The HE corpus contains 1,929 occurrences of the concept rights-based approach. The total count includes both variants in singular and plural (e.g. rights-based approach and right-based approach), as well as the abbreviations RBA and HRBA (Human Rights-based Approach).
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownRights-based approach occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by Africa, North America, Asia and Oceania with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO_Fed, NGO, Net and Found organisations.
IGO and NGO, Net and Found documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe. NGO_Fed documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Africa.
has no single definition
is a/an
approach to poverty & development
programming principle
for Safer Communities
for UN programming
area
value
has variants
"rights-based" - RBA
"human rights-based" - HRBA
is promoted by many organisations
has been employed at least since the 1990s
is applied to areas / programming
development
children, youth
education
trafficking
has pillars / principles
which are not standardised
e.g., empowerment, solidarity & campaigning
e.g., universality, indivisibility, inter-dependence, equality, participation, accountability (UN Common Understanding 2003)
has benefits, including
hold power-holders to account
enable poor families to claim their rights
inclusion & empowerment
prevent discrimination, increase participation
is taught via training, which may be
required for employees
a service offered to partners & other actors
has challenges with adoption
with non-humanitarian stakeholders
state violations
exposing workers to risk
misunderstandings about human rights
is necessary to improve outcomes for many areas, including
refugees, asylum seekers
gender, disaster response
food insecurity
requires
transparency, accountability
engagement, focus on inequality, relationships
viewing affecting populations as rights holders
can be difficult to translate across cultures
can experience funding tensions
is affected by the influence of new technology
is contrasted with other approaches
politically motivated, other humanitarian
service delivery
community-based rehabilitation
Rights-based approach has no standard definition in HE documents. The contexts below offer the best characterisations available, though each has a different focus and may stray from being a complete definition.
ActionAid's work is rooted in a human rights-based approach, which means supporting people and communities to empower themselves to change the policies and practices that deny their rights and perpetuate poverty.
A rights-based approach, which is the foundation of all SCA interventions, means that all members of society must be included. SCA in particular focuses on women and per- sons with disabilities - people who because of the values or ignorance of others oen nd themselves in exclusion.
RIGHTS-BASED APPROACHES: An approach promoted by many development agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to achieve a positive transformation of power relations among the various development actors.
Besides being an approach, rights-based approach tends to be categorised as a programming principle, particularly within UN operations, as well as an area. Here "approach" can also include activities that are not labelled formally as such (e.g., working with youth).
advancing women's rights
promoting rights-based sustainable alternatives
partnership and alliance building
working with the youth
local, national, sub-regional and regional linkages
approach to poverty and development
capability approach
principle in Safer Communities programming
principle in UN country programming
main principle
development cooperation effectiveness
policy coherence for development
key principle guiding UN programming
gender equality
environmental sustainability
capacity development
results-based management
self-organization of community groups
technical skills for agriculture
nutrition knowledge
female leadership
area of innovation
designing social protection that triggers broader development
holistic policy frameworks integrating social protection into national development plans
value
foundation for interventions
basis for UN Development Assistance Framework
practice for international development co-operation
Human rights-based approach is the most frequent variant, with 755 cases, plus nearly 400 uses of the abbreviation HRBA. In comparison, RBA has fewer than 100 cases.
Clear preferences exist among organisations on rights-based versus human rights-based approaches, but overlap also exists. UN documents, for example, tend to prefer "human rights" but do not exclude the other form.
In particular, human rights-based approach and similar has high relative densities in Strategy documents from Africa, including UN_OPA, NGO_Fed, and UO organisation types. Rights-based approach, in contrast, has more evenly distributed relative densities for most text types, with the highest in UN_SA, NGO_Nat, and NGO_Fed_NA Strategy documents from Asia.
Other types of rights-based approaches have very low frequencies, with child/children's rights (22 cases) being the next most common.
SOS response: SOS Children's Villages is a non-political, nondenominational organisation that works to protect and safeguard children, by strengthening families and building-up the capacities of care professionals, also training them in how to apply child rights-based approaches to their work with children.
Other low frequency combinations with rights-based approach show how the concept can be adapted to fit entities and their objectives (e.g., UNICEF, NRC, Belgium). It is also modified by adjectives that commonly appear with approaches, such as integrated, holistic, and comprehensive (also see integrated approach).
