The future of biodiversity and the functioning of the biosphere in the Anthropocene
Abstract:
To meet the ambitious objectives of biodiversity and climate conventions guidance is needed to identify and predict which land areas and taxa have the potential to generate the greatest synergies between conserving biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people. I argue that any general theory for the fate of the biosphere and efforts to conserve biodiversity will need to focus on two key attributes of taxa, the drivers of global rarity and variation in organismal body size. These two attributes disproportionately impact the probability of extinction and ecosystem functioning. Estimates of global species abundance distributions and body size distributions are foundations to build a predictive theory of the biosphere as well as risk assessments and conservation planning in this era of rapid global change.
Bio:
Dr. Enquist is a broadly trained ecologist and botanist whose research program investigates the origin and maintenance of biological diversity and the functioning of the biosphere. His lab uses biological scaling laws and developing general trait-based theory. Applications of this research are used then ‘scale up’ to show how changes in climate then ramifies to influence biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. His lab strives to develop a more integrative, quantitative, and predictive framework for biology, community ecology, and global ecology.
He has published over 300 scientific papers. He is recipient of a Fulbright Scholarship to study in Costa Rica, the Ecological Society of America’s Mercer Award, a National Science Foundation CAREER Award, and he was named one of Popular Science’s Brilliant 10 young scientists. He has been awarded fellowships for advanced studies at (i) Charles University/ The Center for Theoretical Study in Prague, Czech Republic, (ii) the CNRS in Montpellier, France, and (iii) the Oxford Martin School at Oxford University in the United Kingdom. Dr. Enquist was elected a fellow of the Ecological Society of America and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
Dr. Enquist received his PhD (Biology) in 1998 at the University of New Mexico with James H. Brown. After graduating Dr. Enquist was a NSF postdoctoral fellow at the Santa Fe Institute, and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) at UC Santa Barbara. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona. He is an external faculty member of the Santa Fe Institute, an independent, nonprofit theoretical research institute located in Santa Fe, New Mexico, dedicated to the multidisciplinary study of the fundamental principles of complex adaptive systems.
Summary:
Goal: integrate biodiversity data to predict functioning of the biosphere into the future
Diversity: variety of life on Earth and the complexity of their interactions
Focus on quantifying attributes of species:
Rarity
Body size
These attributes predict resilience of ecosystems
Biosphere: ecological system integrating all living things and their relationships
Universal signature of complex systems:
Inverse size distribution
Power law distribution very common: earthquake magnitudes, city sizes
Processes that drive power law distributions are being debated
Key thing: they provide a baseline for understanding ecosystem state
Global species abundance distribution (gSAD)
Question: how many plant species on Earth?
Easy to count common species
Rare species are harder
Biodiversity depends strongly on distribution of rare species
Rare species most vulnerable to extinction
Also, having many rare species is insurance against systemic shocks; odds are that some of them will be adapted to the new environment, diseases, etc.
Challenge: biodiversity data are in a poor state
Broken up into different databases that use different formats/schemas
Include many errors
BIEN: compiles bio-diversity data on mostly plants and some animals
Museum data
Vegetation surveys
Plant traits and measures
Focus is integrating different data sources
Version 4.1:
206 million observations
64m specimens
250k plant species
Version 5 will be coming out soon
Estimated ~435k total plant species
TNRS: Taxonomic name resolution service
GNRS: Geographic name resolution service
Theory
Neutral theory: all species have similar dynamics
Predicts a global power law (log series) distribution with a drop at the count of most common species
Slope = -1
K-niche model:
Each species has a preferred environment
Limits their spread
Predicts power laws (log series) for different environments
Central Limit theorem:
Many processes interact multiplicative
Predicts power law (poisson distribution)
Data can be used to validate the theories
Different collection methods produce power law distributions
Differ from each other in magnitude since some methods are more restrictive than others
Slope of on log-log plot: -1.4
Supports Central Limit model most strongly
36.5% of species have been observed <=5 times
Rate species exist in most climatically stable regions
These happen to be the regions that will be most severely affected by climate change
Application: predict impact of climate change
On biodiversity of species
Identify areas of planet that are especially vulnerable in terms of biodiversity, carbon storage, water availability
Distribution of body sizes:
Data for plants and mammals shows inverse relationship between size and number of individuals
Power law
Humans impact largest species and individuals more
We hunt/exploit them
Result is that many species are becoming smaller; more so on land, less so in ocean
1970-2010 populations of animals on Earth have dropped 52%, disproportionately the larger ones
Trees: total number of trees dropped by 46% since start of civilization, disproportionately larger, older trees
Argument: largest species have a disproportionate impact on the biosphere
Dominate flow of resources, store of carbon, nutrients
Central nodes in interaction networks
Should be priorities of conservation
Distribution of the number of individuals within each species: still working on this
Need a model of the biosphere that can predict how downsizing affects the biosphere
The body size and frequency relationships (power law) indicate that the body size of the largest species is most important for the whole ecosystem’s metabolism
Madingley model: https://madingley.github.io/
Captures distribution of body sizes, species counts, geographically over the world
Predicts significant reduction in overall biomass and overall metabolism and global nutrient diffusivity as a result of size reduction
Still need to model individual and ecosystem adaptation
Impact on agriculture:
Breeders need to understand which genes are able to make crops live well in modified climates
Biobanks have data on close relatives of crop species that live in different climates
Can use this to introduce novel genes to make crop species more resilient
Can leverage phylogeny to infer crop plants’ ability to deal with various climates (where their relatives live)
May be useful to collect data across related species to create more robust plant models
Can try the plant species in different current, past and future environments to predict how they respond