TODAY'S  FEMALE POP  ROLE MODELS  -  TOTALLY  SEXUALIZED  PERFORMANCES

    ALL THE ROLE-MODEL GIRL-STARS ARE STROKING THEIR VAGINAS

                                                                    HOT but NOT

                                                                                TOO BE BOTHERED

                         SHOWCASING HER VERY SEXY SEXUALITY

GIRLS:  HAVE CAKE; EAT TOO

BOYS:  NO STARE AT CAKE;  NO TOUCH CAKE; NO OBJECTIFY CAKE!

The absurd feminist insistence that women should be allowed to dress (and behave) as provocatively as they wish, while men are expected NOT to be provoked, reflects a profound ignorance of human nature.  It is a willfully blind fantasy flying in the face of a million years of evolutionary selected-for traits, and is rooted in nothing deeper than a supremely selfish desire to blatantly advertise their sex-appeal while at the same time demanding that men avoid objectifying them.                                         

"I want to revel in sexy clothes without being bothered"

“Feminists can wear anything they fucking want” Gloria Steinem - 2017

RIGHT!  YES!  ANYTHING THEY FUCKING WANT!" 

#MeToo — ONE OUT OF EVERY FOUR COLLEGE GIRLS ARE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED

REALITIES OF HUMAN NATURE -- CIRCA YEAR 1 TO YEAR 3,000

                                     #MeToo?

IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE HEAT 

THE TRUE STORY of ALEXI HALKET -- from the Toronto Star:

                                                                             SEXUAL ATTENTION

"When will this generation of girls be able to grow up and revel in sexy clothes without recrimination and fear of violence?"

                                                                         EXPOSED SKIN IS NOT SEXUAL 

This pipe-dream posturing will have only one result: trouble, i.e. increasing hostility between the sexes.  This rationalized “demand”-- this pretzel-twisted logic “mandate”--  is a foolish, naive, and dangerous mistake. 

Feminist are caught in a  “Beyoncé trap”, where Bey (and her ilk) presents to the public a hyper-sexualized “Powerful” role model – one that completely contradicts decades of fem-dogma about objectifying women – but one that is above criticism because of her black/female victimized-group status. Let the rationalizing begin! 

SHOWCASING HER SEXY-- HOSTESS AT A LOCAL RESTAURANT 

 A New Kind of Girl - "Showcase Our Sexiness In A Public Way"

   GETTING A LEG UP ON THE COMPETITION

NOTE:  Anytime I start to worry that some of this stuff is too extreme, 

I reassure myself that it's not by watching some MTV, or "Girls"

or "Inside Amy Schumer"  or "Broad City" or etc. or etc. etc.

FEMALE EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SEXUAL PROVOCATION --

A LONG HISTORY 

"THE OPENING WIDE OF FEMALE LEGS HAS ALWAYS BEEN AN ACTION LOADED WITH SEXUAL SIGNIFICANCE"

Via the entertainment industry, female promiscuity is constantly being validated and, in fact, is being -- with great zeal -- encouraged. Yet males are expected to suppress their very strongest drive -- and not objectify females -- and not be aggressive towards them --  even as these females loudly and proudly advertise their sex appeal, and signal their openness to casual sex. 

 "Yet, for today’s girls, sexy appearance has been firmly conflated with strong womanhood, and at ever younger ages"   NY Times  

           The gist of this pictorial "essay" can be summed up as follows: 

 (A) The 21st Century “sexuality in public ways” dress and casual-sex hookup behavior of many American females is profoundly changing the way males perceive women in general, and is guaranteed to invite increased unwanted male attention, harassment, and assault.    This sexualized behavior is also, I believe, fostering hostility among a significant percentage of males. 

