Story 2
Slam bidding is typically the weakest area of bidding for most players — not because of a lack of fancy conventions, but because of undeveloped judgment. You don’t need complicated conventions. What you need is to learn to evaluate hands better, and to be aware of the slam tools available in standard bidding. This lesson explains the concept of “duplication” which allows you to diagnose the degree of fit with partner and consequently make better slam decisions. On Page 2 is an explanation of a helpful slam tool: bidding five in a major suit.
Duplication Duplication is the presence of overlapping partnership values in the same suit. Duplication occurs in two basic forms:
The king, queen or jack (or any combination thereof) opposite shortness
Shortness opposite shortness
For example, if you count 3 points for the king and partner counts 3 points (as dummy) for a singleton in the same suit, the combined value is not worth 6 points — in fact it is closer to 3 points because one of the values is usually worthless. Similarly, if you and partner are both short in the same suit, the real value is much less than the combined point total because you may not be able to ruff anything.
Fit Evaluation The general requirement for a suit slam (six of a suit) is 33 total points, which includes distributional points. This is approximate. The true requirement may be anywhere from 30 to 36 points depending on the amount of duplication. To increase bidding accuracy, I recommend the following method of evaluation for suit slams:
If you find there is no duplication, the requirement for slam is only 30 points.
If duplication exists, still use 30 points as your goal, but do not count wasted honors or wasted shortness in the duplicated suit.
If you cannot determine whether duplication exists, figure on 33 points. This allows for an average amount of duplication.
Locating duplication Every bid you and partner make conveys information, and this will often disclose the presence or lack of duplication. Always ask yourself, “What is partner’s most likely hand pattern? Which suit will he be short in?” Even if you cannot be sure, an intelligent guess is usually good enough.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
1
South
Pass
Pass
2 NT
4
K J 10 4 J 8 2 A K 8 5 4 3
A Q 5 A 10 7 6 3 3 2 K Q 8
1 3
West indicates short clubs by bidding the other three suits, so East does not count the K-Q and settles for game.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
1
South
Pass
Pass
Pass
A Q 5 K Q 10 7 3
2 NT
4
K J 10 4 J 8 2 A K 8 5 4 3
3 2 A 8 6
1 3 4
6
Now East expects no duplication (note the perfect club holding) so his 16 points plus West’s likely 14+ should make slam.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
2 NT
3 NT
Pass
South
Pass
Pass
A Q 8 6 4 3 K J 10 9 3 2 3
K 5 A 8 6 K Q 8 4 Q J 7 4
3 4
West has shown extreme length in the majors so East’s secondary values in the minors are likely to be worthless.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
2 NT
3 NT
6
South
Pass
Pass
A Q 8 6 4 3 K J 10 9 3 2 3
K 5 Q 8 6 A 9 8 4 A 10 7 4
3 4
Now every card in East’s hand is golden. He has 14 points and it is reasonable to assume West’s hand will revalue to at least 16 points. The stab at slam is justified.
West
Dbl
North
3
East
Dbl
South
5
4 3 2 2 A K 10 4 A J 9 7 6
A Q 9 5 5 Q 9 8 2 K Q 10 4
None Vul
West must decide whether to bid a slam or double for penalty. The key consideration is that East is likely to be short in the same suit (hearts) so West takes his profit.
West
6
North
3
East
Dbl
South
5
A Q 9 5
2 4 3 2 A K 10 4 A J 9 7 6
5
Q 9 8 2
K Q 10 4
None Vul
Now West can see that the partnership’s shortness will be in different suits so he takes the aggressive option to bid a slam.
For many players, slam bidding success is pitiful because they only know one way to bid: Blackwood. Good players, however, are aware of the other options and know when to apply them. One of these lesser known slam bidding tools is the bid of five in a major suit. Remember this the next time you want to bid 4 NT.
The most important slam bidding tool is the control-bid, which is covered in my Lesson 3M (Suit Slam Bidding).
Basic meaning Bidding five in a major suit as a voluntary action (not competitive) is a slam invitation. In the old days, this was just a general slam try, but modern methods give it a specific meaning, according to the auction.
