The HE corpus contains 10,468 occurrences of the concept empowerment.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownEmpowerment occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by Asia, North America, Africa and MENA with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO, NGO_Fed, State and RE organisations.
IGO documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from general documents published in Europe. Occurrences from NGO, NGO_Fed, State and RE were mostly obtained from activity reports published in Europe.
The definitional elements for empowerment shown below are separated into generic empowerment and several of it key types. Although there is considerable overlap, doing so offers a clearer view of how types of empowerment have both convergent and divergent elements. From this deliberate - if sometimes forced - separation of types, the following statements can be made:
all empowerment efforts
focus on improving the capacities, resources, and living conditions of various populations
are undertaken largely with training and other direct interventions
are meant to fight poverty and increase equality in some fashion
have a unique focus and perception that cannot be easily subsumed by other efforts
most empowerment efforts
overlap with other types of empowerment activities
have a strong connection with development
are thought of as fast tracks for sustainability and environmental protection
deliberately target needy and under-served subpopulations
prioritise focusing on women
who are considered the most important group because
of their traditional disempowerment
their empowerment benefits everyone the most
is a/an
organisational program
ability/capacity
is part of development
can be part of humanitarian work (although this is debated)
has many subtypes, grouped by
target recipient
gender (women’s, girls’, gender)
age (youth, child)
group
area/focus
suffers resistance from traditional power holders
should be seen as an opportunity, not a loss
requires
systemic changes & cooperation
better monitoring and metrics
can have an overly individualistic focus
has myths and misconceptions
should not be thought of as a uniquely modern, Western notion
is a/an
objective, socio-cultural goal
cross cutting issue
component of gender equality
dimension of human development
ability
to access the components of development
to exercise control over one's actions
is the most prevalent type of empowerment
includes
gender empowerment (almost always)
girls' empowerment (generally)
is part of gender equality and women's empowerment
which is part of several global development plans
in which equality & empowerment may seen as one goal
has been included in various UN plans
is part of several monitoring indices
may focus on
girls, adolescents
women in poor areas
food insecure women & children
has methods
has express purposes
is a principle
is contrasted with
immediate aid assistance
service delivery approaches
has subtypes
participatory, rights-based, grass root level community empowerment
may focus on
women, children, families
the most vulnerable, marginalised
has methods
promoting networking
forming groups
health interventions
monitoring services, access and results
capacity building, training
has express purposes
is a
dimension of sustainable development
key area of focus
key interconnected theme
window of hope and stability for young people
leads to
resilience, self-reliance
is contrasted with
rehabilitation-based methods
may focus on
farmers
rural populations
women, young people
adolescent girls, young women living with HIV
trafficking survivors
has methods
has express purposes
has secondary results
decrease tension in families & communities
may focus on
women, girls
poor, marginalised, disadvantaged populations
has methods
legal services, aid consultations
legal capacity building
legal reform
integrating formal and extralegal economic sectors
has express purposes
protect poor people from globalisation and help them benefit from it
fight inequality
capacity building to defend water rights
improve access to justice
is a key theme
may focus on
women
comprises three indicators
ratio of women with seats in parliament over male value
ratio of women at ministerial level over male value
ratio of number of years of a female head of state (last 50 years) over male value
results in
improved environmental sustainability
may focus on
women
indigenous people
has methods
microfinance
integration with the renewable energy sector
capacity building, training
increasing role and visibility of women in society
organise stakeholder dialogue (government, NGO)
is a process & gateway
has methods
sustainable, decent employment
capacity building, training
improve education, health services
increase opportunities
has express purposes
peace
create leaders and volunteers
well-being
Definitional contexts for the basic concept of empowerment, unaccompanied by women's, economic, and other modifiers, are greatly concentrated in Activity Reports. Organisations tend to define empowerment according to their own objectives, without any standardised phrasing. This leads to surprising variations that, despite commonalities, can reveal stark differences.
Three excerpts from the contexts found further below highlight this variation. The first refers to empowerment as something to be given, the second restricts it to women's human rights, and the third equates it to a type of freedom.