(B) As harassment and assault subsequently increase, feminists – rather than urging women to tone down their out-in-public sexual advertising (no way in hell -- see feminist rationales farther down) -- insist that women should be free to be as sexually provocative as they wish.  Having thus supposedly settled the "OK-2-B-A-Slut" controversy, feminists then seek to "protect" women by bringing increased law enforcement to bear against males.  This is done via significantly expanding the definition of what constitutes harassment and sexual assault, and by attempting to undermine the due process rights of accused males.

"Both critics and supporters of the Center for Disease Control’s methodology note the striking disparity between CDC figures and the Justice Department’s crime statistics based on the National Crime Victimization Survey (which includes crimes unreported to the police). While the CDC estimates that nearly 2 million adult American women were raped in 2011 and nearly 6.7 million suffered some other form of sexual violence, the NCVS estimate for that year was 238,000 rapes and sexual assaults"  TIME MAG.                                     

 (See "Sexual Harassment Ironies" elsewhere in this blog)

So -- aided by a complicit and unquestioning left-leaning mainstream media, feminists use these expanded definitions to Goodyear Blimp-up sexual assault statistics, deliberately manufacturing a totally bogus “culture of rape” epidemic.  This rape-scare is intended (1) to give the gullible public -- and particularly young women -- the impression that females are being victimized on an unprecedented, massive scale; (2) to thereby heat-stroke-stoke female anger so as to pressure politicians into funneling more and more government resources into feminist causes; (3) to make sure young women (thus appropriately terrified and/or incensed) vote Democratic -- and (4) -- most importantly -- via "affirmative consent" laws, to squelch/stymie male aggression and put the female in charge -- i.e. to let her lead in the sexual dance. 

It is now common to regularly read or hear via the media that one-in-four women in college will be raped. 

               A CDC spokesperson told The New Republic that “being unable to consent is key to the CDC’s definition of rape.”    

 Lastly, (D) because the vast majority of alleged campus sexual assaults are not “winnable” in a traditional court of law – simply not enough evidence -- feminists are pressuring police, judges, campus administrators, business owners -- even the Dept. of Justice -- to weaken or jettison the due process rights of accused males.

                                               "Look.  She says he did it.  That's good enough for me. He's guilty!" 

 NOTE:  In no way do I mean to diminish the very serious and traumatic crime of sexual assault.  However, I believe the witch-hunt hysteria addressed here is a serious threat to our societal and legal fabric.  It is feminist tyranny intended to control men -- to make them "behave" as it were.  This same leftist-based “guilty until proven innocent” zealotry has been glaringly evident in several recent "big-news" events, including the Duke lacrosse uproar, the U. of Virginia frat gang rape, as well as the ongoing Ferguson, Missouri media-driven "Hands-Up-Don't-Shoot" 3-Ring Big-Top circus.

So . . . to begin.

(Above yellow print quote from the NY Times, April 2016)   

"most girls do not want an emotional relationship from casual hookups.” Daily Kos

 PART 1 -- "It's My Hot Body;      I Do What I Want"    As with most thought emanating from the far-left, what we have here is a fundamental misunderstanding – or willful blindness -- of human nature.  (This misunderstanding is the reason communism and socialism inevitably falter and collapse -- or drift into totalitarian states.

In this case the misunderstanding has to do with a "from-day-one" primary biological imperative of the male animal, which is to act aggressively towards females he is attracted to, and particularly towards females he is attracted to who appear to be sexually available.  Hand in hand with this natural behavior is the female’s natural inclination to respond negatively or positively to male aggression – depending on which males are, as they used to say, "making advances".

WEAR AS LITTLE AS YOU WANT  WEAR -- AS LITTLE   

That says it all, perfectly.  Girls must be allowed to dress as provocatively as they wish.  Boys must learn NOT TO BE PROVOKED.

“The argument being made by school administrators is not that distant from the arguments made by those who accuse rape victims of asking to be assaulted by dressing a certain way. We tell women to cover themselves from the male gaze, but we neglect to tell the boys to look at something else . . . But we ought to make that distinction without implying that a girl must be accountable for the sexual attention she gets"  Time Mag. 