UNICEF's human rights approach shines consistent light on disparities, and it is reflected in campaigns to provide immunizations for all children, end pockets of child malnutrition and ensure that quality education starts from preschool.
Belgium's rights-based approach focuses on empowerment and human rights. It mainstreams the rights-based approach in all its interventions by focusing on specific individual rights of groups such as women and children; sexual and reproductive rights; and the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.
NRC therefore pursues a holistic rights based approach encompassing the early recovery phase and promoting durable solutions and recovery.
Assisting the Government in adopting an integrated human rights approach to public security, including in the fight against organized crime, will be a major challenge for OHCHR in 2009.
Human Rights Trust purpose: To improve people’s access to their rights and services by conducting a demonstration project of a participative rights-based approach to social justice.
Securing rights In 2010, ActionAid Australia leveraged the strengths of its international network and progressive rights based approach to support innovative programs across Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America.
We highly appreciated AAV's innovative human rights based approach that involves citizens, especially people living in poverty and the marginalized to ensure that their voices are heard in the process of developing laws directly affecting their lives".
It outlines what social protection encompasses, focusing on three areas of innovation: universal rights-based approaches; designing social protection so that it triggers broader development; and holistic policy frameworks that integrate social protection into national development plans.
A comprehensive human rights-based approach to urbanization would contribute to environmental sustainability policies, as resources and risks determine the standards of living and access to basic resources.18
Three contexts include references to earlier uses of rights-based approaches, the earliest being from the 1990s. The 2005 UN World Summit is also mentioned as a key date for recognising the importance of RBAs.
This resolution led to the transformation of the Centre for Human Rights into the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The new Office was vested with a wide-ranging mandate and primary responsibility for promoting, coordinating, strengthening and streamlining human rights work and related activities throughout the United Nations system. Twelve years later, at the 2005 UN World Summit, Heads of State from around the world committed themselves to an expansion of the UN Human Rights programme that recognized the central role and importance of ensuring the application of a human rights-based approach in all aspects of the UN's work.
The behaviour and actions of these communities thus offer rich insight into the theoretical constructs of two important approaches to poverty and development: Amartya Sen’s capability approach (Sen, 1985; 1999) and Thomas Pogge’s human rights-based approach (Pogge, 2008).
ActionAid was founded as a charity in 1972, and throughout our history we have innovated and evolved our approach to better address the structural drivers of poverty and injustice. In the 1990s, we adopted a human rights based approach to development, which we continue to apply.
Rights-based approaches are applied in a variety of areas. The terms most often mentioned in phrases like "a rights-based approach to [area]" are development and programming. The list below includes a broad sample of areas that are referred to in the context of RBA.
development
programming
education
disability
humanitarian assistance
trafficking
migration
women & girls
women's access to food
disasters
hunger
poverty
injustice
advocacy
health care
sexual, reproductive health & rights
policy
analysis & implementation strategy
UN programmes
national budget monitoring
prison management
preserving cultural heritage
A human rights approach to women's access to food is the foundation of CARE's gender transformative nutrition programming.
Responding to Emergencies Our rights-based approach to disasters combines emergency response with programmes and policy work.
This rights-based approach informs our advocacy work on food, agriculture and trade.
Through OHCHR's trainings and awareness-raising activities, knowledge was increased among border guards on applying a human rights-based approach to combat and prevent trafficking in persons.
A number of pillars, principles, and other key elements are associated with rights-based approaches. The most common pillars appear to be empowerment, solidarity, and campaigning, but there is no general consensus, as shown in the quite variable list below.
empowerment, solidarity, campaigning
empowerment, solidarity, campaigning and alternatives
universality, indivisibility, inter-dependence, equality, participation, accountability (UN Common Understanding 2003)
inclusion and non-discrimination, equity and equality, participation and empowerment, and accountability
accountability, participation, transparency and nondiscrimination
viewing target groups as active agents of their own change
availability of and access to complaints mechanisms
AAK commits to work with Women, Children and Youth living in poverty and exclusion to claim and realise their constitutional rights through working within three main pillars of Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA): empowerment, solidarity and campaigning.
Rights-Based Approach: We therefore affirm and reinforce the six main principles of the Common Understanding (UN, 2003) of the rights-based approach. These include universality, indivisibility, inter-dependence, equality, participation, and accountability.
The RBA is guided by four principals; accountability, participation, transparency and nondiscrimination.
