The HE corpus contains 9,572 occurrences of the concept settlement.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownSettlement occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by Africa, MENA, North America and Asia with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed, RC and Net organisations.
NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed, RC and Net documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from Occurrences from activity reports published in Europe.
are
areas of land occupied by humans
have legal statuses
informal
illegal
squatter
which can be regularised
have types of inhabitants
Israeli
refugee
IDP
have various locations
urban
rural
remote
including exposed areas
flood zones
landslide areas
landfills
are referred to by name
Rwamwanja
Nakivale
Kyangwali
have timescales
temporary
permanent
new
have development types
spontaneous, unplanned
sustainable
have specific purposes
transitional
have construction & shelter types
tent
makeshift
have varying sizes
large (including over a million residents)
small
are labelled by economic condition
slum
low-income
have other descriptors
communal
human
have potential synonyms
slum
informal area
biddonville
favela
squatter camp
shanty town
have unclear definitions
with regards to similar terms
in legal contexts
in humanitarian contexts
depending on permanence
are generally more permanent than camps
can be caused by / cause
sprawl
rapid urban development
poor economic conditions
disaster
conflict
displacement
have environmental concerns
restoration of natural areas
environmental degradation
climate adaptation
have inhabitants at risk of
eviction
forced encampment
child labor
displacement
fire
violence
overcrowding
malnutrition
have infrastructure issues
building standards & construction quality
land availability
demolition
require better services
education
primary health care
psychosocial assistance
amenities
transit
have poor living conditions
scarcity of goods
access to food
malnutrition
WASH issues
movement restriction
are treated with broad goals
resilience
communication & partnership
community engagement
are treated with approaches
Sphere Handbook minimum standards
UNHCR global strategy
UN-Habitat human settlement
need specific actions
community action plans
quick-impact interventions
regularisation
securing tenure
upgrading areas
skills training
is a
process of occupying an area of land
has activities
activity (development)
expansion
demolition
relocation
is the
relocation of a party to a third country (more commonly resettlement)
has challenges
defining what integration means for resettled groups
post-migration stressors
IDPs having their preferences and needs voiced, addressed
how to manage temporary migrant worker programmes
are
agreements in a conflict, dispute
have objectives
peace
have means, qualities
political
peaceful
fiscal
have stages, timescales
temporary
new
final
have challenges
armed groups' lack of compliance
piecemeal implementation of agreements that affect IDPs
No explicit definitions were found for any sense of settlement and few implicit definitional contexts exist. Below are examples of key usages of settlement in the humanitarian field.
The primary sense of settlement, which takes up a large majority of cases, is an area occupied by humans, generally on a semi-permanent or permanent basis. This is broken down into various distinct types (see Types of Settlement), and also refers to the process of settling areas.
Settlement has several other usages that take up a small but important portion of cases. Excluding cases that regard settlement in financial transactions, the two most pertinent are
the relocation of vulnerable groups to other countries (more commonly referred to as resettlement, see Resettlement in Synonyms)
an agreement made between parties in a conflict or dispute
The existing illegal individual settlements consist of large tracts of land which have been given to Jewish citizens of the state for their private use over the years by the ILA and regional councils, without bids.
Settlement is a key concern, not only because it reduces the space available for Palestinian use and movement, but also because the Israeli authorities have systematically failed to protect Palestinians from settler violence.
Surveys of policies and rates of migration in developed countries show that most foreign nationals naturalize in traditional settlement countries, such as Australia and Canada, that emphasize the public's interest in encouraging shared national citizenship.
The annual pay negotiations with the Trade Union resulted in an agreed wage settlement of 0.8% for employees in lower grades, down to 0.2% for those in the highest grades, which is in line with our values of supporting the lowest paid employees where we can.
Some Members felt that such recognition should not be subject to the outcome of negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis, while others felt that the twoState solution through a negotiated settlement was the only option for a long-term sustainable peace.
While it may refer to any area and population size, from an encampment to a metropolis, in the humanitarian context settlement usually refers to developments with 1) an irregular legal status (informal settlement) or 2) a temporary or semi-permanent area for affected populations to reside (refugee settlement).
Types of settlement with at least 20 cases include the following, of which informal settlement is by far the most common, with over 1,200:
legal status
informal settlement
illegal settlement
squatter settlement
inhabitants
Israeli settlement
refugee settlement
IDP settlement
Jewish settlement
Roma settlement
location
urban settlement
rural settlement
remote settlement
coastal settlement
Transdniestrian settlement
Nairobi settlement
Rwamwanja settlement
Nakivale settlement
Kyangwali settlement
timescale
temporary settlement
permanent settlement
new settlement
old settlement
existing settlement
development type
spontaneous settlement
unplanned settlement
sustainable settlement
purpose
transitional settlement
construction / housing
tent settlement
makeshift settlement
size
large settlement
small settlement
economic condition
slum settlement
low-income settlement
other descriptor
communal settlement
human settlement
objective / result
peace settlement
means / quality
political settlement
peaceful settlement
fiscal settlement
friendly settlement
comprehensive settlement
dispute settlement
stage / timescale
temporary settlement
new settlement
final settlement
lasting settlement
Informal settlement makes up nearly 15% of hits, with very high relative densities for some sub-types of organisations, especially Net_Pol_Reg, GS, IFRC, UN_OPA, and UN_SA. This is also the case for documents from Africa and General Documents.
While informal settlements can take a variety of forms, the defining characteristics in HE contexts are the lack of formal planning, infrastructure, public services, and documentation of ownership or tenure.
That said, there can be a spectrum of legal circumstances and government positions on such settlements, from their being entirely unincorporated to being practically indistinguishable from other portions of an urban area. Such conditions may change over time, especially as a result of humanitarian and government efforts to permanently incorporate informal settlements.
Today, over 25 per cent of the world's urban population live in informal settlements or slums. A slum household is defined by UN-Habitat as lacking one or more of the following: durable housing; sufficient living area; access to water and sanitation; and secure tenure.
Rapidly expanding informal settlements – slums – are rarely planned, and very often metropolitan authorities do not know who is living in their cities. Without knowing this, they cannot provide basic public services, nor can they collect taxes effectively to pay for the services. The people living in these settlements are rarely consulted on their service needs.
Having a home in an informal settlement usually means lacking land tenure and any official documentation of 'ownership' of the land and house. It also often means living in a settlement with no infrastructure, such as piped water supplies, sewers, drains and paved roads, because local governments refuse to provide these to 'illegal' settlements. It is this lack of infrastructure that greatly increases the impact of the disaster event. Most informal settlements have little or no public provision for healthcare or emergency services, which further limits needed responses to disasters.
It is quite common in the developing world for informal settlements to be comprised of homes that possess varying degrees of tenure security, and that provide differing levels of rights to inhabitants depending upon a variety of factors. The common practice of squatters subletting portions of their homes or land plots to tenants is one of many examples where individuals living on the same land plot may each have distinct degrees of tenure security/insecurity.
Informal settlements can be located in urban centres, on their periphery, or in isolation. They may be in areas with greater exposure to natural hazards, including in protected habitats and landfills. In some cases, they can make up a substantial portion of a city or population and have millions of residents.
More than 1 million people living in slums on informal settlements in Nairobi–about a third of the city's population–depend on private vendors as a secondary water source.
Informal settlements are often located in areas prone to flooding and landslides and, thus, particularly vulnerable.
In Manila, informal settlements at risk to coastal flooding make up 35 per cent of the population; in Bogota, 60 per cent of the population live on steep slopes subject to landslides; and in Calcutta, 66 per cent of the population live in squatter settlements at risk from flooding and cyclones.
Informal settlement can include sub-types like informal refugee settlement and urban informal settlement.
Potential synonyms include slum, informal area, biddonville, favela, squatter camp, and shanty town. These share over 4,000 contexts, with slum making up nearly 90% of contexts.
The term camp is generally contrasted from settlement as being more temporary in nature, but this distinction can be blurred when camps exist over long periods. Other low frequency types of settlement, like urban settlement, can essentially refer to informal settlements with specific locations or characteristics.
Lastly, the regularisation of a settlement occurs when it gains legal status and is to some degree incorporated into government housing and planning efforts. The process of regularising informal settlements is seen as positive, but not without its challenges.
With the urbanisation of the world population, an increasing number of poor people leave their village to live in what are technically termed "informal settlements ", but are often referred to as "squatter camps", "shanty towns", "favelas" or "slums". In these settlements, people often live for years in very precarious conditions, with very unreliable sources of income mostly from informal sectors and limited access to basic facilities such as electricity, water and sanitation. This is due to the fact that no planning has been done on where to lay cables and pipes because, by law, this is unoccupied land.
Where informal settlements have been regularized, the results are often positive. However, because of the location of many settlements on land that is expensive to service, the unit cost of upgrading may exceed the cost of new development. Regularization also leads to increased land and house prices and increased service costs, which may result in gentrification, forcing low-income residents to move to informal settlements elsewhere in the city.
Informal settlement has been considered both a cause of sprawl and a result of rapid urban development. Each case may include a series of potentially complex relationships with a variety of factors, from economic growth to conflict-based internal displacement.
While a key driver of informal settlements may be unfavourable economic conditions, informality itself can also exist at higher economic levels.
In other cities, however, sprawl is fuelled by the growth of informal settlements .
With rapid urbanization, informal settlements (biddonvilles) began to develop.
In addition to the processes of informal settlement described above, in many cities there is much informality in the development of middle- and upper-income residential neighbourhoods.
Those able and willing to pay for better living conditions and private security have segregated themselves in gated communities, which have proliferated in cities throughout the region, often leading to further informal settlement close by to take advantage of the low-wage service employment that they generate.
Israel and settlement cooccur nearly 600 times, making it one of the most common collocations. That said, Israeli settlement is treated narrowly as a humanitarian issue, with few definitional contexts or other linguistic data. Cases are most often relevant to the Debates & Controversies section.
Therefore, PCHR has persistently called upon the international community to immediately intervene to compel the Israeli government to stop all settlement activities in the oPt, especially in East Jerusalem, and dismantle Israeli settlements, which constitute a war crime under international humanitarian law.
Human settlement is fundamentally synonymous with settlement, but with under 400 cases mostly concentrated in UN_OPA documents in Africa, the term is in practice used somewhat differently. In part, this is due to its centrality in the vernacular of the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UN-Habitat). Human settlement is an inclusive umbrella term that also overlaps with housing and shelter. In particular, it can be linked directly to issues such as climate change, adaptation, and resilience.
Just before the turn of the millennium, the Habitat Agenda was adopted at the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements in Istanbul in 1996. The agenda provides a basis for international and national housing and urban development policy for the 21st century.
The shelter issue has become one of a global nature after the concept of 'human settlements' found its place in the international development agenda. Until recently, the classical response to the shelter problems of the urban poor was social housing, both in developed and developing countries. However, the massive demand for affordable housing in developing countries, coupled with the limited resources of the public sector, would have made this solution inapplicable, even in the presence of a wellorganized and transparent public-housing delivery sector.
Refugee settlement is a low frequency term compared to refugee camp, with around 400 for the former and over 4,000 for the latter.
The distinctions between these two concepts is only seen in implicit evidence, given that both lack clear definitions. One observation is that the combination refugee settlement camp, while, infrequently used, underscores their ambiguity as labels.
Further complicating their differences is that camps and settlements can sometimes be grouped together and, for some purposes, treated the same. Of the few contexts that make distinctions, some indicate that camps can become settlements over time and that settlements can consist of multiple camps.
Dadaab is the world's largest long-term refugee settlement, made up of five camps, which are home to some 345,000 refugees, mostly Somalis.
The people living in the Mayo camp, about 20 kilometres from Khartoum, are refugees from the wars that have been tearing Sudan and its neighbours apart for 20 years. Today, Mayo has around 400,000 inhabitants. It's no longer possible to call it a refugee camp, because the majority of families now living there have been doing so for years. Living conditions, however, are still extremely unstable. A lack of running water, no sewage system, and poverty put a heavy strain on the health of children, who make up 50% of the camp's inhabitants.
Senses of settlement that exclude references to a built human environment are much less frequent. Of these, the most common is settlement as a resolution/agreement to end a conflict or dispute.
This meaning has several sub-types that indicate the goal of settlement negotiations (peace settlement), the mode in which they occur (political settlement) and their stage of completion (final settlement). This sense of settlement has several related terms that may be used somewhat interchangeably, such as agreement, accord, and bargain.
Beyond the reporting of settlement negotiations and statements underscoring their importance, few cases contain more detailed analysis. These cases have the highest relative densities in UN_Or and IGO_Other documents.
Following a political settlement and the creation of a coalition Government, the situation stabilised.
In September, Ambassador Tagliavini co-signed the Minsk Protocol and Minsk Memorandum with representatives of Ukraine and the Russian Federation, and representatives of armed groups from Donetsk and Luhansk, providing key elements for a peaceful settlement in eastern Ukraine.
Settlement lacks high frequency compounds, with only several compounds having more than a hundred cases. The two highest frequency compounds refer almost exclusively to the Israel-Palestine conflict: settlement activity and settlement expansion. Both have some distribution across the corpus, but the bulk of cases originate from humanitarian organisations dedicated to this conflict.
Israeli settlement activities in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, clearly violate international humanitarian law and international resolutions.