  "My daughter was punished for showing too much of her (gasp!) legs. Her school is normalizing the notion that girls’ bodies are distractions; that girls bear responsibility for boys’ reactions to their bodies; that boys have thoughts that are inherently impure and will lead to misconduct. The message and actions perpetuated by gender-biased implementation of school dress codes—the blaming and shaming of our girls—has got to stop."  SLATE

OMG! WTF? Her school is normalizing the notion that girls’ bodies are distractions!!

FYI, THAT "HOT" FEMALE BODIES ARE MAJOR "DISTRACTIONS" TO MALES GOT NORMALIZED ABOUT A MILLION YEARS AGO. WHAT'S REALLY BEING NEW-NORMALIZED -- VIA FEMIMIST "TELL THE BOYS NOT TO STARE" DOGMA -- CAN BE SEEN VIA THE IMAGES SPRINKLED THROUGHOUT THIS "HOT BUT NOT to be BOTHERED" SECTION.

 —the blaming and shaming of our girls—has got to stop

So -- I must be seriously abnormal, because if I'm in a classroom, or in a bar, or at a party, or a church social, or a mall etc., etc. -- and there's an attractive woman with nice legs wearing very short shorts or a very short skirt, I tend to get distracted. 

(See my "Death of Motivation Tax" in the "Bertha Kontrolla Major section)

Besides the absurdity of “educating” boys in school not to be distracted by a girl in very short shorts or very short skirt (which is an attempt to negate a few million years of evolution) the question is begged:  Why exactly is the girl wearing the very short shorts or the very short skirt to school? (And please spare me that bullshit about the hot weather.)  The answer is obvious to anyone – with the exception of tunnel-vision hard-core feminists; it's all about sex appeal, i.e. looking and feeling sexy.   Ergo, girls want to appear HOT yet at the same time only want to be BOTHERED by the "right" boys and/or girls. 

                                                                                                                  FEMINIST INDOCTRINATION

                                                                   BOYS MUST BE TAUGHT

"These dress codes send the message that their female bodies are sources of temptation and shame, and teach boys that it’s acceptable, unpreventable even, for them to view their female classmates as sexual objects"

FEMINIST ENTREPRENEUR.COM

It is not acceptable for boys to view their female classmates as sexual objects

The Nation:  Lindsay and her friends formed the group #Iammorethanadistraction to raise awareness about what it means for a middle school girl to be told that her appearance is frustrating her learning environment. Ava Emilione, a member of the group, elaborated, “We shouldn’t be responsible for other people’s actions. When the school board is telling a girl that she has to dress a way so she won’t be distracting, that’s telling a girl that she needs to change herself, to make sure she’s not distracting.”

"It’s Slutty Wednesday,” said Hao, a senior from Brooklyn, who is headed to Carnegie Mellon University.  .  . Another rule [they are protesting against] calls for shorts, dresses and skirts to extend at least beyond the fingertips when arms are extended straight down.  A third bans the exposing of "shoulders, undergarments, midriffs and lower backs."  NY Times      

 Another element in this sexy-image mix is the media-driven psycho-masculinization of women – in particular the jettisoning of what used to be called “femininity”.  Bluntly put, women -- via pop music, movies and television -- are being urged, cajoled, lectured, encouraged, and role-modeled to dress like hookers, to drink to excess, to avoid (for god's sake) "needing" a man, and to welcome -- or better yet, initiate -- casual sex. (In theory I am against none of the above.)

“According to surveys, young women are now as likely as young men to have sex and by countless reports are also as likely to initiate sex.”  Wash. Post 

                     to behave like male assholes.  

     From the movie "Spring Breakers"

This, apparently, is the mainstream media's (and Hollywood's) ideal woman.  In film and on television, and on the web, you see her everywhere.

