This study investigated the factors influencing the course alignment choices of former STEM students in senior high school (SHS) as they transitioned to college. With the increasing flexibility in career pathways, the research aimed to determine the extent to which students' chosen courses aligned with their SHS STEM strand. Additionally, it explored how personal factors (self-efficacy, interests, values), environmental factors (family support, school resources, peer influence), and behavioral factors (effort, time management, perseverance) impacted their decisions. The significance of course alignment on the academic experience of these students was also examined to provide insights into the challenges and opportunities they face.
The researchers saw to answer the following questions:
1. What is the college students' and/or ex-STEM SHS students' demographic profile in terms of:
1.1. year level; and
1.2. college course
2. Are the college students’ chosen course aligned with their formerly chosen STEM strand in senior high school?
3. How do personal factors influence the course choices of college students who were former STEM students in terms of:
3.1. self-efficacy;
3.2. interests; and
3.3. values?
4. How do environmental factors influence the course choices of college students who were former STEM students in terms of:
4.1. family support;
4.2. school resources; and
4.3. peer influences?
5. How do behavioral factors influence the course choices of college students who were former STEM students in terms of:
5.1. effort;
5.2. time management; and
5.3. perseverance?
6. How significant is the effect of course alignment with the STEM strand on the academic experience of former STEM students now in college?
A correlational research design was used to establish relationships between the factors affecting students' course choices and their academic experiences. Purposive sampling was applied to select college students who were former STEM strand learners. A structured Likert scale questionnaire was distributed to gather quantitative data, covering demographic information, course alignment, and the influence of personal, environmental, and behavioral factors. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to draw meaningful conclusions.
Below is the findings that the study has accumulated:
1. Demographic Profile of Former STEM Students
The study revealed that most respondents were first-year and second-year college students, with a smaller percentage consisting of third-year students. The most commonly pursued courses included BS in Nursing, BS in Computer Engineering, and BS in Architecture, reflecting both STEM-aligned and non-STEM fields. This suggests that while many former STEM students followed pathways aligned with their strand, others explored diverse options. To support informed decision-making, schools are recommended to enhance career guidance programs and provide comprehensive career assessment tools. Additionally, colleges should consider offering bridging programs for those transitioning to non-STEM fields.
2. Alignment of College Courses with the STEM Strand
The results indicated that first-year and second-year students showed stronger alignment between their college courses and the STEM strand compared to third-year students. However, alignment satisfaction decreased over time, with many third-year students expressing neutrality or dissatisfaction. This may be attributed to evolving career interests or external factors, such as the pandemic's impact. Educational institutions are encouraged to provide continuous career counseling and mentorship programs to help students reassess their alignment satisfaction and offer options for course realignment if necessary.
3. Influence of Personal Factors on Course Choices
Personal factors, including self-efficacy, interests, and values, significantly influenced students' course selections. Many students chose courses that aligned with their confidence in their academic abilities, interests in STEM-related subjects, and aspirations for stable and fulfilling careers. To further nurture students’ self-confidence and decision-making abilities, schools should implement workshops and activities that promote self-assessment and career exploration. Students are also advised to reflect on their strengths and long-term goals when making educational choices.
4. Influence of Environmental Factors on Course Choices
Environmental factors, particularly family support, school resources, and peer influence, played an important role in students’ decisions. While schools provided adequate academic resources and career guidance, family support was inconsistent, often depending on financial situations or parental preferences. Additionally, peer discussions and experiences influenced students' perceptions of career paths. Schools should strengthen their career support services by involving families in career planning sessions and establishing peer mentoring programs to encourage positive discussions about career options.
5. Influence of Behavioral Factors on Course Choices
Students who demonstrated perseverance, effective time management, and significant effort during their SHS years were more confident and well-prepared in choosing their college courses. Those who actively engaged in academic challenges showed greater determination in pursuing their goals. Schools are encouraged to foster resilience and time management skills through academic support programs, extracurricular opportunities, and mentorship initiatives. Additionally, students are recommended to apply these skills in college to navigate academic challenges effectively.
