There are 67,338 occurrences of risk in the HE Corpus.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownRisk occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by Africa and MENA with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are NGO, NGO_Fed, IGO, RC and Net organisations.
NGO documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe and MENA. In second place, occurrences from NGO_Fed were mostly obtained from activity reports and strategy documents published in Europe, followed by Africa and Asia but to a much lesser extent. Occurrences from IGO were mostly found in European general documents and activity reports.
Occurrences from RC were obtained primarily from few documents from the three categories, maily publised in Europe, MENA and Asia. Lastly, Net also generates ocurrences but provides a considerable smaller number of occurrences primarily from documents published in Asia.
Risk has thus been defined in varying ways, although most definitions refer to likelihood and impact.
Leading the social risk management work for the World Bank, Holzmann and Jørgensen defined risk as "uncertainty or unpredictability that results in welfare losses" (Holzmann and Jorgensen, 2000).
The OECD 2013 High Level Risk Forum called risk "the potential damage caused by a single event or a series of events" and "a combination of two factors". Those two factors are the "probability of the occurrence of a hazard", with hazard defined as a "potentially harmful event", and vulnerability, which is defined as "a measure of the exposure of human lives, health, activities, assets or the environment to the potential damage caused by such hazards occurring" (OECD, 2011).
Risk is defined by the authors of the Good Practice Review (2010) as 'a measure of vulnerability to threats in the environment'. In other words, risk is about the potential for harm: the likelihood of something harmful happening and the extent of that harm if it does. The combination of threat and vulnerability to that threat constitutes risk (Van Brabant 2010, p. 28).
First, overall risk is defined by the interaction of the chance of something happening (exposure) and its likely impact if it does (vulnerability).
Contextual analysis identified 5 parent concepts of risk, namely issue, area, factor, topic and element. Being such a basic concept, it is no suprise that its parent concepts can be seen as vague.
Each month the Management Team of BBC Media Action meets and discusses a range of issues including the current risks faced, and agrees actions.
DFID continued to invest significantly to improve programme management capability, with over 500 staff receiving programme management training in 2015–16 in areas such as finance, risk , programme leadership and commercial awareness.
It requires governments to authorize or deny all arms transfers that enter or leave their territory against a set of criteria including international humanitarian and human rights law, and factors including the risk of gender-based violence, organized crime, corruption, or terrorism.
Projects focused on topics such as solid waste management, landslide risks , hazardous waste, climate change and mining.
based on disaster/undesirable negative situations
disaster risk
natural disaster risk
natural hazard risk
flood risk
drought risk
earthquake risk
urban disaster risk
global disaster risk
fire risk
climate-related risk
climate change risk
based on disaster corollaries
displacement risk
mass atrocity risk
based on disrupted desirable situations/services
safety risk
reputational risk
protetion risk
health risk
social risk
human right risk
cyber security risk
based on timescale
imminent risk
immediate risk
long-term risk
recurrent risk
daily risk
based on economic/financial concepts
credit risk
financial risk
liquidity risk
currency risk
business risk
fiduciary risk
economic risk
share risk
interest rate risk
foreign exchange risk
exchange rate risk
equity price risk
global economy risk
counterparty credit risk
cash flow risk
investment risk
funding risk
based on magnitude/likelihood
high risk
great risk
major risk
key risk
serious risk
heightened risk
catastrophic risk
grave risk
based on sufferers of potential damage
environmental risk
community risk
organisational risk
institutional risk
humanitarian risk
based on location
urban risk
global risk
local risk
based on unethical actions
fraud risk
social exclusion risk
corruption risk
based on health
HIV risk
mortality risk
disease risk
public health risk
environmental health risk
global health risk
psychological health risk
based on human conflict
conflict risk
mine risk
ERW (explosive remnants of war) risk
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest contribution (NGO, NGO_Fed, IGO, RC and Net organisations) proves to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Undoubtedly, reduction is the overall top collocate with risk for nearly every year. Other top colocates include ordnance, scarcity, schedule and pose.
IGO documents contain scarcity as top collocate with the highest score for 2006. However, reduction dominates IGO with slightly lower scores for 2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Other IGO top collocates include lender, schedule, liquidity, exclusion, NCDs (non-communicable diseases), multi-hazard and ordnance.
NGO documents contains Magna as the collocate with the highest score for 2013. This was obtain from mentions of an organisation called Magna Children at Risk. Similarly, reduction wa also found as the top collocate dominating NGO documents across the 2009-2012 and 2014-2017 periods. Other NGO top collocates include collapse, UXO (unexploded ordnance), liquidity, minimise, displacement and predictable.
Collocational data from RC shows culture as top collocate with the highest overall score for 2014. Reduction appears again as top collocate for 2009, 2010 and 2016. Other RC collocates include replacement, liquidity, optimise, violence-related, exposure, cross-infection, management and SGBV (sexual and gender-based violence).
In NGO_Fed documents, the collocation with the highest recorded score is punishing in 2009. Nonethess, liquidity is the dominating top collocate for nearly all years in the 2005-2019 period. Other NGO_Fed collocates include vulnerability, minimise, appetite and increase.
