Homework:
1. Anyone win Powerball? Can we all retire?
2. What graphs did we make from the data? A sample of mine are below, though not fantastic.
3. List of Topics:
Graphs
What makes a good graph
What graph goes with what type of data
What can help make a graph LEAD to a specific conclusion
Fairly or unfairly
Univariate Data
measures of central tendency and spread
What defines an outlier
Normal vs. Skewed
Idea of using the Central Limit Theorem
EST +/- MOE
various ways to get the Estimate
various ways to get the Margin of Error
Confidence Intervals
Hypothesis Testing
t-test
H_o, H_a
Bivariate Data
What makes a trend linear
Correlation Coefficient
Residuals
When is a point an 'influential point'?
Collection of Data
Sampling Methods
What makes a good question
Terminology
4. Building a Survey
Goals -- Quantitative Analysis and Dissection of:
Homework
Classtime
Course Direction
Depth of Understanding
Categorical/Short Answer Collection of:
Concerns, Thoughts, Issues
Positives/Negatives
Read this paper
Data: http://hci.usask.ca/uploads/173-pap0297-bateman.pdf
Perspective: I came across this paper while looking for bad graphs to turn good. It's an interesting twist on what I've been saying thus far; in it, they argue that the bad graphs are good for remembering or assigning value to data. But I think there are some specific flaws in the way that they did this paper.
Goal: Read the paper and do the following:
Look for statistical numbers, ideas and uses directly in the paper. For example, can you figure out what t_19 and t_9 are used for in the paper?
What methods are unknown or strange to you?
In methodology or other aspects, are there things you agree with or disagree with?
You should be able to discuss this paper as a group or individually on Monday.
Resources: I've found two things that will be useful to you. Read and think about the paper on your own before you read this: