March 28
Draft Portfolio Statement Peer Feedback
Draft Portfolio Statement Peer Feedback
Looked for written evidence of the inquiry guiding the artmaking, supported by references to artifacts
Looked for written evidence of synthesis of materials, processes and ideas, supported by references to artifacts
Looked for written evidence of practice, experimentation, and revision, supported by references to artifacts
Peer Review
Work time to make revisions
Upload HI RES FILES of SELECTED WORKS to Brightspace for Roemer to print (digital works)
Sign up for AP Submission Site (get teacher code from Roemer/Lehrmann)
Links to Individual Draft Portfolios are on our ARTIFACTS site
WICOR Strategies Used:
W- feedback to classmate
I - Costa's Level 3
C- peer feedback
O - draft portfolio; mad libs; scoring rubric; graphic organizer
R - peer statements
Now is the time to give constructive feedback-- if you see anything that needs adjusting, let your peer know! Are they making a strong case for why the College Board should award them college credit? Are they providing visual and written evidence that they are meeting the requirements of the College Board rubric?
Make any edits indicated by your teacher & peer reviewer-- especially if there is consensus between your teacher and peer reviewer.
Action steps might include:
Creating additional artifacts collages
Re-photographing artworks with quality lighting in mind
Re-organizing the order of your artifacts/artworks
Editing/refining statements
Finding different artworks to replace ones that don't reflect your SI