There are 60,122 occurrences of care in the HE Corpus. This number reflects all occurrences of care as a noun and as a verb, including all verb forms, e.g. cares, caring and cared.
Care occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by North America, Asia and Africa. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are NGO, NGO_Fed, RC, IGO and RE organisations.
Firstly, NGO documents provide most occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Asia, North America and Europe. Secondly, occurrences from NGO_Fed are the second most important in number. Likewise, they were predominantly found in activity reports published in Europe, with minor contributions from North America, Oceania and Asia.
Thirdly, documents from RC are generally activity reports, mostly published in Europe. Fourthly, IGO provides a substantial portion of occurrences from general documents issued predominantly in Europe and North America. Finally, RE generates a considerable number of occurrences from European activity reports documents, albeit rather minor compared to top contributors.
is a service, support, an essential, a need, a necessity, aid, relief, an intervention, an issue, an area, a sector
delivered to affected populations
who are in need of it because they are affected by poverty, armed conflicts, violence, displacement, orphancy, social exclusion, natural disasters, disease and other health issues
provided by humanitarian organisations, for-profit organisations and governments
who are concerned with:
ensuring quality of care and continuity of care
establishing and improving models of care
providing appropriate standards of care
upholding their duty of care to care recipients, care providers and other involved actors
Care is a basic concept for which no explicit definition is found in the corpus. By and large, mentions of care are shorthand for medical care or health care, but other more specific types of care also exist. Testament to this are the following explicit definitions for comprehensive care and palliative care.
Comprehensive care entails responding to the most prevalent needs of a population through context-specific strategies adapted to their sociocultural reality. Comprehensive: considering the patient not according to his/her illness but as a whole human being with specific and inter-related needs , and being able to respond to the most prevalent needs of a population by integrating the necessary services within a health structure/ network .
The WHO defined palliative care as "an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing the problems associated with life-threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical , psychosocial , and spiritual."
In humanitarian texts, care is mainly understood as a service provided to people who need it. This why it is also referred to as a need and necessity.
Humanitarian actors can be providers of care and it is therefore considered a part of aid, relief and kind of support. Given that care constitutes one or many of the activities carried out by humanitarian actors, another umbrella term is intervention.
Situations of care are discussed at length by those involved in humanitarian action. For this reason, care is also broadly referred to as an issue and more specifically as an essential in the sense of essential service.
Other more general parent concepts include area (e.g. key area, area of expertise) and sector (e.g. government sector, private sector).
A group of 396 contexts was extracted in which care is conceptualised as a service. These contain 79 types of care (e.g. care, health care, child care) and 75 types of service (e.g. service, essential service, basic service).
Most types of care are merely described as an unspecified service. These include health care, antenatal care, medical care, postnatal care, child care, emergency care and specialised care in order of relevance.
The top 6 specified types of service are essential service, basic service, health service, public service, reproductive health service and basic social service. Below is a bar chart representing the top 15 types of services identified as well as the references to the kinds of care they designate.
Please hover over each coloured segment to reveal the type of care represented.
More specifically, care can be understood as a kind of support. This is in line with the idea of service, but it contains a nuance of help or assistance. A selection of 29 contexts were identified with care being conceptualised as support. For instance, medical care, together with education and counselling, is considered to be a constituent of psychosocial support. Another example is trauma care, which is conceptualised as an constituent element of comprehensive survivor-centred support.
Essential is another umbrella term for care, but this appears to be restricted to health care and medical care. This was identified in an extraction of 7 contexts. For example, one context refers to health care, education, safe water and sanitation as essentials.
Therefore, certain essential goods and services, such as health care, are understood as basic and necessary to guarantee a decent quality of life.
A total of 57 contexts were identified in which care is referred to as a need or necessity. When specified, they are described as basic, essential, immediate, urgent and emerging, amongst others. As seen in the previous subsection, these are adjectives also used to qualify services (e.g. basic service as well as basic need).
An extraction of 11 contexts mention health care, medical care, psychosocial care, primary care, speciality care and nutritional care as aid, humanitarian aid, emergency aid and non-food aid.