Plus -- Girls as Bisexual (They are also, incidentally, being urged, cajoled, lectured, encouraged, and role-modeled to regard bisexuality as an exciting, and even preferable option.)  

Anita Barbee, director of the National Resource Center on Child Welfare Training and Evaluation at the University of Louisville points to the media as at least part of what explains this shift in adolescent female behavior. "What the media [do] is normalize the behavior, and lead more sensation seeking young women to 'try it out.'" She went on to explain that the media have now made it "cool" for women and girls to kiss each other.."

                                                     "I kissed a girl and I liked it"

"Katy Perry’s notorious 2008 breakthrough single, 'I Kissed a Girl,' took teenage youth by storm and started a revolution of drunk, juvenile girl-on-girl high school and college hookups."  Tagg Magazine

But, I digress. . . 

Likewise, at the same time feminist activists rail against “slut-shaming” (meaning there is nothing wrong with women dressing like hookers and having lots of sex with multiple partners), feminists are also raising holy hell about the so-called spreading epidemic of “sexual assault”.   I sense a disconnect here.      

            Slut Walkers Take to the Streets             "It's my hot body - I do what I want" 

PART 3 -- Witch-Hunt: Media Headline/Female Student Hysteria                 

A group of 100 protesters – including many topless women – recently marched the streets of Athens, Ohio chanting, "Blame the system, not the victim" and "Two, four, six, eight, stop the violence, stop the rape." Organized by an Ohio University student organization called "fuckrapeculture," the protest was designed to bring attention to what the founders believe is a toxic culture of sexism and sexual violence infecting their campus.

“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.”  George Orwell – 1984

Harassment!!! -- Sexual Assault!!! -- The "Rape Culture"!!! -- It’s literally all over the news 

(NOTE:  Between the headlines below I have liberally sprinkled images depicting the new-normal dress and behavior of many of today's liberated women.)  

Whether you find the images below offensive, humorous, erotic, nauseating or fabulous, these are the tip of the iceberg of  sexual images that boys everywhere are exposed to daily -- on the web, on television, in movies, in music videos -- and in real life.

1. Why a New Nail Polish Can’t Gloss Over Rape Culture! – NY Times 

"Maintaining taboos and stigmas around certain body parts being naughty is counterproductive." 

                  OUR BODY PARTS ARE NOT EVIL, THEY ARE FUNCTIONAL

"You're exactly right! Why can't people, of all ages, wear whatever they want?! It's about time we took the focus off girls, and put it on boys. It's the way society is now.

 When people, namely males, let go of this sexist outlook that they've been brought up with, then society can move on and people can realize that women can wear whatever the hell they want, 'sexually suggestive' or not!” Reader comment

2. Campus Sexual Assault:  Annie Clark and Andrea Pino Are Fighting Back !– Vogue 

  "we should be teaching young boys and men that a woman's body is her business"                       

3. Wash. Post Pole Shows That 20% of Women Sexually Assaulted in College! – Wash. Post 

"And if men still view women as objects when we’re baring skin, maybe it’s time they consciously work on moving past that."            

 4. No, It’s Not OK to Steal Kisses! – Huff Post 

 "we need to remember that women have the right 

 to explore and express their sexuality." 

6. Harassment In Science, Replicated! – NY Times 

       "To maintain that level of attention, many girls are transmitting nude or sexually explicit photos of themselves via cell phone.  The practice is called 'sexting.'  "It is a way to become famous at their school, because those photos are widely forwarded among students",  explained Joy Becker, a youth counselor at Options For Healthy Sexuality in Vancouver."

  "Let's say that a woman [dresses provocatively] because she enjoys how she looks in these clothes and she enjoys the attention she gets. This woman knows precisely what reactions she will get. In fact, she luxuriates in the attention. In my eyes, this woman is empowered. She knows what she is doing and executes it."                            

