The HE Corpus contains 57,226 occurrences of emergency.
Emergency occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, closely followed by North America and Asia. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed, RC and C/B organisations.
NGO documents provide most occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in Europe and Asia. In second place, occurrences from IGO were mostly obtained from general documents and activity reports published in North America. Occurrences from NGO_Fed were mostly found in activity reports published in Europe, with minor contributions from Oceania, North America and Asia.
Occurrences from RC were mostly obtained from European activity reports. Finally, C/B generates a considerable smaller number of occurrences from only European general documents.
Defined here, an emergency is a situation where the members of a population are suffering or threatened to a point that exceeds the local capacity to respond or cope, and recover.
Child protection in emergencies is the prevention of and response to abuse, neglect, exploitation of and violence against children in emergencies. An emergency is defined as 'a situation where lives, physical and mental well-being, or development opportunities for children are threatened as a result of armed conflict, disaster or the breakdown of social or legal order, and where local capacity to cope is exceeded or inadequate.
The UN Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) (1994) defines a complex emergency as: a multifaceted humanitarian crisis in a country, region or society where there is total or considerable breakdown of authority resulting from internal or external conflict and which requires a multi-sectoral, international response that goes beyond the mandate or capacity of any single agency.
The IHR (2005) define an emergency as an "extraordinary event" that could spread internationally or might require a coordinated international response.
based on timescale
sudden onset emergency
slow-onset emergency
rapid onset emergency
protracted emergency
chronic emergency
sudden emergency
immediate emergency
recurrent emergency
short-term emergency
daily emergency
based on perception/attention
silent emergency
neglected emergency
high-profile emergency
based on extent
large-scale emergency
small-scale emergency
large emergency
based on consequences of causing phenomena
mass-casualty emergency
displacement emergency
based on healthcare issues and human sustenance
public health emergency
medical emergency
health emergency
obstetric emergency
neonatal emergency
surgical emergency
nutrition emergency
care emergency
food security emergency
based on affectee/location
environmental emergency
national emergency
international emergency
refugee emergency
global emergency
gaza emergency
based on natural/man-made phenomena
tsunami emergency
flooding emergency
flood emergency
drought emergency
disaster emergency
nuclear emergency
ebola emergency
conflict-related emergency
natural disasters
earthquakes
cyclones
floods
hurricanes
drought
tsunami
heavy seasonal rains
tropical storms
storm surges
man-made disasters
climate change
environmental degradation
chemical attacks
biological attacks
violence
armed conflict
war
post-election turmoil
mines
population displacement
disease
epidemics
emerging infectious diseases
viral outbreaks
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest contribution (NGO, IGO, NGO_Fed, RC and C/B organisations) proves to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Overall, response is the top collocate with emergency from 2014 to 2017, closely followed by obstetric. Additionally, two other collocates registered the higher score: forgiveness and underfund for 2007 and 2019, respectively. Other top collocates include preparedness and complex.
NGO documents generated obstetric as top collocate with the highest scores from 2008 to 2016. In second place is roster, which topped both 2005 and 2006. Other top collocates include obstetrics, response, level-three and relief.
Collocational data from IGO shows L3 (level-three) as top collocate between 2013 and 2016. Again, preparedness and underfund were found as secondary top collocates. Other top collocates include distress, pre-positioning, forgiveness, post-crisis, sudden-onset, threshold and famine.
In NGO_Fed documents, the most relevant collocation is obstetric, which overwhelmingly dominates the 2006-2016 period. Other top collocates include cyclical, room and responder.
RC documents feature responder as top collocate between 2013 and 2016. Nonetheless, both underfund and mass-casualty registered the highest scores for 2018 and 2008, respectively. Other top collocates include, forgotten, brigade, strengthening, ration, preparedness and silent.
Lastly, C/B documents generated rapid-onset as top collocate in both 2011 and 2012, closely followed by L3 (level-three) for 2013 and 2014. Other top collocates include forgotten, distress, feeding, under-funded, food-security, large-scale, underfund, sudden-onset, MHPSS (mental health and psychosocial support) and response.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about emergency that others do not.
Top unique collocates for NGO include NRC (Norwegian Refugee Council), Americares, IFE (Infant Feeding in Emergencies), distributed, mercy, CESVI (Cooperazione e Sviluppo), JRS (Jesuit Refugee Service), dispensary, Malaysia and vocational.
NGO_Fed documents feature maternity, ActionAid, campaigning, admit, influencing, specialise, influence, women-led and stabilisation.