Another 11 contexts were extracted in which care is understood as a constituent of relief. More specific mentions include humanitarian relief, emergency relief, critical relief and immediate relief.
This indicates that humanitarian actors provide affected populations with aid or relief consisting of both goods and services, including care.
Humanitarian actors discuss situations in which they intervene or consider intervening with activities. These interventions also comprise the provision of care. A contextual extraction identified 29 instances in which care is described as an intervention. More specific mentions of intervention including live-saving intervention, essential intervention, emergency intervention and high-technology intervention.
Prior to intervening, humanitarian actors identify those instances in which care or associated concepts become an issue (e.g. access to care, protection of care, detainee health care). In 29 contexts, various kinds of care are described as an issue. Examples of specific types of issues include humanitarian issue, time-dependent issue and public policy issue.
More broadly, humanitarian actors refer to types of care as areas such as key area, area of relevance, program area and effective area, to mention but a few. An extraction of 29 contexts contain references to care as an area.
Another broad umbrella term for care is sector. Caring for someone implies carrying out certain activities that can be conceptually subsumed into one activity: care. For this reason, it is also referred to as an activity sector. For instance, education and health care are core public sectors. In an extraction of 10 contexts, heath care is referred to as a migrant-intensive sector, a public service sector and important economic sector. Other types of care identified as sectors include prenatal care and social care.
Based on provider
medical care
parental care
maternal care
institutional care
family care
pastoral care
specialist care
professional care
personal care
government care
Based on disease/condition
AIDS care
HIV care
trauma care
TB (tuberculosis) care
disability care
wound care
diabetes care
dementia care
malaria care
Based on time
emergency care
day care
long-tern care
follow-up care
timely care
immediate care
interim care
urgent care
constant care
temporary care
Based on location
home care
hospital care
home-based care
residential care
community care
hospice care
Based on recipient
child care
newborn care
neonatal care
patient care
family care
elderly care
maternity care
outpatient care
personal care
orphan care
veterinary care
childhood care
supporter care
staff care
animal care
environmental care
OVC (orphans and vulnerable children) care
in-patient care
refugee care
donor care
blind care
livestock care
Based on extent
comprehensive care
holistic care
integrated care
essential care
basic care
specialised care
Based on quality
quality care
compassionate care
adequate care
great care
high-quality care
loving care
high-level care
proper care
Based on objective
health care
palliative care
preventive care
rehabilitative care
curative care
lifesaving care
therapeutic care
Based on methods/approach
surgical care
clinical care
person-centred care
sustainable care
Based on human dimension
health care
psychosocial care
social care
nutritional care
nutrition care
psychiatric care
spiritual care
mental health care
reproductive care
end-of-life care
Based on phase
post-operative care
post-natal care
post-abortion care
pre-hospital care
post-operative care
post-partum care
perinatal care
end-of-life care
post-abortion care
Based on cost
free care
unpaid care
affordable care
Life-limiting illnesses
Physical trauma
Mental trauma
Orthopaedic issues
Reconstructive issues
Maxillofacial issues
HIV/AIDS
HIV-related co-infections
Kaposi's sarcoma
Viral hepatitis
Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB)
Hepatitis C
Noma
Violence
Acuteness
Resusitation after heart surgery
Mental health issues
Paediatric epilepsy
Cleft palate
Diphtheria
Leprosy
Diabetes
Vegetative state
Old age
Dementia
Malnutrition
Homelessness
Multiple Sclerosis
Oxygen dependency
Armed conflict
Hypertension
Chronic diseases
Critical post-partum conditions
Terminal cancer
Psychiatric issues
Injury
Disability
Ebola
Poverty
Obstetric fistula
Burns
Leishmaniasis
Rickets
Detention
Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Displacement
Migration
Vulnerability
Poverty
Armed conflict
Imprisonment
Violence
Sexual violence
Displacement
Homelessness
Disability
Natural disasters