If your side has bid all but one suit, it asks for control in the unbid suit.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
1
South
Pass
Pass
3 A K J 10 7 6 3 Q 3 K J 9
A K 9 4 Q 4 8 7 2 A Q 8 2
3 4
4 5
Responder goes out of his way to bid clubs so the unbid suit is diamonds, then 5 delivers the perfect message. Lacking diamond control, opener should pass.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
1
South
Pass
Pass
A K J 2 10 6 K 2 K Q 10 9 8
Q 10 9 8 5 4 A J 8 3 A 4 2
3 5
4 6
After responder makes a slam try with 4 , opener jumps to 5 to show a fine hand without heart control. Responder’s singleton heart is the key to the slam.
If the enemy has bid, it asks for control in the enemy suit.
West
1
North
3
East
5
South
Pass
A K 8 2 K J 9 7 5 2
6
4 9 5
3 A Q 10 8 J 2 A K J 8 7 2
The main concern for slam is the danger of two diamond losers (the chance of being off two aces is negligible in comparison). Opener bids the slam with a singleton.
Alternative follow-ups After the bid of five in a major, partner will usually pass or bid six; but there are other options.
Holding the guarded king in the concerned suit, you should bid 5 NT to suggest 6 NT.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
East
3
South
4
A K 9 6 5 4
5 NT
b Pass
Q J 8 2 J 2 A Q 10 8 K 9 2
5 6 NT
A K K J 7 4 3
Opener asks for club control, and responder shows at least K-x. Opener then is happy to be the dummy in 6 NT. Note how foolish it would be to play in 6
.
With first-round control in the concerned suit, you may make a control-bid as a grand-slam try.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
3
South
Pass
Pass
Pass
A Q 8 2 A K J 5 4 3 4 3 K
K 3 Q 9 7 2 A 5 2 A 8 4 3
4 5
3 5 7
By bidding 5 , responder guarantees two things: first-round diamond control and second-round spade control, which is just what opener needs to bid seven.
Asking about trumps
In the preceding cases, there was exactly one unbid suit, or an enemy suit, of concern. In other situations, bidding five in a major (voluntarily) is still a slam try, but it asks about the trump suit.
If a single suit cannot be pinpointed, it asks for good trumps relative to the previous bidding.
West
1
North
Pass
Pass
East
1
South
Pass
3 K 7 3 2 K Q J 4 2 A Q 3
A K Q 2 J 9 6 5 4 A 5 3 2
3
5
After the jump raise, responder bids 5 to indicate that trump quality is his main concern, and opener should pass with such mediocre support.
West
3
North
Pass
East
5
South
Pass
K Q J 9 8 7 6 5 4 6 5 4 3
Both Vul
2 A 10 3 2 A K 3 2 A K Q 2
6
Responder has enough side tricks to bid a slam, but the danger is that two trump tricks may be lost. With a broken suit (e.g., K-J-10-x-x-x-x) opener should pass.
Exception If your side has made a weak bid and either opponent has acted, bidding five in a major is not a slam try. It is an obstructive bid.
West
5
North
1
East
3
South
Pass
J 4 2 A Q J 7 6 4 2
Pass
Pass
3 10 9 8 5 A 7 2 K 9 7 5 2
Both Vul
4 3 3
Because of the enemy bid, the raise to 5 is not a slam try but an attempt to shutout the opponents. Note that they can make at least 4 , probably more.
Hand of the Century Source: ABF
Some years ago, Helgemo was playing in the US with Edgar Kaplan and made a seemingly impossible contract through a sensational piece of card reading. In fact, his play was declared by some bridge journalists as the Hand of the Century.
West lead the heart king, ruffed. Helgemo drew the outstanding trumps with the Ace. He needed three spade tricks to make his contract but after the preempt he didn’t want to bank on a 3-3 spade break by playing the AK. Instead he advanced the
2, West followed with the 4 and dummy’s 7 drew the J from East, who immediately returned the 5, which Helgemo ducked around to dummy’s 9. He could now discard dummy’s losing club on the long spade in his hand. Had East not returned a spade, Helgemo was planning to cross to dummy and run the
9.
How did Helgemo come up with this play? When the first round of spades was played, West played low without thought. Holding, say 10xx, he would at least have momentarily considered taking the trick. Secondly, East won the trick with the Jack. Helgemo correctly assumed East had the ten from West’s play so why would East try to false card with a holding of J10x? It was more likely that he in fact held QJ10x and that a declarer of Helgemo’s ability would get the hand right. Thirdly, why did East return a spade instead of a club, with those two rags in dummy – because he wanted Helgemo to make a decision about the spade suit immediately. Commentators at the time said Helgemo displayed three important talents necessary to play the spade suit the right way on this hand – imagination, psychology and guts!