Poets vs Science

To help to understand 'subjectify' See it as instead of treating something or someone as an object, you treat it as a subject or as the main character in a story or a poet. Now you can understand the feelings of the one you subjectify. For example when Richard Feynman asked in what may be the world’s most poetic footnote:


“Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars - mere globs of gas atoms. I too can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? The vastness of the heavens stretches my imagination - stuck on this carousel my little eye can catch one - million - year - old light. A vast pattern - of which I am a part... What is the pattern, or the meaning, or the why? It does not do harm to the mystery to know a little about it. For far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined it. Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?”



By expanding it to a common ground between poetry and science we can better understand the situation.




The other way around though can be our project with Lieke and Tobias where we created a robotic plant called 'artificiales photosynthesis' that reacts to light and feels like a living creature, by subjectifying it you want to take care of this 'robotic plant'