Hypothesis, Objectives, Goals
Space weathering processes occurs on short time scales, days to months
We want to determine if space weathering is geology-dependent and visually detectable on short time scales
We are going to measure changes in visual and spectral properties of geological materials and astromaterials relevant to a range of solar system bodies i.e. the moon and asteroids
Scientific Importance and Relevance
Iris is the FIRST space mission to attempt to understand space weathering of geological materials
Space weathering occurs on ALL airless bodies
Space weathering impedes our ability to map the surface geology of these celestial bodies
Relevant to understanding the evolution of asteroids Ryugu and Bennu – target asteroids of JAXA and NASA-CSA sample return missions (Hayabusa2 and OSIRIS-REx). The returned samples will provide ground truth for our mission
Background on Space Weathering
Space weathering is a catch-all term that refers to how planetary surfaces are modified by exposure to the space environment
It includes processes such as vacuum desiccation, solar wind ion implantation, radiation damage (solar/galactic cosmic rays), micrometeorite bombardment, sputtering, amorphization, and formation of agglutinates
Past Space Weathering Experiments
NASA’s Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF): 1984-1990 – long-term effects of space weathering in low-Earth orbit (LEO) on components, spacecraft materials, and operations/systems
ESA’s European Retrievable Carrier (EURECA): 1992-1993 – 15 experiments in LEO (science and astronomy)
Japan’s Space Flyer Unit: 1995-1996 – to test space-related technologies in LEO
NASA’s Mir Environmental Effects Payload (MEEP): 1996 -1997 – a variety of materials in LEO were exposed to space debris impacts and the harsh space environment (materials used for the ISS)
NASA’s Materials International Space Station Experiment (MISSE 1-8): 2001-2014 – to determine long-term space weathering effects of materials mounted on the outside of the ISS
Payload Activities to Date
Recorded lighting geometry with a diffused light source to ensure homogenous radiation over the payload sample plate at various phase angles
The magnitude of reflectance increase or decrease will be dependent on the angle of incidence
Will expect to see variation in slope (i.e., decrease in shortest wavelength region) and in overall reflectance (darkening) while the CubeSat is in orbit
Developed procedures on data processing for converting RGB values to visible reflectance spectra
Camera Characterization
Very early stages of characterization to develop procedures
Used positive angles for procedure development but will meet mission requirement for other rounds of testing (+ or - 21° angles)
Setup similar to laboratory setup, hence why angle begins from the top
We expect to acquire images from a constant phase angle anyway
Done to generate pre-flight baseline spectra
Goniometer used to measure reflectance at various incidence angles
Characterized lens for image quality/variation in slope and reflectance
Angles: 1, 10, 26, 41, 48, 53, 63, 68, 75, 82°
Shadow test
57° (all samples are illuminated)
121° (all samples are in shadow)
Variation in Photometry Due to Geometry
Figure produced using the above setup
Poor pixelation was a result of loose wires and will not be an issue for the mission with the flight lens
Simply artifacts of the engineering model
Y axis expressed as photometry not reflectance
Y axis will be expressed as absolute reflectance for the mission
Expressed as photometry because it is a correction of the light intensity measured by the camera
To be expressed as reflectance, the light intensity measured on the sample needs to be compared to the light intensity measured on a reference target
Pellets are dense, flat and specular
Spectral reddening occurs as a function of viewing geometry - bigger phase angle = redder spectrum
Further Payload Characterization
Will characterize flight lens for camera image quality
Will characterize flight lens to produce spectra in the visible spectrum using data from the images
Will record angle of incidence using a goniometer and diffused light source with the flight lens
Will test engineering model (EM) lens with DUV radiation in a nitrogen environment, which provides illumination down to 150 nm
EM lens similar model to flight lens
The samples will undergo thermal vacuum (TVAC) testing when mounted onto the CubeSat prior to launch
Will acquire UV-VIS-NIR reflectance on the samples while assembled in the sample plate
Will compare UV-VIS-NIR reflectance to the visible spectra produced by the flight camera lens to check camera response
Sample Preparation
Sample preparation procedure identical to that used for Mars Perseverance rover calibration targets
