The HE corpus contains 4,996 occurrences of the concept competition.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownCompetition occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by Asia, North America, Africa and MENA with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are RC, NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed and State organisations.
RC, NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed and State documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe.
Competition in the HE corpus can be broken into three distinct but related concepts:
Competition as humanitarian-related events (e.g., essay contests)
Competition between humanitarian actors (for funding, etc.)
Competition between populations and groups (for resources and authority)
No explicit definitions were found for any sense of competition, although 22 other contexts offer several key characteristics. Although competition can be used in various manners, both generic and specialised, here we will focus on three senses above that are particular to the humanitarian sector.
A large portion of the cases of competition in the HE corpus refer to events that have been organised by or otherwise mentioned by humanitarians as an approach or method to accomplish a specific objective.
There are different ways to contribute to the process of desired change to realize self-reliance, which includes networking, funding long-term programs, providing technical support and grants, promoting access to private sector loans, promoting positive competition and other creative methods that can contribute to empowering communities in the realization of self-reliance.
Major urban events, such as sports competitions, can be significant triggers for actions to address climate change
Activities include seminars and debates with students on human rights; cultural activities such as music or writing competitions; theatre performances for and with students; dissemination of human rights education materials in schools; training for teachers and other school personnel; and the setting-up of human rights clubs in schools.
In many cases, when employing the term competition, organisations specifically refer to the generally negative phenomenon of humanitarians competing against one another to better execute their missions and serve distinct populations.
Goals for 2014: If we are going to thrive in 2014 and beyond, we need to develop strategies to overcome challenges such as reductions in government funding, increasing competition, growing stakeholder expectations, increasing urban poverty and incorporating new technologies.
The problems of competition, duplication of work and fragmentation of efforts continue to exist within the NGO sector.
Here competition is formulated as a factor that can cause or aggravate issues that humanitarians respond to, resource scarcity being a primary example.
A number of reports have highlighted various issues contributing to xenophobia; some of which include poor service delivery and competition for resources.
The environment, itself, may be a source of the conflict in that it contains the resources over which competition may arise and intensify into armed conflict. At the same time, the environment itself can be damaged by warfare arising from this competition or other causes of conflict.
is a/an
positive, organized event related to the humanitarian sector
project, activity
approach, creative method
trigger for action
chance [i.e., opportunity]
results in
gains/benefits (for organised events)
is a/an
a generally negative dynamic between humanitarian actors
challenge, risk, issue
criteria
is characterised as
ever-increasing
generally negative
unfair for smaller local organisations
a means to increase performance/standards
worsened by a broken funding system
is regulated via
competition policy & law
is caused by
the need for fundraising & other resources
is related to sector-wide issues
duplication of work
fragmentation
lack of cohesion
withholding of information
results in
operational challenges
is a/an
activity
factor
problem
a driver of humanitarian issues
cause of conflict
is characterised as
ever-increasing
generally negative
results in
increased antagonism
economic challenges
resource loss
is regulated via
competition policy & law
is caused by
increased demand
increased scarcity
crises/disasters
their increasing frequency
climate change
other socioeconomic conditions/policies
the presence of humanitarian aid
is described for its
possibility for participation
open, free
conditions for participants
fair, unfair, true
regulation
excessively free vs. rule-based
relation between competitors
healthy, unhealthy, friendly
result
positive, negative
Many types of competitions - events usually offered to the public for the sake of raising interest in humanitarian issues - are included in the HE corpus. Some of the key examples are those below, although it is necessary to underscore that some types of competition are quite sector-specific.
For instance, different areas of the Red Cross are responsible for the majority of cases for moot court, IHL, essay, and first aid competitions. Business plan competitions, on the other hand, are unique to a single area of NGO_Int documents.
While some organisations may emphasise the utility of competitions more than others, they have a clear importance as an approach that humanitarians leverage; the examples below and others make up over 20% of the nearly 5,000 occurrences of competition.
Also we actively launched first aid competitions , road safety campaigns, and stop swimming accidents campaigns to spread the culture of safety awareness.
The ICRC sponsored students from Zimbabwe to take part in an annual all-Africa moot court competition.
To engage children in the subject, some 250 pupils from across Georgia participated in an IHL competition organized by the ICRC.
The CSNIS Team organised an all island essay competition, for children and adults, on 'Sharing Knowledge towards Humanity'.
Through SPARK's training efforts almost 500 entrepreneurs were trained in 2011, while more than 2,000 Business Plan Competition proposals were accepted, showing both the necessity and the opportunities of Rwanda.