Family separation
Old age
Injury
Psychological and psychosocial issues
Dementia
Malnutrition
Restricted access to services
Remoteness
Drug addiction
Disease
Trichiasis
Lymphatic filariasis
HIV/AIDS
Tuberculosis
Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB)
Leprosy
Ebola
Type 2 Diabetes
Cholera
Abandonment
Armed conflict
Natural Disasters
Dependency
Disability
Poverty
HIV/AIDS
Homelessness
Legal issues
Malnutrition
Medical issues
Orphancy
Poverty
Psychological trauma
Family separation
Under a certain age
Eligible
Living a certain age
Pregnant
Mothers
Childbirth complications
Obstetric fistula
Uterine prolapse
Vaginal prolapse
Incontinence
Violence
Sexual violence
HIV/AIDS
Poverty
Lack of health insurance
Malaria
Hypertension disorders
Pre-eclampsia
Eclampsia
Obstetric haemorrhage
Uterine rupture
Armed conflict
Displacement
Exploitation
Polio
Armed conflict
Trauma
Genital mutilation
Natural disasters
Tsunami
Earthquake
Drought
Human trafficking
Burns
Ill-treatment
Humanitarian crisis
Violence
Sexual violence
Rape
Domestic violence
Elder abuse
Torture
Unaccompanied children
Shan
Syrian
Venezuelan
Colombian
Palestinian
Somali
Iraqi
Detention
Transit
Armed conflict
HIV/AIDS
Tuberculosis
Family-specific issues
Disability
Armed conflict
Natural disaster
Displacement
Emergency
Isolation
Migration
Poverty
Remoteness
Violence
Vulnerability
Rural areas
Urban areas
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest contributors (NGO_Fed, IGO, RC and RE) proves to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Overall, danger is the top collocate with care in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2016. In second place, antenatal topped 2008, 2009 and 2017. The collocate with the highest score is palliative and it was registered in 2018. Other top collocates include primary, obstetric and unpaid.
The top collocate in NGO documents is palliative in the 2010-2016 period as well as in 2018. Other top NGO collocates include home-based, pastoral, antenatal and free.
NGO_Fed documents are clearly dominated by unpaid as top collocate in 2012, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Antenatal is the second collocate with the highest score for 2006, 2010 and 2011. Other top NGO_Fed collocates include therapeutic, obstetrical, mental-health, eye, lifestyle and childhood.
In IGO documents, unpaid is again the top collocate in the 2014-2017 period. However, 2008 saw the highest score with antenatal as top collocate, also topping 2009 and 2019. In third place, obstetric is the top collocate for 2006, 2007 and 2010 with considerably low scores. Other top IGO collocates include ambulatory, heating, parental, good-quality and feeding.
RC documents contain danger as top collocate with the highest overall scores from 2011 to 2016. Palliative is the collocate with the forth highest overall score, which was recorded in 2005. It was also the top collocate for 2019. Other top RC collocates include postnatal, pre-hospital, home-based, emergency-room and giver.
In RE documents, 2005, 2006, 2010 and 2016 saw palliative as their top collocate. However, pastoral is the collocate with the highest overall score, which was recorded for 2017. This collocate also topped 2018, but with a comparatively lower score. Other top RE collocates include teach, giver, cancer, PLHAs (person living with HIV/AIDS, postnatal and eye. Please note that there is no RE collocational data available for 2005 or 2019.
The following visualisation contains key collocations distributed by organisation type. Each collocate is constitutes a bubble whose size represents its frequency in the corpus. You can reduce and increase the number of collocates shown by setting a desired range with the frequency slider control.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about care that others do not.
Top unique collocates for NGO are Planet (Planet Care), GHAP (Global Health Access Program), EHA (Emanuel Hospital Association), MCP (Medical Care Program), AMIC (Addiction Management and Integration Care), reconstructive, heal, SCA (Swedish Committee for Afghanistan), orthopaedic, mercy and delivering.
NGO_Fed documents feature MSF (Médecins Sans Frontières), SOS (SOS Children's Villages), lifestyle, placement, Mectizan, Seim Reap (a city in Cambodia), kinship, Caritas, FBC (family-based care) and decentralisation.
IGO unique collocates with the highest scores are reunification, back-up, trace, people-centred, generalist, satisfaction, conventional, professionalisation, redesign and adverse.