"giving excluded people the right to control their resources"
"the total sum of changes needed for a woman to realize her full human rights"
"freedom to act in pursuit of personal goals and well-being"
This variation is significant, even before taking into account definitional contexts for each type of empowerment. Differentiating between women's and economic empowerment, for instance, generates even more variation.
To more clearly compare the relationship between empowerment and its main types, the Types of Empowerment section offers separated definitional contexts, summaries, and related content.
Empowerment is the process through which we enable people living in poverty to become rights activists.
Empowerment, as the term is used here, refers to a TCRS-facilitated process of awareness building, capacity building, and training for marginalized people and their local leaders, so that they are able to take actions themselves that lead to improvements in their lives.
We define empowerment as the total sum of changes needed for a woman to realize her full human rights: the combined effect of changes in her own aspirations and capabilities, the environment that influences or dictates her choice, and the interactions she engages in each day.
Empowerment means strengthening the material and organizational capacities of people and communities to enable them to take control of their destiny.
empowerment: the possibility for people to speak out and participate in the decision-making processes that shape their society
And while the concept of empowerment – giving excluded people the right to control their resources through the same property and business tools that wealthy people have – has guided discussions among international donors, they have found it difficult to put into practice.
Empowerment, defined as the freedom to act in pursuit of personal goals and well-being,75 can be enhanced through movement.
organisational program
process
core program component
cross-cutting theme
key to change & success
precondition for grass-roots development
outcome of participation
ability/capacity
individual's ability to make decisions
ability to make choices
possibility to participate in decision-making
freedom to act for personal goals & well-being
changes for the full realization of a woman's human rights
There are many types of empowerment based on its appearance in multiword terms. This is in part due to the high level of specificity that can be used with the concept. Nonetheless, frequencies are highly concentrated in only several categories: gender, age, area/focus, and group.
Many types consist of combinations of the above categories, sometimes adding locations or other specifiers. One example is empowerment of Palestinian women. Other less frequent types also focus on a variety of vulnerable groups, as in empowerment of older people, extreme urban poor, and people with HIV.
Women's empowerment is by far the most common and is trailed distantly by economic, community, and youth empowerment. Women's empowerment permeates the concept's discussion to such an extent that any instance of empowerment may implicitly centre on women.
There are often unclear boundaries between types, given their propensity to be used together. Take social and economic empowerment: These disparate areas are frequently combined (either as "socio-economic" or appearing together), such that they commonly refer to the same activities, e.g., microloans. Such pairings raise questions as to the functional differences between different types of empowerment.
gender
women’s empowerment
female empowerment
girls’ empowerment
gender empowerment
age
youth empowerment
child empowerment
group
community empowerment
citizen empowerment
civic empowerment
civil society empowerment
local empowerment
refugee empowerment
collective empowerment
group empowerment
area/focus
economic empowerment
political empowerment
legal empowerment
social empowerment
rights-based empowerment
leadership empowerment
personal empowerment
To help distinguish different types of empowerment, contexts were found that provided one or more of the following kinds of content:
definitional contexts
examples of purpose, method, and subtype
132 contexts, representing 116 documents, were found for key types of empowerment. A primary area of interest was chosen for compounds, e.g., women's economic empowerment was labelled "economic" to distinguish from more generic activities for women.
The contexts used for this analysis are strongly concentrated in NGO Activity Reports, while at the same time showing a more balanced distribution among regions. Below is a summary of their content, which indicates some distinguishing features of types of empowerment but also underscores their interrelated nature.
According to the findings of the Task Force on Education, Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, which forms part of the UN Millennium Development Project, gender equality and women''s empowerment is an objective that includes three core dimensions: i) human abilities, such as education and life expectancy; ii) opportunities to use or apply these abilities by accessing economic and political resources; and iii) security, which refers to the necessary step of making women less vulnerable to violence.
Economists have been exploring the degree of correlation between the fostering of gender equality, women''s empowerment (defined as the ability of women to access the components of development – health, education, earning opportunities, rights and political participation) and overall economic development.
Women empowerment refers to the ability of women to transform their economic and social status with their representation in all major strata's of the society.