Net documents generated integrating as the top collocate for both 2007 and 2008. Other Net top collocates include adolescent, drop, reduction, crosscut, probabilistic, seismic, modelling, analytics and seismic.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about risk that others do not.
Top unique collocates for IGO include schedule, scarcity, ADB (Asian Development Bank), ADPC (Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, incremental, systemic, investor, metric, gender-sensitive and unable.
NGO documents feature Magna (Magna Children at Risk), defender, conventional, UXO (unexploded ordnance), cancer, Christian, measured, MRE (mine risk education), comic and contextual.
RC unique collocates with the highest scores are optimise, replacement, detainee, ICRC, maximun, var, allowance, interest-rate, cross-infection and violence-related.
Documents from NGO_Fed generated the following top unique collocates: Cordaid (Catholic Organization for Relief and Development Aid), comment, Sightsavers, non-speculative, quarterly, CAFOD (Catholic International Development Charity), HelpAge, HI (Humanity & Inclusion), parental and trustees.
Unique collocates for Net include GFDRR (Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery), pillar, crosscut, IRDR (Integrated Research on Disaster Risk), ADRC (Asian Disaster Reduction Center), evidence-based, analytic, promoting, GFDRR-supported and Kathmandu
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations talk about risk. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are reserve (RC+NGO), matrix (NGO_Fed+NGO), integrating (Net+IGO), modelling (Net+IGO), charity (NGO_Fed+NGO), sovereign (Net+IGO) and insignificant (RC+NGO).
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types include register (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO), pool (NGO+Net+IGO), exclusion (NGO_fed+NGO+IGO), concentration (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO), probabilistic (NGO+Net+IGO), acceptable (NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), organisational (NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO) and multi-hazard (NGO+Net+IGO).
Top collocates shared by 4 organisations are liquidity (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), currency (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), mine (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), reward (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), financing (RC+NGO+Net+IGO), rate (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), foreign (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO), exploitation (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO) and malnutrition (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+IGO).
Top collates shared by all organisations analysed (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO+Net+IGO) include reduction, disaster, reduce, management, miigate, assessment, manage, exposure, face and factor.
Verb collocates are useful in determining key relations between concepts. On the left is a diagram that represents verbs of which risk is the subject (in green) and the object (in pink).
At first sight, risk collocates with verbs more frequently as an object than as an subject. This indicates that humanitarian actors describe risk focusing on the following dimensions:
risk reduction (reduce, increase)
risk management (manage, mitigate, address)
risk study (assess, associate, identify, pose)
people exposed to risks (face)
As an object, risk collocates with many verbs, albeit with fewer occurrences but distributed more evenly. It appears that humanitarians use risk as an object to describe:
risk description (be, involve, include, relate, refer)
risk increase and emergence (increase, arise)
people exposed to risks (face, affect)
Further collocational analysis reveals that key associated concepts to risk include:
risk reduction
risk management
risk assessment
risk factor
risk analysis
risk mitigation
risk education
risk financing
risk reduction strategy
risk reduction measure
risk exposure
risk awareness
risk transfer
risk mapping
risk governance
risk model
These conceptual combinations can further examined on demand. Please use the Discussion form at the bottom of this LAR.
The World Development Report 2014 takes an action-oriented approach, arguing that taking on risk, "the possibility of loss" is necessary to pursue development opportunities or "the possibility of gain". This requires a shift from ad hoc responses to proactive, systematic and integrated risk management (World Bank, 2014).
Preservation of the environment and resilience building are two concepts which make it possible to respond to the question of disaster risk while preserving the existing potential of the context in question and strengthening the capacity of the affected populations in the medium and long term. The interactions between these two concepts are all the more important as the people who are the most concerned by international aid are also the most weakened by a degraded environment. Wherein the importance of raising awareness among aid actors so that they take the environment into account more in programmes which aim to build resilience.
By taking a more proactive and preventive approach to risks as opposed to merely responding to disasters after they occur this paradigm shift would lead to three desired outcomes: safeguarding existing and future development and investment in the region, protecting the lives and livelihoods of people who live in the region, and empowering people so that they can act in a responsible manner and thus contribute to the reduction of such risks.
Analysts argue that some risks appear to be intensifying, especially those connected to the environment and climate change and to the growing connectivity among countries, which challenges the remit of national policy.
The chart below represents the distribution of risk between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested to explore why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given corpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult "contexts", or the search the corpus itself.
Occurrences of risk were highest in 2016. However, 2013 saw the highest relative frequency with 480%.
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences but ranks third in terms of relative frequency with 88%. CCSA obtained the highest relative frequency with 107% with comparatively fewer occurrences.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of risk are WHS, Project, Net, C/B and State.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences. However, Strategy documents obtained the highest relative frequency with 135%.
This shows trends for risk and its plural form in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the evolution of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides an overview of risk across domains.
Risk increased steadily from 1965 until today. Values peaked in 2009 and saw a slight decrease until today. However, it stayed over values higher than those for 2005.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.