Documents from RE contain the following top unique collocates: ICRC-supported, weapon-wounded, medical-social, deprived, higher-level, ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross) emergency-room, century, first-aid, and mother-and-child.
Top unique collocates for RE are sufferer, Alzheimer, Hospitaller, Malteser, OSJCT (The Orders of St John Care Trust), socio-medical, Malta, Eficor, enrichment, handicapped and kindness.
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations when they touch on care. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are hospice (RE+NGO), first-level (IGO+RC), person-centred (NGO_Fed+IGO), comfort (RE+RC), supporter (NGO_Fed+NGO) and survival (NGO_Fed+NGO).
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types include unpaid (IGO+NGO_Fed+NGO) pastoral (RE+NGO+NGO_Fed), specialise (NGO_Fed+RE+NGO), foster (NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), parental (NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), and wound (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO).
Top collates shared by 4 organisation types include obstetric (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), eye (RE+RC+IGO+NGO), neonatal (RE+RC+NGO_Fed+NGO), preventive (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), curative (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO) and appropriate (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO).
Finally, all organisation types selected for analysis coincide with the following collocates in order of relevance: medical, health, primary, antenatal, quality and psychosocial
Verb collocates are useful in determining key relations between concepts. On the left is a diagram that represents verbs of which care is the subject (in green) and the object (in pink).
At first sight, care collocates with verbs more frequently as an object than as a subject. The most prominent verb collocate is provide. Synonymous verbal collates include offer and deliver. As can be seen, take is the second most relevant collocate, but it also falls into the provide category because it forms a synonymous verbal phrase, i.e. to take care of. This suggests that humanitarian texts focus on humanitarian actors as agents in the provision of care. Other verbs that take care as an object are improve, ensure and include.
To a lesser extent, texts focus on the role of people on the receiving end. This perspective describes their relations to care by means of receive (synonymous with obtain, access), need and seek. The first two verbs entail a passive role, whereas seek implies an active role in the act of pursuing care services.
Less than a third of verbal collocates takes care as a subject. These are mostly used to describe the notion in particular contexts, e.g. include and centre. Interestingly, a verb that takes care as both subject and object is improve. This highlights the notion of quality of care, which is also examined in this section
Conceptually, care is understood as an abstract entity that is given to someone who is need of it.
Further collocational analysis reveals that key associated concepts include quality, level, model, standard, duty and continuity, which are examined in the following sections. Other related concepts are provision, need, lack, availability and cost.
A collocational extraction obtained 610 occurrences of quality of care. This means that quality is an important concept when discussing the subject of care in the humanitarian sphere. In a sample of 200 contexts containing quality of care, these include mentions of unspecified care as well as specific kinds such as in-hospital obstetric care, social care and child care. Depending on what humanitarians actors do or say about quality of care, these contexts can be categorised into in 18 types of mentions:
Acceptability
Adherence
Affordability
Assessment
Availability
Commitment
Entailment
Establishment
Goal
Improvement
Insufficiency
Monitoring
Promotion
Provision
Satisfaction
Study
Worsening
Quality can bear multiple adjectives when describing specific conditions or hypothetical situations of care:
Good; better quality of care
High; higher; highest; highest possible quality of care
Inadequate quality of care
Low quality of care
Poor quality of care
Overall quality of care
Level of care is another frequent collocation with two meanings. A collocational analysis extracted 180 occurrences of level of care. On the one hand, it is used to describe care in relation to varying degrees of quality, treatment success, technological and procedural sophistication, as well as the catalogue of care services provided by an organisation. When used in this sense, humanitarian actors associate level of care with the concepts of provision, improvement, commitment, goal, need and availability.
At the same time, however, kinship networks have proved resilient in providing at least a minimum level of care and socialisation for children orphaned by AIDS.
On the other hand, level of care refers to the abstract parts making up care systems. The most characteristic example is the health care system, which can be structured into primary, secondary and tertiary levels. In this case, humanitarian actors associate level of care with the concepts of referral, continuity, coordination, improvement, and development.
Health facilities are categorised by level of care according to their size and the services provided.