8. Reporting Rape and Wishing She Hadn’t! – NY Times 

               IT MAKES HER HAPPY". . . the motivation behind why a woman is wearing a short skirt: maybe because her legs are her favorite body part, and it makes her happy to see them"

9. Fight Against Sex Assaults Holds Colleges to Account! – NY Times

10. Checklist For Campus Sexual Misconduct Policies! – The Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault 

"A woman's attire may be a reflection of her mood, however, in no circumstance does an outfit signify a woman's consent to sexual activity. Nor does it signify an invitation" 

11. A Sexual Harassment Blueprint Restricts Verbal Contact! – Wash. Post   

"Women are still restricted in the exploration of their bodies through societal messages of purity. To be pure is to be passive, and this passivity leads to women who are ignorant of their own sexual anatomy, much less their desires or dislikes.”                  

12. White House Calls On Colleges to Do More to Combat Sexual Assault! – Inside Higher Ed      

  “It is incredibly difficult to be sexually empowered in a society that shames women for expressing their sexuality while simultaneously reducing women to their physical value alone."

13. Fifty Five Colleges Named In Federal Inquiry into Sexual Assault Cases! – NY Times    

"The only issues for students to be aware of when it comes to sex are health and consent. Beyond those two issues, there is not a single reason not to have sex with many people"

 15. White House to Press Colleges to Do More to Combat Rape! – NY Times

                                    DOING MORE TO COMBAT RAPE

 16. California Passes First-Ever Bill to Define Sexual Consent on College Campuses!   "California’s bill comes after more than a year of pressure from the federal government, Congress, and student activists for higher education institutions to do more to prevent the widespread sexual assault occurring on the nation’s campuses." – Time Mag. 

 "A hookup can include anything from a goodnight kiss to anal sex. But they are always a matter of casual sex, no strings attached.  The big difference between then and now is that now, if a relationship develops, sex comes before the first date. But most girls do not want an emotional relationship from casual hookups.” Daily kos

    17.  In Florida Student Assaults, an Added Burden on Accusers! - NY Times               

"Our bodies and body parts are not evil, they are functional, and they deserve to be regarded equally, and with genuine respect."       

"Let's get one thing clear: Wearing tight or revealing clothing does not excuse other people from rude behavior like staring."        

18.  Campus Discussions Increasingly Focus on Sex Assaults!-Wash. Post 

"Just because it makes you uncomfortable doesn't mean you get to tell other people what to wear.  It's none of your business.     "Why should we have to hide our bodies if they're a natural part of who we are as people and as a species? "

         22.  An Investigation of Campus Rape Reveals No Easy Solutions - Wash Post

  “The problem isn’t sexualization, the problem is the degradation that comes along with women expressing it,”    

  23.  Sexually Assaulted at UVA -- NY Times  

 you can learn to control your own reactions and respond appropriately once you recognize that your feelings are not caused by other people's behavior." 

 24.  College Rape Survivor Will Carry Her Mattress Around Campus Until Her Rapist Is Expelled -- NY Times 

Notice that the above headline says she wants her rapist "expelled" versus "arrested".  This illustrates what is the norm about “the widespread sexual assault occurring on the nation’s campuses”:  that traditional law enforcement is rarely involved.  Why?  Because the great majority of these cases are not winnable in a court of law; not enough evidence or corroborating witnesses -- and heavy drinking is usually involved.  So -- bring on feminist justice, i.e. who needs a unanimous verdict?  "The Obama White House has reinforced a “preponderance of the evidence” standard in these cases, meaning campus courts need only find it’s 51 percent likely the assault occurred to punish the accused."  New York Magazine  

 Hysteria?  Hell Yes!  Whoever designed this poster is plainly advocating having a man prosecuted for rape -- for pressuring his wife into having sex.  It is via this kind of zealotry that feminists attempt to greatly expand the definition of rape and malign/marginalize masculinity.                                      

PART 4 -- What is the definition of sexual assault?

On the recent (Sept. 2014) Miss America ABC telecast, one finalist was asked a question containing this statement:  "According to some reports one in four college women report surviving rape or attempted rape."  

 This “one-in-four” statistic has been bouncing around the news for years, and our mainstream media is happy to echo/broadcast it with no skepticism whatsoever.  This from ABC News in 2010

One In Four Women Will Be Raped Before Graduating College

"A recent study from the Department of Justice estimated that 25 percent of college women will be victims of rape or attempted rape before they graduate within a four-year college period." 

Does this one-in-four statistic not -- somewhere deep in your consciousness or common sense -- register as bullshit on stilts?  Do you really believe the million women in college (doing very well, by the way) would be happily walking around their campuses if this were true?

So – where does this “1 in 4” statistic come from?  Here’s where:

The study cited by Russlynn Ali (Department of Education's assistant secretary for civil rights), used an online survey, conducted under a grant from the Justice Department, in which college women were asked about their sexual experiences, on campus and off, and the researchers—not the women themselves—decided whether they had been assaulted. The researchers employed an expansive definition of sexual assault that included "forced kissing" and even "attempted" forced kissing. The survey also asked subjects if they had sexual contact with someone when they were unable to give consent because they were drunk. A "yes" answer was automatically counted as a rape or assault. According to the authors, "an intoxicated person cannot legally consent to sexual contact. Dept. of Justice" -- Cristina Hoff Summers, Chronicle of Higher Education

“Sexual assault could even include crimes like voyeurism, exhibitionism, incest, and sexual harassment. What makes it sexual assault is that the victim did not consent to the perpetrator’s actions.”  Hub Pages – May 2014

                   In the Eye of the Beholder – or the Lips of the Recipient?

In an article in 2014 about the sailor-nurse photo, Time noted that “many people view the photo as little more than the documentation of a very public sexual assault, and not something to be celebrated.”NY times sept 2016

So -- here we have Bogart suddenly kissing Bacall -- without first getting a verbal consent -- and she is delighted.  (Actually, one of the first lessons a boy learns -- when in his first kissable moment with a girl -- is to just kiss her.  Normal females want and expect the male to be firmly -- but not overly-- aggressive.)

And, we have feminists insisting such a kiss is a sexual assault. 

“There’s also a tendency in American culture, meanwhile, to shame women for their sexuality”  The Atlantic – Sept. 2014

So, there you go.  American culture is "shaming women for their sexuality".  I must be watching the wrong channels. 

And, just looking at the wrong photos on the web now constitutes abuse!

PART 5 - Adult Women as Pseudo-minors

(Where drunk boys are to be held responsible, drunk girls are not!)  

"Put the bastard in Jail!  Kick him out of school!" shriek the feminists.  "Ruin his life!"  After all, the poor girl was drunk."

                        "an intoxicated person cannot legally consent to sexual contact." Dept. of Justice

                                                        Below:  A True-Life Incident

PART 6 -- The New-Age Female; Males Must Adapt

 Sexually Liberated - "NOT A SINGLE REASON NOT TO HAVE SEX WITH MANY PEOPLE"      

Bi-Sexually Fascinated                

       or inclined - one female was eating the other'   

                                                                                 Horny Like Man  --  if Not More So

PART 7   Conclusions/Predictions:

So -- The easy-as-pie internet access to the ocean of hard-core pornography, in conjunction with our sex-saturated culture and the masculinized openly sexual behavior of girls, is drastically, profoundly and permanently changing the male image of  females.  The web is now swimming with millions of photos and videos of sex; not just images of porn stars, but primarily images of seemingly nice, sweet amateur girls stripping, masturbating, and otherwise participating in any and all variations of sex. It strikes me as inevitable that boys' perceptions of girls will devolve more and more towards sex-objectifying them, slut-ifying them, and in no way "respecting" them in the old-fashioned sense of the word.  

PS  Beyoncé’s Subtext:  

                        Oh yeah. The times, they are a changin' -- major!