The fundamental dynamics labelled as causes of competition are population increase and resource scarcity, although a number of more nuanced factors have also been detected. From the humanitarian standpoint, the balance between supply and demand is also the primary cause of competition, most often in the form of acquiring funding and meeting other institutional needs.
More generally, a host of environmental and economic factors may be at play in many types of crises. These pressures, which affect whole populations, can in turn increase demand for humanitarian intervention. Climate change is one example, in how it can exacerbate multiple types of crises (e.g., natural disasters and food insecurity) that place increasing pressure on humanitarian networks.
One notable cause of competition is the very aid that humanitarians offer to alleviate a crisis (see Aid-fulled competition below). This underscores that humanitarians are not simply subject to competition, but that their actions may worsen conditions if the execution and management of aid programmes is flawed.
Evidently, the list below almost exclusively frames competition as a negative force. This is not to say that some of the same factors cannot be considered positive in other circumstances. It does indicate, though, that in the HE corpus competition between groups is more often lamented than encouraged.
more competitors
population increase (human, livestock)
migration, displacement
resource scarcity, water stress and climate change-related migration
abused and exploited aid resources
crises/disasters (violent, water, environmental)
climate change
increasing humanitarian crises
market saturation
investment
rapid trade liberalization, integration
neglecting poverty and vulnerability
shift from aid to trade
open economy
inequality
globally integrated workforce
Humanitarian assistance can have unintended negative impacts. Valuable aid resources can increase exploitation and abuse and lead to competition, misuse or misappropriation of aid. Famine can be a weapon of war (e.g. deliberately depopulating an area or forcing asset transfers). Aid can negatively affect the wider population and amplify unequal power relations between different groups, including men and women. Careful analysis and design can reduce the potential for assistance to increase conflict and insecurity (including during natural disasters). Design to ensure equitable distribution and the impartial targeting of assistance.
With the child focused intervention, communities are now able and geared to work with us. We experience stiff competition on the ground on fundraising work mainly because of saturation of the market. Many NGOs fundraise through child sponsorship and their mode of programme delivery is service provision and direct support which sounds more palatable to people in need than our strategic approach.
A growing body of evidence suggests that threats to livelihoods, immigration and resource scarcity can become sources of violent conflict, and indicates that climate change can directly and indirectly influence these trends.262 Indeed, the United Nations Security Council acknowledges climate change as a threat to human security as resource scarcity, water stress and migration potentially lead to competition and conflict.263 Still, there is much uncertainty about the specific causal links between climate change, human insecurity and the risk of violent conflict.
The results of competition, in any of its senses, are mostly detailed in activity reports from Europe. Still, of the 29 contexts selected for analysis, there is a wide representation of different organisation subtypes. While NGO_Int had the highest number of cases in this sample, with 7, the results of competition are also discussed in 8 other subtypes. This seems to indicate the generalised concern over competition in the sector as a whole. A minority of cases were also found that listed positive results, but almost always for competitions, i.e., organised events.
tension
rivalry
warfare
xenophobia
conflict (community, armed, inter-communal, tribal, group)
wage pressure
income loss
decreased standard of living
price pressure
strain on livelihoods
loss of income sources
increased consumption
rapid deforestation, soil erosion, destruction of bird populations
over-fishing
difficulty hiring quality staff
difficulty obtaining grants
poor visibility, lack of resources, staff and premises
loss of donor and partner interest
stronger community ties, integration of actors
innovation, potential breakthroughs
project ideas
redirect attention to development cooperation
transmit values and skills
promote understanding of principles
Competition law and competition policy are two compounds, with a total of 67 cases, that count among the few examples of directly managing economic competition. In these cases, competition is often encouraged for a healthier economy or monitored to prevent unfair practices. This type of management is generally considered lacking, with enforcement challenges and insufficient implementation.
In some cases, organisations provide information to authorities and/or the public to encourage action and awareness. In others, organisations may also discuss their own operations as subject to competition law.
Many developing countries struggle to implement investment, trade and competition policies that contribute to good business and investment climates while at the same time supporting local entrepreneurship. Countries interested in attracting investment need to carefully weigh the costs of regulation against its intended benefits. For example, when striving to create favourable conditions for foreign investment, governments need to be careful not to: ● discourage public sector investment in public goods, such as the provision of education, energy and water ● crowd out domestic private investment ● permit excessive deregulation.
For the development of a macroeconomic management infrastructure, JICA provides support for the establishment of economic laws such as competition law, the formulation of macroeconomic models and the improvement of economic statistics including industry-related tables.
