Embedded Files
Frequencies
Frequencies
The HE Corpus contains 24,605 occurrences of Coordination.
Distribution by Region
Distribution by Region
Distribution by Organisation Type, Document Type, Region and Year
Distribution by Organisation Type, Document Type, Region and Year
Click here to enlarge and for more details
Refresh the website if the graphics are not shownCoordination occurs mostly in documents published in North America followed by Europe, Asia, MENA and Africa. Overall, the top five contributors in terms of occurrences are IGO, NGO, RC, Net and State organisations.
IGO documents provide the greatest number of occurrences, primarily from activity reports published in North America. Occurrences from NGO were mostly obtained from activity reports published in Europe.
RC documents mostly generated occurrences in activity reports published in Europe. Occurrences from Net were mostly found in activity reports published in Europe. Lastly, most of the occurrences from State were obtained from activity reports published in Europe.
Definitions
Definitions
Summary of Definitional Elements
Summary of Definitional Elements
Abstracted from definitions and related concepts. Please scroll down for more details.
Definitional Contexts
Definitional Contexts
Related Concepts
Related Concepts
Frequent Collocations
Frequent Collocations
Frequent words that accompany a term are known as collocates. A given term and its collocates form collocations. These can be extracted automatically based on statistics and curated manually to explore interactions with concepts.
Comparisons over time between organisation types with the greatest number of hits (IGO, NGO, RC, Net and State organisations) may prove to be meaningful. Below is an histogram for the top yearly collocation for each of the five organisations with the greatest contribution as well as across all organisation types.
Collocates Over Time
Collocates Over Time
Collocational data for Coordination was found to be scarce. Across all 5 organisation types analysed, only 7 top collocates were obtained:
in-country ;
inter-cluster;
connectedness;
civil-military ;
inter-agency ;
mechanism; and
harmonization
IGO documents generated civil-military as the top collocate in 2017.
NGO documents generated civil-military as top collocate in 2011 with the highest overall score. Other top NGO collocates include decentralised, PNGO (Palestinian Non-Governmental Organisations) and inter-cluster.
RC documents generated bipartite as the top collocate in 2014. . Other top RC collocates include cell, diplomacy, tripartite and mechanism.
Net documents generated connectedness as top collocate for 2015. Other top Net collocates are inter-cluster, vertical and NCCI (National Council on Compensation Insurance).
State documents generated sector-based as top collocate for 2012. Other top State collocates include civil-military, sectoral and synergy.
Unique Collocates by Organisation Type
Unique Collocates by Organisation Type
Organisation subcorpora present unique and shared collocations with other organisation types. Unique collocations allow to discover what a particular organisation type says about Coordination that others do not.
IGO documents feature the following unique collocates: product, harmonization, IM (Information Mangement), publish, nutrition, field-based, empowerment, system-wide, sub-national and HFA (Hyogo Framework of Action).
All NGO unique collocates are PPHDs (Provincial Public Health Directorates), re-construction, ANCC (Afghanistan National Re-Construction Co-ordination ), netherlands, pay, KPK (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa), BPHWT (Back Pack Health Worker Team), recon, sharia and assyrian.
Documents from RC generated mechanism, close, meeting, regular, sectorial, facilitate, cooperation, strengthen, enhance and ICRC ( Iraqi Christian Relief Council).
Net documents generated NGO, mechanism, inter-cluster, ANCB (Afghan NGOs Coordination Bureau ), coherence, efficiency ,vertical, inter-agency, leadership and cluster.
State documents generated foreign, UNDAC (United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination), civil-military, harmonisation, TIKA (Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency ), interagency, mechanism, turkish, assistance and close.
Shared Collocates by Organisation Type
Shared Collocates by Organisation Type
Shared collocations allow to discover matching elements with organisations who discuss Coordination. These constitute intersections between subcorpora.
Top collocates shared by 2 organisation types are:
afghan ( NGO + Net)
vertical (Net + IGO)
ANCB (NGO + Net)
country-level (Net + IGO)
horizontal (Net + IGO)
ERCC (from Emergency Relief Coordination Centre ) (State + IGO)
preparation (NGO + IGO)
turkish ( State + RC)
IASC ( from Inter-Agency Standing Committee) (Net + IGO)
sectorial (RC + NGO)
Top collocates shared by 3 organisation types are:
inter-cluster ( NGO + Net + IGO)
strengthening (RC + NGO + IGO)
interagency (State + Net + IGO)
alignment (State + RC + IGO)
arrangement (RC + NGO +IGO)
architecture (NGO + Net + IGO)
wash (NGO + Net + IGO)
mobilization (RC + Net + IGO)
mine (RC + NGO + IGO)
intergovernment (State + Net + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 4 organisation types are:
civil-military (State + NGO + Net + IGO)
inter-agency (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
UNDAC (from United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination) (State + RC + NGO + IGO)
sharing (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
sectoral (State + NGO + Net + IGO)
coordination (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
NGO (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
regular (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
networking (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
logistic (RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
Top collocates shared by 5 organisation types are:
mechanism (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
close (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
office (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
humanitarian (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
cluster (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
meeting (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
strengthen (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
leadership (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
planning (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
coherence (State + RC + NGO + Net + IGO)
Usage Over Time
Usage Over Time
HE Corpus
HE Corpus
The chart below represents the distribution of Coordination between 2005 and 2019 in terms of the number of occurrences and relative frequency of occurrences. It also allows you to view the distribution across Regions, Organisations and Document types.
What's the relative frequency of a concept?
What's the relative frequency of a concept?
The relative frequency of a concept compares its occurrences in a specific subcorpora (i.e. Year, Region, Organisation Type, Document Type) to its total number of occurrences in the entire HE corpus. This indicates how typical a word is to a specific subcorpus and allows to draw tentative comparisons between subcorpora, e.g. Europe vs Asia or NGO vs IGO. You can read these relative frequencies as follows:
Relative frequency is expressed as a percentage, above or below the total number of occurrences, which are set at 100%. This measure is obtained by dividing the number of occurrences by the relative size of a particular subcorpus.
Under 100%: a word is less frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This is means that the word is not typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
100%: a word is as frequent in a subcorpus as it is in the entire corpus.
Over 100%: a word is more frequent in a subcorpus than in the entire corpus. This means that the word in question is typical or specific to a given subcorpus.
As an author, you may be interested in exploring why a concept appears more or less frequently in a given subcorpus. This may be related to the concept's nature, the way humanitarians in a given year, region, organisation type or document type use the concept, or the specific documents in the corpus and subcorpora itself. To manually explore the original corpus data, you can consult each Contexts section where available or the search the corpus itself if needs be.
Occurrences of Coordination were highest in 2016 (2549) with a relative frequency of 83 %.
North America generated the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 102%.
The top 5 organisation types with the highest relative frequency of Coordination are WHS, C/B, Net, Project and IGO.
Strategy provided the greatest number of occurrences as well as the highest relative frequency with 172%.
Google Ngram Viewer
Google Ngram Viewer
This shows the evolution of Coordination and in the vast Google Books corpus, which gives you a general idea of the trajectory of the term in English books between 1950 and 2019. Values are expressed as a percentage of the total corpus instead of occurrences.
Please note that this is not a domain-specific corpus. However, it provides a general overview of and its evolution across domains.
Coordination hit its peak in 1977. It then slightly decreased until 1985. It increased until 1992 and then decreased again until 2019.
Debates & Controversies
Debates & Controversies
Synonyms
Synonyms
Discussion
Discussion
You can add your feedback on this LAR and say whether you need us to expand the information on any section by filling in a brief form.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse