It feels like 2025 came and went in a flash, and with it, the strongest year for media in this decade so far. Plenty of great cinematic highlights occurred. Theaters for A Minecraft Movie and Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 were filled with overpassionate fans. A surprising number of films gained an abundance of critical acclaim, like One Battle After Another, Sentimental Value, and Marty Supreme. Multiple films redefined their specific genres, and cinema as a whole, like the topic of this year in review: Sinners, Superman, and Wake Up Dead Man. This article will go over the impact these films had and how they added to 2025 being an incredibly exceptional year for cinema.
Weapons is a type of horror movie that only Zach Cregger could conceive. The follow-up film after his breakout film, the bizarre yet captivating Barbarian, did not disappoint. It follows a small town being affected by the sudden disappearance of a classroom of children. One night, at 2:17 AM, all the kids got up, walked out their doors, and ran into the woods. This review will be short because the ideal way to watch this movie is to go in knowing as little as possible about the plot. The movie is built around slowly revealing its mystery, and it is best to learn about things during your viewing. I can say that the performances are all stellar, including Julia Garner as the schoolteacher Justine, Josh Brolin as the aggressive parent Archer, and Austin Abrams as his ridiculous character of James. Hopefully, Zach Cregger will go on to make more creative innovations in horror like Weapons.
Secondly, Superman is a triumph… for its own genre of action and the Superman character. Since Man of Steel in 2013 (a phenomenal or terrible movie, depending on what type of fan you ask) the character has been seen as bland, boring, or only interesting when turned evil. The influx of “evil Supermen” in media like Homelander in The Boys, Omni-Man in Invincible, and the horror film Brightburn does not help either. But when acclaimed comic book filmmaker James Gunn took over WB’s broken DC Universe with The Conjuring franchise producer Peter Safran, there was a glimmer of hope. James Gunn has proven he understands comic books with his Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy and his version of The Suicide Squad, so it seemed like it would be perfect. But, it would be a lie not to admit that the first viewing of this feature can feel off. Superman came out in this current era, where superhero film adaptations have gotten a bit out of hand, and it subverts your expectations by doing things no comic book movie has done before. Despite this being the first film in this new DC film universe, it throws you into the middle of a plotline at the start of the movie, using a series of events that have already happened to set up its true plot. It also throws an abundance of absurd sci-fi and fantastical elements at you without an explanation, but in a way that is extremely refreshing, considering most comic book movies still feel the need to water down silly things from the source material and make it “grounded” for general audiences.
Superman also has a full cast of characters from the comics that all feel perfectly presented, and it is nearly impossible to cover all of them. After having a cinematic Superman in the previous DC universe, who many criticized for being serious and uncaring, this new version of Clark Kent is a breath of fresh air. David Corenswet brings such charm and depth to this version of the character, and he truly feels like a Superman for the modern era. Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane is also adapted very well from the comics, being a dedicated reporter with a heart of gold. The ensemble of the Daily Planet newsroom all unfortunately feel like an afterthought, except for Skylar Gisondo’s Jimmy Olsen, whose characterization and sideplot feel ripped straight from the page. There is also an ensemble of superheroes, including Edi Gathegi as Mister Terrific, who all get their moment to shine. However, the standout performance, arguably the best in the movie, is Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor. No previous adaptation of the character has been portrayed with such pure jealousy and arrogance radiating in every scene and line of dialogue. This version of Lex is hateable and lovable at once, and is arguably the best villain of the year. Overall, Superman is a breath of fresh air that saved the blue boy scout from the creative rut he has been stuck in.
Wake Up Dead Man, like Superman, is a fantastic new subversive film for its own genre of murder mystery. This feature is the third in the Knives Out mystery trilogy by writer-director Rian Johnson, the previous installments being the immediately iconic 2019 film of the same name and 2022’s Glass Onion. The narrative takes the focus from the rich and lavish locations of its past outings to focus on a personal story with former boxer Father Jud, played by Josh O’Connor, who is assigned to a small-town parish in Upstate New York, which is run by the harsh and manipulative Monsignor Wicks, played by Josh Brolin. After a murder makes it appear as if Father Jud is the only suspect, private detective and recurring character of the film series, Benoit Blanc, played by Daniel Craig, must solve the mystery so Jud is not falsely accused further. All the Knives Out films have been crafted with such care and a strong understanding of the mystery genre and how to subvert it. However, the biggest subversion is that this entry has the strongest emotional depth of the franchise. It brings a new perspective to faith, how hope affects it, that most other filmmakers would not tackle out of fear of causing controversy. The emotional core is also carried heavily by Josh O’Connor’s performance, and the film would not be the same with any other actor in the lead. Overall, Wake Up Dead Man was a pleasant surprise that keeps the consistent positive reputation of the Knives Out franchise.
To conclude, I wanted to address one of the most praised films of the year, Sinners. The feature sets itself in 1932 and follows young musician Sammy, played by first-time actor Miles Caton. His cousins Smoke and Stack, both twins played by Michael B. Jordan, return to their hometown in the Mississippi Delta to open a Juke Joint for their community. As the night unfolds, they are forced to face unexpected horrors when they are set upon by the violent Irish vampire Remmick, played by the electric Jack O’Connell. The performances are all top-notch. Michael B. Jordan puts in the work to portray Smoke and Stack with such distinction that an audience member may forget they are watching one person onscreen. Miles Caton is phenomenal as Sammy, not just in his acting ability, but in his singing. Something the marketing hid was the fact that this movie is a musical of sorts. It features long musical performance sequences, and music is directly tied to the plot and the villain’s motivation. You would think something like a period piece horror musical would have conflicting tones, but writer-director Ryan Coogler was able to craft it perfectly. He and his whole production team put in so much work to make the movie perfect in every way, from the costumes to the editing to the songs and composition. This may be the closest a film came this year to being a perfect 10/10, and I feel guilty for anyone unable to witness its beauty in theaters.