With 160 occurrences, model of care is another frequent collocation. From a sample of 135 contexts, mentions can be categorised into 21 categories depending on what it said about model of care.
Collocational analysis also revealed a great deal of specification. Below is a list of types of model of care categorised based on (i) the nature of model, (ii) the nature of the care provided, (iii) care provider-related aspects, (iv) care recipient-related aspects and the (v) location where models of care operate.
Adaptation
Alienation
Assessment
Development
Enrolment
Entailment
Establishment
Goal
Government approval
Implementation
Improvement
Insufficiency
Pilot
Promotion
Provision
Replication
Simplification
Study
Success
Upholding
Upscaling
Nature of model
Alternative model of care
Comprehensive model of care
Cost-effective model of care
Decentralised model of care
Differentiated model care
Holistic model of care
Innovative model of care
Integrated model of care
International model of care
National model of care
Less complex model of care
Pilot model of care
Simplified model of care
Successful model of care
Sustainable model of care
Scalable model of care
Traditional model of care
Replicable model of care
Provider-related aspects
Nurse-based model of care
Recipient-related aspects
Age-friendly model of care
Community model of care
Community-access model of care
Community-based model of care
Patient-centred model of care
Patient-centred individualised model of care
Patient-friendly model of care
People-centred model of care
Nature of care
Ambulatory model of care
Home-based mode of care
Location-based
Urban model of care
Rural model of care
The corpus contains 130 occurrences of standard of care. A sample of 116 rich contexts was analysed. Mentions of standard of care can be categorised into 18 categories according to what organisations say or do about it.
Standard of care was found to have two distinct meanings:
standardised or preferred practice of care; or
a synonym for quality of care.
Adherence
Adoption
Assessment
Consultancy
Demand
Development
Harmonisation
Implementation
Improvement
Indication
Insufficiency
Promotion
Provision
Right
Study
Unavailability
Upholding
Worsening
Sputum smear microscopy is standard of care, but has poor sensitivity especially in patients with HIV.
Emphasis on ongoing staff training and development has meant that the Centre is able to offer an extremely high standard of care that is having a transformative impact in neighbouring countries as well.
The Oxford Dictionary of Law defines duty of care as "the legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid causing damage" (Law, 2018). Duty of care is a concept that applies to all fields of activity, including the field of humanitarian action. A more activity-specific example is the definition found in the Oxford Dictionary of Nursing which defines it as "the legal obligation of doctors and other health professionals to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to their patients" (Martin & McFerran, 2017).
The corpus contains 117 occurrences of duty of care. An analysis was carried out on 88 rich contexts. When humanitarian actors mention duty of care, they do so to:
affirm their commitment;
describe activities performed to uphold their duty of care;
describe relevant regulations;
criticise shortcomings;
define duty of care; and
discuss particular cases related to duty of care.
Affected populations
Associates
Beneficiaries
Children
Clients
Constituents
Contractors
Contributors
Donors
Employees
Field staff
Human capital
Humanitarian personnel
International staff
Local partners
Members
National staff
Officials
Partners
Patients
Representatives
Supporters
Volunteers
Vulnerable people
Vulnerable adults
Workers
Young people
Provide a safe environment
Lobby governments
Conduct audits
Promote workers' well-being
Avoid long-term exhaustion, injury or illness of their workers
Risk assessment
Detect and avoid child exploitation
Guarantee safety and security of human resources
Provide specific training
Develop specific training material
Have a dedicated flexible budget
Offer health and well-being services to staff
Develop new policies
Research
Develop a support welfare package for staff
Obtain informed consent from humanitarian beneficiaries
Implement stress prevention and management programs
Implement conflict resolution practices
Provide staff with quality equipment
Have managers who are role models in terms of good praxis and policy compliance
Provide staff development programmes
Share duty of care policies publicly
Ensure appropriate data protection
Ensuring that people in need have access to continuous care is of utmost importance. The corpus contains 88 occurrences of continuity of care. In a sample of 71 rich contexts, mentions of continuity of care can be categorised into 18 categories based on what humanitarian actors say or do about it.
