Students don't readily differentiate between position, velocity, and acceleration.They have a single, undifferentiated idea of "motion."
Position and velocity are sometimes confused. If car B overtakes and passes car A on the freeway, both traveling in the same direction, many students will say the cars have the same speed at the instant when B is alongside A.
Velocity and acceleration are frequently confused. When asked to draw velocity and acceleration vectors, students often draw acceleration vectors that mimic the velocity vectors. At a turning point (end of a pendulum's swing, top of the motion of a ball tossed straight up, etc.), nearly all students will insist that the acceleration is zero. This is an especially difficult belief to change.
Acceleration is associated only with speeding up and slowing down. Very few students associate acceleration with curvilinear motion. This is not surprising, because a vector acceleration as we use it in physics is a definition, not a common sense observation. Many students, from high school physics, may know that circular motion has a centripetal acceleration. But this is a memorized fact; almost none can tell you why the acceleration points to the center.
Students interpret a positive acceleration as always meaning "speeding up" and a negative accelerating as "slowing down," rather than associating the sign with the direction of the acceleration vector. This is a difficult idea to change, and for many students it becomes a serious difficulty when they get to Newton's second law.
How can the motion of objects be predicted and/or explained?
Can equations be used to answer questions regardless of the questions’ specificity?
How can the idea of frames of reference allow two people to tell the truth yet have conflicting reports?