In Palestine, Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and military operations in Gaza continued to cause displacement.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed, RC and Net organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for settlement was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 3 top collocates were obtained:
informal;
dispute; and
refugee
NGO documents generated informal as top collocate in 2014.
IGO documents generated informal as top collocate in 2009 with the highest overall score.
NGO_Fed documents generated informal as top collocate in 2014.
RC documents generated informal as top collocate for 2010.
Net documents generated informal as top collocate for 2009.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about settlement that others do not.
NGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
JVC (Japan International Volunteer Center)
outpost
wall
adumim (From Mishor Adumim Settlement)
fiscal
annexation
dismantle
beit (Beit Eil Settlement)
jewish
bekaa (Bekaa Valley refugee settlements)
IGO documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
peri-urban
nagorno-karabakh (from nagorno-karabakh conflict )
regularize
upgrade
regularization
negotiation
dense
UN-habitat
nagornokarabakh (from nagornokarabakh Conflict)
periphery
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
violet
ECD (early childhood development)
oruchinga (Oruchinga refugee settlement)
scholastic
windle
alumnus
defer
dance
classroom
sit
RC documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
shaghan (Shaghan settlement)
masazir (Masazir settlement)
sabunchu (Settlement of sabunchu)
tirtiri (Tiritiri settlement)
mashtaga ( Mashtaga settlement)
khirdalan (Settlement of Khirdalan city)
vunivutu (Vunivutu Indian Settlement)
non-geographic
AGDAM (settlement of Agdam district)
buffer
Net documents feature the following top ten unique collocates:
korogocho (korogocho informal settlement)
RCOA (Refugee Council of Australia)
wimmera (Wimmera Settlement Association)
outskirt
multicultural
sponsorship
inquiry
arrival
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss settlement. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are :
jerusalem (NGO_Fed + IGO)
roma (NGO_Fed + IGO)
settler (RC + NGO)
rhino (NGO_Fed + NGO)
negotiate (NGO + IGO)
low-income (NGO_Fed + IGO)
coastal (RC + IGO)
situate (RC + NGO)
recognise (NGO_Fed + NGO)
immigration (Net + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are :
curtailment (RC + NGO_Fed + IGO)
squatter (RC + NGO+ IGO)
makeshift (NGO_Fed + NGO+ IGO)
peaceful (RC + NGO+ IGO)
probable (RC + NGO_Fed + IGO)
tent (RC + NGO_Fed + IGO)
dispute (NGO + Net + IGO)
unplanned (RC + NGO+ IGO)
reside (RC + NGO+ IGO)
option (NGO + Net + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are :
illegal (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
expansion (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
spontaneous (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
temporary (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
israeli (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
housing (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
remote (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
west (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
side (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
inclusive (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are :
informal (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
slum (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
nairobi (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
refugee (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
shelter (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
urban (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
IDP ( Internally Displaced Persons) (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
settlement (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
camp (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
live (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of settlement between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of settlement were highest in 2018. However, this concept obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2007 (140%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and MENA generated the highest relative frequency with 325%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of settlement are project, C/B, NGO, Net and IGO.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences and general documents generated the highest relative frequency with 137%.
This shows the evolution of settlement and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Settlement decreases until 1957. It then maintains a linear course until it drops again in 1997 until its lowest point in 2019.
A sample of over 60 contexts shows the primary challenges and concerns regarding settlement in the humanitarian context. These originate mostly from Activity Reports and General Documents in Europe and Africa.
With little exception, most discussion is oriented toward settlement as an area rather than as a process of relocation or a kind of agreement. Most contexts discuss challenges that must be overcome with informal settlements and strategies for improving their conditions.
Lists summarising challenges and strategies related to settlement are provided below. The full set of cases can be viewed with the link further below).
definitions
comparison with tent village & similar terms
legal definition & consequences
permanence as a factor
city, urban, rural
terms used for inhabitants (e.g., slum dweller vs working poor)
environmental concerns
restoration of natural area
environmental degradation
erosion
climate adaptation
weather resistance
legality, disempowerment
lack of tenure
risk of eviction
forced encampment
child labor
lack of decision-making power
risk of relocation, displacement
permanence
IHL violations
labelling of product origin (Israeli settlements)
safety
fires
riots
overcrowding
insecurity
layout (unsafe areas)
violence, GBV
infrastructure
building standards & construction quality
land availability
demolition
distant, inadequate & poorly planned alternatives
weak urban planning, governance
location, accessibility
cost of upgrading
services
education
primary health care
psychosocial assistance
amenities
transit
bureaucratic processes
living conditions
scarcity of goods
access to food
malnutrition
WASH
movement restriction
armed groups' lack of compliance
piecemeal implementation of agreements that affect IDPs
defining what integration means for resettled groups
post-migration stressors
IDPs having their preferences and needs voiced, addressed
how to manage temporary migrant worker programmes
There is no internationally agreed definition of a "city" or any consensus on how to identify when a settlement is 'urban' or to determine its boundary.
Malnutrition was already a rampant issue amongst Rohingya settlements prior to the most recent displacements, yet such a large-scale increase in refugee population has put further pressure on already limited resources.
Other challenges experienced in poor urban settlements include low transition rate from primary to secondary school, poor teaching strategies, poor infrastructure, indiscipline (associated with 'overage' primary school pupils) and child labor.
Preventing forced 'encampment' and exploring concrete options for the 'decongestion' of refugee settlements and IDP camps in situations of safety and security is a priority.
They are there without permission and have no access to electricity, water, sanitation or education. Without tenure security, they are at risk of forced eviction and have no alternative housing options available to them. Most IDPs in Libya also live in informal settlements around cities such as Tripoli, Benghazi and Sirte, where they face similar difficulties.
broad goals
resilience
communication & partnership
data availability, completeness
community engagement
approaches
Sphere Handbook minimum standards
UNHCR global strategy
UN-Habitat human settlement perspective
specific actions
community action plans
quick-impact interventions
regularization
securing tenure
upgrading areas
skills training
shelter-driven economic activity
protection against eviction
improving arrangements
relocation
improving drainage
improving infrastructure
preventing new settlements
Shelter and settlement UNHCR's global strategy for settlement and shelter (2014-2018) provides a framework to ensure refugees and others of concern can access dignified, secure settlements and shelter, whether they live in urban or rural settings.
Given that the majority of displaced people lived in formal settlements, we set up a number of mobile site management teams with a range of quick-impact interventions: risk reduction activities, basic repairs and refurbishment, and fire prevention and site safety measures.
This programme has been instrumental in improving livelihoods of refugees at the settlement through provision of vocational skills training in tailoring, carpentry and joinery, bricklaying and concrete practice.
For instance, legal provisions against evictions, regularization and upgrading of informal settlements and land-sharing arrangements are some of the approaches that have been used to avoid the harmful effects of forced eviction of both informal settlement/slum dwellers and informal economic entrepreneurs.
The various meanings and types of settlement allow for a number of possible synonyms, which are pointed out in the sections above. That said, full equivalence is rare. Perhaps the most appropriate, partial synonym to highlight is that of resettlement, which has over 3,600 cases in the HE corpus.
When defined as the process of relocating a displaced person to a third country, settlement is functionally the same as resettlement. In fact, it may be more accurate to say that the former is a variant of the latter, given that resettlement is much more common, to the extent of being standard. This standarisation might not fully extend, however, when comparing the verb forms to settle/resettle.
Most organisations prefer refugee resettlement over refugee settlement. While the terms are very similar, resettlement has its own semantic behavior and is commonly combined, like in resettlement nation or involuntary resettlement, in ways that are effectively incompatible with settlement.
Resettlement is defined as the selection and transfer of refugees from a State in which they have initially sought protection to a third State which has agreed to admit them on a permanent basis.
We played a lead role in the negotiation of a third country resettlement arrangement with the United States for refugees currently in regional processing centres (RPCs) on Nauru and Manus Island.
Besides that we facilitate the (re) settlement process for IDP's and we reduce the number and severity of conflicts between IDP and residents.
While there could be antonyms to settlement in theory or in very specific circumstances, in practice there are few clear linguistic associations. The relationship settlement has with displacement is one example.
For IDPs, displacement is an event where prior settlement is lost, making these terms opposites. Yet residing in an IDP settlement may not rightly qualify as becoming "settled" again, which could instead require moving to a third country.
Here the duration and permanence of settlement are factors, yet so is an individual's status along the steps of an official (re)settlement process. The data compiled here, while limited, point to some ambiguity as to when settlement begins and displacement ends.
Also complicating this relationship is that settlement for one population may cause displacement for another, as in the case of Israeli settlements. Fully exploring these dynamics would of course benefit from pairing the current analysis with one of displacement.
In several countries with long-term or intermittent conflict, including DRC, the Philippines and Yemen, people have been repeatedly displaced over the years. Thus new displacement may be partly explained by earlier settlement options proving unsustainable.
The government announced in February 2018 that it plans to turn some displacement camps in Darfur into permanent settlements, giving IDPs the option of a residential plot or returning to their homes.
In Palestine, Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and military operations in Gaza continued to cause displacement.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.