Women and girls make up the majority of those living in extreme poverty. It means rights denied, opportunities curtailed and voices silenced. CARE works with women and girls, men and boys to achieve gender equality as a fundamental human right. Women’s empowerment is an essential component of gender equality. Empowered women – women with the ability and freedom to identify and choose their life courses – will act in ways that lift themselves, their families and communities out of poverty. Women’s empowerment is more than giving a woman training or a loan and expecting her to do more or to do things differently. Empowerment is derived from the changes needed for a woman to realise her full human rights
is a/an
objective
component of gender equality
cross cutting issue
socio-cultural goal
dimension of human development
ability
to access the components of development
to exercise control over one's actions
has been included in UN plans
global goals adopted by UN Member States
United Nations System-Wide Action Plan on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN SWAP) (AR-4221)
UNICEF’s Gender Action Plan
is part of monitoring indices
Gender Empowerment Measure (GD-190)
Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (GD-153)
production
resources
income
leadership
time
Gender Inequality Index (GD-219)
may focus on
girls, adolescents
women in poor areas
food insecure women and children
has methods
women's centers, networking
access to food, micronutrients
policy, legal, accountability frameworks
maternal and child health
access to reproductive health services
increase resource availability
capacity building, training, workshops
international exchange programs
increase market access
government recognition, policy recommendations
volunteer groups
educate all of society about the shared benefits of empowering women
adult literacy
technology access, usage, and training (especially mobile phones)
school programs
increase access to & quality of education
CARE India Framework (AR-1266)
agency
structures
relations
has express purposes
improve decision-making
fight poverty
sustainable development
financial independence
human rights
stability, prosperity, peace
save lives through women farmers
reductions in rates of stunting
family and community empowerment
give women voice in decision-making
freedom from violence
lower health and other risks
empower families via empowering girls
Women's empowerment (WE) appears in nearly 1,500 contexts, although there are also a number of variants, such as empowerment of women (477) and women empowerment (247).
In a query for contexts containing genders, sexual orientations, age groups, as well as "family," in close proximity to empowerment, only those below contained at least 1% of the sample's total hits. This distribution suggests the extent to which women are the primary target of empowerment-related activities.
woman (76%)
youth (12%)
child (4%)
girl (3%)
female (2%)
family (1%)
Women's empowerment, including its variants, is more equally distributed across organisation types than is often observed in other concepts. That said, the highest number and density of contexts is consistently found in IGO_Other and UN_OPA.
Whereas the distinction between gender and women can be controversial in other concepts (see GBV), the term gender empowerment is almost exclusively used to refer to women. "Gender" is also used at such a lower frequency - with easily 20 times fewer explicit contexts - that it is difficult to put their usage to debate.
is a principle
is contrasted with
immediate aid assistance
service delivery approaches
has subtypes
participatory, rights-based, grass root level community empowerment
may focus on
women, children, families
the most vulnerable, marginalised
has methods
promoting networking
forming groups
health interventions
monitoring services, access and results
capacity building, training
has express purposes
improve access to education
positive social change
peace building
reconstruction of war affected societies
project ownership, dignity, participation, sustainability and self-reliance
disaster risk reduction (DRR)
alleviate poverty
increase household food security, utensils/ furniture, farm sizes, crops, animal husbandry
climate change adaptation
enhancing economic growth and social development
is a
dimension of sustainable development
key area of focus
key interconnected theme
window of hope and stability for young people
leads to
resilience
self-reliance
is contrasted with
rehabilitation-based methods
may focus on
farmers
rural populations
women, young people
adolescent girls, young women living with HIV
trafficking survivors
has methods
capacity building, training
develop reports on access to banking, financial services to those earning 1-2 USD/day
early recovery of agricultural production, income
improve food security
improve access to credit
microfinance
women's legal rights
increasing women employers, salaried workers
women's participation in public service
encourage regional tourism
establishing development funds for women
advocacy
has express purposes