Given the various forms and repercussions of competition, it is sometimes modified by one or more adjectives in order to qualify its value or nature. These can loosely be grouped into several identifying characteristics:
possibility for participation
open
free
conditions for participants
fair, unfair
true
regulation
excessively free vs. rule-based
relation between competitors
healthy
unhealthy
friendly
result
positive
negative
These characterisations tend to be contextualised and somewhat subjective, only referring to an established code or set of rules in a minority of cases.
While the number of contexts found was too low for making strong conclusions, it seems likely that many of these modifiers have specific functions that are not interchangeable. A preliminary analysis indicates that
"open" requires accessibility to any and all parties;
"friendly" has the express purpose of promoting stronger relationships;
"unfair" describes rigged conditions and uneven power dynamics;
"negative" is shorthand for wasted opportunities and needless antagonism;
and "true" implies a system that does not prevent certain outcomes.
Public service recruitment and performance management processes are more transparent and merit-based, with all vacant positions now advertised for open competition and managed centrally by the Public Service Commission.
Football for Peace 2015 participants with players from the Loyola Meralco Sparks and the Meralco Football Club, and officers from One Meralco Foundation and the Philippine Marine Corps. their character hoping that the values they learn from playing the sport would inspire them to embrace the concept of friendly competition and adopt the culture of peace.
In other countries, the regulatory environment for private pension funds is similarly in flux, which may put at risk local capital market development. Moreover, the high level of government ownership of banks poses risks of directed lending and unfair competition.
Political indifference and negative competition between political actors may result not only in political tensions between groups and communities, but will also discount the potential for policy to address vulnerability within the country.
Without true political competition, meaningful opposition parties and independent judiciaries and legislatures and with little room for independent civil society organizations, unconventional and volatile political and civic action may possess an appeal.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (RC, NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed and State organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for competition was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 3 top collocates were obtained:
moot-court; (from moot-court competition)
moot; (from moot-court competition) and
poetry
RC documents generated moot-court as top collocate in 2005.
NGO documents generated poetry as top collocate in 2017 with the highest overall score. Other top NGO collocates include poetry and scarce.
IGO documents generated unfair which obtained the highest overall score in 2005 . Other top IGO collocates include essay and transboundary.
NGO_Fed documents generated painting as top collocate for 2018.
State documents generated consensus-building as top collocate in 2007.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about competition that others do not.
RC documents feature the top 10 following unique collocates:
moot-court (co-curricular activity at law schools, participants take part in stimulated court or arbitration proceedings)
IHL (International Humanitarian Law)
novice
cadet
Arusha (City in Northern Tanzania)
mootcourt
FA (First Aid)
overstretched
oratory
Beijing
NGO documents feature the top 10 following unique collocates:
literary
artistic
sing
musical
song
poetry
jury
basketball
spark
organiser
IGO documents feature the top 10 following unique collocates:
ISPS (International Ship and Port Facility Security Code )
monopoly
logo
transboundary
competitive
commercialisation
liberalization
dwindle
talent
duplication
NGO_Fed documents feature the top 10 following unique collocates:
interuniversity
zonal
bronze
singing
cooking
hero
harmful
reward
music
tax
State documents feature the top 10 following unique collocates:
consensus-building
streamlined
farmland
aggressive
entrepreneurship
consensus
recruitment
efficient
enterprise
FY (Fiscal Year)
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss competition. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
unfair (NGO + IGO)
essay-writing (State + RC)
intensify (State + IGO)
painting (NGO_Fed + NGO)
football (RC + NGO)
photography (NGO_Fed + NGO)
game (RC + NGO_Fed)
theatre (NGO_Fed + NGO)
speech (NGO_Fed + NGO)
creative (NGO_Fed + NGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
moot (RC + NGO + IGO)
quiz (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
fierce (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
stiff (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
court (RC + NGO + IGO)
intense (State + NGO + IGO)
debate (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
dance (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
poster (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
entry (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
scarce (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
winner ( State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
sport (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
writing (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
art (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
win (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
competition (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
organize (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
draw (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
enter (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
essay (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
drawing (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
hold (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
open (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
law (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
face (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
increase (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
grow (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
design (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
national (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of competition between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of Competition were highest in 2013. However, competition obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2006 (142%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 99%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of competition are RC, State, IGO, WHS and Net.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 88%.
This shows the evolution of competition and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Competition reaches its peak in 1998 and then steadily declines until 2019.
Competition is a significant topic for discussion among humanitarian organisations. Following is a synthesis of main findings in the corpus, although interested readers are encouraged to browse the full sample of 65 contexts, which are spread across a wide range of organisation types and regions.
