people's lives: health, food availability and education opportunities.
economic loss
high absenteeism among young girls and female teachers (girls staying at home during menstruation, girls can miss up to five days from school a month or drop out entirely)
malnutrition (high malnutrition rates, chronic malnutrition)
forces people to drink unsafe water
breeding sites for mosquitoes
improved health
reduces risk of diseases and infections
reduces overall child mortality by about a third
increased education opportunities, safety and dignity
reduces burden of unpaid care work on women
reduces flood risk by removing waste that would otherwise block drainage systems
reduces water pollution after flooding, mitigating negative impacts on health
leads to growing population (dramatic demographic shift as lifespans increase).
increases dignity and safety: no need to trek into the woods or bathe in front of strangers
A modest collection of contexts reveals the people who are affected by inadequate sanitation or lack thereof, as well as other abstract notions.
billions of people
refugees
poor individuals
women and girls, who are traditionally responsible for fetching water for the family
neonatal mortality, post-neonatal morality
community health
community socioeconomic development
nutrition
nutritional outcomes
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (NGO, C/B, RC, IGO and Net organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for sanitation was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 3 top collocates were obtained:
water-supply;
hygiene; and
water
NGO documents generated hygiene as top collocate in 2015. Other top NGO collocates include mold and water.
IGO documents generated unimproved as top collocate in 2015 with the highest overall score. Other top IGO collocates include hygiene and deficit.
RC documents generated water-supply as top collocate, obtaining the highest overall score. Other top RC collocates include habitat and hygiene.
NGO_Fed documents generated hygiene as top collocate for 2017. Other top NGO_Fed collocates include community-led and water.
State documents generated wealth as top collocate for 2013. Other top State collocates include water and clean.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about sanitation that others do not.
NGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
freight
diarrhea
taskforce
mold
AfriCare
option
empowerment
rotarian
Abidjan ( Economic capital of the Ivory Coast)
ward
IGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
deficit
unimproved
vast
inappropriate
JMP (Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation )
milennium
extend
indoor
wastewater
DG (DG ECHO: Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations )
RC documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
water-supply
prison
ventilation
renovate
electrical
cell
detainee
Ethiopian
room
health-care
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
populate
Benguela (City in Western Angola)
logistical
peri-urban
Kechene (Ethiopian city)
Malawi
Warrap (State in Southern Sudan)
clothing
ACF (Action Against Hunger)
Kordofan ( Old province in Sudan)
State documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
urbanisation
Fogo (Island in Cape Verde)
Rundu (Capital and largest city of the Kavango-East region in northern Namibia )
Segovia
SEEWA (Rapid Deployment Unit Water and Sanitation Abroad)
DFID (Department for International Development)
Diber (County in Albania)
evolution
lagging
hydraulics
surface
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss Sanitation. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
Zimbabwe (NGO_Fed + IGO)
Yemen (NGO_Fed + NGO)
WFP (NGO + IGO)
workshop (RC + NGO)
west (NGO_Fed + NGO)
No collocates were found to be shared by 3 organisation types.
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
woman (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
work (IGO + State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
world (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
year (NGO_Fed + RC + State + NGO+ IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of sanitation between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of sanitation were highest in 2017. However, this concept obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2019 (238 %).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and North America generated the highest relative frequency with 123%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of sanitation are Project, RC, NGO_Fed, State and RE.
General documents provided the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 99%.
This shows the evolution of sanitation and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Sanitation decreases from 1950 until 1987. It then increases slightly until 2004. However, it starts to decline again in 2004 until 2019.
Disputes and discussions surrounding the subject of sanitation are numerous. A substantial selection of 56 contexts was extracted from the HE Corpus. These contexts containing debates and controversies were classified into 18 thematic categories.
The most salient categories concern poverty (i.e. the role of poor sanitation in perpetuating poverty), and policy (i.e the role of governments in achieving full access to sanitation). This section also includes lessons learnt presumably from previous humanitarian experiences or research.
