Modeling what makes us human:
Individual beliefs and identities within sociocultural structures
Abstract:
The modeling of human societies is at a critical point in history. The amount of data we have on human behavior and interactions has been growing exponentially, and techniques from biology, physics, and computer science have started to help us understand many social processes. However, we are missing one piece of the puzzle: the connection between macro sociocultural processes and individual beliefs and identities. In this talk, I will give an overview of the state of the literature and the problem. Then, I will discuss three projects where we model and empirically test how social and cultural structures shape individual identities and beliefs, and vice versa. I will present work on the interaction between social networks and networks of individual beliefs, the influence of social networks on identity signaling, and how culture can reinforce identity categories between groups.
Bio:
Currently based in Tokyo, Tamara is a postdoctoral fellow at the Santa Fe Institute working with professors Mirta Galesic and Henrik Olsson on models of belief change. Prior to that, she received a PhD in Sociology from Indiana University.
Summary
People associate with many different identities
Identities help us organize (countries, directions of road driving)
They also drive us to fight each other
Where do beliefs and identities come from?
Theory:
We develop identities from our interactions with others
Learn social structures: in/out group, stereotypes
We internalize our social structure, place in world, norms of private/public action
Norms control private behavior because we have an idea of a “generalized other” that represents the world
We have choice about which identities we participate in
Norms allow us to interact with people we don’t personally know
Mediated via social networks: receiving and transmitting belief/identity
Feedback look: cognition, belief/identify, larger social context
Challenge: modeling the interaction between culture and identity
Belief change
How do people combine information from personal beliefs and social network information to change/create new beliefs?
For any given issue people have many related beliefs
E.g. for COVID vaccine there are beliefs related to religion, value of nature-based healing, danger
How do people combine prior beliefs to inform a given issue
Belief dissonance:
If different beliefs disagree it is painful
As such, you’ll change your mind to make them agree
Modify beliefs
Modify whether a belief is relevant to an issue
Modify social network to change your influences
Model process as H = weighted sum of difference between different beliefs
The probability that a person holds a given belief is P(1/(1+ebeta*H)
(beta is free parameter)
Topics:
Childhood vaccines
Genetically modified foods
Survey asked people about how other beliefs relate to the topics
Social beliefs
Moral beliefs
Used survey to build a network of beliefs (nodes: beliefs, edges: number of people who hold both beliefs)
Showed that to some extent beliefs do become more homogenized over time but its a noisy process
Identity signaling
In/out-group signaling across social networks
Signaling
Overt: actively displaying identity
Covert: only noticeable to the in-group
Overt signaling more advantageous when more of your network is in-group and vice versa
Data: Tweets from accounts with very heterogeneous networks
Identity of tweets are classified by users to identify signaling
Determined overt vs covert by asking raters about what the tweet actually means politically
If people in a region of political space are confused, then the signal is covert
Data shows that accounts with more diverse social networks
Formation of identity via cultural/group boundaries and stereotypes (in-progress)
How do political elites identify groups as “Us” (Americans) vs “Them” (Immigrants)
E.g. Italians shifted from Them to Us but Mexicans are still Them to a large extent
Criteria has changed (less religion and more ethnicity, legality of entry)
Looked at boundary rhetoric and how it evolves over time
Word embeddings in documents,
Applied to ethnic groups
Related to external world events
Goal: how group boundaries can be used to coordinate different groups for social change