The impact this competition has on the humanitarian sector is more often described in negative terms: results and other associated issues include duplication of work, fragmentation, and a general lack of cohesion, even to the point of withholding information from potential competitors. Included here is also the financial competition that can exist between humanitarian and military disaster relief efforts.
Some authors decry how much effort is spent on funding strategies, including the growing presence of third-party funding services providers, just to function within a financial system that itself is in need of modernisation. That said, other perspectives do point to the benefits of inter-agency competition, the increased performance of highly motivated actors being one example.
Other contexts specify troubling dynamics between different organisation types. Several authors note that smaller local organisations face unfair competition against larger international ones. To overcome funding disadvantages there is an apparent focus on innovation, flexibility, and increasing the target population's resilience. At the same time, some have warned that the distribution of aid, especially by multiple independent actors, can undermine the operations of preexisting systems and hence long-term recovery.
In general, competition in the fundraising market is fierce with an increasing number of international actors. Smaller organisations, such as SCA, are clearly at a disadvantage.
However, there is one field where we continue to struggle. AHA, as an independent African actor, is at an ever-increasing disadvantage in the competition over funds. Handicapped by economically weak constituencies; African governments are in the same predicament as we are. To compound the situation, our chief international partner and sponsor over the years - the UNHCR - is itself struggling to mobilise resources, thus putting financial and other demands on their NGO partners, pushing out most Africa-made organisations.
But for all the possible benefits of international partnerships, in reality, international actors are often in direct competition with national actors, yet the odds of receiving funding remain heavily stacked in favour of international actors. The financing architecture – its systems, standards and culture – is entrenched and unable to adapt to changing realities concerning who is best placed to respond. This is in large part because those who benefit most from the status quo – international mediators of funds, who control the terms on which funds are passed on – are those who have the greatest influence in shaping the system.
Moreover, in some cases, the costs of employing military assets for disaster relief are billed directly or indirectly to humanitarian/development aid budgets. This practice tends to deplete aid funds that could otherwise be spent on food, medicine and shelter and thereby puts the military in direct competition with aid agencies
The problems of very poor communities in the developing world seem suddenly closer to us in our current economic difficulties. With a renewed sense of shared destiny, we can perhaps open ourselves to learn from those with long experience of crisis. While the rich world is ruled by the law of competition, the poor know they can only survive through collaboration. Every CAFOD project I visit proves the value of this instinctive solidarity – as volunteer carers sit with AIDS patients, as women run micro-credit operations based on mutual trust.
NGOs have also to adapt their role to new challenges: with the end of the bilateral competition, the world is going through a phase of extreme global competition, driven by special interests rather than the general ones and the common good. Precisely for this reason it is necessary that an NGO has principles and values to be pursued as a guideline, today even more than in the past, with commitment, determination and accountability at every level.
With increasing competition for the more limited funds for development, and many looking for quick 'outputs', some grants are given to those with particular skills in proposal writing rather than those who are best at working with the communities. It is, therefore, difficult to maintain AAH-I 's vision of community-driven and sustainable improvement in the quality of life of disadvantaged communities. Our new strategic plan, launched in October describes the role of self-reliance and empowerment of the community to manage and govern their own development and hopefully incorporate the advantages of some of the one disease 'vertical' programmes with out being subverted from more holistic development.
Increasing competition for funds: With the increasing buoyancy and capacity of the civil society, the competition for the limited available development funds, is increasing. Intermediary organisations that provide professional fundraising services for organisations that do not possess fundraising capacity, have also mushroomed.
Competition with other NGO's has also been a challenge as there is a lot of duplicating of projects within the same locations, which has hindered a quality service being provided. This has been a problem as community members then have a high dependency on humanitarian support and leading to non conformity to the course of development in terms of depending on themselves and their environment to better the situation. This also brings a setback in following up of the community members' progress as they visit different sites for their 'aid' and getting a clear picture of their improvement becomes difficult. The process of coordination between the NGO's has already been rolled out to avoid duplicating of activities.
Arguably, rather than there being too few agencies in Darfur there are in fact too many (small) ones. Competition over scarce resources, including human resources, has fragmented the overall response, and professional capacity is thin on the ground in many agencies. Heads of agencies confirm that many positions remain vacant for extended periods, and that staff turnover is high. This dearth of international staff has obvious implications for protection by presence, which relies for its force precisely on the foreignness of the presence.