IGO unique collocates with the highest scores are debt, forgiveness, system-wide, Capita, immunization, AESAN, multilateral, preposition and IOM (International Organization for Migration).
Documents from RC generated the following top unique collocates: family-link, first-aid, societies, crescent, mass-casualty, countrywide, scene, branch and wounded.
Top unique collocates for C/B include food-security, wells, benefits, ODI (Overseas Development Institute), on-line, least-funded, market-system, self-recovery, aegis, cash-based and EMM (Emergency Market Mapping).
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements where organisations coincide when they talk about emergency. These constitutes intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are MSF (Médecins Sans Frontières) (C/B+NGO_Fed), under-funded (C/B+NGO_Fed), telecommunication (IGO+NGO) vaccination (NGO_Fed+IGO), ACF (Action Against Hunger) (C/B+NGO_Fed) and intervene (NGO_Fed+NGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types include L3 (level-three) (C/B+IGO+NGO), neonatal (NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), donation (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO), ambulance (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO), accommodation (RC+NGO_Fed+NGO) and distress (C/B+RC+IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisations include onset (C/B+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), underfund (C/B+RC+IGO+NGO), deploy (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), deployment (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), surgery (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO), surgical (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO) and flood (RC+NGO_Fed+IGO+NGO).
Top collocates shared by all 5 organisation types are response, preparedness, respond, complex, relief, appeal, obstetric and shelter.
Verb collocates are useful in determining key relations between concepts. On the left is a diagram that represents verbs of which emergency is the subject (in green) and the object (in pink).
At first sight, emergency collocates with verbs more frequently as a subject than as an object. This indicates that when humanitarian actors mention emergency, they tend to focus on:
affected populations (affect);
needs of affected populations (receive, require)
onset and continuation (arise, occur, continue, remain); and
what an emergency entails (be, have, include).
When emergency appears as an object, collocating verbs indicate:
agents' actions in the face of an emergency (declare, underfund, manage, follow, support, address, provide, receive)
affected populations (face); and
what an emergency entails (cause, include).
Further collocational analysis reveals that key associated concepts to emergency include:
emergency response/assistance
emergency relief/aid
emergency preparedness
emergency services/care
emergency appeal
emergency management
emergency threshold
emergency responder
humanitarian emergency
complex emergency
public health emergency
protracted emergency
L3 (level-three) emergency
These conceptual combinations can further examined on demand. Please use the Discussion form at the bottom of this LAR.
The chart below represents the distribution of emergency between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested to explore why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given corpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult "contexts", or the search the corpus itself.
Occurrences of emergency were highest in 2015. However, 2011 saw the highest relative frequency with 655%.
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences but ranks third in terms of relative frequency with 92%. Oceania recorded the highest relative frequency with 106%, although it generated a substantially smaller number of occurrences.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of psychosocial support are C/B, RC, NGO_Fed, Project and RE.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences. However, Strategy documents obtained the greatest relative frequency with 127%.
This graph shows trends for emergency and its plural form in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the evolution of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides an overview of emergency across domains.
Emergency decreased steadily until 1968. However, it saw a slight increase until 1976 but never surpassed pre-1950 values. From then on, it decreased progressively to values lower than those registered for 1968.
The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) was one of the first aid organisations to actively promote education as a core component of emergency response. The provision of education as part of the initial emergency response is ultimately a question of accountability.
The prolonged economic crisis in Europe, throwing into question sums allocated for emergency and development aid, and uncertain geostrategic balances have direct effects on the activities of a Foundation such as ours, which is seeking to find its rightful place in an unstable environment.
Sperl et al. (2006), for example, note that too many international staff were deployed in the UNHCR response in Lebanon and that national staff felt sidelined and disenfranchised after the arrival of emergency response team members.
The role of the UN has come under scrutiny; there have been suggestions that the process of fund allocation is too slow and in some cases a lack of impartiality in complex emergencies .
Supporters of cash responses in emergencies argue that they can be more cost-effective and timely than commodity distribution, give the recipients greater choice and dignity and benefit the economies into which they are injected.
Much needs to be done to clarify the role and functions of clusters in transition situations, as opposed to emergencies. There needs to be a more integrated approach to planning, preparedness and response at country level, identifying key challenges in advance and promoting actions that reduce vulnerability in the long term.
It is paradoxical to see certain emergency relief NGOs criticising the slow pace of reconstruction when certain of their actions, which were designed with an immediate and often very targeted objective, without taking into account their social foundations, contributed to further weakening institutions and the collective response capacity which are indispensable to any kind of recovery and development.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.