Prog 4: Analyze This

In Ronald White's 2005 New York Times editorial he describes how the inaugural address for presidents' second terms tend to have more "I" language and less "we" language.  In the book The Eloquent President: A Portrait of Lincoln Through His Words Ronald White writes:

     Each of these five presidents began his inaugural address with a reference to the “confidence” of their fellow citizens.  One cannot miss, however, the self-referential quality that was advanced by many different personal pronouns in each of their opening words.  There was a steady staccato of “I” in all of these inaugural addresses.

     Except for Lincoln’s.  The opening words in his Second Inaugural are all the more remarkable when heard against the backdrop of the five previous second inaugural addresses.  He nowhere speaks of the “confidence” or “approbation” of the electorate.  He uses personal pronouns only twice, I and myself, in the first paragraph, and never again.  Because we approach the Second Inaugural through the larger lens of his previous speeches, we should not be so surprised.  He never spoke of himself, did not use one personal pronoun, in the Gettysburg address.

Others have similarly commented on the use of personal pronouns in speeches, such as Stanley Fish's comments on Obama's use of "I" vs. "we", along with Mark Liberman's challenge of those assertions.

For this program we will be:

You will turn in a directory called analysis which will contain these three components.  You must zip this up before submitting, so the zipped version will be called analysis.zip.  Each of the components is discussed in turn below.  If you do not turn in your materials in the structure described below you will get a grade of 0.

Extra Credit (up to 10 points)

     In addition to what is required, for additional credit you may want to consider other questions such as:  Are there particular linguistic characteristics of the best speeches vs. the worst?  Is there some pattern based on political affiliation, decade, century, number of quotes, whether or not it is a president's second term?  How do the linguistic characteristics connect to the historical context?  

     Be sure to include a description of any additional tools you created and the results these generated.  To get any extra credit your results must be meaningful and interesting.  Simply doing extra work will not give you any extra credit, rather you need extra results obtained through the tools you wrote, possibly combined with research.

To summarize, you will zip up and turn in the following:

analysis  ---- 

                    |

                    |----  analyze.cpp

                    |

                    |----  (any other .cpp program tools developed)

                    |

                    |----  netid(s).doc

                    |

                    |----  datafiles  ----

                                                |

                                                |---- your datafile(s)

                                                |