Download Math 30 SQPs pdf
How do we assess democracy's outcomes?
Answer:We would look for the following practices and institutions: regular, free and fair elections; open public debate on major policies and legislations; and citizens’ right to information about the government and its functioning.
How can you say that democracy is a better form of government when compared with dictatorship or any other alternative?
Answer:Promotes equality among citizens: Every citizen enjoys a Universal Adult Franchise, One Person, One Vote, One Value.
Enhances the dignity of the individual: All citizens are equal before the law irrespective of their background.
Improves the quality of decision-making: Effective participation of citizens from the grassroots level due to decentralisation.
Provides a method to resolve conflicts: All legislation is open for public debate and discussions. The judiciary resolves all disputes.
Allows room to correct mistakes: Leaders can make amends. The constitution is also amended and updated.
What are the commonalities and differences in the 21st-century democracies?
Answer:Commonalities:
21st democracies have formal constitutions, they hold elections, they have parties and they guarantee the rights of citizens.
Differences:
These democracies are very much different from each other in terms of their social situations, their economic achievements and their cultures.
How does democracy produce an accountable, responsive, and legitimate government?
Answer:Accountable:
In a democracy, we are most concerned with ensuring that people will have the right to choose their rulers and people will have control over the rulers.
Responsible:
Whenever possible and necessary, citizens should be able to participate in decision-making, that affects them all.
The democratic government develops mechanisms for citizens to hold the government accountable and mechanisms for citizens to take part in decision-making whenever they think fit.
Legitimate:
A democratic government is a legitimate government.
It is people’s own government. That is why, there is overwhelming support for the idea of democracy all over the world.
People wish to be ruled by representatives elected by them.
Democracy’s ability to generate its own support is itself an outcome that cannot be ignored.
Examine the difference between democracies and non-democracies regarding decision-making.
Answer:Non-Democratic:
Non-democratic rulers do not have to bother about deliberation in assemblies or worry about majorities and public opinion.
So, they can be very quick and efficient in decision-making and implementation.
But it may take decisions that are not accepted by the people and may therefore face problems.
Democratic:
Democracy is based on the idea of deliberation and negotiation.
So, some delay is bound to take place.
Because it has followed procedures, its decisions may be both more acceptable to the people and more effective.
How do democracies ensure transparency?
Answer:Democracy ensures that decision-making will be based on norms and procedures.
So, a citizen who wants to know if a decision was taken through the correct procedures can find this out.
She has the right and the means to examine the process of decision-making. This is known as transparency. Eg: RTI.
Why are some people against Democracy?
Answer:Most democracies fall short of elections that provide a fair chance to everyone and in subjecting every decision to public debate.
Democratic governments do not have a very good record when it comes to sharing information with citizens.
The record of democracies is not impressive on two counts. Democracies often frustrate the needs of the people and often ignore the demands of the majority of their population.
The routine tales of corruption are enough to convince us that democracy is not free of this evil.
If democracies are expected to produce good governments, then is it not fair to expect that they would also produce development?
(or)
If you consider all democracies and all dictatorships for the fifty years between 1950 and 2000, dictatorships have slightly higher rates of economic growth. How?
Economic development depends on several factors: the country’s population size, global situation, cooperation from other countries, economic priorities adopted by the country, etc.
The difference in the rates of economic development between less developed countries with dictatorships and democracies is negligible.
We cannot say that democracy is a guarantee of economic development. But we can expect democracy not to lag behind dictatorships in this respect.
When we find such a significant difference in the rates of economic growth between countries under dictatorship and democracy, it is better to prefer democracy as it has several other positive outcomes.
Perhaps more than development, it is reasonable to expect democracies to reduce economic disparities. Explain.
(or)
Even when a country achieves economic growth, will wealth be distributed in such a way that all citizens of the country will have a share and lead a better life?
(or)
Is economic growth in democracies accompanied by increased inequalities among the people?
(or)
Do democracies lead to a just distribution of goods and opportunities?
Parallel to the process of bringing individuals into the political arena on an equal footing, we find growing economic inequalities.
A small number of ultra-rich enjoy a highly disproportionate share of wealth and incomes.
Not only that, their share in the total income of the country has been increasing.
Those at the bottom of society have very little to depend upon. Their incomes have been declining. Sometimes they find it difficult to meet their basic needs of life, such as food, clothing, house, education and health.
The poor constitute a large proportion of our voters and no party will like to lose their votes.
How do democracies help; in the accommodation of social diversity?
(or)
Do democracies lead to peaceful and harmonious life among citizens?
(or)
It will be a fair expectation that democracy should produce a harmonious social life.
Democracies usually develop a procedure to conduct their competition. This reduces the possibility of these tensions becoming explosive or violent.
It is necessary to understand that democracy is not simply rule by majority opinion. The majority always needs to work with the minority so that governments function to represent the general view. Majority and minority opinions are not permanent.
It is also necessary that rule by the majority does not become rule by the majority community in terms of religion or race or linguistic group, etc.
Rule by majority means that in the case of every decision or in the case of every election, different persons and groups may and can form a majority.
Democracy remains democracy only as long as every citizen has a chance of being in majority at some point of time.
Democracy stands much superior to any other form of government in promoting the dignity and freedom of the individual. Explain.
Answer:The passion for respect and freedom are the basis of democracy.
For societies which have been built for long on the basis of subordination and domination, it is not a simple matter to recognise that all individuals are equal.
In a non-democratic set-up, this unacceptability would not have a legal basis because the principle of individual freedom and dignity would not have the legal and moral force there.
Democracy in India has strengthened the claims of the disadvantaged and discriminated castes for equal status and equal opportunity.
There are instances still of caste-based inequalities and atrocities, but these lack the moral and legal foundations.
"Democracy has so many exams. And millions of examiners!". Explain.
Answer:When we ask people about the way democracy functions, they will always come up with more expectations, and many complaints.
The fact that people are complaining is itself a testimony to the success of democracy.
It shows that people have developed awareness and the ability to expect and to look critically at power holders and the high and the mighty.
Democracy transforms people from the status of a subject into that of a citizen.
Most individuals today believe that their vote makes a difference to the way the government is run and to their own self-interest.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-fP9gss1XaCP8h6FuN9PLNJFjTLofOCg?usp=sharing