In conclusion, 2025 was fantastic for films. Even though fear is abundant for the future of the industry right now, with the rise of AI, bizarre studio transactions, and politicians influencing studios, as long as human artists continue to use the outlet to make strong features, there is hope. 2026 looks like it could be another strong year, with critically acclaimed directors and actors releasing intriguing projects, like Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey. Films like Weapons, Superman, Wake Up Dead Man, and Sinners are all proof that the industry is alive and thriving, and will hopefully continue to do so.
The iconic film studio, Warner Brothers, has produced an abundance of films, such as the Harry Potter franchise, Barbie, and multiple franchises of DC Comics characters, just to name a few. This makes it all the more confusing that they have gone up for sale every few years for the past decade. In 2018, mobile company AT&T, of all things, bought the studio. Then, in 2022, there was a disastrous merger with network giant, Discovery. Plans were switched around, they sold a bunch of animated projects to other studios that were based on some of their most popular IP, and fully completed films like Batgirl and Coyote VS Acme were shelved for tax write-offs. Recently, Warner Bros Discovery, as it is now named, went up for auction again in June of 2025. Multiple companies were eying the chance to snatch it up, but no one expected the streaming juggernaut of Netflix to swoop in and acquire it with a ridiculous 82 billion dollar bid.
Netflix needs no introduction. They were the first ever genuine streaming service, spawning film corporations to follow in their footsteps and slowly phase out the relevance of cable television with prestigious and grand digital series. The Warner Bros. purchase is only the newest in a line of demonstrations of how much wealth Netflix has amassed over the years. They have launched locations called Netflix House all over the country, almost akin to small theme parks, and they have been providing ludicrous funds to some of their projects, like Del Toro’s grandiose Frankenstein.
In the official statement Netflix released on their “about” page, Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos explained his reasoning for the purchase. “Our mission has always been to entertain the world. By combining with Warner Bros.’ incredible library of shows and movies…Together, we can give audiences more of what they love and help define the next century of storytelling.”
Sarandos, in that same stanza, had compared such timeless classics and recognizable titles as Casablanca, Citizen Kane, and Harry Potter to be as successful and culturally important as Netflix properties such as Stranger Things and K-Pop Demon Hunters. Many could undoubtedly say it is laughable and incredibly pretentious to compare timeless classics to projects that have only been popular through brief internet discussions for the last few years.
There is no doubt that the idea of a big film studio being picked up by a streaming service can set off alarm bells for people who indulge in media. Anyone who cares about the Discovery assets but does not prefer streaming will have to change their outlook, as many believe the landmark channels under that section will shut down in the finalization of this merger. It may leave one questioning if they will ever see new films from this beloved studio again.
Netflix tried to ease this concern, stating that they intend to “maintain Warner Bros. current operations and build on its strengths, including theatrical releases for films.” This may sound like a great sign, but a conference call CEO Ted Sarandos had with investors and press outlets provides doubt. In Variety’s report, he still defends the idea of cinematic experiences. Still, he is quoted as saying, “I think, over time, the (theatrical release) windows will evolve to be much more consumer-friendly, to be able to meet the audience faster…” This implies streaming releases will eventually be prioritized. This is unsurprising when reflecting on Netflix’s own theatrical releases; they are barely marketed, and the films show in select theaters for a few weeks before real marketing efforts begin on the streaming release. The ladder of his statements, seemingly making a threat to theatrical Warner Bros. releases, is more believable than the stated respect for it, as Sarandos has said numerous times in the past that Netflix’s model apparently should prove that people don’t want to go to the theater anymore.
The threat to the theater industry is transparent. Warner Bros. is an incredible asset to the theatrical experience, as they are cited as the first studio this year to have crossed the 4 billion mark in their overall gross from such hits as Superman, Sinners, A Minecraft Movie, and Weapons. Taking this successful company out of theaters with incredible creatives in their rotation and drawing intellectual property will cripple an industry that is already struggling enough from the streaming boom that started during the pandemic. The industry could drastically shrink, and if audiences give in and subsequently prove Netflix right in their doubt of cinema, it could lead to other studios replicating that mindset. This would lead to the death of an essential part of our culture and kill thousands of jobs.
Speaking of killing jobs, there’s a possible second, more terrifying reason Netflix made this acquisition, outside of profit.
There is an article that was published by The Hollywood Reporter titled “Warner Bros. Hidden Appeal to Netflix: AI Supercharge,” that seems to have gone under the radar or has been hidden from the general news surrounding this buyout. It initially reads into prior statements. “...Ted Sarandos just said innovation several times while he and others alluded to “world-building.” But the subtext was there — since technology relies on a massive library, Netflix’s AI efforts just got a big boost.” The article’s point of reference is Disney planning to offer a program for Disney+ to utilize AI to let a user generate content related to Disney properties. This, on top of the rise of an AI actor, should be more than enough to warrant another WGA and SAG-AFTRA strike, but the terrifying implication is that if the unions followed through, the big companies would ignore it and utilize the AI to replace them entirely.
The implications of this deal are wonderful for the rich CEOs who have been leeching off artists eternally and overproducing projects recently. They get to make more money and utilize intellectual property and/or artificial intelligence to draw people in and phase out the markets that are being stretched thin and no longer making enough money to satisfy them. This direction for the industry may also be discouraging to young artists who dream of creating projects through this medium, as AI could replace them in an instant. However, to pretend to know the fate of this industry so far ahead is pretentious. Holding out hope in reasonable doubt that theatrical releases will be continued and AI will be ignored is the best way for fans of Warner Bros. properties and film in general to handle it.