Contextual analysis revealed a number of causes that disrupt continuity of care as well as what organisations do to achieve it.
Adherence
Adoption
Assessment
Consultancy
Demand
Development
Harmonisation
Implementation
Improvement
Indication
Insufficiency
Promotion
Provision
Right
Study
Unavailability
Upholding
Worsening
Armed conflict
Centralisation of care services
Displacement
Eviction
Insecurity
Instability
Programme fragmentation
Remoteness
Violence
Develop new guidelines and training tools
Distribute emergency HIV kits
Involve social workers in delivering medicines
Decentralise services
Transfer management to local organisation
Train community health workers
Link peripheral units with referral hospitals
Utilise local services
Conduct livestock vaccination campaign
Provide veterinary training
Train animal health workers
Train doctors in war-surgery
Train volunteers and potential first responders in first-aid
Cost-effectiveness assessment
Have a specific protocol
Increasing medical donations
Lobbying health officials
Training local medical staff
Implement a transfer plan
Implement a communication protocol
Implement a specific process
Have continuity of information
Establish direct and lasting relationship between providers and community
Make providers responsible
Have good communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care doctors
Have a variety of health professionals and instruments
Better coordination
Correct responsibility handover among health care professionals
Developing an information system
Three near-synonyms for care were identified. Given that care is a broad basic concept, synonymous expressions appear to be highly context-dependent. Basic concepts tend to combine with other concepts to become more specific. This is why care and its synonyms are more often found in combination with modifiers than on its own.
It is in these combinations with other concepts that one can establish differences between near-synonyms in isolation. This section looks at assistance, support and protection and compares their collocations with those of care. In this way, nuanced meaning differences can be determined.
When acting as a subject, assistance and care appear with key verbs such as help, improve, reach and respond with relatively balanced scores. Please note that some of the detected verbs are false positives. These include need, work and programme, which are in fact nouns in this case (i.e assistance needs, assistance work, care work, care programmes). As objects, assistance and care also share key verbs such as provide, receive, deliver, seek and offer.
Assistance and care are also found to share modifiers (i.e. modifying nouns or adjectives), but to a lesser extent compared to verbs. Common modifiers such as emergency, food, medical and health were detected. The first two are sightly more frequent with assistance, while the last two are more frequent with care. Interestingly, emergency assistance and emergency care do not appear to be synonyms. The former may actually be a parent concept of the latter. Conversely, when modified my medical, both medical assistance and medical care appear to be synonymous.
As modifiers of other nouns, programme shows a balanced distribution between assistance and care. Other shared modified nouns include provider, service, unit, facility and centre, but they are more frequent with care. Here is where nouns detected as verbs should be included.
Support and care act a subjects of improve with even distributions. They also share key verbs like include and help, but frequencies lean towards support. Many verbs taking support and care as objects (provide, offer, receive, seek, access) coincide with the previous case.
When taking modifiers, support and care overlap with psychosocial and psychological. However, they occur slightly more frequently with support. In this case, psychosocial support and psychological support are synonymous with psychosocial care and psychological care.
As modifiers, both collocate with service, unit, centre, staff, worker and facility. As with assistance, some false positives were detected as verbs and they should be included here, e.g. need, programme and work.
Protection and care only appear to share remain when acting as subjects. Need, work and programme were again erroneously detected as verbs. Similarly, protection and care share key verbs when acting as objects as with assistance and support. Key verbs include provide, receive, ensure, access, offer and seek.
As modifiers of other nouns, they both collocate with system to form protection system and care system. They were found to share social and child as modifiers. Again, need, work and programme should be included here too. It could be argued that social protection and social care are near-synonyms. Additionally, as for child protection and child care, the former may perhaps be considered a parent concept of the latter.
The chart below represents the distribution of care between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested to explore why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given corpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult "contexts", or the search the corpus itself.
Occurrences of care were highest in 2015. However, 2019 saw the highest relative frequency with 145%.
Oceania generated the greatest number of occurrences with a relative frequency of 227%. Coming in second place, North America recorded the highest relative frequency with 120%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of care are NGO_Fed, RE, Project, RC and Found.