families' needs being met
improve women's independence
improve quality of life in rural areas
reduce poverty
increase agency for poverty reduction
increase women's political power
give women freedom from violence
help find employment
promote growth
has secondary results
decrease tension in families and communities
may focus on
women, girls
poor, marginalised, disadvantaged populations
has methods
legal services, aid consultations
legal capacity building
legal reform
integrating formal and extralegal economic sectors
has express purposes
protect poor people from globalisation and help them benefit from it
fight inequality
capacity building to defend water rights
improve access to justice
is a
key theme
may focus on
women
comprises three indicators (see GD-212)
ratio of women with seats in parliament over male value
ratio of women at ministerial level over male value
ratio of number of years of a female head of state (last 50 years) over male value
results in
improved environmental sustainability
may focus on
women
indigenous people
has methods
microfinance
integration with the renewable energy sector
capacity building, training
entrepreneurship
business, vocational skills
small savings
microcredit groups
strengthening co-operatives
increasing role and visibility of women in society
organise stakeholder dialogue (government, NGO)
is a
process, gateway
has methods
sustainable, decent employment
capacity building, training
literacy
English
vocational skills
technology
improve education, health services
increase opportunities
has express purposes
peace
create leaders and volunteers
well-being
Youth empowerment is an attitudinal, structural, and cultural process whereby young people gain the ability, authority, and agency to make decisions and implement change in their own lives and those around them. Youth empowerment is often addressed as a gateway to intergenerational equity, civic engagement and democracy building. Therefore, many local, state, provincial, regional, national, and international government agencies and nonprofit community-based organizations provide programs centered on youth empowerment.
Together, gender equality and empowerment coappear in the same sentence around 1,500 times. The majority of these cases are set phrases, generally gender equality and women's empowerment. This is a significant portion of these terms' total frequencies, amounting to 18% of the cases of gender equality.
While they are sometimes considered twin goals, priorities, values, and issues, they are also taken as a single unit: "59% of its aid had gender equality and women's empowerment as a principal" (GD-154). Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women is also a Millennium Development Goal, and the concepts are paired in other global development objectives (see excerpts below).
Many organisational activities can be included under the combined concept of gender equality and women's empowerment. Yet there is also some indication that empowerment and equality are used to refer to distinct project areas (see Debates & Controversies).
The dual role of gender equality and women's empowerment –as a means and end of human development–has been consistently reflected in the global development agenda. In the Millennium Development Goals and in the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals, gender equality and women's empowerment appear both as standalone goals and part of most development objectives. This view, in turn, has trickled down to other multilateral, regional, national and local government entities, supported by a global network of civil society organizations.
Gender equality and women’s empowerment are critical to achieving all the goals and, with this in mind, the UN Millennium Project Task Force on Education and Gender Equality1 identified seven strategic priorities for women’s empowerment:
Strengthen opportunities for post-primary education for girls while simultaneously meeting commitments to universal primary education.
Guarantee sexual and reproductive health and rights.
Invest in infrastructure to reduce the time women and girls spend on tasks such as fetching water.
Guarantee women’s and girls’ property rights.
Eliminate gender inequality in employment by decreasing women’s reliance on informal employment, closing gender gaps in earnings, and reducing occupational segregation.
Increase women’s share of seats in national parliaments and local governmental bodies.
Combat violence against girls and women.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO, NGO_Fed, State and RE organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for empowerment was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 2 top collocates were obtained:
equality; and
gender
IGO documents generated equality as top collocate in 2016 with the highest overall score.
NGO documents generated socio-economic as top collocate in 2014.
NGO_Fed documents generated solidarity as top collocate for 2017 obtaining the highest overall score.
State documents only generated equality as top collocate for 2015.