Concrete steps must be taken to accelerate access disadvantaged groups to sanitation. The first step is to track better when and how and which people access improved sanitation and drinking water. (Activity_Report, Africa, 2014, NGO_Fed, MO, AR-845)
People living in low-income, informal or illegal settlements, and on the outskirts of cities or in small towns, are less likely to have access to improved water supply or better sanitation. (Activity_Report, Africa, 2014, NGO_Fed, MO, AR-845)
The water and sanitation crisis facing poor households in the developing world has parallels with an earlier period in the history of today's rich countries. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Without safe water or sanitation, people are trapped in a cycle of poverty and disease. (Activity_Report, North_America, 2018, NGO_Fed, MO, AR-376)
Underlying each of these problems is the fact that the people suffering the most from the water and sanitation crisis–poor people in general and poor women in particular–often lack the political voice needed to assert their claims to water. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
One plausible explanation is that, unlike HIV/AIDS and avian flu, the water and sanitation crisis poses the most immediate and most direct threat to poor people in poor countries–a constituency that lacks a voice in shaping national and international perceptions of human security. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
The crisis in water and sanitation is–above all–a crisis for the poor. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Those suffering the sanitation crisis the most–poor people in general and poor women in particular–often lack the political voice needed to assert their claims to water. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Tackling the crisis requires awareness of the cost generated by deficient sanitation. Key sanitation policy challenges include:
Developing national and local political institutions that reflect the importance of sanitation to social and economic progress.
Building on community-level initiatives through government interventions aimed at scaling up best practice.
Investing in demand-led approaches through which service providers respond to the needs of communities, with women having a voice in shaping priorities.
Extending financial support to the poorest households to ensure that sanitation is an affordable option. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
The obligation that water and sanitation are available, accessible, affordable, acceptable and safe for all without discrimination at all times, must be progressively realised by states within available resources. (General_Document, Europe, 2011, RC, IFRC, GD-100)
Economic models of sanitation must be redesigned to cover the entire value chain, managing waste, protecting the environment and living conditions, while generating business and jobs for private operators. (General_Document, Europe, 2012, IGO, IGO_Other, GD-152)
All governments should prepare national plans for accelerating progress in water and sanitation, with ambitious targets backed by financing and clear strategies for overcoming inequalities. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Governments should aim at a minimum of 1% of GDP for water and sanitation spending. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Developing countries should be judged on their ability to use aid resources efficiently and transparently to reach the poorest with clean water and sanitation. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Improving sanitation may require radical behavioural change as well as funding and reforming public policies. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Working with people those who are struggling to survive was very challenging to motivate them on behaviour changes related to sanitation and hygiene without offering any tangible incentives. (Activity_Report, Asia, 2016, Found, 0, AR-332)
Sustaining water and sanitation services and good hygiene behaviour is a significant challenge in many developing countries. Governments and other service providers should pay more attention to skilled management and maintenance of facilities that are appropriate, affordable and accessible. Key drivers behind sustained hygiene behaviour change are often overlooked, resulting in poor hygiene practices. (Strategy, Europe, 2015, NGO, NGO_Int, 2305)
With the increased number of pupils in primary schools, a major challenge for the water and sanitation sector is to ensure a healthy and hygienic learning environment for children. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-284)
A lack of sanitation facilities in schools results in high absenteeism among young girls and female teachers. (Activity_Report, Oceania, 2011, NGO_Fed, NGO_Fed_NA, AR-3751)
Inappropriate sanitation facilities in schools affect the children's performance at school, personal hygiene and well being and even jeopardise their access to education. (Activity_Report, MENA, 2011, NGO, NGO_Reg, AR-1761)
Teenage girls will tend to be absent from school during their menstrual period if hygiene facilities are not appropriate. (Activity_Report, MENA, 2011, NGO, NGO_Reg, AR-1761)
Cultural restrictions on sharing of sanitation facilities between adults and children, men and women and in-laws have caused slow scale-up of sanitation coverage. (Activity_Report, Africa, 2012, NGO_Fed, MO, AR-843)
Building of sanitation facilities is considered a waste of resources by nomadic households, particularly if they expect to move when drought strikes. (Activity_Report, Africa, 2012, NGO_Fed, MO, AR-843)
Failed reliance on standard and hardware subsidies and a top-down approach has provided inadequate costly toilets, delivered them to people who are not the most poor, achieved only partial coverage and use, and engendered dependence. (General_Document, North_America, 2011, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-195)
There can be particular collective action problems for water and sanitation provision, where the costs, for example of maintaining boreholes or latrines, may be seen as too high for communities to be able to meet these needs themselves. (General_Document, Europe, 2013, C/B, 0, GD-64)
