The HE corpus contains 92,100 ocurrences of the concept Security.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownSecurity occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by North America, Africa, Asia and MENA with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO, RC, State and NGO_Fed organisations.
IGO and State documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in North America. Occurrences from NGO, RC and NGO_Fed were mostly obtained from activity reports published in Europe.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO, RC, State and NGO_Fed organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for Security was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 4 top collocates were obtained:
tenure; (from security of tenure, tenure and security…)
council; ( from Security Council)
president; (President of the Security Council) and
food (from Food Security)
IGO documents generated Tenure as top collocate in 2007. Other top IGO collocates are president and council.
NGO documents generated chaos as top collocate in 2005 with the highest overall score. Other top NGO collocates include food and nutrition.
RC documents generated Ontological as top collocate for 2014. Other top RC collocates include constraint and logistical.
State documents generated Pathogen as top collocate for 2007. Cyber and prosperity are other top State collocates.
NGO_Fed generated IFSN (International Food Security Network) as top collocate in 2015. Other top NGO_Fed collocates are taxation and food.
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about Security that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
identical
chairman
multidimensional
hemispheric
transmit
accredit
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)
paragraph
politico-military
fragility
NGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
chaos
remuneration
prisoner
suspect
renovation
NRC (Norwegian Refugee Council)
defense
PCHR (Palestinian Centre for Human Rights)
defender
fixed-interest
RC documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
ICRC (Iraqi Christian Relief Council)
internee
rehab
doctrine
sub-programme
helt-to-maturity
proximity
habitat
conflict-related
delegate
State documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency)
CSSF ( Conflict, Stability and Security Fund)
pathogen
dispatch
underprivileged
biosafety
FMF (Federal Ministry of Finance)
BFS (Bureau For Food Security)
budgetline
ICP ( International Church Partnerships)
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
CordAid
IFSN (International Food Security Network)
RBF (Results Based Financing )
ActionAid
confidentiality
rating
Chikurubi (Prison in Zimbabue)
MSF (Médecins Sans Frontières/ Doctors Without Borders)
sundry
maximise
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss Security. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
detainee (RC + NGO)
letter (NGO + IGO)
terrorist (State + IGO)
employer (NGO_Fed + NGO)
detain (RC + NGO)
nuclear (State + IGO)
receivable (RC + NGO)
body (NGO + IGO)
stockpile (NGO + IGO)
counter-terrorism (State + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
maritime (State + RC + IGO)
creditor (State + NGO_Fed + NGO)
nutritional (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
marketable (State + NGO_Fed + NGO)
quote (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
dimension (State + NGO + IGO)
arrest (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO)
arm ( RC + NGO + IGO)
treaty (State + RC + IGO)
accrual (State + NGO_Fed + NGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
co-operation (State + RC + NGO + IGO)
tenure (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
homeland (State + RC + NGO + IGO)
volatile (State + RC + NGO + IGO)
constraint (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
military (State + RC + NGO + IGO)
energy (State + RC + NGO + IGO)
president (State + RC + NGO + IGO)
collective (RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
taxation (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
food (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
safety (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
peace (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
council (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
nutrition (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
force (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
situation (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
livelihood (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
incident (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
economic (State + RC + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of Security between 2005 and 2015 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of Security were highest in 2016. It obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2007 (112%).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and North America provided the highest relative frequency with 155%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of Security are IGO, Project, C/B, State and RC.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 87%.
This shows the evolution of Security and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Security increases progressively until it reaches it peak in 2004. It then starts to decrease until 2015, where it then remains at the same point until 2019.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.