The HRBA consists of the following elements: (1) using international human rights standards; (2) empowering target groups; (3) encouraging participation; (4) ensuring non-discrimination; and (5) holding stakeholders accountable to fundamental rights.
Organisations use rights-based approaches with several objectives in mind. Generally speaking, many rights-based approaches are ultimately meant to increase inclusion and empowerment for target populations. RBAs are also associated with other benefits in areas, a sample of which are provided in the list below.
hold power-holders to account
enable poor families to claim their rights
help household develop personal integration plan
support people with disabilities to claim their rights
inclusion & empowerment
prevent discrimination, increase participation
refugee issues
ensure civic rights
ensure equal & just allocation
defending rights of girls
climate change
eliminate preventable maternal mortality
migrant protection
strengthen solidarity
land certificates, local microfinancing for women
giving target groups a say
rehabilitation of vulnerable youth
reach poor households effectively
society-wide benefits
policy tool
protecting rights of homeless
improve development cooperation, sustainbility
The human rights based approach improves development cooperation effectiveness by promoting ownership and thus the sustainability of activities. It also fosters inclusive partnerships, transparency and mutual accountability, as both donor and partner countries are committed to respecting the same universal commitments.
SCA considers marginalization and disempowerment, rather than simply lack of resources, the root causes of poverty. Consequently, SCA applies a rights-based approach, seeking the inclusion and empower-ment of individuals, communities and local organisations so that they may participate fully in society and influence their own development.
Evidence from countries that have successfully achieved the Millennium Development Goals demonstrates that rights-based approaches reach poor households more effectively while minimising administrative, social, political and particularly economic costs, enabling social protection to generate maximum growth and development.
Nineteen mandate-holders issued a joint statement during the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December, urging the international community to adopt a human rights-based approach in relation to climate change.
Several organisations comment on their activities to train humanitarians and other actors in rights-based approaches. Such work may be required for employees or be provided as an external service to partners.
During 2014, 25% of our staff furthered their education through individual training courses. Our revamped induction programme saw the introduction of Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA) training as a mandatory component.
SPO worked with state and civil society institutions to build their capacities in understanding and adopting rights-based approach within their policy and operational frameworks.
With OHCHR's support, the Ministry of Education is working in five regions to develop a human rights approach in schools responsible for training primary school teachers.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO_Fed. NGO, Net and Found organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for rights-based approach was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 1 top collocates was obtained:
human
IGO documents generated human as top collocate in 2008.
NGO_Fed documents generated human as top collocate in 2011 with the highest overall score.
NGO documents generated gender as top collocate in 2013 with the highest overall score.
Net documents only generated human as top collocate for 2010.
Found documents only generated human as top collocate for 2017.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about rights-based approach that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
programming
HRC (Human Rights Council)
poverty-reduction
adviser
MDGS (Millennium Development Goals)
guideline
migration
eliminate
OHCHR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights)
labour
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
AAG (ActionAid Ghana )
underpin
rights-based
ActionAid
solidarity
believe
innovative
mean
involve
engage
NGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
tolerant
needs-based
SCA ( South and Central Asian Affairs )
adhere
understand
hunger
concept
integration
recognize
fight
Net documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
age
hold
Found does not feature any unique collocates for rights-based approach.
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss rights-based approach. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
RBA (Rights Based Approach ) (NGO_Fed + NGO)
incorporate (NGO + IGO)
mainstreaming (NGO_Fed + IGO)
equality (NGO + IGO)
empowerment (NGO_Fed + NGO)
advocacy (NGO_Fed + NGO)
principle (NGO_Fed + NGO)
framework (NGO_Fed + IGO)
challenge (NGO_Fed + IGO)
follow (NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
HRBA (Human Rights Based Approach ) (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
apply (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
integrate (NGO + Net + IGO)
adopt (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
gender (NGO + Net + IGO)
approach (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
implement (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
right (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
endure (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
promote (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
work (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
use (Net + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
include (IGO + Net + NGO_Fed + NGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
human (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO + Found)
development (Found + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of rights-based approach between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of rights-based approach were highest in 2013. However, this concept obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2011 (122%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and Africa generated the highest relative frequency with 242%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of rights-based approach are NGO_Fed, IGO, WHS, RE and Found.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences and strategy generated the highest relative frequency with 295%.