The Millennium Development Goal requires an investment of $10 billion, which represents less than five days' worth of global military spending and less than half what rich countries spend each year on mineral water. This investment can save millions of young lives, unlock wasted education potential, free people from diseases that rob them of their health and generate an economic return that will boost prosperity. (Activity_Report, Africa, 2014, NGO_Fed, MO, AR-845)
Global efforts to provide improved water and sanitation for all are gaining momentum, but serious gaps in funding continue to hamper progress. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Sanitation facilities are often public and therefore prone to social dynamics and even conflicts at community level. (Activity_Report, Europe, 2017, NGO, NGO_Int, AR-380)
When it comes to development aid projects, the issue of access to water and sanitation is complex, because the solutions considered must take into account a large number of local parameters, and it is critical that the beneficiaries and all the stakeholders fully appropriate the project and thus foster its technical and social sustainability. (Activity_Report, Europe, 2017, NGO, NGO_Nat, AR-876)
Ideally, there should be closer coordination with actors providing water, sanitation and shelter. (General_Document, Europe, 2010, C/B, 0, GD-55)
Local planning and coordination play a major role in sanitation projects, involving all stakeholders. Partnerships should not only address project implementation but also governance of the life cycle of the sanitation project. Monitoring, maintenance, financing, regulation, as well as its financial accountability, should be addressed within a framework of agreement and partnership with all stakeholders involved. (Activity_Report, Europe, 2011, State, AA, AR-743)
Product innovations such as sanitation kits can offer improvement but fail to reach full adoption because humanitarian agencies prefer to create their own version of an innovation rather than adopting one built by another organisation. (General_Document, Europe, 2016, C/B, GD-73)
As no piped water was available on the sites, sanitation had to be waterless. General_Document, Europe, 2010, C/B, GD-55)
Several factors underline that we should be looking at alternatives to conventional sanitation Firstly, there is a very high incidence of diarrhoeal illnesses, which are themselves sometimes made worse by sanitation systems which are not adapted to the hydro geological context, like for example, in places where the water table is high. (General_Document, Europe, 2012, NGO, NGO_Nat, GD-251)
Pilot sanitation projects should be encouraged, in order to test new solutions on a small scale before they are diffused more widely, make adjustments if necessary and learn lessons. (General_Document, Europe, 2012, NGO, NGO_Nat, GD-251)
The appropriateness of aid mechanisms is currently being questioned, with a particular focus on sanitation. (General_Document, Europe, 2012, NGO, NGO_Nat, GD-251)
Although there has been significant progress in the achievement of some of the MDGs, results have not been enjoyed equally throughout the world. There are also some areas – e.g. maternal and reproductive health, access to basic sanitation - where achieving the 2015 targets are questionable. (Strategy, Europe, 2014, State, GS, S-175)
Due to the lack of sanitation facilities women were compelled to relieve themselves in the open and often did so at night leaving them vulnerable. (Activity_Report, Asia, 2018, NGO, NGO_Nat, AR-3798)
The biggest problem is the lack of indoor water and sanitation facilities, causing pregnant or menstruating women to shy away from shelters often at the cost of their lives. (General_Document, Europe, 2014, RC, IFRC, GD-102)
Overcoming the crisis in water and sanitation is one of the great human development challenges of the early 21st century. Success in addressing that challenge through a concerted national and international response would act as a catalyst for progress in public health, education and poverty reduction and as a source of economic dynamism. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Sanitation has received far less attention, partly because of the huge scale of underprovision and a legacy of underinvestment. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
The benefits of progress in water may be eroded by a failure to achieve advances in sanitation. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
No act of terrorism generates economic devastation on the scale of the crisis in water and sanitation. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Publicly funded infrastructure such as transport, health care, drinking water, sanitation , telecommunications, and electricity, must be designed as resilient, so that basic services are maintained during disaster and infrastructure users are not put at risk by sub-standard structures. (Strategy, 0, 2017, IGO, IGO_Other, 705)
The sanitation sector is affected by the "classic" problems as other sectors in post-crisis situations: the need for high quality initial assessments, positioning in relation to the state, funding for the intermediary phase between emergency relief and development, coordination and planning ahead for the transition from assistance to cost recovery. Humanitarian and development agencies have interconnected know-how, but there is a lack of understanding between them. (General_Document, Europe, 2009, NGO, NGO_Nat, GD-246)
Reluctance to talk about sanitation contributes to its neglect. (Activity_Report, Europe, 2008, Net, AR-3194)
Stigma and taboos around women and sanitation must be challenged to overcome harmful practices. (Activity_Report, Asia, 2018, NGO, NGO_Nat, AR-3798)
Rapid progress is possible. Perhaps the biggest obstacle can be the stigma associated with sanitation, which is similar to HIV/AIDS. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
