The HE corpus contains 237, 204 occurences of the concept Development.
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownDevelopment occurs mostly in documents published in Europe, followed by Asia, North America, Africa and Oceania with comparatively smaller contributions. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO, State, NGO_Fed and Net organisations.
IGO documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from general documents published in Europe. Occurrences from NGO, State, NGO_Fed and Net were mostly obtained from activity reports published in Europe.
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO, State, NGO_Fed and Net organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocational data for Development was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 3 top collocates were obtained:
human;
sustainable;
SADC (Southern African Development Community )
IGO documents generated co-operation) as top collocate in 2015.
NGO documents generated sustainable as top collocate in 2015 with the highest overall score. Other top RC collocates include afghan and inclusive.
State documents generated sustainable as top collocate which obtained the highest overall score. Other top State collocates include belgian and industrial.
NGO_Fed documents generated childhood as top collocate for 2016. Other top NGO_Fed collocates include integral and child-centred.
Net documents generated alleviation as top collocate for 2005. Other top Net collocates include transformational and ACFID (Australian Council for International Development ).
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about Development that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
multidimensional
hydropower
inequality-adjusted
OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights )
libyan
Tuvalu (Island in Polinesia)
GDI (Gender-related development index )
SDF (Social Development Fund )
UNDG (United Nations Development Group )
OCR (ordinary capital resources )
NGO documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
PCHR ( Palestinian Center for Human Rights )
amity
violation
AHD (Association for Humanitarian Development )
SCA (Save the Children Association )
CHF (Swiss francs )
MRRD (Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development )
health-post
puntland (A state in Somalia)
EPDO (Environmental Protection and Development Organization )
State documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
SATREPS (Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development )
geothermal
AFDB (African Development Bank )
education-vocational
ASDF (The Asian Development Fund )
criteria
FMF (Federal Ministry of Finance )
hungarian
JICA-RI (JICA Research Institute )
ESC (environmental and social considerations )
revaluation
NGO_Fed documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
ADPP (Development Aid from People to People )
non-sponsorship
kandal (Province in Cambodia)
sub-total
mondulkiri (Province in Cambodia)
samlout (A district in Cambodia)
cashew
programme-supported
SOS
AMREF (Africa Medical Research Foundation)
poverty-fighting
Net documents feature the following top 10 unique collocates:
PNPM (Urban Community-Driven Development )
MMDA (Metropolitan Manila Development Authority )
AEDD (Environment and Sustainable Development Agency)
chamber
aging
tank
IEDG (The International Economic Development Group)
ATD (European Alternatives to Detention)
IRCT (International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims)
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss Development. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
ADC (Area Development Committee ) (State + NGO)
spiritual (NGO_Fed + NGO)
transportation (State + IGO)
sponsorship (NGO_Fed + NGO)
Battampang ( Cambodian city) (NGO_Fed + NGO)
Slovenia (State + IGO)
anglican (NGO + Net)
iceland (State + IGO)
migrant (NGO + IGO)
gender-related (State + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
ACFID (Australian Council for International Development) (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
christian (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
fundraising (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
CARITAS (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
US (State + NGO_Fed + NGO)
community-driven (NGO + Net+ IGO)
DFATD (Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development) (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
cognitive (NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
interchurch (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
CAFOD (Catholic Agency for Overseas Development) (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
enterprise (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
rank (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
integral (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
CIDA ( Canadian International Development Agency ) (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
entrepreneurship (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
adventist (NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
holistic (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
employment (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + IGO)
tourism (State + NGO + Net + IGO)
SDG (Sustainable Development Goals) (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
sustainable (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
cooperation (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
millenium (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
agency (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
economic (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
human (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
international (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
rural (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
department (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
policy (State + NGO_Fed + NGO + Net + IGO)
The chart below represents the distribution of Development between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of Development were highest in 2016. However, it obtained the highest relative frequency recorded in 2005 (92 %).
Europe generated the greatest number of occurrences and CCSA generated the highest relative frequency with 125%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of Development are State, IGO, Net, WHS and Found.
Activity reports provided the greatest number of occurrences and Strategy provided the highest relative frequency with 130 %.
This shows the evolution of Development and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Development increases until it reaches its peak in 1977. From then onwards it declines until 2019.
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.