This shows the evolution of rights-based approach and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Rights-based approach starts to increase in 1987 and reaches its peak in 2019.
Contexts related to challenges and debates for rights-based approaches tend to come from a variety of organisation types in Europe and Africa, both in Activity Reports and General Documents. Relevant contexts often fall into three categories: challenges with adopting RBAs, calls for more RBAs, and requirements for successful RBA implementation. Other contexts discuss a range of issues, including the importance of accountability, the translation of RBAs across cultures, and potential downsides (see the full sample in the link further below).
The tendency of States is to focus on law enforcement based responses, so a constant challenge for OHCHR is to re-focus stakeholders on a human rights-based approach.
Some states promoted a human rights approach but practised questionable human rights standards for minorities in their own countries, and at times engaged in the same expulsion or deportation practices they criticized in others.
LDP partners appear not confident to address governance and Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA) issues in communities due to fear of being victimised by authorities and politicians. iii.
One of the major challenges with regard to main-streaming human rights-based approaches into policy and practice is a persistent misunderstanding of the issue. Human rights are not a ‘burden’ on governments. Greater attention to human rights has practical and pragmatic results because it makes the response to the HIV epidemic more effective and efficient. The argument can be also reversed: better inclusion of people living with HIV means de facto advance in respect to their human rights. Improving the conditions for meeting human rights obligations is not a ‘zero-sum game’ as it is often perceived: it opens a virtuous circle of mutual benefits for both affected individual and their societies.
APRRN believes that for meaningful regional cooperation, states have to adopt a rights based approach, addressing conditions and concerns in the source and transit countries for refugees and asylum seekers.
Moving beyond a beneficiary model of disaster response, the chapter argues that, in order to reduce future risks, aid organizations must adopt a rights-based approach to address the causes of social vulnerability which are rooted in gender inequality.
The fact that hunger was increasing even before the food and economic crises suggests that present solutions are insufficient and that a right-to-food approach has an important role to play in eradicating food insecurity.
A rights-based approach requires high standards of transparency and accountability. Internal rules and regulations are not enough - a culture of pride in governance and in adhering to good practices is essential. The trust of target groups, staff, authorities, members and donors is key. Their time, commitment and feedback makes change possible.
Power and lack of power are important and complex elements of a human rights-based approach. Different interests and power structures frequently clash with each other. Applying a human rights-based approach involves active civil engagement, highlighting conflicts and inequality, and seeking constructive relationships between rights holders and duty bearers to enable long-term solutions.
Responding to the symptoms only can lead some charities and humanitarian agencies to define the problem in their own image; that is, shaping the analysis of the problem to fit the gap-filling services that they are able to provide. Consequently, the limitations of the response are defined by the limitations of the charities themselves. Not only does this limit the influence of local people and their organisations to influence change, but most alarmingly, we as charities are making the lack of response to need OUR problem and shifting the spotlight off the state, local authorities, and communities to deliver on their duty to provide in the first instance. Over the past few years, human rights based approaches have evolved, in part, as an attempt to address these issues. The perception of those who live with poverty and the effects of conflict have been transformed from people who are defined as needy to people who have rights, which demand a response.
Lost in translation While translating the rhetoric of rights-based approaches into a practical implementation methodology is difficult in many contexts, in Myanmar the challenges to creating an environment conducive to open and honest feedback are especially acute.
ActionAid's HRBA approach is at times in tension with the demands of institutional funders, whose interpretation of effectiveness and focus on short-term, tangible deliverables often differs from the needs expressed by communities.
Conclusion Whereas the 'new humanitarianism' that emerged in the mid-1990s focused on human rights-based approaches to humanitarian endeavours and later on humanitarian reform, the new humanitarianism of today is about technological innovation.
While rights-based approach has several variants, no direct synonyms or antonyms exist. Still, authors sometimes contrast RBAs with other potentially less effective approaches:
The campaign to legislate restrictions on funding to organizations that highlight the lack of international accountability, report to the International Criminal Court, advocate right of return, call for human rights approach rather than politically motivated or humanitarian ones, and support BDS in a number of European countries has resulted in a huge loss of core funding for our 2018 budget.
The Community Child Nutrition Project brought a new dimension to our work and forced us to work from a rights based approach instead of service delivery.
On social inclusion our programmes now take a rights-based approach rather than focusing on community based rehabilitation in line with the strategy launched mid-year.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.