Humanitarian aid should not be judged for failing to deliver in a role for which it was never designed; and yet it still has to adapt to changing times. It's not a competition – we have to work together We wish to see a move away from the current situation of inter-agency competition, which wastes scant resources, towards a model of collaborative efficiency. In the last decade the number of humanitarian organisations has expanded rapidly, creating a crowded market where everyone competes to raise funding from the same pot of limited financial resources. With a few exceptions there is very little practice of working together to reduce overhead or procurement costs. While the need for joint planning is often talked about, in reality every organisation is an island. 'Turf wars' are a common occurrence, with each organisation trying to position itself as the best implementer–and therefore most deserving of donor funds. This duplicates efforts and saps energy which humanitarian aid can ill afford to lose. The humanitarian and the development worlds cannot continue to exercise what is at best a benign neglect towards each other. They must commit to working constructively together. Part of the problem lies in the use of outdated definitions, used primarily by donors, which create artificial and unhelpful divisions. There are growing inter-linkages between humanitarian, development, peacekeeping and climate change-related interventions and this should be reflected in the funding responses.
One of the most corrosive aspects of this problem has been the use of clusters as project funding channels. This has been administratively dysfunctional, diverted clusters from their raison d'être and exacerbated the worst kind of negative competition between humanitarian actors. The establishment of a pooled funding mechanism – akin to an ERF – where funding decisions are made collectively, based on clear criteria and cluster needs mapping, would go a long way to solving this problem.
Despite these constraints, UNDP continues to make an important contribution to achieving the MDGs, working increasingly closely with our sister organizations in the UN system. Such cooperation should not mean a lack of competition in ideas or methods, but it should mean that there is a synergy in our actions which allows each organization to take advantage of its comparative strengths, pool resources when needed, and work in partnerships, which enable developing countries to steer their own development.
Two results of this level of resourcing are an unusually high level of competition ; and an emphasis on accountability. Competition The abundance of funds led to an influx of agencies into some tsunami-affected areas, and there were instances where agencies competed over communities and beneficiaries. An Indian colleague related how his friend's daughter had nearly been commandeered by an agency worker; 'Where did you get the little girl? ', the staffer demanded to know. At the same time, competition had some healthy effects. It drove up standards. For example, in South India initial hastily-constructed 'sheds' were replaced by standard houses with palm-leaf roofs, built to Sphere standards. Partners had much more power to negotiate terms.
Also institutional funding enabled us to continue our support for victims of conflict and disaster, even though the competition for these funds is at times severe. In general we see a trend to more emergency aid and less investment in recovery and development. That is understandable given the size of the emergencies and the political climate. However, in the long run there is a need to invest in stability, resilience and creating self-sufficiency.
The permeability between the refugee camps and the non-destroyed city created competition between the services which had existed before (water which had to be paid for, whether private or public) and the water supplied free of charge by the international aid organizations (free water from bladder reservoirs). There is a risk that this competition will lead to the breakdown and decapitalisation of the fee-paying sector, whether public or private, despite the fact that, sooner or later, it will have to take over from emergency aid and unsustainable approaches involving handouts. There is also competition between camps and neighbourhoods.
Both competition and contest can refer to kinds of organised events, although in practice they behave somewhat differently. Contest, for instance, combines exclusively with drawing, photo, and essay, whereas competition is used exclusively with moot court, IHL, and first aid (although this can be highly influenced by the particular conventions of a few organisations).
Competition is frequently juxtaposed with both collaboration and cooperation, although their relationships are not always binary. The very purpose of friendly competitions (organised events), for example, may be to instil greater collaboration among groups.
Similarly, in the humanitarian sphere, it is possible that healthy competition can lead to better cooperation across organisations. In this regard, both competition and collaboration/cooperation are seen as strategic tools that can be used, sometimes together, to accomplish goals.
That said, statements that treat competition with disdain are not uncommon. As a whole, negative statements about competition are substantially more frequent, especially in reference to a much awaited shift from competition to collaboration.
This behavioural transition is popularly formulated using verbs of movement: shift, put above, set aside, and move from, as if competition were a broken or outdated form of interaction. In any case, collaboration and cooperation are also considered as antidotes to competition, with the purpose of minimising its negative effects.
SPARK facilitated discussion as to whether the increase in Dutch NGOs and the competition among them leads to more efficient and effective development cooperation.
UNICEF's supply strategies leverage competition, transparency, improved forecasts, special financing, innovative contracting and partner collaboration.
Our work is guided by a vision of human life that puts cooperation and collaboration above heartless competition.
Success will rely upon a consensus of support for a culture-shift away from insularity, reactiveness and competition towards anticipation, transparency, research and collaboration.
Global cooperation can also help ensure that intensifying global competition does not result in a 'race to the bottom' in terms of labour standards, but rather in an agreement to push for full and decent employment for all.
MIFTAH strategy is based on a mixture of competition and collaboration with other NGOs; that is, competition for funds and collaboration on activities.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.