Kanaka Rajan, Harvard
Abstract:
Understanding how brain-wide circuit mechanisms govern slow behavioral state transitions—such as the shift from active to passive coping under persistent, inescapable stress, a behavioral hallmark related to learned helplessness and major depressive disorder—is fundamentally challenged by the partial observability of large mammalian brains and the limitations of standard correlational analyses. While experimental recordings capture neural activity outputs, they cannot directly isolate the underlying causal inputs or distinguish locally generated recurrent dynamics from signals inherited across distributed brain regions. To bridge this gap, we introduce a computational framework centered on data-constrained multi-region Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) trained via recursive least squares to directly match experimentally recorded single-neuron time series across species, ranging from larval zebrafish with near-complete brain observability to rodents, non-human primates, and humans. From the inferred directed interaction matrices of these trained networks, we develop CURBD (Current-Based Decomposition), a method that demultiplexes recorded neural activity into constituent within-area and inter-area source currents without requiring prior anatomical constraints.
Applying CURBD to whole-brain calcium imaging data from larval zebrafish subjected to inescapable behavioral stress, we uncover the multi-timescale causal mechanisms driving the transition from active to passive coping across the habenula, raphe nucleus, and telencephalon. Whereas conventional output-based analyses reveal only a monotonic ramp in ventral habenular activity and concurrent raphe suppression, source-current decomposition demonstrates that early active coping is driven externally by fast directed currents from the raphe to the habenula, while late-stage passivity is maintained by slower, plastic strengthening of recurrent connectivity within the habenula and projections from the telencephalon. Furthermore, by extending this approach to whole-brain recordings via chained epoch training and tensor decomposition, we extract low-dimensional compositional modes that capture brain-wide spatiotemporal motifs—including conserved ramping, oscillatory, and decaying modes alongside individual-specific baseline signatures. Under behavioral stress and pharmacological perturbation with ketamine, these unsupervised modes automatically isolate habenular hyperactivation and reveal that ketamine delays passive coping not by restoring baseline control dynamics, but by shifting brain-wide source-current trajectories into a distinct intermediate state, demonstrating how data-constrained generative models serve as a transparent virtual laboratory for causal mechanism discovery and therapeutic intervention design.
Bio:
Kanaka Rajan, PhD, is a computational neuroscientist, Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School, and a founding faculty member of the Kempner Institute for the Study of Natural and Artificial Intelligence at Harvard University. Her research seeks to understand how important cognitive functions — such as learning, remembering, and deciding — emerge from the cooperative activity of multi-scale neural processes. Using data from neuroscience experiments, she applies computational frameworks derived from machine learning and statistical physics to uncover integrative theories about the brain that bridge neurobiology and artificial intelligence.
Summary:
Active vs Passive Coping to stimuli
Can differentiate between the two by analyzing brain activity and neuronal activation
What whole-brain patterns indicate a transition
Zebra fish are a good model system
Brains have ~100k neurons
Brain regions have analogous structures to mammalian
E.g. ZAPBench (Zebrafish Activity Prediction Benchmark) is a dataset of zebra fish brain activations: https://research.google/blog/improving-brain-models-with-zapbench/
Roadmap for mapping brain activation and conserved & unique mechanisms
Range of model organisms: fruit flies, zebrafish, mice, macaques, humans
Models can be same/similar but as we advance data availability drops, while richness of dynamics increases
Train on neural and behavioral data across species
Infer circuit mechanisms
Multi-region Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)
Focus on tracking many time series rather than the graph structure of the brain
Each RNN is a dense matrix of dynamical interactions
Connections between RNNs are sparse submatrixes that capture coarse, longer-term interactions
Zebrafish experiments:
Induce an electric shock
Fish wiggle tails to escape from the shock
After several minutes transition to passive coping and stop wiggling tails
Vs control: medium level of wiggling throughout
Monitoring the activation of neurons in zebrafish brain
Activation in brain regions changes due to shock:
Habenula: increased
Raphe: reduced
Trained a 3-region RNN (idea is that 3 regions should dominate: Habenula, Raphe and Telencephalon)
The 3 region RNNs did in fact align to the 3 regions
Has identified interactions between brain regions that were not known before and can now be investigated experimentally to identify any physical mechanism
Region scale dynamics are conserved across different organisms
Developing a grammar for behavioral state dynamics
E.g.
Behavioral: left turn = syllable
Internal neural processes drive syllable transitions
Would be simple if neural regions turned syllable transitions on/off
In reality its more compositional where its more like trajectories for various behaviors
Same sets of neurons have different behavioral motifs
Extending analysis to whole brains
Increase to 9 regions
Break down data into 9 epochs.
Train first RNN on a random initial state and first epoch’s data
Train next RNN by initializing on the prior RNN and data from next epoch
…
Allows to understand diverse dynamical patterns over time
Project targets and sources of inter-region activations back to the brain identifies dynamical modes of responses of the different regions to stimuli
The whole brain responds to stimuli but the pattern of response changes by stimulus
Different major modes of activation for all fish: ramp-like, oscillating, fast-decaying, slow-decaying
Further, 10-20% of brain activity is unique to each individual
Can we perturb these modes individually? (that’s what makes something causal and compositional)
Yes, in fish treated with ketamine
Respond by changing the activation patterns of the identified RNN regions by switching modes of activation
New whole-brain mode of shocked+ketamine is different from normal or shocked