Sample preparation done by same facility (CIRIMAT) that prepared the Perseverance rover SuperCam calibration targets
Outgassing
All samples are vacuum sintered, performed at high temperatures, and applied pressures of typically 50 -100 MPa
Method: Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS)
As a result, should be sufficient to remove any volatiles so collected volatile condensable material (CVCM) and total mass loss (TML) risks are low (R-PLD-0400, R-PLD-0410)
Due to the high temperatures and negative vacuum pressures, the samples would have outgassed any volatiles during the vacuum sintering process
The samples are considered low risk and benign
Total mass measurement for all 24 potential samples is 0.79% of the entire mass of the spacecraft
All sample properties are known (XRF, XRD, Raman, and UV-VIS-NIR reflectance)
Due to the low mass, and high-temperature vacuum sintering, we do not consider the geological samples to be of harm to the mission
Outgassing Plan
The CubeSat with the geological payload fully assembled prior to launch will be subjected to TVAC testing
During TVAC testing, the samples will be baked out at 45˚C for a period of time (RFD submitted) and are open to suggestions regarding time duration
This will desorb any volatiles, including atmospheric water, that condensed on the sample surfaces since vacuum sintering
Post-TVAC, samples will be stored in a controlled environment at Magellan Aerospace (in the repository in the cleanroom)
Data Acquisition
Measuring red-green-blue (RGB) reflectivity of a range of geological samples relevant to multiple planetary bodies
Using a three-colour commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) camera
Two cameras will be included on the satellite for redundancy
Multiple images were taken with the test lens to acquire images to test for camera response
The data from these images have been converted from RGB values to absolute visible reflectance spectra
The spectra will be used to calibrate in-orbit measurements of the optical properties of the samples to assess the effects of space weathering
The images will also be used to measure changes in physical properties of the payload
Payload Structure
Will Select Regions of Interest (ROIs) from the image
ROIs will be selected for each sample
Each sample is required to have no fewer than 59 red pixels, 52 green pixels, and 45 blue pixels
Test results show on average 1085 red pixels, 2170 green pixels and 1085 blue pixels (V-PLD-0190, V-PLD-0320, V-PLD-0330, V-PLD-0340)
Histogram of Red, Green, Blue Bands
The RGB histograms are plotted in number of pixels / intensity
We used the RGB bands (shown in the graph) and converted them into reflectance / wavelength
Converting the values into the visible spectrum will help us better determine the effects of space weathering
Why Convert RGB Values to Spectra?
Many reasons:
•Standard procedure
•Plotting multiple datasets
•Averages the variation over the samples
•Increased signal-noise
•Spectra needs to be calibrated to the standards
Camera Spectral Response
Wavelength plots max value:
Red: 610 nm
Green: 530 nm
Blue: 460 nm
Spectral resolution is considered as full width at half maximum
Camera Response
The camera’s spectrum response determines the wavelength plot for the RGB bands (between ~450 nm – 650 nm)
We will be observing changes in optical reflectance properties in the visible spectrum as show in the graph
Calibration Standards
Three calibration standards will be used to determine detector response of RGB cameras pre-launch and during the mission
Multiple calibration targets to be used: AluWhite98 (white reference), Grey33 (grey scale), and Green (colour standard), as well as a black aluminum standard (dark reference)
Atomic oxygen (AO) is present in low-Earth orbit but not on planetary surfaces
Will look into developing calibration targets that are resilient and not resilient to AO
Will use them as controls to form part of the experiment by analyzing how the optical properties change between the two disks over time
We will compare the pixel intensities to the calibration standards so that we remove the effect of any changes in camera response
These materials have all been used in previous planetary missions (e.g., Mars Perseverance rover)
Mission Status for Science Experiment
Several more samples have undergone vibration testing
As a result of the pandemic, there is still a delay on receiving the last batch of samples from CIRIMAT
To date, 17 samples passed testing and verification
Only two candidate samples have failed testing: anthracite coal and goethite
We are currently meeting the mission requirement of a minimum 10 samples for the payload (V-PLD-0010, V-PLD-0011)