There are 633 occurrences of contingency planning in the HE Corpus.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownContingency planning occurs mostly in documents published in North America and Europe. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, RC, C/B, Net and NGO organisations.
IGO documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports and general documents published in North America. In second place, occurrences from RC were mostly obtained from activity reports published in Europe. Occurrences from C/B were solely found in European general documents.
Occurrences from Net were obtained primarily from North American and Asian activity reports. Lastly, NGO also generates a considerable number of occurrences from Asian, African and European activity reports.
From a practical and operational perspective, one of the most important benefits of contingency planning is the identification of constraints prior to the onset of a crisis, allowing preparedness actions to be identified and implemented.
Contingency planning gives humanitarians and (sic) opportunity [to] assess, think, and discuss response options before the pressure of a crisis makes it difficult.
Contextual analysis identified 5 parent concepts of contingency planning, namely preparedness, readiness, tool, area and activity.
With the adoption of the 2009 policy, OCHA ROs focus on three key areas, particularly where there is no country office: response preparedness, including early warning and contingency planning; support to emergency response; and developing regional coordination networks.
Steps to address these challenges will include: • Increasing advocacy and awareness of critical health needs and health care delivery challenges in countries in chronic crisis including Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, and West Bank and Gaza strip. • Strengthening coordination with regional stakeholders and accelerating support to Member States in the design and implementation of emergency preparedness and hazard mitigation programmes. • Increasing focus on training, contingency planning and other response readiness modalities using an all hazards approach that includes avian and pandemic influenza. • Improving WHO's ability to lead and manage the Health Cluster response to major crises and complex emergencies.
It also HC and HCT and prepares a consolidated provides tools such as contingency planning, Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP), which is hazard mapping and early warning reports. evidence based and prioritized.
Following the identification of specific preparedness needs in target countries, the Office aims to provide support to humanitarian partners and Governments in key areas such as the establishment of coordination structures, contingency planning, data preparedness and needs assessment readiness.
NGOs and donors were regularly included in coordination activities, including CHAP/CAP processes and contingency planning.
In view of the large numbers of people affected by El Niño in 2015 and 2016, it is evident that more progress is urgently required: • Contingency planning and other preparedness activities need to be timely and more systematic and methodological.
based on scale/sophistication
extensive contingency planning
comprehensive contingency planning
based on human dimension/activities
humanitarian contingency planning
non-health contingency planning
system contingency planning
financial contingency planning
based on adequacy/quality
good contingency planning
strong contingency planning
effective contingency planning
based on undertaking/beneficiary organisations
inter-agency contingency planning
multi-agency contingency planning
government-led contingency planning
government contingency planning
organisational contingency planning
multi-sectorial contingency planning
based on approach
scenario-based contingency planning
response-oriented contingency planning
innovative contingency planning
based on natural disaster/hazards
flood contingency planning
multi-hazard contingency planning
based on geographical area/community
area-specific contingency planning
national contingency planning
regional contingency planning
community contingency planning
subregional contingency planning
state-level contingency planning
based on timescale
early contingency planning
predisaster contingency planning
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest contribution (GO, RC, C/B, Net and NGO organisations) proves to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Across organisations types, surge is the top collocate with contingency planning in 2008. Other two collocates, inter-agency and preparedness, were found as top collocates in three different years, respectively. Other top collocates include mechanism, exercise, scenario, stockpile, warn, simulation and warning.
IGO documents also contain surge as top collocate with the highest score for 2008. However, preparedness dominates as top collocate in 2010, 2015, 2017 and 2018 with considerable lower scores. Other IGO collocates include inter-agency, exercise and warning.
There is only RC collocational data available for 2013 and 2016, with national and early as top collocates, respectively.
Collocational data from C/B shows preparedness as top collocate for 2011 with the highest score. Action was found as top collocate for 2008, 2009 and 2010 with considerably lower scores. Other C/B top collocates include process.
Net documents only generated collocational data for 2014 and 2015 with warn and warning as top collocates.
No collocational data is available from NGO documents.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about contingency planning that others do not.
Top unique collocates for IGO include inter-agency, simulation, surge, standing, mapping, IASC (Inter-Agency Standing Committee), OCHA (UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) , rapid, undertake and stock.
RC documents feature focus, ICRC, aid, service and member.
C/B unique collocates with the highest scores are action, situation, help and can.
Documents from Net generated the following top unique collocates: warn and system.
Unique collocates for NGO include country and village.
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations talking about contingency planning. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are scenario (IGO+C/B), exercise (Net+IGO), emergency (Net+IGO), process (IGO+C/B), response (RC+IGO), disaster (RC+IGO) and strengthen (Net+IGO).
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types include warning (RC+Net+IGO), early (RC+Net+IGO), capacity (RC+NGO+IGO) and humanitarian (RC+IGO+C/B)
No significant top collocates shared by 4 organisations are were found.
The only top collate shared by all organisations (RC+NGO+Net+IGO+C/B) analysed is preparedness.
Verb collocates are useful in determining key relations between concepts. On the left is a diagram that represents verbs of which contingency planning is the object (in pink). It was not found to act as subject of any meaningful verb.
Humanitarian actors refer to contingency planning (CP) to describe:
activities involved in CP (include, link)
what improves CP (strengthen, improve, support)
specific operations (complete, undertake, facilitate, lead)
Further collocational analysis reveals that key associated concepts to contingency planning include:
development of contingency planning
mechanism for contingency planning
contingency planning process
contingency planning exercise
These conceptual combinations can further examined on demand. Please use the Discussion form at the bottom of this LAR.
In the case of contingency planning , for example, as Richard Choularton argues in his Network Paper: 'More consistent use of terms related to contingency planning and preparedness is needed to help improve the sharing of experience, lessons and practice'. But there are dangers here, even where we avoid the over-academic approach and look for something more practical. One is that the drive towards consistency may develop into a struggle between different groups or organisations to impose their terms and meanings on everyone else. There is also the counter-risk that consensus achieved through committee will result in definitions that try to say too much in order to keep all the stakeholders happy.
Market analysis and market-based programming also opens up opportunities to link with longer-term development programming and connect water and sanitation issues with food security issues. Market analysis could also play a role in preparedness and contingency planning, helping to develop better and timelier responses and more realistic response triggers, potentially mitigating the impacts of a crisis.
The chart below represents the distribution of contingency planning between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested to explore why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given corpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult "contexts", or the search the corpus itself.
Occurrences of contingency planning were highest in 2007. However, 2011 saw the highest relative frequency with 5,507%.
North America obtained the highest relative frequency and number of occurrences with 198% of relative frequency and a total of 259 occurrences of contingency planning.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of contingency planning are C/B, Project, WHS, Net and IGO.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences. However, Strategy documents obtained the highest relative frequency with 150%.
This shows trends for contingency planning in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the evolution of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides an overview of crisis across domains.
Contingency planning increased steadily from 1953 until 1983. It then began a slow decrease trend until today, but it never reached values lower than those recorded prior to 1970.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.