As the "dirty" counterpart to the clean topic water, the serious problem of the worldwide insufficient sanitation supply, is still a cultural taboo. (Activity_Report, Europe, 2013, NGO, NGO_Int, AR-878)
One of the reasons that the stigma has been so slow to dissolve is that the crisis in sanitation , unlike the crisis in HIV/AIDS, is more discriminating: it is overwhelmingly a crisis for the poor, not the wealthy. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
It is absolutely essential that sanitation, which aims to allow everyone to live in a healthy environment, should be taken into account in order to manage water resources in a sustainable and integrated manner. (General_Document, Europe, 2012, NGO, NGO_Nat, GD-251)
In ecological sanitation, the "re-use" of human waste should automatically be taken into consideration from the beginning of projects, and at the very least, the final destination of the waste should be established in advance when sanitation projects are being designed. (General_Document, Europe, 2012, NGO, NGO_Nat, GD-251)
The absence of a consensus on an acceptable basic level of sanitation, allied to problems in generating demand, has contributed to the failure. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Should it not be shocking that a displacement camp in Darfur has better sanitation, nutritional support, shelter, health care and protection programmes than the places where refugees are staying in Greece or France? (General_Document, Europe, 2016, C/B, GD-74)
"Not having access" to water and sanitation is a polite euphemism for a form of deprivation that threatens life, destroys opportunity and undermines human dignity. (General_Document, North_America, 2006, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-191)
Humanitarian organisations are being forced to become default providers of essential services like sanitation. (General_Document, North_America, 2016, IGO, UN_OPA, GD-32)
Only one family had latrine in our community. When Red Cross people came and taught our community on hygiene and sanitation, we realised that latrine is not only for sanitation but it is a symbol of dignity and prestige.
One of the key lessons learnt was that providing basic infrastructure (water supply, sanitation , drainage, roads, electricity and telephone networks) encouraged residents to upgrade their houses.
The use of communal water and sanitation facilities, for example in refugee or displaced situations, can increase women's and girls' vulnerability to sexual and other forms of gender-based violence. In order to minimise these risks, and to provide a better quality of response, it is important to ensure women's participation in water supply and sanitation programmes.
Two lessons come out of Oxfam’s experience in Haiti. The first is that delivering water and sanitation services in urban areas poses very different technical challenges than those that arise in rural environments. As the urban population grows, so agencies will increasingly need to respond to urban disasters.
Two lessons come out of Oxfam’s experience in Haiti. [...] Second, technical solutions need to be innovative and responsive to the specific physical, social and cultural circumstances of the disaster- affected population. Programmes are most effectively managed when they are implemented by dedicated groups of staff working with small communities with whom they develop clear reciprocal relationships and understanding. A balanced combination of these technical and management approaches can help to deliver an effective humanitarian response.
We should have given more emphasis to girls' input into the design and construction of water and sanitation facilities, so we could better incorporate their needs. This evaluation has provided lessons that will inform the design and implementation of gender and disability aspects of all our projects. Biggest lesson: We need to ask girls for more input when designing and constructing facilities for them.
Recommendations / lessons learned: Sensitisation sessions about hygiene and sanitation should be ongoing in the communities as prevention in longer-term project. This has also been requested by the communities and district leaders.
Behavioural change, which is indispensable for establishing the professional working procedures proposed by the project, has taken a long time to materialise and the real impact of this work can only be evaluated over the long term. The lessons learned from this project draw attention to the fact that every new water and sanitation project must be part of a sector-based development strategy. This strategy, which was not available in Cape Verde when the project was being carried out, ought to set out the major issues in the sector, include targets and propose a raft of reforms which will enable improved effectiveness within an independent, objective regulation of the sector. It was also recommended that the scale of intervention be changed and inter-municipal activity be started - this would be the only way of drastically reducing costs. Finally, it was recommended that field projects be mixed with institutional projects, since connecting institutional aspects with concrete practice enables projects to be more effective.
Just as the impact of water and sanitation programmes depends on the improvement of infrastructures, these programs should also be accompanied by extension and education services. These activities ensure a better understanding and usage of available resources, maintenance of infrastructure and even their reproduction if necessary. These actions are based on the setting up of health promotion networks which include community leaders or reference people as well as network "promoters" (community members or representatives of local and/or central authorities) who are trained in prevention methods and public health messages. Training sessions are organised for them on different themes such as drinking water, water and food storage, personal and environmental hygiene, domestic waste management, family planning, etc. After these sessions, the network mobilisers are responsible for spreading public health messages to the members of their community.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.