Transportation Decarbonization - Individual Vehicle Focus
Abstract:
The Argonne National Laboratory Vehicle & Mobility Systems Department (VMS) leads world-class research to develop and assess the impact of advanced technologies on transportation decarbonization. VMS assesses the technology impact of advanced vehicle, powertrain, and control variables on individual vehicles, including light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty, in on-road, off-road, and aviation scenarios. The presentation will provide an overview of the status and challenges of individual vehicle design (e.g., component technologies, powertrain selection and sizing, control, connectivity and automation…) with respect to energy consumption, performance and cost. A series of tools supporting advanced vehicle design to App deployment will be presented.
Bio:
Aymeric Rousseau is the Interim Director of the Center for Decarbonization Solutions Deployment (CDSD) and the Director of the Vehicle and Mobility Systems Department at Argonne National Laboratory. He received his engineering diploma at the Industrial System Engineering School in La Rochelle, France in 1997 and an Executive MBA at Chicago Booth in 2019. For the past 25 years, he has been evaluating the impact of advanced vehicle and transportation technologies from a mobility and energy point of view including the development of Autonomie (vehicle system simulation) and POLARIS (large-scale transportation system simulation). As part of CDSD, he coordinates stakeholder engagement, technical assistance and deployment related to decarbonization across Argonne. In addition to leading numerous projects for private companies and US Department of Energy, Aymeric Rousseau has been providing the vehicle energy consumption analysis for the US DOT NHTSA fuel economy regulations and has authored or co-authored more than 175 papers related to transportation decarbonization.
Summary:
Focus: modeling transportation for individual vehicles
Powertrain design
Control
Use of vehicles in a wide range of conditions
Entire transportation systems
Goal: deploy research results and tools in industry
Wide range of transportation types: road, rail, road, etc.
Mission / Simulations:
Better vehicles:
Autonomie (developed over 25 years)
Vehicle energy consumption
Smarter vehicles:
Road Runner (extension to Autonomie)
Multi-vehicle powertrain and driving dynamics
Smarter roads:
Existing tools: PTV/VISSIM, Aimsun
Traffic flow micro-simulations
Smarter travelers:
Polaris
Integrated travel demand & mesoscopic traffic flow simulation
Vehicle models integrated with micro- and meso-scale models of traffic
Integration with SUMO and Polaris
Models that interact cyclically: energy use affects refueling behavior and thus traffic
ML models used to approximate simulation models
Autonomie: Vehicle Energy consumption, performance, cost
Approach: forward looking, effort/flow model
Model impact of accelerating on the vehicle attributes and then on its energy use profile
Gear shifting, powertrain details, pedal positions, etc.
This level of fidelity needed to capture small differences in vehicle design (10-20% difference in efficiency)
Autonomie emphasizes:
Power train control
Integration of all the individual vehicle components
Validated turn-key vehicle models: existing vehicles and anticipated future vehicle designs
AI Engine
HPC support
Variants:
Autonomie: detailed model of vehicle (20s to model 20 mins of real time)
Autonomie Lite: simpler model where components and their parameters can be modified but component/vehicle control cannot be modified (10x faster)
Autonomie Express: fully compiled models with very few parameters, typically used together with micro and meso-scale traffic sims, 5000+ predefined vehicle models (10x faster than Lite)
Autonomie AI: ML approximation of Autonomie Express models (extremely fast)
Projects:
Collaborating with US Department of Transportation to forecast evolution of vehicle designs in the coming decade
Design of electric trucks to find configurations that will be cost effective
Total cost of ownership of passenger cars or freight vehicles in Chicago Metro Area, from which one can infer the optimal power train distribution given the distribution of duty cycles
Route planning for electric vehicles to optimize power use and plan charging (key for taxis, trucks)
Bean model:
Techno-economic analysis of advanced vehicle technology
Analysis: what should the cost of a battery be for an electric vehicle to be cost-competitive with hybrid for a given duty cycle?
How does cost parity depend on wider economic factors (e.g. cost of electricity)?
Road Runner: CAVs Vehicle control and energy consumption
Focus: the impact of connectivity and automation on energy consumption
Traffic lights
Sensors
Vehicle sensors
Autonomous driving
Observation: Autonomous driving systems are not designed for fuel efficiency
Their energy consumption is worse because these algorithms are focused on safety first
Can improve efficiency by 5-30% with improved sensors and algorithms
E.g. catch green wave of traffic lights if integrated with lights
E.g. can communicate with other vehicles to align paths
Extensive testing on test tracks and roads
Model must account for behavior of human drivers
Extracted second-by-second driving behavior of humans
Argonne’s team
Large multi-disciplinary team (40+)
25+ years of experience