Activity reports provide the greatest number of occurrences and also the highest relative frequency with 113%.
This shows occurrences of care in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the evolution of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides an overview of care across domains.
Care saw a steady increase from 1970 until 1995 when it peaked to then plateau whilst maintaining pre-1990 values to date.
The study report on Unpaid Care Work (UCW) was featured in almost every news outlet, which contributed in mainstreaming the debate and highlighting the importance of recognising Unpaid Care Work in the GDP.
This opened up community debate around unpaid care work, and in the region where the event took place, 30% of men saw, for the first time, the need to support their wives' unpaid care work.
ActionAid India also took an innovative approach to unpaid care work - working with women and youth at community level, it questioned men on the subject and sensitised them on sharing care work.
The public/private mix debate in health care .
The relative roles of the public and private (for-profit or not-for-profit) sectors in health-care provision have evolved over time and have continued to engender strong debate on ideological grounds.
When the scale of the disaster became clear, it led to significant public outcry and debate about the way France handles its elderly care .
In February, our annual report into the Health and Care of Older People in England reported that 1.2 million older people are now living with an unmet need for care – a fact which has been widely quoted in Parliamentary and public debates .
As debates on ageing and health and care increase, we will continue with our Age Demands Action campaigns during World Health Day to advocate governments and the WHO to act on supporting healthy ageing and service provision for NCDs.
For example, a look to Afghanistan shows a high mother-child mortality rate. Behind the misery of women and children there is a social problem. Thus the deficit of medical care mainly in rural areas is to a large extent due to the questionable role of women in the community. As long as women are bound in their traditional role and are excluded from working life, they are missing in the health care system as professionals.
A number of Arab governments have attempted to improve the basic health care services offered to the public. However, these attempts are incomplete in most Arab countries and are subordinated to the existing care health system and third-rate hospitals. Public sector health care is widely criticised for its low quality and inefficiency, its unresponsiveness to patients' needs, and the frequent referral of patients to the private sector.
The devastating effects of institutional care on a child's development are well documented. Current debates about de-institutionalisation (DI) are a welcome sign that governments and society are finally acknowledging their responsibility to fulfil every child's right to quality care.
In 1949, the year SOS Children's Villages was founded, the organisation's concept of offering orphaned and abandoned children an alternative form of long-term care was pioneering in its nature and opposed to traditional institutional care facilities.
Our Care in Crisis reports spearheaded the national debate about the scale of the funding challenge facing social care and the inadequacy of the Government's response so far.
Age UK has been at the forefront of debate around our social care system, calling for an end to the crisis in social care.
The absence of tailored and community-based care, especially long-term care and accessible transport and health care for the elderly, is a major contributor to social exclusion, which is exacerbated by declining family support networks.
Alongside the Australian Medical Association, the ANMF has actively protested this 'gag' law, arguing that it goes against their professional and ethical responsibilities to ensure duty of care for their patients. In response to the legislation, ANMF Federal Secretary Lee Thomas said: "We're horrified the government is using this new law to prevent the Australian public from knowing what really goes on inside detention centres by trying to silence nurses and other health professionals who work there.
Amid the debate over health care reform–before and after the law's enactment–Health Affairs published a wide array of articles on many aspects of the reform, from the effects of expanding insurance coverage on children's health, to the likely impact of the controversial individual mandate on health insurance.
While communities did in some cases appear to play vital roles as interlocutors with armed groups, this was largely limited to areas where community members were either trusted by the group, or the group was not predisposed to limit access. Even so, significant risks were involved. While some degree of risk sharing is unavoidable, the ethics of approaches that rely on community members risking their lives in order to enable access – particularly in the absence of well-planned strategies and support – raise serious questions about risk transfer and duty of care .
Switzerland must respect children's rights Switzerland fails to respect the rights of children and youth in the asylum field, despite having ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child. In a position paper, Caritas criticises the lack of suitable accommodation and care for under-age asylum seekers. It demands access to schooling and the re-introduction of embassy applications, to avoid the most dangerous refugee routes.
A frequently asked question from field partners is how best to support the mental well-being of their employees and volunteers.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.