RE documents generated economic as top collocate for 2016.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about empowerment that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
principal
GEM (gender empowerment measure)
rank
HDI (Human Development Index)
WEPs (Women's Empowerment Principles )
dimension
productivity
inequality
labour
stand-alone
NGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
TCRS (Tankanyika Christian Refugee Service)
curriculum
coordinated
rights-based
cross-sectoral
refugee-led
Dalit (Name for people who used to belong to the lowest caste in India)
Kilwa (An island in East Africa)
Palestinian
single
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
HRBA (Human Rights Based Approach)
ambassador
indigenisation
CMCE (Centre for Maternal and Children Empowerment)
pan-African
pillar
reflection
employability
GLOWA (Global Action for Women empowerment)
freirian
State documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
horticulture
SHEP (Smallholder Horticulture Empowerment Project)
bottom-up
cut
NCA (Norwegian Church Aid)
boost
MDG (Millennium Development Goals)
comprehensive
DFID (Department for International Development )
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency)
RE documents feature the following unique collocates:
oral
lighting
zone
Burundi
church
Mozambique
reconciliation
(RE + NGO) Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss empowerment. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
CEP (Child Empowerment and Protection) (RE + NGO)
IRDP (Integrated Disaster Resilience Programme) (RE + NGO)
self-reliance (NGO + IGO)
personal (NGO_Fed + NGO)
WEP (Women's Empowerment Project)(NGO_Fed + NGO)
reliance (RE + NGO)
solidarity (NGO_Fed + NGO)
green (NGO_Fed + NGO)
microfinance (NGO_Fed + NGO)
index (State+ IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
smallholder (State + NGO_Fed + NGO)
socio-economic (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
literacy (RE + NGO_Fed + NGO)
female (State + NGO + IGO)
citizen (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
transformation (RE + NGO_Fed + NGO)
dignity (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
equity (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
emphasis (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
civic (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
empowerment (RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
inclusion (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
participation (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
promote (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
livelihood (RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
girl (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
justice (RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
leadership (RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
advance (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
resilience (RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
equality (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
woman (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
economic (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
gender (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
youth (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
rural (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
community (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
social (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
program (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
project (State + RE + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of empowerment between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of empowerment were highest in 2017. However, this concept obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2018 (109%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and Africa generated the highest relative frequency with 146%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of empowerment are RE, NGO, NGO_Fed, IGO and State.
General documents provided the greatest number of occurrences and Strategy generated the highest relative frequency with 136%.
This shows the evolution of empowerment and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Empowerment increases steadily in 1980. It reaches its peak in 2004 and then declines until 2011. From 2011 it picks up and increases slightly until 2019.
Contexts involving debates over empowerment have a consistent representation in IGO General Documents due to the term's ubiquity in development reports. Still, a mix of organisation types discuss empowerment. Discounting the weight of European documents, discussions are also found for most regions.
The contexts shown below are a sample of the 41 discovered for empowerment (see the link at the end of the section for more). Overall, there are several notable topics that receive attention.
Empowerment...
suffers resistance from traditional power holders
should be seen as an opportunity, not a loss
is part of development and can be part of humanitarian work (although this is debated)
requires systemic changes and cooperation
can have an overly individualistic focus
requires better monitoring and metrics
has myths and misconceptions
should not be thought of as a uniquely modern, Western notion
The spread of the concept of “women’s empowerment” in the Arab region has excited the rancour of certain socio-political forces. They have tended to see it as “imposed” by the West and not emerging from either the realities or needs of Arab societies, which are based on the entrenched role of the family as society’s basic building block. This has driven some to resist development plans that adopt the gender perspective and to resist the governments and the women’s organisations which work in accordance with it.
Youth empowerment key to future development in Arab countries The report argues that young people are not a problem or a burden on development; they are rather a key resource for resolving the problems of development in the region. It concludes that Arab states can achieve a huge developmental leap and ensure durable stability if they put the empowerment of their youth at the top of their urgent priorities and harness their energy to advance development processes.
Although it is important to promote women's empowerment as part of efforts to advance gender mainstreaming, focusing solely on women may not achieve the desired results. This also requires changing the consciousness of men, decision-makers and socially influential people such as administrative officials, educators, politicians and religious leaders. In other words, it is necessary to reform the social structure and systems surrounding women.
In addition to this specific package of commitments, the WHS should integrate women and girls into all its areas of work. The WHS should advance the empowerment of all women and girls--not just pursue gender equality. We need to foster mechanisms that ensure women are in the lead in program design and decision-making as well as benefit from innovative ways of work.
One question is how empowerment fits between development activities and humanitarian work. Quantitative analysis shows that empowerment is more frequently seen within a development paradigm, but some humanitarian organisations also consider it quite necessary. Its proper role in humanitarian work is nonetheless debatable, as described in the following context.
