Abstract:
Protecting our oceans and advancing a sustainable blue economy require an in-depth understanding of marine systems, driven by robust ocean observation, monitoring and valuation. Yet collecting reliable data remains time- and resource-intensive. This data is vital for scientists, emergency responders, and decision-makers to support early-warning systems and emerging tools like digital twins. Stronger support is therefore needed for data collection and its integration into systemic, innovative, and stakeholder-engaged ocean observation efforts. I will provide an overview of how technology-boosted science-socioeconomic coupling could address the challenges posed by geopolitical winds and the slow development of sustainable socioeconomic frameworks.
Bio:
Ali is a faculty member in the Department of Earth Sciences and an affiliate faculty member in the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, and a Physics Fellow at Peterhouse at the University of Cambridge. He is also affiliated with the National Oceanography Centre, UK. Within Cambridge, he is also associated with the Institute for Energy & Environmental Flows, the Centre for Climate Repair, the Quantitative Climate and Environmental Sciences, the AI for Environmental Risk Centre for Doctoral Training, and the Institute for Computing in Climate Sciences.
Ali is the founding director of CREST. Prior to joining Cambridge, he was an Assistant Professor (Lecturer) at Imperial College (2018-2022), a NERC Independent Research Fellow and a Junior Research Fellow at the University of Oxford/St. Hugh's College (2017-2018). Ali got his PhD from the University of Toronto in 2013 and was a postdoctoral fellow at MIT (2013-2016) and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (2016-2017).
Summary:
Focus: modeling global oceans and their interactions with the climate
The future of the oceans is the Blue Economy
Will combine
Harvesting+Aquaculture (fish, vegetation)
Marine CO2 removal
Deep sea mining
Energy harvesting
Tourism
Does not yet exist in a meaningful way
Massive-scale ocean operations requires
Cooperation
Governance
Cost-benefit analysis: How do we value the various resources in the ocean?
Oceans keep a large portion of the Earth’s heat and carbon budget
91% of global heat stored in ocean water, slow exchange with atmosphere and land
2x more CO2 in ocean than atmosphere
Complex chemistry as carbon spreads from atmosphere to surface ocean (water, phytoplankton, etc.) and then deep ocean (water, sediment, etc.)
These processes, fluxes and amounts are very uncertain
Limited ability to sense ocean processes (chemistry, currents): leads to huge error bars in our models
We have sensor technology to constrain it but we have not invested in deploying them on a sufficient scale
Changing polar climates
Both poles are being heated by climate change
Heating of the North Atlantic is being taken by the ocean south to Antarctica
Massive ice loss will cause major disaster events
Study of flow of heat via ocean to Antarctica
Upwelling of heat from deep ocean up to the Antarctic coast
GLODAP ship measurements: https://glodap.info
Argo float measurements: https://argo.ucsd.edu (go between surface and 2km depth)
Using all available data to infer the state of the ocean via
Southern Ocean High-Resolution (SOhi) Model: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023GL106377
Melt from ice shelves on land into the ocean
ML critical for this data fusion and model inference
Arctic modeling is similar
Ice melts from floating ice on the water surface
Sea ice protects against heating from warmer ocean and from sun; losing it will make the ocean warming worse
Geoengineering has been explored for slowing the impact of heating on ice (very controversial)
Climate variability in Arctic links up to equatorial weather patterns (e.g. Monsoon)
Hard to collect data in cold Arctic regions
Also, melting of ice opens ocean routes, so has geopolitical implications
Also motivates calls for global cooperation
Looking at histories of climate in both poles
The poles are generally unsynchronized
One gets warmer, while the other cools and then the effects propagate to switch the dynamic
The dynamic takes is ~100-~1000 years
We are now warming both poles, so dynamic may change
Incorporating these dynamics into ocean models is challenging because data sources are highly inferential and limited in accuracy
Interactions between ocean and ice sheets change at the 100k year time frames.
Antarctic ice sheets also depress the continent, affecting its tectonics
Biogeochemistry couples tightly with the evolution of the ocean
Organisms and their interaction with ocean chemistry
Nutrient cycling between deep ocean and surface
Observation: changing the level of background mixing in a state-of-the-art ocean simulation has a 100% impact on CO2 flux in the first year and 60% over 6 years
Examining the concentration of iron on the ocean surface
There are proposals to do carbon storage by changing iron concentration
Impact is very sensitive to the ocean mixing level and whether the iron will be taken up by organisms
We have diverse available data
Enables coherent ocean state estimates
But still lots of missing knowledge and insight
DICE model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DICE_model
Integrated assessment model that combines economics and climate
Indicates that climate change is done most economically if removals are combined with reductions
Critical to create a financial framework that makes it possible to connect research and knowledge gathering to commercial value
Balancing IP and academic freedom
Change in perspective about how to best impact the world positively
We have significantly more tech for sensors and modeling, need to connect to governance and finance
MRV for ocean intervention
Sinking wood or improving mangroves can be tracked
But changing ocean geochemistry is much harder/more expensive to track
Local interventions that affect local ecosystems are easier to finance because the beneficiaries are more clear