6. Significance of Course Alignment on Academic Experience
The study found that course alignment had a stronger impact on first-year and second-year students, with satisfaction decreasing as students progressed. Third-year students who experienced misalignment were more likely to express dissatisfaction with their academic experience. Colleges should monitor students' alignment perceptions throughout their academic journey and provide support systems for those experiencing dissatisfaction. Offering elective courses, interdisciplinary learning opportunities, and academic counseling can enhance students' satisfaction and academic performance.
Cell Press: Heliyon. (n.d.). Www.cell.com. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/home
Kersha, Y. (2021). How Schoolmates Affect Your Chances of Getting into College: School Socioeconomic Composition and Inequality in Access to Higher Education. Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 4, 187–219. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-4-187-219
White, E., & Shakibnia, A. (2019). State of STEM: Defining the Landscape to Determine High-Impact Pathways for the Future Workforce. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary STEM Teaching and Learning Conference, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/stem.2019.030104
Halim, L., Rahman, N. A., Wahab, N., & Mohtar, L. E. (2018). Factors Influencing Interest in STEM Careers: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1227886
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Nite, S. (2023). Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060
Rudolph, C. W., Zacher, H., & Hirschi, A. (2019). Empirical developments in career construction theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 111, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.12.003
Truyens, M. (2019). Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT). Marcr.
https://marcr.net/marcr-for-career-professionals/career-theory/career-theories-and-theorists/social-cognitive-career-theory-scct/
Chang, P.-C., Guo, Y., Cai, Q., & Guo, H. (2023). Proactive Career Orientation and Subjective Career Success: A Perspective of Career Construction Theory. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 13(6), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13060503
Santos, J., Blas, L. C., Panganiban, A. J., Reyes, K. C., & Sayo, J. C. (2019). Alignment of senior high school strand in college course. Jewel Christine, Alignment of Senior High School Strand in College Course (February 1, 2019).
Hu, X., & Chan, H. Y. (2024). Preparing for the STEM pathways? Dual enrollment and college major choice in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education, 95(5), 607-638.
Louis, M., Hayes, D., & Jiang, M. (n.d.). SELF-EFFICACY 35 Self-Efficacy: College Students and Instruments. Literature Reviews in Education and Human Services Fall 2024, 3(2), 35–46. https://www.tamuc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Self-Efficacy-College-Students-and-Instruments.pdf
Ortega-Torres, E., Solaz-Portoles, J.-J., & Sanjosé-López, V. (2020). Inter-Relations among Motivation, Self-Perceived Use of Strategies and Academic Achievement in Science: A Study with Spanish Secondary School Students. Sustainability, 12(17), 6752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176752
Bilgiler, S., Dergisi, E., Weiler, T., & Murad, M. (2022). Journal of Social Studies Education Research Motivational Factors Influencing Learners’ Academic Success in an Australian Enabling Education Setting. 2022(13), 97–119. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1375011.pdf
Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2020). College students’ time management: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1319–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z
Ahmad, S., Batool, A., & Hussain Ch, A. (2019). Path Relationship of Time Management and Academic Achievement of Students in Distance Learning Institutions. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1266710.pdf
Calonia, J. T., Pagente, D. P., Desierto, D. J. C., Capio, R. T., Tembrevilla, J. A. P., Guzman, C. A., & Nicor, A. J. S. (2023). Time Management and Academic Achievement: Examining the Roles of Prioritization, Procrastination and Socialization. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED647441
Ashraf, R., Godbey, J. M., Shrikhande, M. M., & Widman, T. A. (2018). Student Motivation and Perseverance: Do They Explain College Graduation? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i3.22649
de los Reyes, R. (2021). College Students’ Decision Making and Experiences in Changing Their STEM Major and Their Career Choice. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/10900/
Watson, R. (2015). Quantitative Research. Nursing Standard, 29(31), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.31.44.e8681
Curtis, E. A. (2016). Importance and use of correlational research. Rcni.com.
https://journals.rcni.com/nurse-researcher/importance-and-use-of-correlational-research-nr.2016.e1382
Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). What is purposive sampling? | definition & examples. Scribbr.
https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/#:~:text=Purposive%20sampling%20refers%20to%20a