At the meeting there were questions on the extent to which participation or engagement in humanitarian contexts should necessarily have empowerment as an overt goal. Many participants – from Robert Chambers, who gave the keynote speech, to representatives of small African local NGOs – viewed social “It is sometimes unclear whether engagement is seen as a right and a moral duty, and thus a valuable objective in itself, or simply as a way to achieve better humanitarian outcomes.”22 ALNAPSTUDY change as a key rationale for engaging with affected groups. The more traditional humanitarian Dunantist4 voices, who would argue that it is not for humanitarians to engage with the root causes of structural crises, were very much in the minority. Thus the ambiguities around the application of more developmental approaches to humanitarian situations remained largely unresolved. Not all actors in a humanitarian context would necessarily be comfortable with an empowerment approach or share social change objectives. Some might be pursuing engagement for instrumental reasons, for example to facilitate access and meet humanitarian objectives, but not as part of a social change strategy.
A number of development organisations have adopted the concept of “women’s empowerment” as a general compass for policies and activities in women’s development. As with many concepts relating to women’s development, that of “empowerment” has caused controversy in women’s and developmental circles. Some feel that the concept of empowerment is incapable of achieving the desired change because it focuses only on the empowerment of individuals. It neglects collective empowerment, which aims to change the social, economic and political infrastructure that generates oppression and discrimination not only against women but against the majority of the poor and the marginalised as well (Agarwal, 1994; Kabeer, 2003; Radtke and Stam, 1994; Rowlands, 1998).
The goal on gender equality and women's empowerment has tracked progress on education, employment and participation in parliament. It has helped hold governments accountable, mobilize new resources, and stimulate better laws, policies, programmes and data. But the goals overall did little to cut the roots of discrimination and violence against women and girls– as evidenced by the fact that the slowest progress on any of the MDGs was in reducing maternal mortality. Glaring omissions include the lack of a reference to ending violence against women and girls. Also missing are issues fundamental for women's economic empowerment , such as equal property rights and a fair division of household and care responsibilities. In the future, a stand-alone goal to achieve gender equality, women's rights and women's empowerment could fuel faster, broader progress.
The GEM demolishes two widely held myths about gender empowerment. First, there is no evidence that Islam necessarily represents an obstacle to female empowerment, as measured by political representation. Malaysia, a Muslim country, has a GEM far higher than Saudi Arabia’s and comparable to that of Greece. Second, there is no clear evidence that gender inequalities automatically diminish at higher levels of income (figure 1.24). Two members of the Group of Seven (G-7) industrial countries are poor performers on the GEM.
• Women’s economic contribution is limited when women are not employed [....]
• Women’s economic participation equals women’s economic empowerment [....]
• There is an automatic win-win between gender equality and wider development outcomes [....]
• What works for one group of women will work for another [....]
• Increasing women’s individual skills and aspirations is the main challenge [....]
The empowerment of women is not a ‘Western’ notion, foreign to Asian and Pacific cultures. Nor is it the result of recent globalization. Historical records and folklore from the region show that women exercised power and influence, and demonstrated intelligence and creativity, much before feminist ideas came into the global political discourse. Is There a Common Understanding of Gender Equality? The concept of equality in general, and gender equality in particular, is complex. Numerous debates have taken place on how to define and achieve equality. This Report advocates that equality is based on fairness in freedoms and choices and is inherent to the idea of human development.
While disempowerment is a low frequency term, with just 83 cases, it is a clear antonym for empowerment. Beyond their obvious correlation, contexts with disempowerment neatly match the evidence seen in the rest of this analysis and help bring to focus key takeaways about empowerment:
1) disempowerment is a root cause of poverty (and vice versa)
(reducing poverty is an empowerment strategy)
2) food insecurity is a root cause of disempowerment
(food security plays a role in empowerment)
3) household conflict causes disempowerment
(empowerment decreases household conflict)
4) disempowerment complicates resolving environmental issues
(empowerment is aligned with sustainability)
5) disempowerment is a cause of violence against women
(stopping violence is an objective of empowerment)
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.